Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Federal Courts and Total Disregard for the Constitution



“Same-Sex Marriage and the Insignificance of Men and Women
Tuesday, August 17, 2010

The left passionately supports the most remarkable and radical change in modern social history—the redefinition of marriage from male-female to include male-male and female-female.

Marriage is the building block of society. Changing its nature will therefore change society. Among other things, same-sex marriage means that because sex (now called ‘gender’) no longer matters for society’s most important institution, it no longer matters in general.

Men and women as distinct entities no longer have significance. Which is exactly what the cultural left and the gay rights movement advocate—even though the vast majority of Americans who support same-sex marriage do not realize that this is what they are supporting. Most Americans who support same-sex marriage feel (and ‘feel’ is the crucial verb here, as the change to same-sex marriage is much more felt than thought through) that gays should have the right to marry a member of their own sex. It is perceived as unfair to gays that they cannot do so. And that is true. It is unfair to gays.

But the price paid for eliminating this unfairness (And the Constitution nor anything else guarantees “fairness.” The obvious question is “Who decides fairness?” Secondly, it is an impossibility to make all things “fair” even if everyone or even a majority of people could agree on what is “fair.” The whole concept of “fairness” as promoted by the libertines is absurd. Is it “fair” that some people are attractive and some people are not? Is it “fair” that some people are tall and some people are short? The list could go on for a very long time!—my addition) that is enormous: It is the end of marriage as every society has known it. And it is more than that. It is the end of any significance to gender. Men and women are now declared interchangeable. That is why, as I noted in a recent column—the ‘T’ has been added to ‘GLB:’ ‘Transgendered’ has been added to ‘Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual.’ ‘T’ does not represent transsexuals—people who choose to change their sex.

No one is arguing against such people. ‘Transgendered’ refers to people who are members of one sex and who wish to publicly act as if they are members of the other sex, e.g., men wearing women’s clothing in public. The transgendered who publicly act out are living the cultural Left’s primary agenda: rendering gender insignificant. Your sex is what you feel it is; and if you feel both, you are both. Gender doesn’t matter.

That is why Judge Walker (The inferior federal court judge who had the audacity to rule a California Constitutional Amendment unconstitutional according to the United States Constitution!—my addition) and his supporters dismiss the argument that, all things being equal, it is better for children to be raised by a married man and woman than by two men or two women. If Walker or GLBT activists and their supporters admitted that children need a mother and father, they would be affirming that there is great significance to the differences between men and women. (And there is! That is why GOD created both men and women. Could he have created two men? Of course! Could he have created two women? Of course! He made man and woman for a reason! And man does NOT have the ability or the authority to change that which GOD has created!—my addition)

They reject that. Instead, they and Walker offer studies that purport to prove that it makes no difference whether or not a child has parents of both sexes. These academic (Questionable term for the actual “studies!”—my addition) studies are as unserious as all those academic studies of a generation ago that ‘proved’ that boys do not prefer to play with trucks and soldiers but would be just as happy to play with dolls and tea sets, and that girls do not prefer dolls and tea sets but would be just as happy to play with trucks and soldiers.

These newer ‘studies’ of same-sex parents are as valid as the earlier propaganda (EXACTLY what they are!—my addition) in the guise of scientific studies. Like the boy-girl studies, these were conducted by academics with agendas: the denial of male-female differences and the promotion of same-sex marriage. That many Americans believe these studies—studies that are in any case based on a small number of same-sex couples raising a small number of children, during a short amount of time (a couple of decades), based on the researchers’ own notions of what a healthy and successful young person is—only proves how effectively colleges and graduate schools have succeeded in teaching a generation of Americans not to think critically but to accept ‘studies’ in place of common sense. (VERY TRUE!!!—my addition)

Ask anyone who supports same-sex marriage this: Do you believe that a mother has something unique to give to a child that no father can give and that a father has something unique to give a child that no mother can give?

One has to assume that most people—including supporters of same-sex marriage—would respond in the affirmative. How, then, can they support same-sex marriage? The left’s trinity—compassion, fairness and equality (As THEY define compassion, fairness, and equality—my addition)—is one reason. And ‘studies’ and ‘facts’ are another.

That is exactly how so many college graduates came to believe that boys would be happy with tea sets, and girls would be happy with trucks—compassion, fairness, equality and ‘studies.’ That is also how many Americans, including a judge who overturned a state’s constitutional amendment, have come to believe that never having a mother or never having a father makes absolutely no difference to a child.

And if mothers and fathers are interchangeable, men as men and women as women lose their significance.”

The libertines have the “right” to believe what they want. The libertines have the “right” to push their agenda. The libertines have the “right” to try to change and to change the nation in their image.

They do NOT have the right to violate the Constitution of the United States and our laws to do so. We the people have allowed this to happen. As I’ve said repeatedly, one of the major methods used to advance their unholy agenda has been and is through the federal court system. They have and are accomplishing their goals through court decisions that would never have been accepted through the legislative process or even through executive orders.

Part of the reason they are successful is because we the people do not know the Constitution of the United States and therefore do not know when the Constitution of the United States is being violated. This instance of an inferior federal court judge ruling a provision of the California Constitution unconstitutional is a prime example of this lack of knowledge. And a prime example of we the people allowing a violation of our Constitution without much resistance. Even those who protest seem to accept the violate of the Constitution in the process of their resistance.

As I’ve said repeatedly, this inferior federal court judge had and has NO jurisdiction over a State. NONE! The Constitution of the United States of America clearly states in Article III, Section 2, ¶ 2: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.” Who has jurisdiction when a State is a party to the case? The United States Supreme Court!!! And only the United States Supreme Court until and unless the Constitution is amended!!! An inferior federal court has no such jurisdiction! The inferior federal courts in the United States have NO jurisdiction over States! NONE!!!

It’s time, it is past time to TAKE BACK THE NATION!!! It’s time, it past time to be obedient to the Constitution of the United States!!! It’s time, it is past time to TAKE BACK THE NATION!!!