Memorial Day 2006 and now 2008

Recommended: the CD “How to Think Like a Christian.” This CD is or should be a reminder to all Christians!

I suggest you check out the following website if you are a policy holder of Farmers Insurance Group or thinking about having them insure you in any capacity: www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com



https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367


The above link is for a company—Vision Forum—that provides unique products for the family. I am an affiliate for the company and receive a small commission whenever someone uses this link and then makes an unreturned purchase while using the link. Check it out. I think you might like the products offered. I do. See my more complete explanation on my post of February 1, 2008 entitled “Affiliate program with Vision Forum.”

Based upon past historical data: 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS have occurred in the last 24 hours in the United States. See my post “BABY HOLOCAUST” posted January 22, 2008.

I’ve been involved in a problem one of my clients has with Farmers Insurance Group. My previous posts in relation to this problem were:

September 10, 2007 post: “Beware of Farmers Insurance Group”
September 11, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group’s response”
September 18, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company received the requested list”
September 19, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company’s response to the list”
October 16, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and my request for information”
November 27, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group does not respond to my request”
January 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group latest stall”
January 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group is sent a response”
January 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group pays some money”
January 19, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group continues to be obstinate”
January 26, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group receives another request”
February 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group shows how low they will go?”
February 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group: If I were going to respond to the final letter”

I will not be continuing my Creationism posts today. I do plan to return to them soon.

Then, I plan to answer the response about Iraq. I am sorry for the change in plans. Plans, in reality, often are altered for one reason or another. “The best laid plans … often go astray.” Thank you for your understanding and patience.

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish, barbaric decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com

www.childpredators.com

www.lifedynamics.com

www.libertylegal.org

www.alliancedefensefund.org

www.searchtv.org

Yesterday was the day of observance for Memorial Day—a day set aside to honor veterans and members of the armed forces. Yet, we should not limit our thoughts to that one day. Pray for veterans and current military personnel. Remember their continued service and sacrifice.

The following was first posted by me for Memorial Day 2006. I’ve modified it slightly and have added additional material for 2008.

During our history, we have had periods of volunteer armies, a variety of military conscription plans, and a draft lottery system. Today, we use a system of an all volunteer military service. Regardless of the method used, some have complained and called the different programs unfair and discriminatory. One thing unfortunately is clear, given our sinful human nature; this country needs a military presence.

On Memorial Day 2006, the Peoria Journal Star published a column written by Cal Thomas. It was entitled “‘Thank you for my freedom.’” Here are some thoughts from that column.

“Eighteen months ago, I wrote about a remarkable young man who I have known since his birth. Specialist Daniel Calvin Dobson of Grand Rapids, Mich., joined the National Guard with the intention of going to Iraq. He served and he came home. Next week, he leaves for a second tour. He tells me the Army has a policy that anyone who has already served in Iraq is not required to go back should his unit be recalled. Daniel volunteered to go back.

In e-mail to his friends, he asks three things: ‘First, do not lose hope in the face of negative reporting. We are doing good work in Iraq and God is with us. Second, pray for those of us who have chosen to serve our nation and the liberties espoused by our Constitution. Third, I ask that you never take advantage of the liberties guaranteed by the shedding of free blood, never take for granted the freedoms granted by our Constitution. For those liberties would be merely ink on paper were it not for the sacrifice of generations of Americans who heard the call of duty and responded heart, mind and soul with ‘Yes, I will.’’” (5/29/06, page A4)

“Find a veteran this Memorial Day and say, ‘Thank you for my freedom.’ (Pray to GOD every day and thank HIM for your freedom—my addition.) Visit a military cemetery and thank God someone was willing to die so you and I might live in freedom. And support those, like my friend Daniel Dobson, who for the second time is about to make an installment payment toward the price free people must pay in order that we might continue to enjoy liberty.” (5/29/06, page A4)

The above quote was the end of the article. However, earlier in the column he had this quote: “Chaplains prayed with the wounded and for the dead. If the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union—my addition) objects, someone should tell them to shut up.” (5/29/06, page A4)

At one time, I believe that the ACLU actually seemed concerned about correctly adhering to the provisions of the United States Constitution. Gradually over time, I believe the organization changed its apparent concern from following the Constitution to promoting that which they desired to be Constitutional. They discovered they could rewrite the Constitution by convincing the members of the Supreme Court that “the Court knows best” rather than “the Constitution knows best.” Thus, the Court could reinterpret the Constitution to implement that which could not be implemented by state or congressional law.

However, there are organizations and citizens opposed to the murder of unborn babies, the immoral concept that homosexual behavior is a protected right, and the continuing attempts of the ACLU to build a “wall of separation of church and state” where none is required by the Constitution.

Recently, I received a letter from one such organization—the ACLJ (American Center for Law and Justice) in relation to a court case in San Diego, California. The following are excerpts from that letter.

“After a 17-year legal battle between the City of San Diego and a self-described atheist, a judge has order San Diego officials to remove a giant cross from a hilltop park or start paying $5,000 a day in fines. Defying the order is something cash-strapped San Diego cannot afford. Still, Mayor Jerry Sanders said he would ask the city attorney to appeal.

U.S. District Judge Gordon Thompson, Jr., gave the city 90 days to comply with a 1991 injunction forbidding the cross on public property. The 29-foot-high cross was dedicated as a memorial to veterans in 1954 on a hill that overlooks seaside La Jolla.

The city has tried to sell the half-acre beneath the cross to a non-profit association that maintains the surrounding memorial walls. But federal judges have repeatedly blocked the sale, saying the transactions were designed to favor a buyer who would keep the cross in place.”

“This cross…marks a memorial to fallen soldiers, heroes who deserve to be honored and respected. And a recent survey says 76% of the city’s residents want the cross to stay!” [A survey that you are not likely to see printed or spoken of in the news media—my addition] (American Center for Law and Justice, letter dated May 22, 2006, page 1 and 3)

Answer these questions. Do you believe the veterans who have fought and/or died in past wars sacrificed so that a handful of judges, an atheist, and the ACLU could force their will upon the American people? Do you believe the individuals in the military today are sacrificing so that a handful of judges, an atheist, and the ACLU can force their will upon the American people? If the ACLU, these self-important judges, and this atheist are ultimately successful in this case, will they then attempt to remove all crosses in every public cemetery in America tomorrow?

Crosses have been used in public cemeteries in the United States since before the adoption of the United States Constitution and the addition of the first ten Amendments. Why did not judges earlier in our history rule that these crosses were unconstitutional? Are our present day judges more in tune with the Constitution? Are our present day judges rewriting the Constitution by judicial fiat? Why are we allowing Courtocracy in our democracy? Why are we surrendering our democracy to unelected federal and elected and unelected state judges? Is a courtocracy better than a democracy of the people?

I have not been following the San Diego case and do not know if a final solution has been reached. Since the original decision two years ago was at the district level, it might still be in the court system. Since the above was written, the two strict constructionists appointed by President Bush to the Supreme Court have slowed down the growth of Courtocracy particularly at the federal level but it has not yet been stopped.

The latest, most public, and most egregious example of Courtocracy (the tyrannical rule of a few judges) was the California Supreme Court decision to permit marriage between homosexuals which precipitated my present series on homosexuality. I will (the LORD willing) conclude this series with more thoughts on that court decision. For tonight, the conclusion is obvious. Those who believe that our democracy should be preserved still have work to do. Courtocracy has not yet been stopped in this nation.

Remember: Courtocracy is NOT the implementation of the “rule of law.” It is the Court CREATING law contrary to the “rule of law.” Those who say otherwise are misleading the public. Courtocracy is a perversion of democracy! Ultimately, Courtocracy will replace our democracy if not stopped!