“Safe” Sex, HIV, 50,000 New Infections, Not so “Safe”

Petitions for 1) supporting marriage between one man and one woman—traditional, GOD-given marriage, 2) stopping taxpayer funding of the MURDER of unborn babies, 3) protecting the Second Amendment, 4) preventing amnesty for illegals, 5) preventing an internet tax, and 6) stopping the Common Core Curriculum are at


http://christiangunslinger1.blogspot.com

Videos in relation to: 1) homosexual marriage 2) MURDER of unborn babies and 3) fairness are at

http://christiangunslinger1.blogspot.com

—

New Petition: Petition to stop the food stamp madness!

http://www.grassfire.com/982/petition.asp?Ref_ID=20614&CID=982&RID=38545456

—

WATCH this video:

“FLASHBACK: When Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid, Dick Durbin Swore They Would Never Back Gay (Homosexual—my addition) Marriage …”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7a2y_Vxi7s&feature=player_embedded

The above video is from C-Span 2 which means the statements occurred on the floor of the Senate. The year is either 2005 or 2006 when the Republicans controlled the Senate. The debate is about a Constitutional Amendment to define marriage as being between one man and one woman. The Amendment would have passed in the Senate if some RINO Republicans like John McCain had not voted against it. As a result, we now have the Supreme Court considering if homosexuals somehow have the “right” to have faux “marriage!”

—

Obamacare for everyone including Congress or no one

http://www.patriotvoices.com/stop_government_hypocrisy

—

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/04/30/despite-condoms-and-safe-sex-50000-new-annual-usa-hiv-infections/

“Despite Condoms and ‘Safe Sex’ 50,000 New Annual USA HIV Infections

by Wesley J. Smith

Despite decades of calling sex with a condom ‘safe sex,’ or even worse, ‘safer sex,’ there are still 50,000 new infections in the USA each year. And now, a federal panel is calling for HIV testing to be offered to all adolescents and adults to the age of 65.

From the LA Times story:

http://www.latimes.com/health/la-sci-hiv-screening-20130430,0,5454357.story

The recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force seeks to address one of the key challenges in the fight against HIV/AIDS: The window during which patients respond best to treatment is also the time when symptoms of the disease are least noticeable. ‘HIV is a critical public health problem, and there are still 50,000 new infections per year,’ said Dr. Doug Owens, a task force member and professor of medicine at Stanford University. ‘There’s very good evidence that treatment is effective when given earlier, at a time when people are often asymptomatic. So the only way they would know that they had HIV, or that they needed treatment, is to be screened.’

Based on a review of more recent data–including evidence that as many as 25% of people who carry HIV in the U.S. have no idea they are infected–task force members concluded that early detection would ‘result in substantial public health benefits’ that outweighed any risks of widespread screening.

Based on what was reported, it would appear that the Task Force did not issue a clarion call for restricting one’s sexual behavior (Of course not! To the Left such a call is an infringement of a “right” to be promiscuous!—my addition). That’s par for the course. I saw a story recently of a vaccine trial with some 2,000 volunteers that was stopped

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2013/04/26/179231916/failure-of-latest-hiv-vaccine-test-a-huge-disappointment

because more people got HIV with the vaccine than without it. That certainly implied that at least some of the subjects were willing to risk infection by engaging in risky behaviors.

This is truth: The only actual ‘safe sex’ is that between mutually monogamous, uninfected partners (One of which is male and the other female! Which is what GOD intends. He intends it for our good not for our harm! Those who promote promiscuity, intended or not, promote behavior for our harm. And that is a fact!—my addition). Anything else is risk. Sex with condoms is properly called ‘less safe,’ since it provides some but not absolute protection. And sex with no protection at all is ‘unsafe.’ That isn’t moralism (Being moral is a good in and of itself but it also has side benefits that the promiscuous will not be able to say!—my addition). It is basic health science.

LifeNews.com Note: Wesley J. Smith, J.D., is a special consultant to the Center for Bioethics and Culture and a bioethics attorney who blogs at Secondhand Smoke.”

Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. Whoever sows to please their flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; whoever sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.”