Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Christian Responsibility and the Pro-Life Movement



Todd Akin: GOP Senatorial candidate for Missouri


Donate: https://www.akin.org/contribute/?utm_method=akin_nav



Watch this video: Operation Hot Mic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?feature=player_embedded&v=-Czo5Vf8KZs

Watch this video: Barack Hussein Obama

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?feature=player_embedded&v=-Czo5Vf8KZs

Watch this video on Barack Hussein Obama’s first four years

https://secure.freedomdonations.com/mmpac/election/?a=1036b-mp-mmpac



Watch this video—an interview with President Obama supporters!

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-supporters-slam-romney-policies-then-find-out-theyre-actually-obamas/



Watch this video—five reasons NOT to vote for Barack Hussein Obama! One that was left out, appointments to the federal courts over the next four years! And of course, there are a ton of other reasons NOT to vote for Barack Hussein Obama!

A must watch Video ...

https://www.youtube.com/embed/eILPwSOtXxI



Watch these two videos on Benghazi!

http://counterjihadreport.com/2012/10/24/benghazi-was-this-a-united-states-gunrunning-operation-to-al-qaida-jihadis/

I am involved in the 40 Days for Life Prayer Vigil and will not be posting Saturday. This election is too important for any Christian and/or pro-life supporter to sit out. We currently have in the White House the most Pro-MURDER President in out history—even outdoing Bill Clinton! GOD does hold us, as well as all people, accountable for our actions or inactions.

James 4: 17 (NIV)

If anyone, then, knows the good they ought to do and doesn’t do it, it is sin for them.” (My use of red—my addition)

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2012/10/29/why-every-christian-voter-should-vote-for-mitt-romney/

“Why Every Christian Voter Should Vote for Mitt Romney

by David French
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
10/29/12 11:06 AM

The Christian Post asked me to distill the case for Mitt Romney down to 400 words. Considering that I’ve probably written (conservatively) more than 400,000 on the topic, it was a challenge. But here it is—the 400 word Christian case for Mitt Romney.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/why-every-american-christian-should-vote-for-mitt-romney-83887/

Share with all your wavering friends:

This election presents perhaps the clearest moral contrast of my adult life. On one side is a Republican candidate who is pro-life, supports marriage, defends religious liberty, has real-world experience creating jobs, and has a realistic understanding of the threat of jihad.

His opponent, the sitting president, is radically pro-abortion (when you support taxpayer funding of abortion, you’re beyond ‘pro-choice’), has launched a frontal assault on religious liberty and the most basic rights of conscience, seeks to redefine marriage, has led the most anemic economic recovery since the Great Depression, and advances a hope-based foreign policy that is imploding in front of our very eyes.

Simply put, I cannot understand the Christian case for Barack Obama.

But what about the Christian case for Mitt Romney? In Massachusetts—one of America’s most liberal states—he won a political leadership award from Massachusetts Citizens for Life after he vetoed expanded access to the so-called ‘morning after’ abortion pill and vetoed a bill permitting embryonic stem cell research. And in the battle for marriage, Maggie Gallagher, founder of the National Organization for Marriage, writes: ‘Mitt Romney didn’t just oppose court-ordered same-sex marriage with words, he fought hard, including behind the scenes.’

Regarding the economy, imagine for a moment you’re interviewing a job applicant. Your company is struggling, and you need somebody who can make you profitable again. Several of the applicants have impressive-sounding ideas, but only one of the candidates has actually made it happen—has actually executed the turnaround—not once, not twice, but three times, in different places and contexts. That person gets the job, and it’s not even close.

As a much younger man, Mitt Romney was named CEO of the struggling Bain & Company and brought it all the way back from the brink, leaving it financially healthy and prosperous. He helped found Bain Capital and turned it into an economic powerhouse, creating thousands of private-sector jobs and leaving it with $4 billion under management.

After his private sector success, he was called to save the Salt Lake City Olympics—the first post-9/11 games—from corruption and fiscal collapse. He turned an almost $400 million deficit into a $100 million profit—all while maintaining safety and security in tense times. Then, as governor of Massachusetts, he turned a $3 billion budget deficit into a $700 million surplus and left office with a 4.7 percent state unemployment rate.

Finally, I know Mitt and Ann Romney, and like many others, my wife and I have experienced their kindness and compassion first-hand. They are people of integrity, they share your values, and they will live those values in the Oval Office.

LifeNews Note: David French is an attorney with the American Center for Law and Justice. This article originally appeared at Patheos and is reprinted with permission.”

http://www.patheos.com/

I have been saying since I started blogging in 2005 that the three most important issues in our nation are:

1) Stopping the MURDER of unborn babies

2) Stopping the anti-family homosexual agenda

3) Returning to the U.S. Constitution as written.

Mitt Romney is weak in relation to number two and probably number three. He is not as strong on number one as I am because he has allowed for exceptions for MURDER which I do not believe is Biblical or as GOD desires.

He was not my choice to represent the Republican Party as its Presidential candidate. If there was a viable alternative, I would vote for that alternative. However, there is NOT! That said, Mitt Romney is infinitely preferred to the alternative—Barrack Hussein Obama. Contrary to how he is portrayed, Barrack Hussein Obama is evil and was evil during his first run for the Presidency. He is not worthy to even be considered for the Presidency, let alone be elected to a second term!

The fate of this nation and of Christian values is in the balance. And, I believe, GOD demands that Christians act accordingly. I know this, the nation can NOT continue MURDERING our unborn and promoting perversionhomosexual behaviorand not suffer GOD’S just wrath! Israel faced it; if the United States continues as it is, we will too.

Todd Akin: GOP Senatorial candidate for Missouri

Donate: https://www.akin.org/contribute/?utm_method=akin_nav


Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Two Pro-Life Women Senatorial Candidates for Nebraska and New York


Todd Akin: GOP Senatorial candidate for Missouri


Donate: https://www.akin.org/contribute/?utm_method=akin_nav



Watch this video: Operation Hot Mic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?feature=player_embedded&v=-Czo5Vf8KZs

Watch this video: Barack Hussein Obama

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?feature=player_embedded&v=-Czo5Vf8KZs

Watch this video on Barack Hussein Obama’s first four years

https://secure.freedomdonations.com/mmpac/election/?a=1036b-mp-mmpac



Watch this video—an interview with President Obama supporters!

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-supporters-slam-romney-policies-then-find-out-theyre-actually-obamas/



Watch this video—five reasons NOT to vote for Barack Hussein Obama! One that was left out, appointments to the federal courts over the next four years! And of course, there a ton of other reasons NOT to vote for Barack Hussein Obama!

A must watch Video ...

https://www.youtube.com/embed/eILPwSOtXxI



Watch these two videos on Benghazi!

http://counterjihadreport.com/2012/10/24/benghazi-was-this-a-united-states-gunrunning-operation-to-al-qaida-jihadis/



From: Susan B. Anthony List Candidate Fund

There’s just one—only one—pro-life woman serving in the United States Senate.

Pro-life Americans everywhere should be outraged that the voice of women in the U.S. Senate has been hijacked by radical pro-abortion Senators like Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein from California. They only speak for a small minority of American women who believe in abortion on-demand, for any reason, up until the moment of birth, paid for by the taxpayer—but act as if they speak for everyone. Enough is enough!

Pro-life candidates Deb Fischer in Nebraska and Wendy Long in New York are desperately fighting to reach the U.S. Senate but your need your help today. Wouldn’t it be great to provide our hero, U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, with some much-needed back-up this November?

I urge you to please make an immediate contribution of $25, $50, $100 or more right now to give pro-life women a stronger voice in the United States Senate.

http://www.sba-list.org/donation-groups/support-our-women-senate-candidates

By clicking the link above, you’ll be able to watch interviews I conducted with both Deb Fischer and Wendy Long just the other week in Chicago—you’ll see why I’m so excited about the prospects of having them join Kelly Ayotte in the U.S. Senate! So please watch the interviews and give generously.

And remember, the SBA List Candidate Fund will ‘bundle’ your gifts with those from pro-life activists all over America, and we’ll deliver them to pro-life campaigns as one huge donation. That way we can combine pro-life America’s collective resources and make one major impact on these critical elections. This way, pro-life leaders like Deb Fischer and Wendy Long know for certain that we are standing behind them.

You may not know this, but Deb Fischer is inches away from winning one of the most competitive Senate races of 2012. Polls released just yesterday show her winning by just two points. This is our best chance to add a pro-life woman to the Senate but if we fail to come to her aid in the closing days of this election—I’m afraid we could lose this race which is why I’m asking for your help today.

Wendy Long is a long-time friend of the SBA List and a nationally-known advocate for the pro-life movement. Her opponent, Kirsten Gillibrand, is nothing more than a rubber stamp for Planned Parenthood’s agenda. Long’s victory would be a double blow to abortion supporters by eliminating a high-profile abortion supporter and adding a powerful pro-life woman’s voice to the Senate.

So, will you make an immediate contribution of $25, $50, $100 or more right now to give pro-life women a stronger voice in the United States Senate?

http://www.sba-list.org/donation-groups/support-our-women-senate-candidates

These are your last opportunities to fight for a pro-life Senate. Only days remain before this election and every dime you contribute will go towards turning out the pro-life vote in these key races.

Please don’t delay—these candidates are counting on you.

Sincerely,

Marjorie Dannenfelser
President
Susan B. Anthony List Candidate Fund

PS: Pro-life Americans everywhere should be outraged that the voice of women in the U.S. Senate has been hijacked by pro-abortion Senators like Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein from California. Please make an immediate contribution of $25, $50, $100 or more right now to help pro-life candidates Deb Fischer in Nebraska and Wendy Long in New York.”

http://www.sba-list.org/donation-groups/support-our-women-senate-candidates

Deb Fischer’s Website: http://debfischer2012.com/


Contribute: https://transaxt.com/Donate/BUDBBK/DebFischerforUSSenate/

Wendy Long’s Website: http://www.wendylongfornewyork.com/splash?splash=1

Contribute: https://wendylong.nationbuilder.com/donate



Todd Akin: GOP Senatorial candidate for Missouri

Donate: https://www.akin.org/contribute/?utm_method=akin_nav


Monday, October 29, 2012

The 2012 Election and All Pro-Life Voters Including Catholic Democrats


Todd Akin: GOP Senatorial candidate for Missouri


Donate: https://www.akin.org/contribute/?utm_method=akin_nav



Watch this video—an interview with President Obama supporters!

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-supporters-slam-romney-policies-then-find-out-theyre-actually-obamas/



Watch this video—five reasons NOT to vote for Barack Hussein Obama! One that was left out, appointments to the federal courts over the next four years! And of course, there a ton of other reasons NOT to vote for Barack Hussein Obama!

A must watch Video ...

https://www.youtube.com/embed/eILPwSOtXxI



Watch these two videos on Benghazi!

http://counterjihadreport.com/2012/10/24/benghazi-was-this-a-united-states-gunrunning-operation-to-al-qaida-jihadis/




From: www.lifenews.com

“Election Could Decide Fate of Abortion for 40 More Years

Dear LifeNews.com Readers,

While the economy dominates the election, for those of us who long for the day unborn children are protected by law from the violence of abortion, there is much at stake in this election.

Next January, our nation marks 40 years of virtually unlimited abortion under Roe v. Wade and more than 55 million unborn babies have lost their lives in this national travesty ever since. The next president will have an opportunity during the four-year term to leave an indelible mark on the nation’s high court.

Consider this: the average age of retirement from our nation’s highest court is 71.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg is 79

Justice Antonin Scalia is 76

Justice Anthony Kennedy is 76

Justice Stephen Breyer is 74

We already know where Obama stands on Roe and four decades of killing children and hurting women—he’s appointed two pro-abortion Supreme Court justices in Elana Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. They will keep Roe in place for another generation.

With Mitt Romney, he has repeatedly called for overturning Roe v. Wade. He has said he would appoint the kinds of judges who would not make law from the bench as they did in 1973 with Roe, but who would strictly interpret the Constitution.

Romney’s top judicial advisors include pro-life stalwarts

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/08/05/romney-picks-pro-life-conservatives-as-top-judicial-advisors/

like former Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork and pro-life Harvard professor Mary AnnGlendon. Leading pro-life attorneys like Jordan Sekulow, David French, and James Bopp have confirmed they trust Romney as president when it comes to judges.

LifeNews is continuing to work seven days a week to inform pro-life voters about the important implications of the presidential race like this. We’re informing hundreds of thousands of pro-life people about what is at stake.

LifeNews needs your help

http://www.lifenews.com/donate/

to continue our pro-life Election 2012 efforts. As you can see, the fate of millions of unborn children rests on the results of this election.

Please make an online donation NOW to support LifeNews.com

http://www.lifenews.com/donate/

as we promote pro-life values this election. We have just days left until Election Day!

Sincerely,

Steven Ertelt, Editor
LifeNews.com

P.S. You can make an electronic donation here.

http://www.lifenews.com/donate/



From: http://www.lifenews.com/2012/10/29/catholic-bishop-vote-pro-abortion-and-jeopardize-your-soul/

“Catholic Bishop: Vote Pro-Abortion and Jeopardize Your Soul

by Jill Stanek
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
10/29/12 2:53 PM

I would like to review some of the principles to keep in mind as you approach the voting booth to complete your ballot. The first is the set of non-negotiables. These are areas that are “intrinsically evil” and cannot be supported by anyone who is a believer in God or the common good or the dignity of the human person.

They are:

1) abortion

2) euthanasia

3) embryonic stem cell research

4) human cloning

5) homosexual ‘marriage’

… Some candidates and one party have even chosen some of these as their party’s or their personal political platform. To vote for someone in favor of these positions means that you could be morally ‘complicit’ with these choices which are intrinsically evil.

This could put your own soul in jeopardy.

The other position to keep in mind is the protection of religious liberty. The recent aggressive moves by the government to impose the HHS mandate, especially the move to redefine religion so that religion is confined more and more to the four walls of the Church, is a dangerous precedent. This will certainly hurt the many health care services to the poor given by our Catholic hospitals. Our Catholic hospitals in the Diocese give millions of dollars per year in donated services to the poor. In the new plan, only Catholic people can be treated by Catholic institutions.

~ Bishop David Ricken of the Catholic Diocese in Green Bay, Wisconsin, in an October 24 letter to parishioners, as reported by greenbaypressgazette.com, October 26”

Todd Akin: GOP Senatorial candidate for Missouri

Donate: https://www.akin.org/contribute/?utm_method=akin_nav


Saturday, October 27, 2012

Abortion within the United States, part 5


Selected Pro-Life Resources and Organizations


Legal organizations that are pro-life with websites:

1) Alliance Defending Freedom: www.alliancedefendingfreedom.org

2) American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ): http://aclj.org

3) Liberty Counsel: www.lc.org

Organizations which include pro-life in their mission with websites:

1) Family Research Council: www.frc.org

2) Illinois Family Institute: www.illinoisfamily.org

Pro-Life websites:

1) Central Illinois Right to Life, Inc.: www.cirtl.org

2) Christian Gunslinger: http://christiangunslinger.blogspot.com

3) Life Decisions International: www.fightpp.org

4) Life Dynamics Incorporated: www.lifedynamics.com

5) Life News: www.lifenews.com

6) 40 Days for Life: www.40daysforlife.com/peoria

Politically oriented pro-life organizations with websites:

1) Americans United for Life: www.aul.org

2) Concerned Women for America: www.cwfa.org

3) National Pro-Life Alliance: www.pro-lifealliance.com

4) Students for Life: http://studentsforlife.org

5) Susan B. Anthony List: www.sba-list.org

Life Decisions International (LDI) www.fightpp.org is a unique organization in the spiritual battle against the MURDER of unborn babies that achieves provable results. It specializes on stopping Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider within the U.S.

Planned Parenthood is classified as a nonprofit organization which receives millions of dollars every year from three primary sources. The three are fees for “services” provided, grants from the federal government and State governments, and “charitable” donations from businesses and individuals. Life Decisions International concentrates on stopping the donations by businesses to Planned Parenthood.

To participate in the LDI program, one must become a program partner with a yearly payment of $42.95 while certifying that he/she “1) opposes legal abortion, 2) supports the goals of Life Decisions International, and 3) will adhere to all copyright and other restrictions.” A member receives a quarterly Boycott List, a Checkbook List, a Caleb Report, and other Special Reports.

All members are divided into specific groups and each group is given a list of companies who donate to Planned Parenthood to contact. All members in the specific group contact one identified company each week asking that specific company to no longer finance Planned Parenthood. Contact may be made by phone, e-mail, or letter. The most impact is probably by letter. The Boycott List is a booklet—painstakingly researched—which lists the contact information for identified corporations that support Planned Parenthood.

“At least 285 corporations have stopped funding Planned Parenthood since this List was first published…. It is essential that you write to the corporations listed herein…. It is important that you stop doing business will all boycott targets…. Do the right thing before GOD, even when it may be difficult, and you will be blessed.”

A sample letter:

“I am a member of Life Decisions International and, as a member and as a Christian, I oppose the MURDER of unborn children in all circumstances. I discuss the MURDER of the unborn exclusively on my blog at http://christiangunslinger.blogspot.com. It is my understanding that your company supports the MURDER of unborn children.

I try very hard to spend my dollars with businesses that support the same values that I support. When I find out about a business which does not, I stop supporting them financially and I tell my like-minded friends about my decision.

It is my unfortunate duty to inform you that your company will no longer receive my financial support. There are substitutes for the products you provide. I will pray that the company reverses its immoral behavior and comes to realize the value of the life of all children—born and unborn.

Regrettably,”


Life Decisions International, P.O. Box 439, Front Royal, Virginia, 22630-0009

Friday, October 26, 2012

Richard Mourdock, Planned Parenthood (AKA MURDERHOOD), and Rape


                                          

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2012/10/24/planned-parenthood-attacks-mourdock-but-hides-child-rape/


“Planned Parenthood Attacks Mourdock But Hides Child Rape

by Steven Ertelt
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
10/24/12 12:27 PM

The Planned Parenthood abortion business is attacking Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock today over his comments on rape and abortion in last night’s debate. But the abortion business has repeatedly covered up actual or alleged cases of child rape.

‘Wow. Another extreme comment made about rape by an out-of-touch candidate,’ Planned Parenthood said on its Facebook page. ‘This is the same politician Mitt Romney proudly endorsed this week, and has even said, ‘We’ve gotta get this guy elected to the US Senate!’ Anyone with these kind of dangerous views has NO place in Congress.’

The abortion giant made an image of Mourdock’s comments and is encouraging pro-abortion activists to share it.

‘Another extreme comment made about rape by a politician. This time: #INSen candidate Richard Mourdock,’ it added on Twitter.

Planned Parenthood has been repeatedly found to have failed to report suspected cases of sexual abuse and child rape to authorities (Which in many States is a felony!—my addition).

In one case out of Ohio, a fourteen year old girl was impregnated by her twenty-two year old soccer coach, a man that she and her parents trusted. The coach knew that he needed to get this ‘problem’ taken care of as quietly as possible since the pregnancy was proof of his statutory rape—repeated statutory rape, in fact, that began almost a year earlier. He turned to Planned Parenthood.

With no questions asked, the Planned Parenthood clinic allowed him to sign for the minor’s abortion in place of her mother and father and to speed up the process and perform the abortion quickly in violation of the state’s 24-hour waiting period. Planned Parenthood staffers didn’t report the sexual abuse to the authorities either—leaving the coach with the opportunity to continue molesting his victim.

In another Ohio case, Planned Parenthood staffers failed to report a father’s sexual abuse of his thirteen-year-old daughter—resulting in his continued abuse of his daughter, Denise Fairbanks, for over another year. According to a staffer’s handwritten note, their policy is ‘don’t ask, don’t tell (DO NOT REPORT!—my addition).’

In September, 2001, police in Spokane, Washington served the Planned Parenthood abortion business with a search warrant looking for information in yet another case of Planned Parenthood doing an abortion that potentially covers up a case of sexual abuse. In this case, the parents of an unidentified 15-year-old girl, who became pregnant by a 21-year-old man, took her to Planned Parenthood for an abortion after learning from a school nurse that their daughter was pregnant. Police wanted Planned Parenthood to turn over DNA from the remains of the baby killed in the abortion to connect the man to the possible statutory rape charges.

Steve Aden, the Senior Legal Counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund (Now, Alliance Defending Freedom—my addition), says, ‘The evidence is overwhelming that Planned Parenthood, which receives hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding annually, routinely ignores, fails to report, and covers up sexual abuse of young girls by older men.’

‘Sadly, there is strong evidence that these are not isolated incidents, only examples of a Planned Parenthood policy of empowering sexual abuse of minors,’ he has said. ‘Live Action investigations have revealed that Planned Parenthood clinics across the country have a similarly nonchalant approach to sexual abuse of young girls. Posing as a thirteen-year-old girl seeking an abortion due to intercourse with her thirty-one-year-old boyfriend, Lila Rose called a Bloomington, Indiana Planned Parenthood clinic

http://www.liveaction.org/monalisa/bloomington-in/

and was encouraged to lie about her boyfriend’s age and to go out of state to skirt parental notification laws. Calls to Planned Parenthood clinics

http://www.liveaction.org/monalisa/bloomington-in/

in Indianapolis, Tucson, Phoenix, Memphis, Birmingham, Milwaukee, and Louisville revealed similar willingness to hide sexual abuse against children.”

Also, Live Action footage showed three centers

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/02/04/three-more-videos-show-planned-parenthood-helping-sex-traffickers/

in southern Virginia, a Perth Amboy, New Jersey abortion business and a Planned Parenthood center in Richmond, Virginia all having staffers helping the alleged sex traffickers find information on how to obtain abortions without facing scrutiny and get STD testing for the girls.

A Planned Parenthood staffer in New Jersey has already been fired, New Jersey officials are looking into a shoddy abortion center Planned Parenthood referred to in its video, and the Virginia attorney general has received the full footage of the Richmond Planned Parenthood expose’. All three of the new videos clearly show staff willing to aid and abet the sexual trafficking and exploitation of minors and young women and the videos, Lila Rose of Live Action says, provide more evidence of a clear, disturbing pattern of gross misconduct by Planned Parenthood.

This year, Life Dynamics released additional tapes

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/04/13/tapes-show-planned-parenthood-abortion-ctrs-hiding-statutory-rape/

showing staff at hundreds of abortion centers across the country covering up statutory rape. Life Dynamics released tapes from some of the 813 Planned Parenthood and National Abortion Federation centers it calls across the country. The group placed the calls from Texas, where it is legal to record a phone conversation without the consent of the other party. In the phone calls, an actress portrayed a 13-year-old girl who claimed her 22-year-old boyfriend impregnated her and that she wanted an abortion to keep her parents from finding out.”

Compare Richard Mourdock's misspoken words to Planned MURDERHOOD'S illegal actions!

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Richard Mourdock and His “Rape Comment”


WATCH THIS VIDEO: a former navy SEAL!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agUx79yG1Lo&feature=player_embedded

WATCH THIS VIDEO on Obama’s “foreign policy!”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkYbkx1Cu64&feature=player_embedded



I’ve received several e-mails in relation to the Richard Mourdock “rape comment.” I am deferring to three of them instead of a long commentary written by me. I will continue to support Richard Mourdock just as I have Todd Akin. The Left is demonstrating that rather than defend the un-defendable—the MURDER of unborn children—they would rather try to twist and turn any and all poorly worded comments made by PRO-LIFE candidates. You will know them by their words and actions. The MOST REPREHENSIBLE action is MURDERING unborn babies!!!

From: Family Research Council www.frc.org

“The GOP’s Missing Life Preservers

Ever since the Todd Akin controversy started to fade, the media’s been on the lookout for a new punching bag. Yesterday, they found one: Hoosier conservative Richard Mourdock. The former Indiana state treasurer, who’s been locked in a three-way race for U.S. Senate, is dominating headlines this morning for an awkward statement he made during Tuesday’s debate. In explaining his position on abortion, Mourdock said, ‘I know there are some who disagree, and I respect their point of view—but I believe life begins at conception. The only exception I have to have an abortion is in the case of the life of the mother. I just struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize: Life is that gift from God that I think even if life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.’

Before the words were barely out of his mouth, Democrats pounced on the opportunity to feed the narrative that Republicans are out of step with women. From CNN to the New York Times, the spin was: GOPer declares pregnancies from rape God’s will. To his credit, Mourdock refused to back down. ‘God creates life, and that was my point,’ he said. ‘God does not want rape, and by no means was I suggesting He does. Rape is a horrible thing, and for anyone to twist my words otherwise is absurd and sick.’

Unfortunately for Republicans, this is a problem that the national party helped to create. After the GOP hung Todd Akin out to dry, liberals have been looking for opportunities to trap candidates. Instead of standing their ground and defending life, the Republican Party made it more of an issue by running away. Now, the Left sees how weak-kneed the national party can be on abortion, and they’re exploiting it. For the first time in modern polling, America is a pro-life nation. It’s time for Republicans to draw on that strength and stop apologizing for standing on the side of life—even on tough topics like abortion exceptions. Comments today from Senators Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) and John Cornyn (R-Texas) are a good start. If we’re going to navigate this difficult terrain, we need a fixed reference point. Ours has always been that life is valuable because it's created in the image of God, not because of a choice someone makes. In the end, our laws should punish the violators, not the innocent (The rapist NOT the unborn child who is NOT responsible for the act of the father!—my addition).

Everyone has a right to life. Even through something as horrendous as rape, which has terrible consequences for the woman, God can still do something miraculous. Look at people like Ryan Bomberger

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ktbnqpiHr94

or James Robison, who were both products of rape. Because of their mothers’ courage, they were alive to launch worldwide ministries that have changed thousands—if not millions—of hearts. ‘I [am] here as a product of rape, but I had an encounter with God,’ James shared. ‘His principles came into my life, not to make me perfect, but to get me in the pursuit of applying those principles. Look at the offspring: 11 grandchildren, three children, their spouses, and they’re happy. It works! The world needs to see something that works.’ Every life has potential. To understand just how much, take a few minutes to watch James’s testimony

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCof70WnZiw

at FRC’s iPledge Sunday or Ryan’s powerful speech

http://www.frcaction.org/get.cfm?i=PG12H02

(scroll down and clink on his picture—my addition)

at the Values Voter Summit. Then, click over to FRC’s pamphlet published in 2000, The Hard Cases of Abortion,

http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF04F16.pdf

(This is a MUST read for any PRO-LIFE person who feels uncomfortable supporting LIFE in ALL circumstances!!!—my addition)

so that you’re prepared with a pro-life response.”



From: Illinois Family Institute www.illinoisfamily.org

“Richard Mourdock, the Problem of Evil, and God’s Sovereignty
Written By Laurie Higgins

Another conservative has made another inept comment regarding rape. I am referring to this comment from Indiana Republican U.S. Senate candidate Richard Mourdock in response to a question regarding his views on abortion:

Life is that gift from God. I think that even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something God intended to happen.

First, it should be clear that the demonstrative pronoun ‘that’ was referring to conception, not rape. To some listeners, Mourdock’s comment was offensive because they mistakenly thought he was saying that God intended rape ‘to happen.’

Second, it should be equally clear—at least to Christians—that God is the author and creator of life. So, if a new life begins, God has, indeed, ‘intended it to happen.’ All human beings are precious gifts from God and are created in the image and likeness of God.

I am not a theologian, nor do I know precisely what Mourdock was trying to say, but I suspect he was trying to express a difficult theological concept that is better left out of our political discourse, which is decidedly not shaped by theological sophistication. In fact, neither our mainstream news media nor most of our political discourse is shaped by any kind of intellectual sophistication or depth, let alone theological sophistication.

Mourdock’s comment suggests the difficult theological issue of the problem of evil and God’s sovereignty, which raises a whole host of theological questions: Does God ordain, cause, will, or bring about evil (NO! HE has given us free will though which does result in evil!—my addition)? What is the nature of the relationship between God’s sovereignty; his redemptive plan for history; human will; evil; and his infinite goodness, knowledge, holiness, and wisdom?

One thing is certain, our political circus tent is not the place where substantive, serious discussions of the problem of moral evil and God’s sovereignty can take place. Before the mainstream press, feminists obsessed with feticide, and other ‘progressives’ start throwing stones at Mourdock, perhaps they should take note of the fact that the greatest theological minds throughout history and today wrestle with precisely the question his comment raises.

The only sound bite that’s needed in response to a media question that is intended to generate all heat and no light is, ‘Babies do not deserve to be killed (MURDERED—my addition) because of the evil actions of their biological fathers.’”



From: Susan B. Anthony List http://www.sba-list.org/

If you haven’t heard already, Richard Mourdock, the Republican candidate for Senate in Indiana, is being viciously attacked by his Democratic opponent and the pro-abortion, mainstream media—and he needs our help right now.

You see, Richard Mourdock had the courage to say at a debate last night that all unborn children—no matter what the circumstance—are gifts from God.

His comment immediately set off a firestorm, with his opponent Joe Donnelly, Planned Parenthood, and the Democratic National Committee outrageously claiming that Richard Mourdock was trying to say that rape was God’s will! Mourdock, of course, believes that all rape is horrific, but that it doesn’t mean an innocent little baby has to die.

That’s why the SBA List is standing up to the pro-abortion mob and defending Richard Mourdock—but we need your immediate help.

To ensure these vicious attacks don't go unanswered, the SBA List is launching a counter attack exposing the Joe Donnelly record of betrayal of unborn children.

Donald, will you watch our hard-hitting TV ad, and if you agree with Richard Mourdock that all unborn babies are a gift from God, please give whatever you can right now.

https://secure.donationreport.com/donate.html?key=QGC92ITLWZLW

Here at the SBA List, we believe that the best defense is a strong offense. That’s why our television ad goes after Richard Mourdock’s opponent, Joe Donnelly, for claiming to be pro-life, yet casting a deciding vote for ObamaCare, which forces taxpayers to pay for abortions.

Polling shows that this race is virtually tied—and could determine control of the U.S. Senate—which is why we must go up on television right now in Indiana to defend Richard Mourdock.

Even if you do not live in the Hoosier state, I hope you agree that we must stand by Richard Mourdock and help win this race—we must stand by a strong pro-life leader like Richard Mourdock, must expose the truth about his opponent Joe Donnelly, and must win this race so we can kick Harry Reid out as Majority Leader.

Please help us defend Richard Mourdock by helping us keep this hard-hitting television ad on the air exposing the truth about his Democratic opponent.

https://secure.donationreport.com/donate.html?key=QGC92ITLWZLW

All life is precious gift from God—and we’re proud to have SBA List Candidate Fund endorsed candidates who share this view.

When they are attacked for this view, they must be defended.

This is a tight race—and remember, it could determine control of the U.S. Senate.

Please give right now.

https://secure.donationreport.com/donate.html?key=QGC92ITLWZLW

Thank you for standing for unborn children and Richard Mourdock—I can’t thank you enough.

Sincerely,

Marjorie Dannenfelser
President
Susan B. Anthony List

PS: If you agree that all life is a precious gift from God, I need your immediate help. Not only can your immediate gift help determine the winner of this important U.S. Senate race in Indiana, but it can ultimately decide control of the United States Senate. Only your $25, $50, or even $100 gift today will help us keep our hard-hitting ad on the air and defeat the Planned Parenthood, national pro-abortion attack machine.

https://secure.donationreport.com/donate.html?key=QGC92ITLWZLW

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Five Supported Pro-Life Senate Candidates in Indiana, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Missouri


WATCH THIS VIDEO: a former navy SEAL!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agUx79yG1Lo&feature=player_embedded

WATCH THIS VIDEO on Obama’s “foreign policy!”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkYbkx1Cu64&feature=player_embedded



I am posting this material today because Richard Mourdock—one of the candidates supported by the National Pro-Life Alliance—has made the mass media news negatively based on a comment during a debate (I believe, last night.). I plan to discuss that issue tomorrow.

From: National Pro-Life Alliance www.nationalprolifealliance.com



“Five Winnable Pro-Life Senate Races

A net pickup of just four pro-life Senators will end the absolute death grip that Harry Reid and the abortion lobby have on the Senate.

Please check out the thumbnails below, and give directly to one or more of these pro-life champions.

1) Richard Mourdock—Indiana

In Indiana, State Treasurer Richard Mourdock defeated 36 year incumbent Dick Lugar in the Republican primary and is now in a dead heat with Joe Donnelly. Although Donnelly claims to be pro-life, he has repeatedly voted for taxpayer funding of abortion (Which means he is NOT pro-life! He is a words NOT action fake! James 2: 17 [NIV]: “In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.”—my addition)

Website: http://www.richardmourdock.com/

Donate: https://transaxt.com/Donate/VEGRRL/HoosiersforRichardMourdockInc/

I support him as well!

2) Rick Berg—North Dakota

“Congressman Rick Berg, a Life at Conception Act cosponsor in the House is running neck and neck with Heidi Heitkamp. Heitkamp has been ducking and weaving on the abortion issue to leave herself wiggle room to vote with the abortion lobby if elected.” (And you know she will! It is political suicide these days for a Democrat to be pro-life. The Party has endorsed MURDER and a MURDERER you will be if you want any success within the Party!—my addition)

Website: http://northdakotaforberg.com/?gclid=COrAyMyrmrMCFc5cMgodoTEAjg

Donate: https://www.nrsc.org/secure/statesite-northdakota/

I support him as well!

3) Tom Smith—Pennsylvania

“In Pennsylvania, NPLA members pushed Tom Smith over the edge in an upset primary to challenge Senator Bob Casey. Casey voted repeatedly in favor of taxpayer funding of abortion and received a 100% rating from the so-called ‘National Abortion Rights Action League’ (NARAL).”

Website: http://tomsmithforsenate.com/

Donate: https://www.geticontribute.com/tom-smith

I support him as well!

4) Josh Mandel—Ohio

“Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel is closing the gap with radical pro-abortion incumbent Senator Sherrod Brown. As a Congressman, Brown voted to keep the grisly practice of Partial-Birth Abortion legal.”

Website: http://joshmandel.com/

Donate: https://jobs.joshmandel.com/donate

I support him as well!

5) Todd Akin—Missouri

“In Missouri, Todd Akin is challenging Senator Claire McCaskill who has a 100% rating from the so-called ‘National Abortion Rights Action League’ (NARAL). This race is now too close to call.”

Website: http://www.akin.org/

Donate: https://www.akin.org/contribute/

I support him as well!

“You can give to any or all of these candidates, but they need your help at once to battle the onslaught of the abortion lobby.

For Life,

Martin Fox, President
National Pro-Life Alliance

P.S. A pro-life pickup in 4 Senate seats will change the tide of the pro-abortion lobby. Please click on donate link above to give directly to any one of the above candidates.”

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Barack Hussein Obama—the Pro-Abortion (AKA MURDER) President!


WATCH THIS VIDEO: a former navy SEAL!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agUx79yG1Lo&feature=player_embedded

WATCH THIS VIDEO on Obama’s “foreign policy!”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkYbkx1Cu64&feature=player_embedded



From: http://www.frc.org/issuebrief/obama-administration-threatens-unborn-life

The Obama Administration Threatens Unborn Life
by Jeanne Monahan

Prior to his election President Obama had established a record that some critics called the ‘most pro-abortion’ of any candidate or President[1]. Since taking office his record has lent support to this distinction. Here are a few examples:

Mexico City Policy: January 23, 2009—In one of his first executive actions, President Obama lifted the ban on U.S. funding for international health groups that perform abortions, promote legalizing the procedure, or provide counseling about terminating pregnancies. [2]

Embryonic Stem Cell Announcement: March 9, 2009—President Obama signed an Executive Order to lift restrictions on human embryonic stem cell experimentation. [3]

Conscience Rule: March 10, 2009—Obama administration published its proposal to rescind and eliminate the conscience-protecting regulations passed by the Bush administration in January 2009. [4]

Plan B access expanded to 17 year-olds: April 22, 2009—FDA accepted rather than appealed a federal judge’s order that lifted Bush administration restrictions limiting over-the-counter sales of ‘Plan B’ to women 18 and older. One of ‘Plan B’s’ way of acting is to prevent implantation of a newly conceived embryo, i.e., ‘Plan B’ can kill (Does MURDER—my addition) unborn children. [5]

NIH unveils new human embryonic stem cell experimentation funding guidelines: July 7, 2009—The new Guidelines provide an incentive for continued destruction of human embryos, to provide new hESC lines for federal taxpayer funding. [6]

Abortion/Reproductive Rights language changes in international meetings: March, 2009—Overall international organization language changes, in particular on definition of reproductive rights and reproductive health. Began to be evident at the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) in March, 2009 and continued through until present. [7]

President’s Budget eliminates abstinence education funding: May, 2009—President Obama eliminates Community-Based Abstinence Education funding from his budget, replaced by a variety of comprehensive sexuality education programs. At present, he never includes in his annual budget funding for abstinence education, creating a ratio of 24:1 for government funding of comprehensive sex education to abstinence education (a small amount was reinstituted by Congress). [8]

D.C. abortion funding: December 17, 2009—For the first time in 13 years, funding for abortions is restored in the District of Columbia. President Obama makes this happen by signing Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 into law. [9]

Plan B in Military Hospitals: Feb 8, 2010—The Obama administration issued a new order for the U.S. military requiring all military hospitals and health centers to stock the morning after pill which can kill (Does MURDER—my addition) unborn children by preventing implantation. [10]

NIH proposes further broadening the definition of ‘embryonic stem cell’: February 19, 2010—The National Institutes of Health proposed to allow federal taxpayer funding of more human embryonic stem cell lines, providing incentive for further destruction of human embryos. [11]

Healthcare law: March 23, 2010—President Obama signs ‘Obamacare’ into law.[12] He also signs an Executive Order (EO) said to ban taxpayer funding of abortion.[13] In fact, an Executive Order cannot circumvent the text of legislation; the Obama health care plan allows for taxpayer funding of abortion. Later, in a media interview, Rahm Emmanuel, Mr. Obama’s former Chief of Staff, admitted that the EO did nothing to prevent abortion in Obamacare. [14]

FDA panel approval of Ella: June 17, 2010—FDA panel approves the use of Ella, labeled as an Emergency Contraceptive, but which is identical in chemical and operational modes to the abortion drug, RU-486. [15]

Obama Administration approves Ella: August 13, 2010—Late on a Friday evening in August, in a move designed to avoid press attention, the Obama administration announces approval of Ella. The drug is labeled as an emergency contraceptive, but it can kill (Does MURDER—my addition) the unborn by preventing implantation as well as destroying a baby post-implantation.[16]

Obama Administration weakens conscience protection: February 18, 2011—The Obama Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) releases revised conscience protections for healthcare workers which significantly weaken protections of conscience for pro-life workers. [17]

President Obama refuses to cut taxpayer funding to abortion-giant Planned Parenthood: April 11, 2011—The President is willing to decrease family planning money but he will not budge on Planned Parenthood funding, even if it means he must shut down the government. [18]

Obama Administration issues ‘Women's Preventive Services’ rule (part of Obamacare) which includes abortion drugs: August 1, 2011—The administration includes ella, Plan B, intra-uterine devices (IUDs), and ‘the full range of FDA-approved contraceptives’ in the list of items that all insurance companies must cover. They issue a very narrowly defined religious exemption, which will essentially only apply for churches. [19]

HHS denies United States Catholic Conference of Bishops (USCCB) anti-trafficking grant because they will not refer for abortion: Septmeber, 2011—HHS gives a competitive grant to programs that scored lower than the USCCB because this group would not refer for abortions. [20]

Obama administration bypasses New Hampshire’s de-funding of abortion giant Planned Parenthood: June, 2011—New Hampshire voted to de-fund abortion giant Planned Parenthood. In October the Obama administration bypassed this decision by directly awarding a $1 million grant to Planned Parenthood. The state filed a formal protest with HHS. [21]

Obama administration denies Medicaid funding to Texas because the state defunded abortion giant Planned Parenthood: March, 2012—HHS announces it would not be re-issuing its family planning extension waiver for the Texas Women’s Health Program (part of Medicaid) because the state de-funded Planned Parenthood. [22]

Obamacare forces insurance agencies to include drugs that cause abortion: January 20, 2012—Obama administration solidifies August 1 ruling. Still included are drugs that can cause abortion. And the ruling still provides only the narrowest of religious exemptions. [23]

Obama ‘compromise’ February 10, 2012—After a national outcry from protesters across the political spectrum, the president announces his ‘compromise’ on the women’s preventive services. In truth, he changes nothing in the actual regulation. In March HHS issues another rule requesting feedback on how to facilitate compromise. [24]

Obamacare regulation issued that forces people to pay for abortion: March 16, 2012—In its regulation on abortion exchanges, the Obama administration issues a rule where insurance plans that cover abortion will include an abortion surcharge and a secrecy clause. [25]

President Obama appears in Planned Parenthood promotional video from the White House: March 29, 2012. In a video message recorded for Planned Parenthood’s Action Fund, the president promotes the organization. Last year, PPFA was responsible for the abortion of 340,000 unborn children. He does this in the White House, in the Red Room (Illegal misuse of government property for a political PAC!—my addition). [26]

Personnel is Policy: January 2009-present—The president strategically placed abortion activists throughout his administration. Examples include naming the stridently pro-abortion Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius as Secretary of Health[27] and Human Services and Senator Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.[28] Less well-known players include Ellen Moran,[29] former director of Emily's List, as the White House Communications Director, and Tina Tchen, former director for NOW, to lead his Women’s Council.[30] Most recently, in April 2012 the Obama Health and Human Services (HHS) hired former Planned Parenthood spokesperson, Tait Sye, as the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs for HHS. [31]*

Judicial Nominations: January 2009-present—President Obama has nominated many ardent pro-abortion judges to the circuit courts. One of these, Andrew Hurwitz,[32] boasts of having drafted the infamous Roe v. Wade ruling. He named Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. She urged President Clinton to veto the ban on the Partial Birth Abortion. [33]*

*Note: this is not an exhaustive list.

Jeanne Monahan is the Director of the Center for Human Dignity at the Family Research Council.”

Footnotes are given at the website noted above. How much has Barack Hussein Obama promoted the MURDER of unborn babies? The President of Planned MURDERHOOD has taken a leave of absence from our job to actively campaign for Barack Hussein Obama. The money for Planned MURDERHOOD comes from MURDERING unborn babies. Barack Hussein Obama is good for theirbusiness!” Mitt Romney and a Republican Congress will NOT be. VOTE REPUBLICAN save millions of unborn babies lives!!!

Monday, October 22, 2012

When is killing a baby MURDER? Pro-choice for what?


I received this from a friend today. Don’t know if it is true. It is better to be safe than sorrow with this type of message.


PLEASE CIRCULATE to your friends, family and contacts.

In the coming days, DO NOT open any message with an attachment called:

BLACK MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE, regardless of who sent it to you. It is a virus that opens an Olympics torch that burns the whole hard disk C of your computer. This virus comes from a known person who you have in your list.

Directions: You should send this message to all of your contacts. It is better to receive this e-mail 25 times than to receive the virus and open it.

If you receive a message called BLACK MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE even if sent by a friend, do not open, and shut down your machine immediately. It is the worst virus announced by CNN. This new virus has been discovered recently it has been classified by Microsoft as the virus most destructive ever.

This virus was discovered yesterday afternoon by McAfee.

There is no repair yet for this kind of virus. This virus simply destroys the Zero Sector of the hard disk, where vital information function is stored.

You can check snopes.Com if you wish—I did.”

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2012/10/22/media-its-only-murder-if-she-wanted-the-baby/

“Media: It’s Only Murder if She Wanted the Baby

by Susan Michelle Tyrrell
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
10/22/12 1:20 PM

A tragedy in Brooklyn Saturday reminds us again of what even the most pro-abortion rights advocates know is true: an unborn baby is a baby.

Vindalee Smith, 38, was eight months pregnant when she was found dead, the day before she was supposed to be married. This is tragic enough in itself but the reality of the tragedy was found in words in the MSNBC report:

It wasn’t clear how long she’d been dead before the body was discovered. Her baby boy did not survive.

Her baby boy. Not her fetus. Why? Because she was 8 months along? Of course not. It’s legal to abort at 8 months in most states. It takes certain criteria, but it can be done easier than most people think. So if the story was reporting on abortion, it’s pretty likely the report would be on the fetus. But it’s a baby because we have made killing a choice. When a woman decides she wants it, it is no longer a fetus but a baby. It’s the most obvious and blatant double-mindedness that exists in our society. It literally says ‘this thing in me becomes what I want it to be.’ We become little gods to play big God. Ms. Smith was tragically killed so it was a baby. It was a double murder, and most likely how the assailant will be charged if he or she is caught.

What struck me most deeply was the statement that one of her friends made to the media:

‘I can’t even begin to imagine who would want to do that. It would be the devil, to kill a woman with a child in her stomach. They killed two people.’

And that, my friends, is the bottom line right there. Killing a woman with a child in her stomach is the devil—and killing an innocent child in anyone’s stomach is the devil. That very act is one devised by the devil himself, which has been twisted into deceit of people who would never think they were serving the god of darkness and death, but every abortion is a praise to the devil, usually unbeknownst to the woman who has believed the lie of the culture. It’s a cause for rejoicing in hell because one more life has been taken, more innocent blood has been shed, and the desire of God has been thwarted for the life taken, and the ones who sadly believed it was okay to take it.

Sometimes the obvious truth is right before our eyes in secular media. This story struck me more powerfully than any classic pro-life prose. A woman killed, and her baby the other victim. The news calls it a baby. Her friend says only the devil could do such a thing. And all across the same city, the abortion rate is almost twice that of the national abortion rate, with over 40% of all pregnancies ending in abortion.

We call one murder and the other choice. What we really mean is ‘it’s only a baby when I want it to be.’ The ‘right to choose’ is moral relativism at its worst.

The tragedy people feel over the brutal murder of this precious woman and her unborn child is the tragedy we ought to feel over every unborn child sacrificed to murder each day in our nation. And many do. Family members of some of these aborted babies feel the loss of a child, grandchild, a niece or nephew, when a woman chooses to abort. People grieve an aborted baby because like Ms. Smith’s baby, it’s a dead baby.

In reality, it’s no different. In both, a baby brutally dies. It’s just that sometimes we arrest a person for the murder and other times we call it ‘women’s health.’

LifeNews Note: Susan Michelle Tyrrell is the editor of Bound4Life’s blog.

MURDER is MURDER is MURDER is MURDER is MURDER. No amount of deceit can or will change that fact.

A BABY is a BABY is a BABY is a BABY is a BABY. No amount of deceit can or will change that fact.

The devil was a liar from the beginning! GOD is TRUTH. No amount of deceit can or will change that fact.

You only have two choices. Serve the devil! Serve GOD! Serving the devil without repentance leads to eternal damnation! Serving GOD leads to eternal life. It’s your choice! Choose wisely!

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Abortion within the United States, part 4


Abortion: Should there Be Exceptions?


From: http://townhall.com/columnists/stevedeace/2012/10/13/abortion_and_the_conscience_of_a_nation/page/full/

“Abortion and the Conscience of a Nation
Steve Deace 10/13/2012

Imagine for a moment that your home is invaded by thugs who will do harm to your family, or perhaps even kill them. But then one of them takes a look at your three children and offers you a sinister Faustian bargain: pick one to die and the others will be allowed to live.

Would you helplessly choose one of your own children to die so that the other two may live? Would you trust a person whose moral conscience is so far gone to even offer such a deal to live up to his end of it?”

“ … [W]hat kind of father would consent to the killing of even one of his children in such circumstances? Would the father who consented to such a heinous exchange be celebrated as a hero for saving two of his children, or considered a heel for not risking his own life to save the lives of his own children first?”

Some, who claim to be pro-life and who affirm that life begins at conception, have, nevertheless, proclaimed that certain exceptions may be legitimate in relation to any law or laws restricting abortions. The three exceptions usually offered are for rape, incest, and when the life of the mother is at risk. Generally, some only except when the life of the mother is at risk. Others include all three. Two fundamental questions are generated from these positions. First, should there be any exceptions? Second, if so, what are the exceptions and why should these specific circumstances be excluded?

In too many instances, “ … we have accepted the contradiction known as ‘pro-life with exceptions.’ If someone is pro-life, how can there be exceptions? Imagine if you told your spouse before marriage you were ‘pro-fidelity with exceptions.’ The only exception you’re asking for is a three-hour window on Thursday nights to get your adultery on. After all, there are 8,760 hours in a year and you’re only asking for less than 2% of them. Not to mention, your fiancé could choose to marry someone else, and they might be even worse and cheat on them even more if not all the time. Why not choose the lesser of two evils here? No fiancé in her right mind would accept such a deal….”

And that is the Biblical answer to whether or not exceptions should be allowed. The Bible does not say “You shall not commit adultery except for ….” The Bible does not say “You shall not murder except for ….” If abortion is murder, and it is. No exceptions are permitted. In a rape, the innocent unborn child is not responsible for the actions of his/her father. In incest, the innocent unborn child is not responsible for the actions of his/her father. In both circumstances, the unborn child is innocent. The innocent must not be murdered for the sins of another. Murder is murder regardless of the circumstances surrounding the murder.

But what about to save the life of the mother? “Surely, to save the life of the mother is an exception that must allow for abortion. Even the Texas law that the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional allowed the exception in order to save the life of the mother.”

However, this argument is fallacious for at least two reasons. First, just because the law allowed for this exception does not mean it was a right and/or just provision of the law. As stated before, the Bible—Old and New Testament—does not allow for any exceptions for “You shall not murder.” Exodus 20: 13 (New International Version)

Second, in actuality, this is a straw man argument. Experienced doctors in this area of medicine have written and testified that in their many years of practice they have never come across an instance where it was necessary to kill the unborn child in order to save the mother. Furthermore, no ethical doctor would deliberately kill one person in order to save another. “Would you helplessly choose one of your own children to die so that the other two may live?” The goal in all cases should be/must be to save the life of both. That does not mean that any doctor will be successful in reaching that goal in every instance. Doctors are not 100% successful in saving lives.

However, to include the exception of “to save the life of the mother” is to reverse the legal principle. If a law is to be in error, it should be in error in favor of life not in favor of death. If the exception exists, an unethical doctor would simply claim that the unborn child was killed to save the life of the mother. It creates a loophole that unscrupulous individuals would attempt to take advantage of.

If there is no exception of “to save the life of the mother,” it is easier to bring such immoral doctors to justice. However, even then, the prosecutor would have to prove that the death of the unborn child was indeed murder. An unborn child dying does not automatically mean it was murder. If the law allows for the exception, it is far less likely that an unethical doctor would be prosecuted.

“But we know that the Law is good, if one uses it lawfully, realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous man, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers and mothers, for murderers (My use of red—my addition) and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching, according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, with which I have been entrusted.” I Timothy 1: 8-11 (New American Standard Bible)

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Stand Up for Religious Freedom National Rallies—Abortion (AKA MURDER) Mandate


From: http://standupforreligiousfreedom.com/locations/?ad=wnd


http://standupforreligiousfreedom.com/ (home page)

The next Stand Up for Religious Freedom Rally will take place Saturday, October 20 at noon local time.

This peaceful, nationwide event, the third of its kind, will protest the HHS Mandate

http://standupforreligiousfreedom.com/mandate/

and other attacks on religious freedom coming from the federal government, especially during this critical election year.

The first two Stand Up Rallies were held on March 23 and June 8. Over 300 rallies were held in cities and towns across the country, with attendance topping 125,000.

What to expect at the Stand Up Rally

Each of the October 20 Stand Up for Religious Freedom rallies is being locally sponsored and organized, so no two are quite alike. However, you can expect to see colorful signs and banners at the Rally, hear inspiring speeches about fighting the current attacks on religious freedom like the HHS Mandate and join in hymns and prayers for our nation.

For more specific details on your local Rally, look for information below. You may also wish to contact your local Rally Captain (see link below) if you have additional questions.

Don’t see a Rally in a nearby city? Sign your city up!

If you don’t see a city near you on the list below, consider signing on to be a Rally Captain. Just fill out this form,

http://standupforreligiousfreedom.com/contact/?WhyContact=NewCaptain#contact

and the Stand Up Rally Team will be in touch with all the information you need.

The Nationwide Rally for Religious Freedom was a peaceful, family-friendly, non-partisan, ecumenical event. For more information, please see the Rally Guidelines and Protocols.

http://standupforreligiousfreedom.com/locations/?ad=wnd#guidelines

Cities and Towns Participating in the October 20 Rally

145 cities in 43 states, organized alphabetically by state

(go to http://standupforreligiousfreedom.com/locations/?ad=wnd

to see the full list)

Peoria, Illinois (The nearest one to me.)

NOTE: The Peoria Rally will begin at 11 a.m.

Gateway Building

200 Northeast Water Street (map)

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Gateway+Building,+Northeast+Water+Street,+Peoria,+IL&hl=en&sll=42.322016,-83.176318&sspn=0.008773,0.012156&oq=gateway+building,+&hq=Gateway+Building,+Northeast+Water+Street,+Peoria,+IL&t=m&z=15

Email the Peoria Rally Captain

http://standupforreligiousfreedom.com/contact/?c=Peoria%20IL


Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Planned Parenthood (AKA MURDERHOOD) in Our Schools, Wants Our Children


From: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/parents-demand-schools-back-from-abortionists/


“PARENTS DEMAND SCHOOLS BACK FROM ABORTIONISTS

Campaign under way to remove Planned Parenthood ‘teachers’ from class
Published: 10/06/2012 at 6:30 PM

The Obama administration has a program that distributes funding to Planned Parenthood to indoctrinate children with the abortion industry’s perspective of sexuality, and the industry giant’s workers routinely are given students in public schools for their work.

But parents in the Salem, Ore., school district are infuriated and are fighting back, setting up a website to start building opposition to the program.

The group, called Salem School Watch, explains online, ‘Planned Parenthood is America’s abortion provider. They derive most of their income from the killing of unborn children. On this basis alone, they should never be given access to our children. Their business model is based on abortion (Absolutely TRUE!—my addition).’

So arises the question of giving the abortion industry leader access to public school children.

‘Planned Parenthood gained access to our children by claiming to be interested in reducing teen pregnancy. Yet Planned Parenthood promotes teen sex and promiscuity, which is the direct cause of teen pregnancy (Absolutely TRUE! Teen pregnancy adds millions of dollars to its coffers every year!—my addition). They are not in the business of ‘women’s health’ as they claim. They are in the business of sex, pure and simple. They have even published a ‘Young People’s Guide to Sexual Rights’ which states on page 14 that ‘All young people are entitled to sexual well-being and pleasure,’’ the parents say.

‘In other words, they don’t believe that parents should have any say, or that your church has the right to teach that children shouldn’t have sex. Rather, Planned Parenthood promotes violating parental rights to raise children according to the values of parents. They are now in our schools (Absolutely TRUE!—my addition).’

The campaigners say their goal is to create enough public concern that school officials no longer will grant the abortion business access to school children.

‘We are asking that the word be spread about what is going on. Post Salemschoolwatch.com on your Facebook page. Email your friends. Talk to your pastor. … We would like every parent, every taxpayer, every community member to contact the school board and the superintendent to voice their opposition to Planned Parenthood’s presence in our schools.’

The group continued, ‘We need people to show up at school board meetings. … [Be] firm and insistent … Make it a special point to contact the superintendent.’

The parents’ group says the district has refused to give up the abortion advocates when requested to do so through the ordinary complaint process.

‘The district initially said Planned Parenthood was not teaching in the school. Then they later admitted that Planned Parenthood was teaching a class in the school,’ the parents’ organization said.

Eventually school officials ‘backed down,’ briefly.

Then officials ‘signed a new contract with Planned Parenthood. … In response to community and parental concerns, the district has actually expanded Planned Parenthood’s access to our children,’ the parents say.

According to a report at ChristianNews Northwest, church members and churches in Salem and nearby Keizer are getting involved.

A meeting recently called by Doug Muravez, a parent of two students at North Salem High, drew dozens of people.

‘This is an avenue by which Planned Parenthood is inserting themselves into high schools all over the country,’ he told CNNW. ‘It’s very important that we remove Planned Parenthood before it gets firmly entrenched.’

The district said it wanted the money that pays for the program, which comes from a $4 million grant by the Department of Health and Human Services through Planned Parenthood, officials said.

Superintendent Sandy Husk told CNNW that she wanted to have district teachers handle the course, but Planned Parenthood didn’t want that.

Muravez said parents should not expect a quick battle.

‘We need to pace ourselves,’ he said in the report. ‘We want to make sure it [opposition] goes on through the [school] year.’

Planned Parent has been a focal point of many controversies in recent years, with a recent report explaining the organization was promoting a program focusing on the meaning of the word ‘slut.’

It also recently was forced to settle a lawsuit over the fact it performed an abortion on an underage teen but failed to report suspected child rape.

Among dozens of other disputes, it also was the target of a court case in Texas recently where a court ruled the state could cut off funding for abortion businesses.”

The parents in every school district in America should get Planned MURDERHOOD out of their district schools! Planned MURDERHOOD is evil pure and simple! Planned MURDERHOOD is spending millions of dollars trying to get Barack Hussein Obama reelected! Why is that! Planned MURDERHOOD wants to continue receiving millions of dollars from the federal government—lying, deceiving, MURDERING. It is Planned MURDERHOOD’S way!!!


 

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

I Am PRO-LIFE with Exceptions?


Todd Akin: GOP Senatorial candidate for Missouri


Donate: https://www.akin.org/contribute/?utm_method=akin_nav

From: http://townhall.com/columnists/stevedeace/2012/10/13/abortion_and_the_conscience_of_a_nation/page/full/

“Abortion and the Conscience of a Nation

Steve Deace

Imagine for a moment that your home is invaded by thugs who will do harm to your family, or perhaps even kill them. But then one of them takes a look at your three children and offers you a sinister Faustian bargain: pick one to die and the others will be allowed to live.

Would you helplessly choose one of your own children to die so that the other two may live? Would you trust a person whose moral conscience is so far gone to even offer such a deal to live up to his end of it (My use of red—my addition)?

For a generation the pro-life industry—I call it an industry because in many quarters it long ago sadly ceased being a movement—has offered this false choice to pro-life voters and activists in America every election cycle. It has told them they have to put up with a certain amount of innocent babies being slaughtered from ‘pro-life with exceptions’ Republicans to win elections, because the Democrats will just kill them all. Nonetheless, the killing continues no matter who wins.

Yet what kind of father would consent to the killing of even one of his children in such circumstances? Would the father who consented to such a heinous exchange be celebrated as a hero for saving two of his children, or considered a heel for not risking his own life to save the lives of his own children first? Wouldn’t a good father recognize that as an American he possesses the God-given right to self defense? Therefore, he does everything he can—including lethal force if necessary—to try and save all of his children.

I believe the killing continues because the Church of Jesus Christ in America is not outraged by it enough to make it stop (My use of red—my addition), and one of the symptoms of our complacency are the scores of spineless ‘pro-life’ politicians we continue to support.

For example, we have accepted the contradiction known as ‘pro-life with exceptions.’ If someone is pro-life, how can there be exceptions? Imagine if you told your spouse before marriage you were ‘pro-fidelity with exceptions.’ The only exception you’re asking for is a three-hour window on Thursday nights to get your adultery on. After all, there are 8,760 hours in a year and you’re only asking for less than 2% of them. Not to mention, your fiancé could choose to marry someone else, and they might be even worse and cheat on them even more if not all the time. Why not choose the lesser of two evils here?

No fiancé in her right mind would accept such a deal, but that’s just what we have accepted from the GOP.

I have interviewed several of these ‘pro-life with exceptions’ Republican pretenders the past few years, and they always offer me the same kind of utilitarian justification for their lack of moral courage. So to test them I ask them when was the last time you introduced or fought for legislation that would save those 98% of the babies you claim to be for protecting?

To this day not a single one of them has provided me with an example. Furthermore, the pro-life industry tells us to vote for ‘Republican A’ who is pro-life 98% of the time over ‘Democrat B’ who is pro-life never. But if that Republican were really pro-life 98% of the time, wouldn’t he or she do everything they could to save the babies they claim they’re for saving? Where’s your ‘pro-life with exceptions’ bill?

Then there’s the politician who says he believes ‘life begins at conception’ but still allows for exceptions to kill. This one I take personally, because there are people in my own family line who are these so-called exceptions, so essentially these politicians are telling me to vote for them anyway despite the fact they’d support the killing of my loved ones. What’s more morally reprehensible than saying you agree that it’s a life but you should be allowed to kill it anyway? Besides, if that politician really thought life began at conception, would they really allow for its killing? What do we call people who extinguish life without cause? We call them murderers (My use of red—my addition). So the only way these special kind of spineless politicians aren’t at least accessories to murder is if they think it’s justified to execute an innocent child for the crimes of his father.

What’s happened here is the pro-life industry has permitted the most pressing moral issue of this age to be co-opted for partisan political talking points. Their motivation for doing so only God knows, but we know that by allowing the cause of life to be co-opted like this for partisan political gain we have tragically become collaborators in the worst moral outrage of our time.

Thus the killing continues. (He should be saying the MURDERING continues—my addition)

In short, we have surrendered the moral high ground and lost control of the language (My use of red—my addition). Yes, there are polls that say a majority of the American people claim to be pro-life, but if you look internally at those polls you’ll find many of our fellow Americans can’t really define when life begins, nor do they think those that kill unborn children should be held criminally accountable for doing so.

In other words, we’re nothing but a cliché. Thus the killing continues.

Begrudgingly I must admit the most successful grassroots movement for social change in America today is the homosexual movement. It began in the red light districts of places like San Francisco around the same time the church gave birth to the Moral Majority. Although it’s lost 32 consecutive elections on the redefinition of marriage, it continues to grow in influence and stature, exceeding the influence and stature of the Church of Jesus Christ in contemporary American culture. It runs the Democrat Party, and is making major inroads within the GOP. It controls the public schools as well as most of our university administrations, and has caused many of our pulpits to grow silent or dance around morality out of fear. And it has done so by refusing to compromise its standard.

For example, last May as the homosexual movement was losing yet another referendum on marriage in North Carolina, the pro-homosexual lobby applied so much pressure on President Obama that it demanded he risk his own re-election to take a public stand on its issue. As a result, Obama buckled and threw away North Carolina’s crucial 15 Electoral College votes that he won in 2008. In other words, homosexuals put principle ahead of political expediency.

Give the devil his due. That is a movement.

Until coming to the aid of Congressman Todd Akin while Karl Rove and the rest of the Republican Party establishment tried to ‘Bork’ him, I can’t think of a single time the pro-life movement has ever done the same. For the most part we have never been willing to risk anything for the sake of an election.

Thus the killing continues.

We are not a movement but mascots for the Republican Party establishment, or perhaps even their useful idiots they tempt perpetually with a seat at the table. As long as our highest priority is a seat at the table with the system, the system will never buckle to our demands. Until we really mean it when we say no issue is more important than the sanctity of life it won’t be (My use of red—my addition).

Thus the killing continues.

If you know a tree by its fruit, and actions speak louder than words, then we have to come to the conclusion those peddling immorality have more courage of conviction than those standing for the sanctity of life. If we’re going to win the battle for the soul of America and end the slaughter of innocents, we’re going to need much more courage of conviction (Why I have stopped filing income tax returns!—my addition).

Perhaps the most famous and effective of America’s 19th century abolitionists, William Lloyd Garrison won the argument against his fellow liberators that only immediate and complete emancipation of the slaves would win the day. Many thought slavery would only be ended incrementally, but Garrison thought otherwise. ‘As long as one man is enslaved none are free,’ he once famously said.

Just as soldiers follow in the footsteps of the Savior who leaves 99 behind to find the one lost sheep, by risking their own lives to save one of their wounded so that no man gets left behind, we must do the same on behalf of the sanctity of life.

We have attempted to gradually end child killing in America for 40 years with no success, and it’s because we have surrendered the moral high ground. Heartbeat and fetal pain bills are well intended, but all they argue is the quality of life, and not the sanctity of life. If there are conditions on when life will be protected, then we are making the same argument as the abortionists, but are just arguing with them over the casualty count. This is why I am a strong advocate for the emerging personhood movement (My use of red—my addition).

If I’ve heard it once, I’ve heard it a hundred times that by allowing compromised politicians to hijack the sanctity of life we’re like the fireman who comes across a burning building and saves as many as he can.

Except that’s a lie.

In these United States, we are a government by the consent of the governed. The state has no power the people are not willing to submit to or permit. Therefore, what you’re really doing is choosing which of two arsonists to hand the matches to. One arsonist may burn down a building with fewer people, but you are consenting to allow him to burn down the building nonetheless.

Imagine choosing between two Nazis. One will kill 1,000 Jews, and the other will 10. Are you a hero for choosing the one killed 10 Jews? Not according to the Nuremberg trials after World War II. As depicted in the award-winning holocaust film Judgment at Nuremberg, judges who tried to make the case they were heroes by sending fewer Jews to the gas chambers and concentration camps were hung to death right alongside the worst of executioners.

I agree we should do as much as we can to save as many as we can whenever we can, like in another award-winning holocaust film Schindlers List. But before settling for the best we can do, we should try to do all we can do first. That’s not what we’re doing. We’re surrendering to the child killing industry and the ruling class up front, and then patting ourselves on the back for our own sellout.

Thus the killing continues.

What about jobs and the economy? Aren’t those the most important issues? Suppose you have two neighbors. One just lost their job. The other’s child was just hit by a car on your street and could die. Which would you rush to be there for first? Of course you would prioritize the one with life at stake first. What kind of person would callously walk by a bloody boy lying in the street to go talk to his other neighbor about the job market?

If you believe this nation wouldn’t exist without the providential blessing of God, and we can’t sustain freedom and liberty in this nation without that same blessing, then we must realize God will not bless us financially as long as the killing continues. ‘Thou shall not murder’ is the first explicitly moral law given in the 10 Commandments.

But what about the courts, you say, don’t we have to keep stacking them with Republican-appointed judges to overturn Roe v. Wade?

Contrary to what you’ve been told, we don’t have to wait for the courts to act to stop child killing America—nor should we.

It was a Supreme Court with a majority of Republican-appointed judges who gave us Roe v. Wade. It was a Supreme Court with a majority of Republican-appointed judges who left it in place with decisions like Planned Parenthood v. Casey. And it was a Supreme Court with a majority of Republican-appointed judges who upheld the most anti-life legislation in America since the Three-Fifths Compromise (Obamacare).

The Constitution of these United States allows the Congress to pass laws that limit the review jurisdiction of the judicial branch. In addition, the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says no person ‘shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.’ If that’s true, then there is nothing stopping your pro-life Republican presidents, senators, congressmen, governors, and legislators from enacting legislation that recognizes a human being as a ‘person’ under the U.S. Constitution from the moment of conception (or biological beginning), granting that person the full legal protections of all other lawful citizens, and telling the courts they have no jurisdiction to overturn such laws.

We won’t stop the killing until we muster the courage of conviction to demand our elected officials do the same (My use of red—my addition). Right now we lack the conscience and the courage to act.

Thus the killing continues.”

If you have regularly read this blog, you know that I am PRO-LIFE without exceptions. The PRO-MURDER supporters use the “exception argument” to allow MURDER of all! MURDER is MURDER! The innocent unborn child has NO control over how or why he/she was conceived! One does NOT punish the innocent because of the SINS of the guilty!

Our emphasis in elections MUST be in the primaries to elect 100% PRO-LIFE candidates and then to support them totally in the general election. That is why I never hesitated to support Todd Akin for the Senate from Missouri. That is also why the Left jumped on his “misstatement.” First, they want Pro-MURDER Congressmen. But, if not, they much prefer PRO-Life candidates with exceptions than PRO-LIFE candidates. THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS THAT JUSTIFY MURDER!!!

In a political science classroom, I ended an attempt by the Professor to generate a discussion on abortion, which he had previously stated he supported. I spoke up first and said just this one sentence. NO ONE HAS THE “RIGHT” TO MURDER ANOTHER HUMAN BEING! No one dared to argue to the contrary! No one! And that is what is occurring in the United States and for the good of this nation; we MUST stop the MURDER of the innocent!

Todd Akin: GOP Senatorial candidate for Missouri

Donate: https://www.akin.org/contribute/?utm_method=akin_nav