Resigned
I will not be continuing my Creationism posts today. I do plan to return to them soon.
Then, I plan to answer the response about Iraq. I am sorry for the change in plans. Plans, in reality, often are altered for one reason or another. “The best laid plans … often go astray.” Thank you for your understanding and patience.
How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish, barbaric decisions of the United States Supreme Court?
Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers
“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)
http://www.kansasmeadowlark.com/2006/ShameOfKansas
www.childpredators.com
www.lifedynamics.com
www.aclj.org
www.libertylegal.org
www.alliancedefensefund.org
www.searchtv.org
After months of harassment and badgering from libertine Democrats, the first Hispanic Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, resigned. “President Bush … told reporters he had accepted the resignation reluctantly. ‘His good name was dragged through the mud for political reasons,’ Bush said.” (Peoria Journal Star, August 28, 2007, page A1)
In contrast, libertine Democrats are quoted as saying “‘the Department of Justice suffered a severe crisis of leadership that allowed our justice system to be corrupted by political influence,’ said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who has presided over the investigation into the firings of eight prosecutors whom Democrats say were axed for political reasons. (They say, they have not proved.—my addition)
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said the investigation would not end with Gonzales’ leaving.
‘Congress must get to the bottom of this mess and follow the facts where they lead, into the White House,” said the Nevada Democrat.” (Peoria Journal Star, August 28, 2007, page A5)
Notice by these two statements that these two libertine Democratic Congressmen have already decided 1) the Justice Department has been corrupted by political influence [whatever that means] 2) the eight prosecutors were fired for political reasons [whatever that means] 3) that President Bush and his advisors are guilty of these transgressions. Since they already seem to know the truth and have declared what the truth is, I’m not sure why they are continuing their investigation. Maybe, just maybe; it is for political purposes. Of course, these are the same people who have already declared that the war in Iraq has been lost. So maybe, it is that they just don’t have a clue and like to hear themselves talk.
The Constitution of the United States declares “… he (the President of the United States—my addition) shall nominate, and with the Advise and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law….” (Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2 of the United States Constitution.) The President of the United States appoints all Department of Justice prosecutors. By tradition and Supreme Court decision, the President may also dismiss, for whatever reason, any individual appointed to an executive office position without consulting anyone within the legislative branch of government. Therefore, the President of the United States has the right and responsibility to dismiss any prosecutor that he has appointed. NOT THE SENATE, NOT THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NOT THE CONGRESS!
The question becomes: is this a concern for a politically free Justice Department or is this retribution for the Justice Department successfully arguing for the ban on partial birth abortions and other social issues that libertine Democrats oppose? Is this pay back to demonstrate their support for the position held by Planned Murderhood supporting the murder of unborn babies? Would they go after the Attorney General of a libertine Democratic President who dismissed eight federal prosecutors? Is this attack on Attorney General Gonzales just as political as the libertine Democrats claim that the firings were political?
Given the stated Democratic desire for a politically free Department of Justice (even though President Kennedy appointed his own brother as Attorney General which obviously was not political), I would suggest that every Democratic Presidential candidate be asked these two questions:
“If you become President, how many of the present Department of Justice prosecutors do you plan to dismiss from office? What criteria will you use to determine whether or not to dismiss any of the present Justice Department prosecutors?” Shouldn’t we hold all Democratic Presidential candidates to the same high standard that the libertine Democrats are trying to impose on the present President of the United States? (Don’t be fooled by tradition. By tradition, at the end of a President’s term, all prosecutors resign. They are then reappointed. If they are not reappointed, they have been fired.)
Libertine Democrats claim to be great supporters of tolerance, freedom, equality, and justice. Yet, they have this strangely nasty habit of declaring those they disagree with of being guilty before any judicial trial has ever occurred. They preach tolerance, but it turns out to be tolerance only for those with whom they agree. They preach freedom, but it is freedom TO sin not freedom FROM sin. They preach equality for those with whom they agree, but deny equality for those with whom they disagree. And when all else fails, they attempt to name call, harass, and badger into submission.
The conclusion of this seemingly unjust persecution seems a prime example of their Hitler-like behavior. It doesn’t matter if he is guilty of any wrong doing or not. They don’t need a jury trial. They have declared him guilty (which they did even before the “investigation” began) and therefore he must go. It is their way or the highway even though he was a member of the executive branch not the legislative branch. Was this a “political firing”? A “firing” by persecution?
I don’t know if Alberto Gonzales is guilty of improper behavior and/or illegal act(s). The point is that neither does 99.9+% of the nation and neither does the libertine Democrats who hounded him out of office. The libertine Democrats seem to have already decided he was guilty before any investigation to get at the facts. It seems to have been a “witch hunt” from the beginning designed for political purposes. By their own admission, they had already formed an opinion and have declared him guilty as charged. Where is the justice in that type of behavior? These are Congressmen who believe it is a right to murder your own unborn baby! How trustworthy can they be?
“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)
I will not be continuing my Creationism posts today. I do plan to return to them soon.
Then, I plan to answer the response about Iraq. I am sorry for the change in plans. Plans, in reality, often are altered for one reason or another. “The best laid plans … often go astray.” Thank you for your understanding and patience.
How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish, barbaric decisions of the United States Supreme Court?
Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers
“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)
http://www.kansasmeadowlark.com/2006/ShameOfKansas
www.childpredators.com
www.lifedynamics.com
www.aclj.org
www.libertylegal.org
www.alliancedefensefund.org
www.searchtv.org
After months of harassment and badgering from libertine Democrats, the first Hispanic Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, resigned. “President Bush … told reporters he had accepted the resignation reluctantly. ‘His good name was dragged through the mud for political reasons,’ Bush said.” (Peoria Journal Star, August 28, 2007, page A1)
In contrast, libertine Democrats are quoted as saying “‘the Department of Justice suffered a severe crisis of leadership that allowed our justice system to be corrupted by political influence,’ said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who has presided over the investigation into the firings of eight prosecutors whom Democrats say were axed for political reasons. (They say, they have not proved.—my addition)
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said the investigation would not end with Gonzales’ leaving.
‘Congress must get to the bottom of this mess and follow the facts where they lead, into the White House,” said the Nevada Democrat.” (Peoria Journal Star, August 28, 2007, page A5)
Notice by these two statements that these two libertine Democratic Congressmen have already decided 1) the Justice Department has been corrupted by political influence [whatever that means] 2) the eight prosecutors were fired for political reasons [whatever that means] 3) that President Bush and his advisors are guilty of these transgressions. Since they already seem to know the truth and have declared what the truth is, I’m not sure why they are continuing their investigation. Maybe, just maybe; it is for political purposes. Of course, these are the same people who have already declared that the war in Iraq has been lost. So maybe, it is that they just don’t have a clue and like to hear themselves talk.
The Constitution of the United States declares “… he (the President of the United States—my addition) shall nominate, and with the Advise and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law….” (Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2 of the United States Constitution.) The President of the United States appoints all Department of Justice prosecutors. By tradition and Supreme Court decision, the President may also dismiss, for whatever reason, any individual appointed to an executive office position without consulting anyone within the legislative branch of government. Therefore, the President of the United States has the right and responsibility to dismiss any prosecutor that he has appointed. NOT THE SENATE, NOT THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NOT THE CONGRESS!
The question becomes: is this a concern for a politically free Justice Department or is this retribution for the Justice Department successfully arguing for the ban on partial birth abortions and other social issues that libertine Democrats oppose? Is this pay back to demonstrate their support for the position held by Planned Murderhood supporting the murder of unborn babies? Would they go after the Attorney General of a libertine Democratic President who dismissed eight federal prosecutors? Is this attack on Attorney General Gonzales just as political as the libertine Democrats claim that the firings were political?
Given the stated Democratic desire for a politically free Department of Justice (even though President Kennedy appointed his own brother as Attorney General which obviously was not political), I would suggest that every Democratic Presidential candidate be asked these two questions:
“If you become President, how many of the present Department of Justice prosecutors do you plan to dismiss from office? What criteria will you use to determine whether or not to dismiss any of the present Justice Department prosecutors?” Shouldn’t we hold all Democratic Presidential candidates to the same high standard that the libertine Democrats are trying to impose on the present President of the United States? (Don’t be fooled by tradition. By tradition, at the end of a President’s term, all prosecutors resign. They are then reappointed. If they are not reappointed, they have been fired.)
Libertine Democrats claim to be great supporters of tolerance, freedom, equality, and justice. Yet, they have this strangely nasty habit of declaring those they disagree with of being guilty before any judicial trial has ever occurred. They preach tolerance, but it turns out to be tolerance only for those with whom they agree. They preach freedom, but it is freedom TO sin not freedom FROM sin. They preach equality for those with whom they agree, but deny equality for those with whom they disagree. And when all else fails, they attempt to name call, harass, and badger into submission.
The conclusion of this seemingly unjust persecution seems a prime example of their Hitler-like behavior. It doesn’t matter if he is guilty of any wrong doing or not. They don’t need a jury trial. They have declared him guilty (which they did even before the “investigation” began) and therefore he must go. It is their way or the highway even though he was a member of the executive branch not the legislative branch. Was this a “political firing”? A “firing” by persecution?
I don’t know if Alberto Gonzales is guilty of improper behavior and/or illegal act(s). The point is that neither does 99.9+% of the nation and neither does the libertine Democrats who hounded him out of office. The libertine Democrats seem to have already decided he was guilty before any investigation to get at the facts. It seems to have been a “witch hunt” from the beginning designed for political purposes. By their own admission, they had already formed an opinion and have declared him guilty as charged. Where is the justice in that type of behavior? These are Congressmen who believe it is a right to murder your own unborn baby! How trustworthy can they be?
“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)
posted by Christian Gunslinger at 3:03 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home