Saturday, June 09, 2007

Not old enough; old enough to murder!

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

The following brief news story was published in the Peoria Journal Star on June 7, 2007, page D2 (The Sports Section of the paper.).

“A former high school principal was indicted Wednesday on charges that he failed to report on-campus sex crimes to protect a star running back who eventually led his team to a state title.

Dwight Bernard, the former head of Northwestern High School, turned himself in after the indictment was released.

The misconduct charge dates back to last September, when Antwain Easterling, then an 18-year-old senior football player, allegedly had sex with a 14-year-old freshman on the floor in a school bathroom. It was described as consensual but, because of the students’ ages, is considered a crime under state law.”

“It was described as consensual but, because of the students’ ages, is considered a crime under state law.” What does that mean? It means that this is an alleged instance of statutory rape. The male was of legal age; the female was not. The female because she was only 14 could not legally under any circumstances consent to having intercourse with anyone. (In some States [maybe all, I don’t know the statutory rape laws for all fifty States], if married, it would not be statutory rape.)

Here’s the thing. According to past obscenely unconstitutional decisions of the Supreme Court, that same minor at the age of 14, if pregnant, could walk into any Planned Murderhood clinic in the country and have her baby murdered. Thus, she is too young to have intercourse but not too young to murder her own child!!!

So now we have the situation where a 14-year-old girl can’t legally:

▪ have intercourse but can “legally” murder her unborn baby
▪ drop out of school but can “legally” murder her unborn baby
▪ receive a license to drive but can “legally” murder her unborn baby
▪ enter into a binding contract (except for food, clothing, and shelter) but can “legally” murder her unborn baby
▪ steal but can “legally” murder her unborn baby
▪ vote but can “legally” murder her unborn baby

With an estimated population of almost 300,000,000 (300 million) people, who made this decision that a 14-year-old girl is allowed to “legally” murder her unborn baby? Not the Congress of the United States with the approval of the President. Not the legislative body of any State in the nation. Not any elected body within the United States. Instead, nine unelected people decided that any female can “legally” murder her unborn baby.

Is that democracy in action or what? Or is it judicial tyranny by an uncontrolled court system run amuck?

What is wrong with the reasoning power of some members of the Supreme Court? Oh, how they are going to suffer one day for their murderous decisions if they do not repent!!!

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)

We are each RESPONSIBLE for our actions and the thoughts that are in our hearts!!!


Post a Comment

<< Home