Fathers: An Equal Partner in the Creation of Life as Designed by GOD the True Creator of All Things

I had a fabulous five days off. Now, it is time to get back to the work at hand— taking control of the Senate, increasing control of the House, and reining in a tyrannical federal government while returning to doing GOD’S will for the nation. I will be moving at the end of the month. Otherwise, GOD willing, I’ll be posting through the November election and beyond! GOD save the United States! Government can not and will not!


Chris Daniel won the primary in Mississippi for the Republican nomination for the United States Senate. However, he did not receive 50% + 1 of the vote as required by law. Therefore, a run-off election will occur on June 24. He needs his campaign funds to be rebuilt. Donate to the Chris McDaniel Senate primary campaign in Mississippi:


http://www.fourteenin2014.com/make-a-donation/donate-to-chris-mcdaniel/

Donate: https://mcdaniel2014.com/donate/

Donate: https://secure.senateconservatives.com/step1?

Website: https://mcdaniel2014.com/

Reminder:

www.amazon.com now has the exclusive right to sale my first e-book in its Kindle Store.

The title of the e-book is The Black Sword: The Secret U.S. Army in Vietnam

A paperback and hardcover version of the book was available since 2007. I believe it was since 2007. I do not know for sure. It was copyrighted in 2007. That edition had one comment and that comment was very negative receiving a one star rating.

The direct link to the e-book:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00KCWVHIK

Here is that comment in its entirety and without change from the site:

“A poorly self aggrandizing working of ficition. November 8, 2012
By Robert M. Stanford
Format: Hardcover

I should prefix this by saying that I know the author of this book. To start regardless of how this book this being marketed by the author, it is a piece of fiction, the author never served in the military in capacity. Where to start with this review, the book is very poorly written and the author clearly did not do much in the way of historical research on military tactics in general or the Vietnam war in particular. The book reads much like a bad war movie mixed with some kind of cheesy martial arts film, the battle scenes are ridiculously unrealistic. Including laughably bad claims like how the author was trained in hand to hand combat techniques where he would be able to kill some one with one punch in less than one second, he selected for the group because he was genius with Forest Gump like running ability, doing three hours of weight training for 6 straight days a week for months, claims of gun with finger printer readers that only let the owner fire them, act. Save yourself some money and avoid this book”

Robert does indeed know me. However, it goes a little deeper. Robert is my nephew—the first born of my younger sister. She is four years younger than I am. I was working for a living teaching school when she graduated from Illinois State University. She didn’t meet her future husband until she was working as a teacher. Therefore, Robert wasn’t even born during the time period of most of the book. Robert also never served in the military. Neither did his father or mother.

I do state that I have a tested I.Q. of 130 or above. Both of my children have tested I.Q.s of 130 or above. Does that prove that I do? Of course not. Therefore, before I wrote the book, I went to the public school district that I attended from first grade through high school. I asked for and received a copy of my school records including the results of an I.Q. test. I have written proof that I have a tested I.Q. of 130 or above. If I didn’t, I would not have put it in the book. However, I never said, anywhere in the book, that I am a genius.

As far as his statement that “the book is very poorly written.” That is, at best, an opinion. Read again what he wrote. How well written are his comments? I was a high school American government/economics teacher for ten years. Having been a teacher, I am use to negative comments from students. Most of those comments were from people who did not do well in my class. I expected the students to earn their grade through work and meeting my standards. If they did not, they suffered the consequences. Most did not like the consequences.

If you read the dedication page, I paid an English teacher to edit the work. We did each of the six chapters the same way. At the time, I lived in Tucson and she lived in Arkansas where she taught high school English. I mailed a chapter to her, she ripped it to shreds. I corrected and rewrote the chapter based upon her suggestions and sent the rewritten chapter back to her. She found more items to criticize and gave more suggested corrections. I corrected a second time and sent them back once again. She approved the chapter and mailed it back. When Robert states that “the book is very poorly written,” he criticizes her. I do not believe those criticisms are justified.

Concerning the publication of the book itself, I did not want to go through a regular publishing house because I did not want the book to be edited by the publisher. Since I did not know how to publish a book, I hired a publishing company to do the actual printing of the book and the creation of the front and back book covers. When the company rejected my print copy because the margins were wrong several times including after I went to a Peoria printer to have the margins done correctly by a professional, I wrote the CEO of the company saying I was cancelling the contract because the company was not fulfilling its obligation to print the book. Without my knowledge, the book was printed and offered to the public including on Amazon in paperback and hardcover editions. My guess is that a company lawyer told the CEO that he had better fulfill the contract. I did not know the book was in distribution until I received a royalty check from the company. The copyright date on this published version of the book is 2007.

In the mean time, after borrowing money from my mother, I went to the Peoria printer and paid that company to print my book under my Arizona established publishing company. I had established the company in Arizona before moving back to Illinois in 2004. I never planned to live in Illinois—the land of Barack Hussein Obama—permanently. Until this book was published, I had not actually published anything through the company. My book through my publishing company was published in 2008.

Here is a strange occurrence. Robert’s mother—my younger sister—purchased four books in 2008. There are four people in her family—mother, father, brother, sister. I would have thought that Robert would have first read the book in 2008. He certainly did not have to purchase it from Amazon.

It was family squabble time. In 2004, I moved back to Illinois to care for my mother after my father had died. My two sisters and I had a verbal agreement that I would stay in Illinois until mom dies, caring for her in her home. She would not be put into a nursing home. After a series of minor strokes over a period of about a year, my sisters broke the agreement and put her in a home. Conflict resulted over my staying or leaving the house and the State. Discussion was done by e-mail. I stated in one e-mail that I was going to write more Black Sword books—five in total—and the next one would include the current dispute.

In early January of 2012, I received an eviction notice. The process continued through the year until a court date was set for November 30, 2012. (I believe that is the correct date. I did not bother to check to make sure.) On October 15, 2012, my oldest sister died after a brief illness. On November 8, 2012, Robert posted his criticism of the book. Coincidence? On November 30, 2012, I was court ordered to leave the house by midnight on December 31, 2012. On December 31, 2012, I moved out of the house.

If Robert meant to hurt sales of the book, I hope he did. I want the other company to stop selling my book. And the company did send me notice that I am being dropped. Good! I had told them not to publish.

If you read this blog regularly, you may know that I actually write five blogs, six days a week. Not on Sunday.

http://christiangunslinger.blogspot.com— pro-life

http://christiangunslinger1.blogspot.com— politically conservative

http://christiangunslinger3.blogspot.com— politically conservative

http://christiangunslinger5.blogspot.com— pro-traditional family

http://christiangunslinger7.blogspot.com— politically conservative concentrating on the primaries and the upcoming general election

By the very nature of my blogs, I expect the radical Left, pro-abortion/unborn baby MURDERERS, and pro-homosexual behavior advocates to attack my e-book as well as anything else I wrote and publish. Robert may be the first but I do not expect him to be the last.

The e-book costs only $3.00. The only cheaper price is $2.99 and I do not price my books that way. Everyone should know that $2.99 is actually $3.00. What a sad marketing ploy! Spend the $3.00 to determine whether or not Robert is correct. If a member of Amazon prime, the book is a free selection. You just might be pleasantly surprised. I have received very positive comments from readers including people who have actually been in the military unlike Robert and a student at the United States Naval Academy located in Annapolis, Maryland who is the grandson of a friend.

And finally, I would like nothing better than being reconciled with my sister and the rest of my earthly family. The theme of the second book is family. Planned publication date 2015. The theme of the third book is politics with the planned publication date being 2017. The fourth about education in 2019. And the last and final book in the series, on the church of JESUS, the CHRIST in 2021.

The direct link to my e-book:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00KCWVHIK

—


Primaries in June:

19) Maine Primary: June 10, 2014

28) Nevada Primary: June 10, 2014

34) North Dakota Primary: June 10, 2014

40) South Carolina Primary: June 10, 2014 ~ Primary Runoff: June 24, 2014

46) Virginia Primary: June 10, 2014


—

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2014/06/09/this-fathers-day-remembers-dads-who-got-no-say-when-their-unborn-children-were-aborted/

“This Father’s Day Remember Dads Who Got No Say When Their Unborn Children Were Aborted
by Dave Andrusko | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 6/9/14

We’ve collectively been so inundated with the “fact” that abortion is a “woman’s decision” that it’s difficult to remember that this is absurd on a gazillion different levels (It is absurd! It was the Supreme Court in its decision which made it absurd! Made it absurd by ignoring a basic scientific fact that life begins at conception! Thus, allowing the MURDER of an unborn, innocent, citizens of the nation! Then, making it even more absurd by removing completely one half of the two people who created that new unborn citizen as if the male half of the equation did not exist and was not necessary! An absurd decision by an absurd Supreme Court! And we follow this decision? Seriously?—my addition).

No one is evading the truth that carrying a baby to term is not easy under the best of circumstances (It is part of the curse upon women for original sin! Men have their own curse!—my addition), or that care of that child most often falls disproportionately on the mother (Part of the help mate quality of women!—my addition). But it doesn’t follow that the father ought not to have a voice in the fate of a child that is his as well as hers (Nor should it! The Left is always talking about equality but they usually completely ignore it for their own ideology!—my addition).

Next week NRL News Today will re-post a story we first ran in 2008—‘Second Reclaiming Fatherhood Conference Draws Much Media Attention.’ Here are a few thoughts in anticipation.

Vicki Thorn reminds us that the simple-minded, one-dimensional stereotype of the boyfriend/husband who can’t wait to abort an unplanned pregnancy, while obviously true in some instances, doesn’t account for many men, let alone all the other possibilities. (Note to pro-abortionist feminists, life is rarely simple.)

Thorn does not photoshop out the villains, for example, the men who coerced the women in their lives—including their daughters—into having abortions. Her point, my point, however, is that this does not exhaust the range of possible behaviors, nor does the failure of some to act as they should exclude all men from any voice in any and all abortions (Nor should it! Isn’t it strange that the father’s voice should be heard when it comes to MURDERING the child but should not be heard when it comes to bringing a new life into the world?—my addition).

Consider …

There are men who oppose the abortion from the beginning but have no ability to save their child. Read their stories of powerlessness and you will have a tough time sleeping.

There are men—a LOT of men—who’ve been told that they should not engage their hearts or their minds. Their ‘job’ is exclusively to support the woman’s decision to abort. To do otherwise, it’s implied when not stated flatly, is to try to impose your will. If in his heart a man knows that he has a responsibility to the child AND the mother, he is, at best conflicted, at worst an emotional basket case. (This overlaps with what Thorn is describing when she talks about the men who ‘seem’ not to care.)

Thorn talks about the men who really didn’t care, or who were happy to see this ‘inconvenience’ swept away. ‘But years later, when they are ready to be fathers, the reality of what happened hits them hard,’ Thorn writes. I’ve personally known more than a few men who’ve looked back at their younger selves with great bitterness.

What almost never gets talked about is how a sister’s abortion affects a brother. We tend to overlook how deep the bonds can be between siblings and how much one sibling can hurt when another is terribly distraught.

Likewise, as Thorn reminds us, ‘There are men whose wives had abortions before they met, who get caught up in the vortex of her pain.’ Talk to any counselor, as I have, and you hear how this unresolved pain and grief about an abortion she likely has not told her husband about, is almost too much to bear. And if they are unable to have children, the impact is multiplied.

Click here to sign up for daily pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

There are lots of arguments one can make that easily dismantle (or at least show the inconsistencies of) the argument that men are, at best, irrelevant to the abortion issue, at worst power-hungry intruders.

But my desire here is simply to show that abortion does not forever change the destinies of women and unborn children alone, but husbands, boyfriends, brothers, grandfathers, even uncles and cousins. If you think the latter is a stretch, I can tell you from personal experience what a difference my father’s care and compassion for my unwed, pregnant cousin made in her decision to carry her baby to term and to find a loving home for that child—and how it shaped my attitude forever more.

Women and men are in this together (As in every thing! GOD created male and female for a reason! Man can not successfully alter what GOD has ordained!—my addition), never more so than in the case of an unplanned or crisis pregnancy.

LifeNews.com Note: Dave Andrusko is the editor of National Right to Life News and an author and editor of several books on abortion topics. This post originally appeared at National Right to Life News Today.”

—

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2014/06/09/the-most-powerful-pro-life-fathers-day-video-youve-ever-seen/

“The Most Powerful Pro-Life Father’s Day Video You’ve Ever Seen
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 6/9/14

It’s not even Father’s Day yet and we have what we think is the most pro-life Father’s Day video we’ve ever seen.

Every so often a big company or corporation hits the nail on the head with a video advertisement that shows a profound respect for life. It’s not that these companies are pro-life per se, but they have the big budgets to produce the kind of video that will easily move hearts when it’s seen.

This commercial from Dove that powerfully captures the irreplaceable value of fathers is just the kind of unintentionally pro-life video that will move hearts this week as we prepare to honor Dads. This one even comes with a scene featuring a daughter showing her Father a picture of an ultrasound of her unborn baby.

See for yourself and … thank you Dads!

Click here to sign up for daily pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

The commercial:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Jpb2_YdxYM”

Every life has a father involved in the creation of that life! It is GOD’S way! And GOD IS PRO-LIFE without exception! GOD did not say, “Thou shalt not MURDER except for …!