Homosexualizing the United States military
I’ve had the following e-mails for awhile and decided to post them tonight since I dealt with the comments made by a homosexual lawmaker of the Illinois General Assembly on my last post. The last I’ve read about the attempt to change the law on homosexuals within the military was a statement that the military is not yet ready to offer a policy change and won’t until after the November election. That delay may be a method used to protect Democrats in the upcoming election and hoping upon hope that by not pushing this issue the Democrats will be able to maintain control of Congress. This issue is certainly not off the table for Democrats since homosexual activists are a major part of the foot-soldiers for Democrats as they push their SINFUL, twisted agenda in Congress. The following is from e-mails from Americans for Truth about Homosexuality http://www.aftah.org/:
“Gay Military Porn Bust Reminds Us of Some Inconvenient Truths Regarding Homosexuality and the Military
‘Gay’ lobby group HRC plans $2 million campaign to push radical agenda on Armed Forces
‘Gay rights groups were already mobilizing Thursday to make the subject [of homosexuals in the military/ending ‘Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell’] a campaign issue before congressional elections in November. The Human Rights Campaign announced plans to start a more than $2 million national grass-roots and lobbying campaign targeting lawmakers whose votes would be needed to pass a repeal.’—Washington Post, “On Issue of Gays in Military, Pentagon Will Make Recommendations to Congress”, Jan. 29, 2010
‘Gay’ military porn ad. Homosexual military pornography is a huge business. Many ‘gay’ men are attracted to ‘macho’ (masculine) guys in uniform. (Just like some women?—my addition) The last thing our Armed Forces need is to welcome more men and women with disordered sexuality. (SIN!!!—my addition)
BACKGROUND NOTE: Here’s the truth on “Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell” and the law from Center for Military Readiness.
By Peter LaBarbera, http://www.aftah.org/
TAKE ACTION: Dedicate yourself to actively oppose President Obama’s goal of homosexualizing and politicizing our American Armed Forces (pro-‘gay’ ‘diversity’ is political). As the Washington Post above reveals, homosexual activists will be going all out to pressure Congress to impose their radical agenda on our Service members. Contact your Congressman and Senators by phone [(202) 224-3121; (202) 225-3121; http://www.congress.org/] AND in writing (preferably in a regularly mailed letter or a fax as opposed to e-mail) and urge them to OPPOSE H.R. 1283 — which we’re calling ‘Homosexualize Our Military Act’—which is mischievously named by liberals as the “Military Readiness Enhancement Act.” This act would impose a pro-homosexuality ‘non-discrimination’ policy on our Armed Forces. In other words, it would radically force a change in ethos in the military to one of approving of homosexuality—including through one-sided ‘diversity’ programs that would undermine service members’ faith and morals (as happens today to people of faith in major corporations implementing pro-homosexual ‘sexual orientation’ agendas).
Also oppose all efforts by the President to advance his misguided agenda of homosexualizing our military non-legislatively (i.e., by various executive actions). Already, military leaders are laying the groundwork for a plan to gradually open up the military to homosexuality—the Washington Post reports. Obama must NOT autocratically launch this revolutionary change to our Armed Forces without legislative action and oversight.
Two points about the 2006 FOX story below on a homosexual porn bust at Ft. Bragg:
1) There is a huge market for ‘gay’ military porn because lots of homosexual men are turned on by ‘straight-acting,’ ‘macho’ (masculine) men. I realize it’s a sick comparison, but just as many women like a ‘man in uniform,’ so do homosexual men. On Jan. 29, 2010, a Google search on the three words ‘gay military porn’ (no quote marks) yielded ‘about 1,300,000’ entries. ‘Gay Military Porn’ (in quote marks) yielded 34,300 entries. This is a huge (and very twisted) business, and obviously the demand is high among men with a homosexual problem.
The last thing our fighting men and women need is to have the military floodgates opened up for homosexual men and lesbians to join as open practitioners of homosexuality. That would put men who are sexually attracted to men, and women to women, in tight bunking situations, showers, etc., with service members of the same sex. Remember: homosexuality is not an ‘identity’ issue (sorry, Warren Throckmorton) or a ‘civil rights’ issue; it’s a BEHAVIORIAL issue (ABSOLUTELY!!! And it is a SINFUL behavior!!!—my addition), and welcoming in men and women who are tempted to practice—or inclined to practice—disordered same-sex behavior is wrong and detrimental to the morale, effectiveness and readiness of our Armed Forces.
Of course, there is a huge straight pornography problem, too, of course. But men do not bunk and shower with women in the Armed Forces (except married couples). The sexes are segregated. [And then there is this peculiar logic by a homosexual activist, Dale Carpenter, who argues that allowing open homosexuality in the military would help identify the ‘gay’ soldiers—making it harder for them to leer at naked straight soldiers! ‘Under present policy, the straight soldier doesn’t know who might be leering at him in the shower. So he has to wonder about everybody—hardly a reassuring prospect,’ Carpenter writes. ‘Under a policy of openness, he’ll have a better idea who might find some of his 2,000 body parts especially appealing. Thus, he can take whatever modest precautions are available (NONE!!!—my addition) to minimize his exposure.’ How absurd. To even discuss such folly in a time of war is a needless distraction (It’s not a distraction. It’s insanity of the usual type exhibited by the libertines!—my addition)—and showering/privacy issues are just one of the many problems caused by homosexualizing the military.
2) Read the second to last sentence of the Fox story below: ‘The military’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy states that ‘homosexual orientation alone is not a bar to service, but homosexual conduct is incompatible with military service.’ (How absurd! It’s like putting homosexual men into leadership positions for boys in Boys Scouts or any other type organization. It an open invitation to SIN!!!—my addition) What kind of a nonsensical policy encourages ‘homosexuals’ to join the armed forces but then bars homosexual conduct? (A Barack Hussein Obama policy!!!—my addition) This is a triumph of ‘gay’ activists’ ‘sexual orientation’ ideology—skewing the debate toward ‘civil rights’ and away from aberrant behavior. (It’s never a civil right to SIN—my addition) And it is very bad public policy. As Elaine Donnelly of the Center for Military Readiness constantly reminds anyone who will listen, “Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell” is NOT the law of the land, (TRUE!!!—my addition) but rather a political compromise driven by a previous president’s (Bill Clinton’s) desire to pander to homosexual activists. We must go back to following the actual law passed by Congress, (TRUE AGAIN!!!—my addition) which bars homosexuals from serving. But that can only happen after the Obama presidency is over. Meanwhile, we must resist Obama’s plan to homosexualize and politicize our Armed Services.”
“Army Paratrooper Pleads Guilty in Gay Porn Case
April 27, 2006, FoxNews.com
FORT BRAGG, N.C.—An Army paratrooper pleaded guilty Thursday to engaging in sex acts on a military-themed gay pornographic Web site and was sentenced to prison.
Pfc. Richard T. Ashley, one of seven members of the 82nd Airborne Division charged with appearing on the site, pleaded guilty to sodomy, conduct detrimental to the Army and the unit, and drug use.
He was sentenced to 90 days in prison, but was given 15 days credit. Ashley also was demoted to private, will receive a bad conduct discharge and will lose two-thirds of his pay.
‘I’ve embarrassed the entire Army, my country and most of all, dishonored God!’ (DUH! So, why did he do it?—my addition) Ashley said during the hearing.
Pfc. Wesley K. Mitten and Pvt. Kagen B. Mullen were charged with pandering, sodomy and conduct detrimental to the Army and the unit. Mitten and Mullen, who also faces adultery charges, have pleaded not guilty.
Military Investigating 82nd Airborne Over Gay Porn Allegations
The 82nd Airborne says that four other soldiers, whose names were not released, received nonjudicial punishment for appearing on the Web site. They were reduced in rank to private, forfeited half a month’s pay for two months, performed extra work and were restricted to Fort Bragg for 45 days. The Army has recommended that all seven be discharged.
The 15,000 paratroopers of the 82nd Airborne are among the Army’s most elite soldiers, having volunteered to serve in a unit that trains to deploy anywhere in the world within 18 hours.
The military’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy states that ‘homosexual orientation alone is not a bar to service (Not what the law says though!—my addition), but homosexual conduct is incompatible with military service.’ Service members who violate the policy are removed from the military.”
“Donnelly Scores Obama’s Goal of Open Homosexuals in the Military
Well, folks, our Commander-in-Chief has just telegraphed to the nation that he is more concerned with appeasing a sexual special interest lobby than building up the morale of our fighting men and women. (TRUE!!! And that is exactly what all this is about. Pandering to SIN while weakening the military—my addition.) Mr. President: this is just more ‘change’ we don’t believe in. Let’s fight hard to make sure this does not happen during Obama’s first (and hopefully last) [AMEN!!!—my addition] term in office.—Peter LaBarbera, http://americansfortruth.com/news/www.aftah.org
TAKE ACTION: Call or write your U.S. Congressman and Senators [(202) 224-3121; (202) 225-3121; http://www.congress.org/] and urge them to oppose all legislative efforts to homosexualize the U.S. Military.
Elaine Donnelly of the Center For Military Readiness, the leading pro-family advocate opposing the effort to homosexualize the U.S. military, writes:
Walking the Plank for Military ‘LGBT Law’
President Barack Obama is expected to push for acceptance of professed gays in the military, a goal that can only be achieved legally by passage of a new ‘LGBT Law’ for lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgenders in the armed forces. In response, the Center for Military Readiness predicted that the effort would fail for three basic reasons:
1) Members of Congress are becoming aware that repeal of the 1993 law stating that homosexuals are not eligible for military service, usually mislabeled ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,’ would undermine recruiting, retention, and readiness in our military. More than 1,160 retired Flag & General Officers for the Military have personally signed a statement supporting the 1993 law (Section 654, Title 10), and expressing concerns about consequences of repeal that would ‘break the All-Volunteer Force.’
2) A decision by the Commander-in-Chief to violate his oath of office by suspending enforcement of the law would alienate members of Congress and break faith with the troops he leads. (He’s suppose to be leading!—my addition)
3) Political dynamics of the issue could develop in ways similar to 1994, when Republicans regained majority control of Congress, and no GOP incumbents were defeated. (The President seems not to care. He’d rather be a “really good” 1 term President! That is NOT happening! Quite the contrary!—my addition)
CMR President Elaine Donnelly noted that even if President Obama keeps pushing for a new LGBT Law for the military, some members of Congress may be more concerned about lessons learned in the recent Massachusetts special election, as well as in 1994. Said Donnelly, ‘Voters are concerned about national security, and they don’t want America’s military to be used for any purpose other than national defense.’
1) In 1994, a survey done for the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) by Stanley Greenberg, President Clinton’s own pollster, indicated the second most important factor that shifted control of Congress to the Republicans in the 1994 mid-term election was President Bill Clinton’s 1993 push for gays in the military.
2) That finding was reported by Dan Balz in a November 14, 1994, Washington Post article titled ‘Health Plan Was Albatross for Democrats: Big Government Label Hurt Party, Poll Finds.’ Greenburg found that 54% of 1,250 voters surveyed named the Health Care Task Force issue as the number one reason they cast a ‘vote of dissatisfaction’ in the leadership of Clinton and the Democrats controlling Congress in 1993. Greenberg also identified a second issue, called ‘cultural liberalism,’ which was cited by 51% of respondents and symbolized by Bill Clinton’s failed 1993 campaign for homosexuals in the military.
3) Greenberg’s survey was significant because gays-in-the-military was not even an issue in the 1994 elections. Congress had already settled the issue in 1993, and bipartisan veto-proof majorities had approved current law stating that homosexuals are not eligible to serve in the military. The voters punished Democrats anyway, due to a lingering impression of what Greenberg called ‘cultural liberalism.’ Those concerns could emerge again if President Obama and LGBT Left liberals in Congress insist on votes for gays in the military.
In 2010, the Massachusetts special election detected public opposition to similar issues involving what is usually called ‘political correctness in the military.’ In an article titled ‘It’s the Enemy, Stupid,’ Andrew McCarthy of National Review Online quoted Senator-elect Scott Brown’s top strategist, Eric Fehrnstrom, who said that the campaign’s internal polling showed ‘terrorism and the treatment of enemy combatants’ to be an even bigger issue than health care.
Said Donnelly, ‘Liberals and Blue Dog Democrats can dismiss the national security message sent by Massachusetts, as well as Stanley Greenburg’s post-1994-election analysis, but they would do so with political risk.’
To arrange an interview on these and related military/social issues, please call CMR President Elaine Donnelly at (734) 464-9430 or CMR Executive Director Tommy Sears in Washington D.C. at (202) 347-5333.
The Center for Military Readiness in an independent, non-partisan public policy organization that specializes in military/social issues.”
I’ve had the following e-mails for awhile and decided to post them tonight since I dealt with the comments made by a homosexual lawmaker of the Illinois General Assembly on my last post. The last I’ve read about the attempt to change the law on homosexuals within the military was a statement that the military is not yet ready to offer a policy change and won’t until after the November election. That delay may be a method used to protect Democrats in the upcoming election and hoping upon hope that by not pushing this issue the Democrats will be able to maintain control of Congress. This issue is certainly not off the table for Democrats since homosexual activists are a major part of the foot-soldiers for Democrats as they push their SINFUL, twisted agenda in Congress. The following is from e-mails from Americans for Truth about Homosexuality http://www.aftah.org/:
“Gay Military Porn Bust Reminds Us of Some Inconvenient Truths Regarding Homosexuality and the Military
‘Gay’ lobby group HRC plans $2 million campaign to push radical agenda on Armed Forces
‘Gay rights groups were already mobilizing Thursday to make the subject [of homosexuals in the military/ending ‘Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell’] a campaign issue before congressional elections in November. The Human Rights Campaign announced plans to start a more than $2 million national grass-roots and lobbying campaign targeting lawmakers whose votes would be needed to pass a repeal.’—Washington Post, “On Issue of Gays in Military, Pentagon Will Make Recommendations to Congress”, Jan. 29, 2010
‘Gay’ military porn ad. Homosexual military pornography is a huge business. Many ‘gay’ men are attracted to ‘macho’ (masculine) guys in uniform. (Just like some women?—my addition) The last thing our Armed Forces need is to welcome more men and women with disordered sexuality. (SIN!!!—my addition)
BACKGROUND NOTE: Here’s the truth on “Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell” and the law from Center for Military Readiness.
By Peter LaBarbera, http://www.aftah.org/
TAKE ACTION: Dedicate yourself to actively oppose President Obama’s goal of homosexualizing and politicizing our American Armed Forces (pro-‘gay’ ‘diversity’ is political). As the Washington Post above reveals, homosexual activists will be going all out to pressure Congress to impose their radical agenda on our Service members. Contact your Congressman and Senators by phone [(202) 224-3121; (202) 225-3121; http://www.congress.org/] AND in writing (preferably in a regularly mailed letter or a fax as opposed to e-mail) and urge them to OPPOSE H.R. 1283 — which we’re calling ‘Homosexualize Our Military Act’—which is mischievously named by liberals as the “Military Readiness Enhancement Act.” This act would impose a pro-homosexuality ‘non-discrimination’ policy on our Armed Forces. In other words, it would radically force a change in ethos in the military to one of approving of homosexuality—including through one-sided ‘diversity’ programs that would undermine service members’ faith and morals (as happens today to people of faith in major corporations implementing pro-homosexual ‘sexual orientation’ agendas).
Also oppose all efforts by the President to advance his misguided agenda of homosexualizing our military non-legislatively (i.e., by various executive actions). Already, military leaders are laying the groundwork for a plan to gradually open up the military to homosexuality—the Washington Post reports. Obama must NOT autocratically launch this revolutionary change to our Armed Forces without legislative action and oversight.
Two points about the 2006 FOX story below on a homosexual porn bust at Ft. Bragg:
1) There is a huge market for ‘gay’ military porn because lots of homosexual men are turned on by ‘straight-acting,’ ‘macho’ (masculine) men. I realize it’s a sick comparison, but just as many women like a ‘man in uniform,’ so do homosexual men. On Jan. 29, 2010, a Google search on the three words ‘gay military porn’ (no quote marks) yielded ‘about 1,300,000’ entries. ‘Gay Military Porn’ (in quote marks) yielded 34,300 entries. This is a huge (and very twisted) business, and obviously the demand is high among men with a homosexual problem.
The last thing our fighting men and women need is to have the military floodgates opened up for homosexual men and lesbians to join as open practitioners of homosexuality. That would put men who are sexually attracted to men, and women to women, in tight bunking situations, showers, etc., with service members of the same sex. Remember: homosexuality is not an ‘identity’ issue (sorry, Warren Throckmorton) or a ‘civil rights’ issue; it’s a BEHAVIORIAL issue (ABSOLUTELY!!! And it is a SINFUL behavior!!!—my addition), and welcoming in men and women who are tempted to practice—or inclined to practice—disordered same-sex behavior is wrong and detrimental to the morale, effectiveness and readiness of our Armed Forces.
Of course, there is a huge straight pornography problem, too, of course. But men do not bunk and shower with women in the Armed Forces (except married couples). The sexes are segregated. [And then there is this peculiar logic by a homosexual activist, Dale Carpenter, who argues that allowing open homosexuality in the military would help identify the ‘gay’ soldiers—making it harder for them to leer at naked straight soldiers! ‘Under present policy, the straight soldier doesn’t know who might be leering at him in the shower. So he has to wonder about everybody—hardly a reassuring prospect,’ Carpenter writes. ‘Under a policy of openness, he’ll have a better idea who might find some of his 2,000 body parts especially appealing. Thus, he can take whatever modest precautions are available (NONE!!!—my addition) to minimize his exposure.’ How absurd. To even discuss such folly in a time of war is a needless distraction (It’s not a distraction. It’s insanity of the usual type exhibited by the libertines!—my addition)—and showering/privacy issues are just one of the many problems caused by homosexualizing the military.
2) Read the second to last sentence of the Fox story below: ‘The military’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy states that ‘homosexual orientation alone is not a bar to service, but homosexual conduct is incompatible with military service.’ (How absurd! It’s like putting homosexual men into leadership positions for boys in Boys Scouts or any other type organization. It an open invitation to SIN!!!—my addition) What kind of a nonsensical policy encourages ‘homosexuals’ to join the armed forces but then bars homosexual conduct? (A Barack Hussein Obama policy!!!—my addition) This is a triumph of ‘gay’ activists’ ‘sexual orientation’ ideology—skewing the debate toward ‘civil rights’ and away from aberrant behavior. (It’s never a civil right to SIN—my addition) And it is very bad public policy. As Elaine Donnelly of the Center for Military Readiness constantly reminds anyone who will listen, “Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell” is NOT the law of the land, (TRUE!!!—my addition) but rather a political compromise driven by a previous president’s (Bill Clinton’s) desire to pander to homosexual activists. We must go back to following the actual law passed by Congress, (TRUE AGAIN!!!—my addition) which bars homosexuals from serving. But that can only happen after the Obama presidency is over. Meanwhile, we must resist Obama’s plan to homosexualize and politicize our Armed Services.”
“Army Paratrooper Pleads Guilty in Gay Porn Case
April 27, 2006, FoxNews.com
FORT BRAGG, N.C.—An Army paratrooper pleaded guilty Thursday to engaging in sex acts on a military-themed gay pornographic Web site and was sentenced to prison.
Pfc. Richard T. Ashley, one of seven members of the 82nd Airborne Division charged with appearing on the site, pleaded guilty to sodomy, conduct detrimental to the Army and the unit, and drug use.
He was sentenced to 90 days in prison, but was given 15 days credit. Ashley also was demoted to private, will receive a bad conduct discharge and will lose two-thirds of his pay.
‘I’ve embarrassed the entire Army, my country and most of all, dishonored God!’ (DUH! So, why did he do it?—my addition) Ashley said during the hearing.
Pfc. Wesley K. Mitten and Pvt. Kagen B. Mullen were charged with pandering, sodomy and conduct detrimental to the Army and the unit. Mitten and Mullen, who also faces adultery charges, have pleaded not guilty.
Military Investigating 82nd Airborne Over Gay Porn Allegations
The 82nd Airborne says that four other soldiers, whose names were not released, received nonjudicial punishment for appearing on the Web site. They were reduced in rank to private, forfeited half a month’s pay for two months, performed extra work and were restricted to Fort Bragg for 45 days. The Army has recommended that all seven be discharged.
The 15,000 paratroopers of the 82nd Airborne are among the Army’s most elite soldiers, having volunteered to serve in a unit that trains to deploy anywhere in the world within 18 hours.
The military’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy states that ‘homosexual orientation alone is not a bar to service (Not what the law says though!—my addition), but homosexual conduct is incompatible with military service.’ Service members who violate the policy are removed from the military.”
“Donnelly Scores Obama’s Goal of Open Homosexuals in the Military
Well, folks, our Commander-in-Chief has just telegraphed to the nation that he is more concerned with appeasing a sexual special interest lobby than building up the morale of our fighting men and women. (TRUE!!! And that is exactly what all this is about. Pandering to SIN while weakening the military—my addition.) Mr. President: this is just more ‘change’ we don’t believe in. Let’s fight hard to make sure this does not happen during Obama’s first (and hopefully last) [AMEN!!!—my addition] term in office.—Peter LaBarbera, http://americansfortruth.com/news/www.aftah.org
TAKE ACTION: Call or write your U.S. Congressman and Senators [(202) 224-3121; (202) 225-3121; http://www.congress.org/] and urge them to oppose all legislative efforts to homosexualize the U.S. Military.
Elaine Donnelly of the Center For Military Readiness, the leading pro-family advocate opposing the effort to homosexualize the U.S. military, writes:
Walking the Plank for Military ‘LGBT Law’
President Barack Obama is expected to push for acceptance of professed gays in the military, a goal that can only be achieved legally by passage of a new ‘LGBT Law’ for lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgenders in the armed forces. In response, the Center for Military Readiness predicted that the effort would fail for three basic reasons:
1) Members of Congress are becoming aware that repeal of the 1993 law stating that homosexuals are not eligible for military service, usually mislabeled ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,’ would undermine recruiting, retention, and readiness in our military. More than 1,160 retired Flag & General Officers for the Military have personally signed a statement supporting the 1993 law (Section 654, Title 10), and expressing concerns about consequences of repeal that would ‘break the All-Volunteer Force.’
2) A decision by the Commander-in-Chief to violate his oath of office by suspending enforcement of the law would alienate members of Congress and break faith with the troops he leads. (He’s suppose to be leading!—my addition)
3) Political dynamics of the issue could develop in ways similar to 1994, when Republicans regained majority control of Congress, and no GOP incumbents were defeated. (The President seems not to care. He’d rather be a “really good” 1 term President! That is NOT happening! Quite the contrary!—my addition)
CMR President Elaine Donnelly noted that even if President Obama keeps pushing for a new LGBT Law for the military, some members of Congress may be more concerned about lessons learned in the recent Massachusetts special election, as well as in 1994. Said Donnelly, ‘Voters are concerned about national security, and they don’t want America’s military to be used for any purpose other than national defense.’
1) In 1994, a survey done for the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) by Stanley Greenberg, President Clinton’s own pollster, indicated the second most important factor that shifted control of Congress to the Republicans in the 1994 mid-term election was President Bill Clinton’s 1993 push for gays in the military.
2) That finding was reported by Dan Balz in a November 14, 1994, Washington Post article titled ‘Health Plan Was Albatross for Democrats: Big Government Label Hurt Party, Poll Finds.’ Greenburg found that 54% of 1,250 voters surveyed named the Health Care Task Force issue as the number one reason they cast a ‘vote of dissatisfaction’ in the leadership of Clinton and the Democrats controlling Congress in 1993. Greenberg also identified a second issue, called ‘cultural liberalism,’ which was cited by 51% of respondents and symbolized by Bill Clinton’s failed 1993 campaign for homosexuals in the military.
3) Greenberg’s survey was significant because gays-in-the-military was not even an issue in the 1994 elections. Congress had already settled the issue in 1993, and bipartisan veto-proof majorities had approved current law stating that homosexuals are not eligible to serve in the military. The voters punished Democrats anyway, due to a lingering impression of what Greenberg called ‘cultural liberalism.’ Those concerns could emerge again if President Obama and LGBT Left liberals in Congress insist on votes for gays in the military.
In 2010, the Massachusetts special election detected public opposition to similar issues involving what is usually called ‘political correctness in the military.’ In an article titled ‘It’s the Enemy, Stupid,’ Andrew McCarthy of National Review Online quoted Senator-elect Scott Brown’s top strategist, Eric Fehrnstrom, who said that the campaign’s internal polling showed ‘terrorism and the treatment of enemy combatants’ to be an even bigger issue than health care.
Said Donnelly, ‘Liberals and Blue Dog Democrats can dismiss the national security message sent by Massachusetts, as well as Stanley Greenburg’s post-1994-election analysis, but they would do so with political risk.’
To arrange an interview on these and related military/social issues, please call CMR President Elaine Donnelly at (734) 464-9430 or CMR Executive Director Tommy Sears in Washington D.C. at (202) 347-5333.
The Center for Military Readiness in an independent, non-partisan public policy organization that specializes in military/social issues.”
posted by Christian Gunslinger at 4:26 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home