A short nine line news article appeared in the paper August 2, 2005. According to the story, the California Supreme Court ruled that country clubs must allow homosexual members who register as domestic partners the same discounts that they give to married heterosexual couples. The courts in this country continue to be out of control thinking that they rather than the legislatures or the people should determine the moral (or lack thereof) climate in this country. They continue to promote the courtocracy that has been developing for at least the last forty five years in this nation.
The spell check in this computer, underlined courtocracy in red which indicates that it was a misspelled word. Checking it, it had no suggestion on how to correct the spelling. We have not yet developed a word for the rule by courts that is growing yearly in the United States. Courtocracy is as good as any other.
Since all court members at the national level are appointed to their position by the President of the United States with the majority approval of the Senate, it is imperative that we continue to support appointments to the court that will uphold the Constitution of the United States and not rewrite it based upon their own opinions. That should be the primary basis for selection of judges and justices.
People in support of the courtocracy (They support it because they support most of the decisions of the courts.) have already declared that their criteria is decision based. If the appointee supports the libertine positions of the court, then he is qualified to serve on the court. If he does not support the libertine positions of the present court, then he is not qualified to serve on the court. They have no desire to return to the practice of actually using the provisions of the Constitution to reach judicial decisions since doing so would void much of the last forty five years of court decisions.
The Democrats have lost the Presidency and Congress. They do not want to lose control of the libertine courts. My question is this. Would you trust or respect any court system that thinks murdering unborn babies is perfectly legal? Would you trust or respect any court system that has ruled that immoral behavior is a civil right protected and promoted by the United States Constitution?
The Constitution with amendments has been around for more than two hundred years. Yet, it is only in the last forty five years that these libertine decisions have occurred. For some unknown reason, the people who wrote the Constitution and its amendments didn't realize that the provisions within allowed the murder of unborn babies or promoted immorality. How could they have not known what they were writing when they originally wrote them? According to today's court, they understand those earlier written provisions of the Constitution better than did the original authors.
Demand that we actually follow the intended meaning of the Constitution as written and amended. Demand that the courts stop rewriting the Constitution without following the procedure for amending the Constitution. Stop courtocracy! Stop court tyranny!
The spell check in this computer, underlined courtocracy in red which indicates that it was a misspelled word. Checking it, it had no suggestion on how to correct the spelling. We have not yet developed a word for the rule by courts that is growing yearly in the United States. Courtocracy is as good as any other.
Since all court members at the national level are appointed to their position by the President of the United States with the majority approval of the Senate, it is imperative that we continue to support appointments to the court that will uphold the Constitution of the United States and not rewrite it based upon their own opinions. That should be the primary basis for selection of judges and justices.
People in support of the courtocracy (They support it because they support most of the decisions of the courts.) have already declared that their criteria is decision based. If the appointee supports the libertine positions of the court, then he is qualified to serve on the court. If he does not support the libertine positions of the present court, then he is not qualified to serve on the court. They have no desire to return to the practice of actually using the provisions of the Constitution to reach judicial decisions since doing so would void much of the last forty five years of court decisions.
The Democrats have lost the Presidency and Congress. They do not want to lose control of the libertine courts. My question is this. Would you trust or respect any court system that thinks murdering unborn babies is perfectly legal? Would you trust or respect any court system that has ruled that immoral behavior is a civil right protected and promoted by the United States Constitution?
The Constitution with amendments has been around for more than two hundred years. Yet, it is only in the last forty five years that these libertine decisions have occurred. For some unknown reason, the people who wrote the Constitution and its amendments didn't realize that the provisions within allowed the murder of unborn babies or promoted immorality. How could they have not known what they were writing when they originally wrote them? According to today's court, they understand those earlier written provisions of the Constitution better than did the original authors.
Demand that we actually follow the intended meaning of the Constitution as written and amended. Demand that the courts stop rewriting the Constitution without following the procedure for amending the Constitution. Stop courtocracy! Stop court tyranny!
posted by Christian Gunslinger at 10:52 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home