Saturday, January 04, 2014

Teenage Girls: It Is Permitted to Murder Your Unborn Baby but Not to Murder Your Skin


“Why Do Teen Girls Need Parental Consent for Tanning But Not an Abortion?
by Tom McClusky | Washington, DC |

With the New Year come new laws. If you live in Colorado you can now light up a doobie without fear of (local) arrest.

For everyone a new IRS rule will treat automatic tips added to large parties as taxable wages, which could mean that automatic gratuity may go away altogether (Already suppose to claim tips as income—my addition).

In California transgendered kindergartners (only in California would those two words EVER go together) can now decide which bathroom they wish to use. And in Texas the minimum age for visiting tanning salons has gone up from 16 1/2 to 18.

The regulations on tanning salons have grown considerably over the last few years. Currently in 14 states you need to be accompanied by a parent if you are a certain age and wish to indoor tan. In 38 states you need parental consent or permission if you are a certain age (usually 18 and under) and you wish to indoor tan.

In one state, California, it is deemed so dangerous that if you are under the age of 18 you are not allowed to use an indoor tanning bed, meaning that for thousands of Californian kids to get any sun they will have to the unthinkable—get it off the streets like I did as a kid.

How dangerous is artificial tanning for kids? According to the Center for Disease Control pretty dangerous:

Using a tanning bed, booth, or sunlamp to get tan is called ‘indoor tanning.’ Indoor tanning has been linked with skin cancers including melanoma (the deadliest type of skin cancer), squamous cell carcinoma, and cancers of the eye (ocular melanoma).

Indoor tanning exposes users to both UV-A and UV-B rays, which damage the skin and can lead to cancer. Using a tanning bed is particularly dangerous for younger users; people who begin tanning younger than age 35 have a 59% higher risk of melanoma. Using tanning beds also increases the risk of wrinkles and eye damage, and changes skin texture.

So it seems universally agreeable that minors usually are not capable of making rational decisions and are less likely to think about long term ramifications of their actions and it makes sense that such decisions are best left to their parents.

So then why do so many politicians, including the Democratic Leadership in Washington, D.C., oppose the same type of restrictions when it comes to abortion (And deny choice? Because the baby murderers know the same thing we do. Every change to pro-life is a step closer to ending the MURDER OF unborn babies. Ending the MURDER of unborn babies would mean losing a lot of money that goes to the Left!—my addition)? They also support Planned Parenthood and their ilk that have a long history of covering up statutory rape (Follow the money!—my addition). As recent as just a few months ago one such abortionist failed to report the abuse of a number of young girls, including a 13 year old who he performed an abortion on.

While the numbers for abortion reporting are always shaky as the abortion industry doesn’t keep good watch over itself according to the CDC while abortion numbers in general are going down they are increasing for one age group—girls under the age of 15.

In 2010, adolescents aged 15-19 years accounted for 14.6% of all abortions and had an abortion rate of 11.7 abortions per 1,000 adolescents aged 15-19 years. Throughout the period of analysis, the percentage of all abortions accounted for by adolescents and the adolescent abortion rate decreased.

In contrast to the percentage distribution of abortions and abortion rates by age, abortion ratios in 2010 and throughout the entire period of analysis were highest among adolescents and lowest among women aged 30-39 years. Abortion ratios decreased from 2001 to 2010 for women in all age groups except for those aged <15 br="" for="" increased.="" they="" whom="" years="">

While advocates for tanning regulations point to the risks of getting cancer, some statistics show that abortion holds the same risks. As reported by, a new study by Chinese researchers, published in the peer-reviewed journal Cancer Causes and Control, found a 44 percent increased breast cancer risk after an abortion. It also found that the risk grew significantly with subsequent abortions—a 76 percent increase after two abortions, 89 percent after three.

Cancer is not the only risk—other possible risks to young girls who get an abortion include future ectopic pregnancies. The risk of an ectopic pregnancy is twice as high for women who have had one abortion, and up to four times as high for women with two or more previous abortions. In addition abortion has been found to cause psychological stress as well. The largest and most definitive analysis of the mental health risks associated with abortion was published in the prestigious British Journal of Psychiatry in 2011. The meta-analysis conducted by Professor Priscilla Coleman, PhD of Bowling Green State University, examines twenty-two major studies published between 1995 and 2009 involving a total of 877,181 women, of whom 163,831 had abortions. The study found:

· Women who have had an abortion have an 81% higher risk of subsequent mental health problems compared to women who have not had an abortion.

· Women who aborted have a 138% higher risk of mental health problems compared to women who have given birth.

· Women who aborted have a 55% higher risk of mental health problems compared to women with an ‘unplanned’ pregnancy who gave birth.

· Women with a history of abortion have higher rates of anxiety (34% higher), depression (37%), alcohol use/misuse (110%), marijuana use (230%), and suicidal behavior (155%), compared to those who have not had an abortion.

Instead of looking at the evidence the deniers attack the messengers and place their fealty to abortion over any health concerns over young girls or rights of the parents (Of course they do! The MURDER of unborn babies is one of their best cash cows and they will let nothing get in the way of those MURDERS if they can help it!—my addition). The overwhelming evidence shows that parental involvement laws in regards to abortion help protect children and save lives. If it is too dangerous to tan can they really argue that abortion, where the life of one child always ends, is safer (Not logically. However, the MURDER of the unborn has never been dealt with logically by the Left! If it would be, there would never be such MURDERS! No one has the right to MURDER another Person! No one!—my addition)?

LifeNews Note: Tom McClusky writes for March for Life.

Young or old. Rich or poor. Black or white. Married or unmarried. Christian or atheist. Abortion is ALWAYS MURDER! ALWAYS!

The March for Life in Washington D.C. is January 22, 2014. Roe v. Wade will be the illegal, unconstitutionallawof the land for 41 years on that date!

We will have been MURDERING unborn babies for 41 years! A total abomination for any nation! A total atrocity for any nation! A total evil for any nation!

No one has the rightto MURDER another person! NO ONE!

Christians were bold in the First Century church! Are Christians as bold today?

Christians were resolute in the First Century church! Are Christians as resolute today?

Christians stood for the truth in the First Century church! Are Christians standing for the truth today?

If not Christians, who? If not now, when?

This is my two part suggestion to Tea Party groups, social conservatives, Constitutionalists, and anyone else who wants to save our Republic from the approaching destruction.

1) Run as many conservative candidates in as many Republican primaries as possible.

2) Then, run as many independent and/or third party candidates as possible in as many races as possible where we did not win the primary.

That is why I am working to get the Constitution Party on the ballot in Texas. If we get on the ballot, we will have two Congressional House candidates running and two State candidates running. Getting on the ballot is the first step. Winning elections is the second. Winning elections will grow the Party. The Constitution Party is much more in line with the Tea Party movement than is the Republican Party. And I have been involved with all three!

If elected to Congress, I will not, under any circumstances, vote for present Speaker of the House John Boehner to be Speaker of the House. I call on every Republican primary candidate running in Texas Congressional District 19 to publicly (in writing) make the same pledge. It would not be a bad idea for every Republican candidate running for the House of Representatives to give the same pledge. See my post at on December 16, 2013 entitled “Speaker of the House John Boehner Attacks the Tea Party Again for Being Fiscally Responsible!”

If I am elected to the House, I will use the Constitution, as written, to do everything in my power to stop judicial tyranny! Will the other candidates pledge the same? I know our present Representative has NOT done everything possible to stop judicial tyranny! Why is that?

Competition is good for the economy and competition is good for the Republican Party!!! Competition keeps Congressmen committed to we the people!!! Primary Republicans who do not support the Constitution as written.