Supreme Court usurps its authority again

Remember the Vision Forum “Giveaway” See the post of June 14, 2008 for complete details: “Vision Forum ‘Giveaway’”

I suggest you check out the following website if you are a policy holder of Farmers Insurance Group or thinking about having them insure you in any capacity: www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com




https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367


The above link is for a company—Vision Forum—that provides unique products for the family. I am an affiliate for the company and receive a small commission whenever someone uses this link and then makes an unreturned purchase while using the link. Check it out. I think you might like the products offered. I do. See my more complete explanation on my post of February 1, 2008 entitled “Affiliate program with Vision Forum.”

Based upon past historical data: 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS have occurred in the last 24 hours in the United States. See my post “BABY HOLOCAUST” posted January 22, 2008.

I’ve been involved in a problem one of my clients has with Farmers Insurance Group. My previous posts in relation to this problem were:

September 10, 2007 post: “Beware of Farmers Insurance Group”
September 11, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group’s response”
September 18, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company received the requested list”
September 19, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company’s response to the list”
October 16, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and my request for information”
November 27, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group does not respond to my request”
January 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group latest stall”
January 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group is sent a response”
January 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group pays some money”
January 19, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group continues to be obstinate”
January 26, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group receives another request”
February 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group shows how low they will go?”
February 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group: If I were going to respond to the final letter”
February 13, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and associated companies”
February 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and how others rate the company”

I will not be continuing my Creationism posts today. I do plan to return to them soon.

Then, I plan to answer the response about Iraq. I am sorry for the change in plans. Plans, in reality, often are altered for one reason or another. “The best laid plans … often go astray.” Thank you for your understanding and patience.

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish, barbaric decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com

www.childpredators.com

www.lifedynamics.com

www.libertylegal.org

www.alliancedefensefund.org

www.searchtv.org

(I’m still having problems with my server and haven’t been able to post—hopefully tonight. I plan to return to my series on homosexuality and the California Supreme Court Tuesday night or more likely Wednesday morning. For this post, a current event created by the edict of the United States Supreme Court as it continues to push Courtocracy upon the nation.)

The U.S. Supreme Court ought to try reading the U.S. Constitution before rendering its decisions! The court Thursday again usurped its authority and dictated a decision that ignores the provisions and/or lack thereof within the Constitution. Some members of the Supreme Court really seem to believe that they are the Constitution of the United States. It is the same old story of five appointed, unelected lawyers believing that “they know best.”

The story was published in the Peoria Journal Star on June 13, 2008 on page 1A and 11A. The article is long so I will only quote portions of the material.

“In a stinging rebuke to President Bush’s anti-terror policies, a deeply divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that foreign detainees held for years at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba have the right to appeal to U.S. civilian courts to challenge their indefinite imprisonment without charges. (Note the following: these detainees are FOREIGN and ARE NOT U.S. citizens. These FOREIGN detainees are being detained as military prisoners and yet five members of the Supreme Court are giving them the “right” to appeal to civilian courts—my addition.)

Bush said he strongly disagrees with the decision—the third time the court has repudiated him on the detainees—and suggested he might seek yet another law to keep terror suspects locked up at the prison camp, even as his presidency winds down. (pg 1A and 11A)

(The remaining quotes are from page 11A)

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the 5-4 high court majority, acknowledged the terrorism threat the U.S. faces—the administration’s justification for the detentions—but he declared, “The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times.” (That is true but they are not designed to allow the Supreme Court or any other court to usurp the Constitution and the laws of the nation as the Supreme Court has now been doing for many years. The Courts are erroneously claiming to be upholding the Constitution when, in fact, certain members of the Court are yearly rewriting the Constitution to suit their own purposes and desires —my addition.)

In a blistering dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia said the decision ‘will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.’”

“Kennedy said federal judges could ultimately order some detainees to be released, but he also said such orders would depend on security concerns and other circumstance. The ruling itself won’t result in any immediate releases.” (Does this mean that the CIVILIAN courts are to ultimately determine who is and who is not a military prisoner!!! When did they get that power and that expertise???—my addition)

“Most are classed as enemy combatants and held on suspicion of terrorism or links to al-Qaida and the Taliban.” (Note again: These are FOREIGN TERRORISTS or suspected FOREIGN TERRORISTS—my addition)

“But James Cohen, a Fordham University law professor who has two clients at Guantanamo, predicted Bush would continue seeking ways to resist the ruling. ‘Nothing is going to happen between June 12 and January 20,’ when the next president takes office, Cohen said.” (I should hope that is TRUE!!! When did FOREIGN terrorists get their own lawyers? I wonder how many American citizens who were murdered by Al-Qaida had lawyers representing them to the terrorists before they were MURDERED. How many Iraqis who were murdered by roadside bombs, by car bombs, by suicide bombers in public areas were represented by lawyers before they were MURDERED???—my addition)

“Guantanamo generally and the tribunals were conceived on the idea that ‘Constitutional protections wouldn’t apply,’ Swift said. ‘The court said the Constitution applies. They’re (meaning the military tribunals—my addition) in big trouble.” (The Constitution no where applies to FOREIGN military and terrorist groups. NO WHERE!!! The Supreme Court has again rewritten the Constitution to suit there own desires, concepts, and prejudices!!! The question is: Why do we the people continue to allow it to happen. Do we really prefer a Courtocracy to a democracy. It seems we do!!!—my addition)

“At its heart, the 70-page ruling says that the detainees have the same rights as anyone else in custody in the United States to contest their detention before a judge.” (ABSOLUTE and UTTER NONSENSE!!!!!!! These are FOREIGN TERRORISTS!!!!!!!—my addition)

“Chief Justice John Roberts, in his own dissent to Thursday’s ruling, criticized the majority for striking down what he called ‘the most generous set of procedural protections EVER (my capitalization—my addition) afforded aliens detained in this country as ENEMY (my capitalization—my addition) combatants.’

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas also dissented.

Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and John Paul Stevens (the libertine four—my addition)—the court’s more liberal members—joined Kennedy to form the majority.” (These four should have been impeached and convicted a long time ago for usurping power and violating their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States—my addition.)

“Scalia, citing a report by Senate Republicans, said at least 30 prisoners have returned to the battlefield following their release from Guantanamo.”

Did you read that indictment of the courts? “AT LEAST 30 PRISONERS HAVE RETURNED TO THE BATTLEFIELD FOLLOWING THEIR RELEASE FROM GUANTANAMO.” What kind of insane people would even contemplate releasing FOREIGN ENEMY combatants so that they can return to the BATTLEFIELD to once again attempt to KILL Americans and others that they disagree with? THAT IS INSANE! ISN’T THAT TREASONOUS???

Here is what the Constitution of the United States (the document the Supreme Court is suppose to be obeying) has to say about the situation:

(The numbering of the following is my own. I am not listing all the powers specified—just those which pertain to the situation)

“Article I, Section 8. The Congress shall have Power …

1) To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

2) To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; (That seems significant! Repeating a portion of this power that CONGRESS possesses [NOT the COURTS]: MAKE RULES CONCERNING CAPTURES ON LAND AND WATER)

3) To raise and support Armies, but no appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

4) To provide and maintain a Navy;

5) To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

6) To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

7) To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

8) To make ALL (my capitalization—my addition) Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and All (my capitalization—my addition) other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States or in any Department or Officer thereof.” (This last paragraph quoted is the last paragraph of Article I, Section 8.)

“Article II, Section 2. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; … and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”

What powers does the United States Constitution give to the courts including the United States Supreme Court in relation to the carrying out of war and the treatment of FOREIGN combatants? ABSOLUTELY NONE!!!

Does the United States Constitution declare that FOREIGN individuals have the same protections provided in the United States Constitution that United States citizens have? NO!!! NO!!! NO!!!

Does the United States Constitution declare that FOREIGN COMBATANTS have the same protections provided in the United States Constitution that United States citizens have? NO!!! NO!!! NO!!! A THOUSAND TIMES—NO!!!

Does the United States Constitution declare that FOREIGN COMBATANTS who are waging war against the United States have the same protections provided in the United States Constitution that United States citizens have? NO!!! NO!!! NO!!! A MILLION TIMES—NO!!!

I deliberately left out one paragraph in the article until now. That paragraph stated:

“Human rights groups and MANY (my capitalization—my addition) Democratic members of Congress celebrated the ruling as affirming the nation’s commitment to the rule of law. (What nonsense!!! It is not affirming the rule of law!!! It is affirming the illegal edicts and beliefs of five unelected members of the Supreme Court—my addition.) Several Republican lawmakers called it a decision that put FOREIGN TERRORISTS’ RIGHTS (my capitalization—my addition) above the safety of the American people.”

Do you remember this quote from the article? It is the very last paragraph in the news story. “Scalia, citing a report by Senate Republicans, said at least 30 prisoners have returned to the battlefield following their release from Guantanamo.”

Did you know that during World War II, that the United States kept German prisoners of war within the United States including some in the Morton, Illinois area? And guess what? Not one of those held prisoners of war were given a civilian trial. NOT ONE!!!

This is what the Constitution says about Treason which incidentally is in Article III which is the article which defines the powers and duties of the courts.

“Article III, Section 3. TREASON (my capitalization—my addition) against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”

Questions: Is illegally and UNCONSTITUTIONALLY declaring that FOREIGN ENEMY combatants must be given a day in court in civilian court an instance of GIVING THEM (our enemies) AID AND COMFORT??? ARE FIVE of our chief justices GUILTY of TREASON??? Why is this nation allowing the Supreme Court to pervert and rewrite the CONSTITUTION of the United States??? Does this Court even realize that WE ARE AT WAR??? THAT THE TERRORISTS WANT TO KILL US??? THAT THE TERRORISTS HAVE MURDERED INNOCENT AMERICAN CITIZENS???

We now live in a Supreme Court created world where FOREIGN TERRORISTS have Constitutional rights and UNBORN AMERCAN CITIZENS who are daily murdered DO NOT!!! HOW UTTERLY ABSURD!!!

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)

Thank you for your past purchases making the present giveaway possible! Don’t forget the current sale going on until June 17th—“The Ancient Wisdom for Modern Families” Audio Series saving 40% while supplies last. See previous post—“Vision Forum sale …” June 13, 2008—for more details.

https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367