House Vote Tomorrow to Limit Abortions (AKA MURDER) to the First 20 Weeks
I’m back! I have not posted since the Friday before the Memorial Day weekend. I had hoped to begin posting the Tuesday after Memorial Day. As you know, it didn’t happen. I moved at the end of May and didn‘t have time to post. I planned to begin moving Friday the 31st. However, because of the forecast of tornadoes in Missouri and Oklahoma for Friday, I stayed in a motel Friday night in Morton. I am now settled in my new State of Texas. I am thrilled to have left the corrupt, immoral State government now in control of Illinois—the Democrats control the General Assembly with a veto proof majority and the Governor’s office! The results are demonstrably bad!
From: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/06/11/bill-to-ban-abortions-after-20-weeks-needed-to-stop-more-kermit-gosnells/
“Bill to Ban Abortions After 20 Weeks Needed to Stop More Kermit Gosnells
by Steven Ertelt
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
6/11/13
A U.S. House committee will vote tomorrow on a bill that would ban abortions nationwide after 20 weeks of pregnancy and the editors at National Review released an editorial today about why the measure is so important.
They say the bill is necessary to stop future abortion practitioners like Kermit Gosnell, who kill babies in gruesome abortion procedures that are tantamount to infanticide.
As National Review writes:
‘Representative Trent Franks (R., Ariz.) has introduced a bill that would ban abortions performed after the 20th week of pregnancy. In the wake of the horrific trial of abortionist/murderer of newborns Kermit Gosnell, that bill has passed out of subcommittee—with every Democrat opposed—and is being sent to the Judiciary Committee. It deserves to become law.
To be sure, the bill is at odds with current Supreme Court jurisprudence, and it is certain to be challenged. The Court should welcome the opportunity to revisit its rulings on the subject, which have been by any measure extreme, to say nothing of their fundamental lack of constitutional merit.
The Fourteenth Amendment commands that no state shall ‘deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws,’ and directs Congress to enforce the guarantee. In many cases, under current law, the newborns butchered in Kermit Gosnell’s Philadelphia abattoir would have been denied the protection of the law had Gosnell stabbed and dismembered them a few inches away from where he did, or had he done so a few minutes before he did. The distinction between an unborn child a few moments (or a few weeks) away from delivery and an infant is a judicial creation with no basis in moral logic. The horror with which the American public regarded the evidence in the Gosnell trial suggests that this is, despite four decades of indoctrination, understood at a level deeper than politics. While Americans still support access to abortion in particular circumstances, they favor many restrictions on abortion and especially on late-term abortions. Republicans need not be meek on the subject of late-term abortions; if the Democrats want to be the party of Kermit Gosnell, they are welcome to it.
There is an additional political reason not to shy away from this issue. If 2012 taught us anything, it is that when Republicans do not have an abortion agenda of their own, the Democrats will invent one for them—one that is sure to be less popular than banning late-term abortions. The Democrats invented a “War on Women” out of whole cloth the last time around; 2014 is unlikely to be any different. Better to be on offense pressing for good policies than on defense explaining away imaginary ones.
The Supreme Court is wrong about abortion, and it has been for 40 years. It has been constitutionally wrong, morally wrong, and politically wrong. Congress and the state legislatures have the constitutional power to restrict abortion, and they have a moral obligation to see to it, at the very least, that the crimes of Kermit Gosnell are not endlessly replicated across the country. And while the electorate may not be entirely in the pro-life camp, it is not so extreme in its embrace of abortion as the Emily’s List faction imagines. Even if restricting late-term abortions were a guaranteed losing proposition, it would be a fight worth having and losing. But it would be better to have that fight and win, and this is the time for it.’
The full House Judiciary Committee will vote on Wednesday on a Congressional bill that would ban abortions nationwide at 20 weeks of pregnancy.
Last week, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice voted on a party-line vote 6-4 for the bill, with Republicans supporting the ban on late-term abortions and Democrats opposing it.
During the hearing, former abortion practitioner Anthony Levatino told members of the committee the gruesome details of his former abortion practice and how he became pro-life following the tragic automobile accident of his child.
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/05/23/doctor-who-did-1200-abortions-tells-congress-to-ban-them/
Another bombshell dropped during the hearing came from Dr. Maureen Condic, who is Associate Professor of Neurobiology and Adjunct Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Utah School of Medicine. She testified that the unborn child is capable of reacting to pain as early as 8-10 weeks.
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/05/23/expert-tells-congress-unborn-babies-can-feel-pain-starting-at-8-weeks/
This is when most abortions in America take place.
The committee also saw graphic pictures of babies who were killed by Douglas Karpen, who is considered the second Kermit Gosnell.”
From: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/06/11/bill-to-ban-abortions-after-20-weeks-needed-to-stop-more-kermit-gosnells/
“Bill to Ban Abortions After 20 Weeks Needed to Stop More Kermit Gosnells
by Steven Ertelt
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
6/11/13
A U.S. House committee will vote tomorrow on a bill that would ban abortions nationwide after 20 weeks of pregnancy and the editors at National Review released an editorial today about why the measure is so important.
They say the bill is necessary to stop future abortion practitioners like Kermit Gosnell, who kill babies in gruesome abortion procedures that are tantamount to infanticide.
As National Review writes:
‘Representative Trent Franks (R., Ariz.) has introduced a bill that would ban abortions performed after the 20th week of pregnancy. In the wake of the horrific trial of abortionist/murderer of newborns Kermit Gosnell, that bill has passed out of subcommittee—with every Democrat opposed—and is being sent to the Judiciary Committee. It deserves to become law.
To be sure, the bill is at odds with current Supreme Court jurisprudence, and it is certain to be challenged. The Court should welcome the opportunity to revisit its rulings on the subject, which have been by any measure extreme, to say nothing of their fundamental lack of constitutional merit.
The Fourteenth Amendment commands that no state shall ‘deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws,’ and directs Congress to enforce the guarantee. In many cases, under current law, the newborns butchered in Kermit Gosnell’s Philadelphia abattoir would have been denied the protection of the law had Gosnell stabbed and dismembered them a few inches away from where he did, or had he done so a few minutes before he did. The distinction between an unborn child a few moments (or a few weeks) away from delivery and an infant is a judicial creation with no basis in moral logic. The horror with which the American public regarded the evidence in the Gosnell trial suggests that this is, despite four decades of indoctrination, understood at a level deeper than politics. While Americans still support access to abortion in particular circumstances, they favor many restrictions on abortion and especially on late-term abortions. Republicans need not be meek on the subject of late-term abortions; if the Democrats want to be the party of Kermit Gosnell, they are welcome to it.
There is an additional political reason not to shy away from this issue. If 2012 taught us anything, it is that when Republicans do not have an abortion agenda of their own, the Democrats will invent one for them—one that is sure to be less popular than banning late-term abortions. The Democrats invented a “War on Women” out of whole cloth the last time around; 2014 is unlikely to be any different. Better to be on offense pressing for good policies than on defense explaining away imaginary ones.
The Supreme Court is wrong about abortion, and it has been for 40 years. It has been constitutionally wrong, morally wrong, and politically wrong. Congress and the state legislatures have the constitutional power to restrict abortion, and they have a moral obligation to see to it, at the very least, that the crimes of Kermit Gosnell are not endlessly replicated across the country. And while the electorate may not be entirely in the pro-life camp, it is not so extreme in its embrace of abortion as the Emily’s List faction imagines. Even if restricting late-term abortions were a guaranteed losing proposition, it would be a fight worth having and losing. But it would be better to have that fight and win, and this is the time for it.’
The full House Judiciary Committee will vote on Wednesday on a Congressional bill that would ban abortions nationwide at 20 weeks of pregnancy.
Last week, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice voted on a party-line vote 6-4 for the bill, with Republicans supporting the ban on late-term abortions and Democrats opposing it.
During the hearing, former abortion practitioner Anthony Levatino told members of the committee the gruesome details of his former abortion practice and how he became pro-life following the tragic automobile accident of his child.
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/05/23/doctor-who-did-1200-abortions-tells-congress-to-ban-them/
Another bombshell dropped during the hearing came from Dr. Maureen Condic, who is Associate Professor of Neurobiology and Adjunct Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Utah School of Medicine. She testified that the unborn child is capable of reacting to pain as early as 8-10 weeks.
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/05/23/expert-tells-congress-unborn-babies-can-feel-pain-starting-at-8-weeks/
This is when most abortions in America take place.
The committee also saw graphic pictures of babies who were killed by Douglas Karpen, who is considered the second Kermit Gosnell.”
posted by Christian Gunslinger at 8:59 PM
<< Home