Supreme Court usurps its authority again, part 9

I suggest you check out the following website if you are a policy holder of Farmers Insurance Group or thinking about having them insure you in any capacity: www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com




https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367


The above link is for a company—Vision Forum—that provides unique products for the family. I am an affiliate for the company and receive a small commission whenever someone uses this link and then makes an unreturned purchase while using the link. Check it out. I think you might like the products offered. I do. See my more complete explanation on my post of February 1, 2008 entitled “Affiliate program with Vision Forum.”

Based upon past historical data: 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS have occurred in the last 24 hours in the United States. See my post “BABY HOLOCAUST” posted January 22, 2008.

I’ve been involved in a problem one of my clients has with Farmers Insurance Group. My previous posts in relation to this problem were:

September 10, 2007 post: “Beware of Farmers Insurance Group”
September 11, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group’s response”
September 18, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company received the requested list”
September 19, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company’s response to the list”
October 16, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and my request for information”
November 27, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group does not respond to my request”
January 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group latest stall”
January 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group is sent a response”
January 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group pays some money”
January 19, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group continues to be obstinate”
January 26, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group receives another request”
February 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group shows how low they will go?”
February 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group: If I were going to respond to the final letter”
February 13, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and associated companies”
February 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and how others rate the company”

I will not be continuing my Creationism posts today. I do plan to return to them soon.

Then, I plan to answer the response about Iraq. I am sorry for the change in plans. Plans, in reality, often are altered for one reason or another. “The best laid plans … often go astray.” Thank you for your understanding and patience.

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish, barbaric decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com

www.childpredators.com

www.lifedynamics.com

www.libertylegal.org

www.alliancedefensefund.org

www.searchtv.org

Since the obscene Supreme Court decision in June to allow FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANTS to seek habeas corpus relief in civilian courts, I have written eight posts entitled “Supreme Court usurps its authority again.” As demonstrated by the editorial written by the editorial writers of the Peoria Journal Star, some either don’t know our history or have chosen to ignore it. Tonight, it is time for a history lesson.

Contrary to what seems to be the position of the Peoria Journal Star editorial writers, the Founding Fathers did not provide for equal power for the three branches of government when they created a separation of powers and a balance of power between the three branches. In fact, the Founding Fathers deliberately and consciously created Congress to be more powerful than the other two branches while certainly not all powerful. This can be discerned by simply reading the Constitution. It was no accident that Article I dealing with Congress is listed first and is the longest of the three articles dealing with the three branches of government. Congress was intended to be the most powerful of the three.

The House of Representatives was the only portion of government where the people directly elected the members to the body. In a compromise, the Senate members were appointed by the respective States and were to represent the interests of the States. The President was indirectly elected by the States through the Electoral College and the President then appointed federal judges (contrary to what some claim—for “good behavior” NOT for life) with the advice and the consent of the Senate. Notice the importance of the States in the process. Senators were appointed by the States, Electoral College members were elected/appointed by the States, and all federal judges were to be approved by Senators who were appointed by the States.

The power order intended was exactly how the three branches of government are listed in the Constitution. The legislative branch (the Congress) was to be the most powerful and was listed first. The executive branch (the President) was to be the second most powerful and was listed second. The judicial branch (the courts) was to be the least powerful of the three and was listed third. True, there was a separate of power and a balance of power but it was NOT EQUAL power in either separation or balance.

The primary duty of the legislative branch was to make law. The primary duty of the executive branch was to enforce the law. Because of the need for a united decision making process, the President was responsible to wage war but only if so approved by Congress. Contrary to the editorial writers, the duty of the courts WAS NOT to review and approve or reject the laws passed by Congress and approved by the President. The duty of the courts was to administer the law—apply the laws PASSED BY CONGRESS and APPROVED by the PRESIDENT through the court system. THE COURTS WERE GIVEN NO AUTHORITY BY THE CONSTITUTION TO REVIEW THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS PASSED BY CONGRESS AND APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT. I sat through hours of college classes in both American history and political science taught by liberal college professors and not one of them claimed that the Constitution of the United States allowed the courts to rule a law passed by Congress to be unconstitutional. NOT ONE!!!

The Constitution gives a number of powers to Congress to control the courts. (In a much earlier post I listed a total of seven if I remember correctly, I will only mention three tonight.) Among those powers is the power to create all federal courts below the Supreme Court. Furthermore, Congress can regulate the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court—“In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.” (Article III, Section 2, ¶ 2) Note the following: in ALL cases where the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction (The Constitution lists specific instances where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction—i.e. the case begins in the Supreme Court.) CONGRESS can make EXCEPTIONS not allowing the Supreme Court to get involved or restricting the Supreme Court’s involvement and CONGRESS can REGULATE how the Supreme Court gets involved. Thirdly, Congress has the power to impeach and convict members of the federal courts—that is why the term of office is for “good behavior” and NOT for life.

Also, the federal courts have absolutely no enforcement authority. There are numerous examples throughout our history where the President, as the head of the executive branch, has simply refused to enforce an unconstitutional edict of the courts. Unfortunately, today when a President does not enforce such an unconstitutional edict, editorial writers, like those who write for the Peoria Journal Star, loudly, and wrongly scream that the rule of law is being violated as if an edict of the Supreme Court is the same as the rule of law. NEWS FLASH: IT IS NOT. The SUPREME COURT is NOT the CONSTITUTION and the SUPREME COURT has probably violated the CONSTITUTION more than any of the three branches of government by UNCONSTITUTIONALLY and ILLEGALLY REWRITING the CONSTITUTION to suit the whims of a FIVE member majority.

Today, because of judicial fiat and the willingness of Congress, the President, and, most importantly, the people to allow it to happen; the power structure has been REVERSED. The Supreme Court is the most powerful, the President is second, and the Congress is the least powerful of the three branches of government.

The judicial branch led by the Supreme Court has become the most powerful branch of government because they have been allowed to have the FINAL authority in almost all facets of government from local school boards, to the States, and to the federal government contrary to the Constitution of the United States. Unfortunately, the people seem to have grown weary of the messiness of democracy and seem to prefer the totalitarian exactness of a dictatorial COURTOCRACY.

Or as the Bible so clearly states, we reap what we sow. We sow the seed of Supreme Court supremacy and infallibility, and we reap the corrupting power of MY WORD IS FINAL AND ABSOLUTE! Unfortunately for the Supreme Court and the nation, it is ONLY GOD’S WORD THAT IS FINAL and ABSOLUTE!!!

There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution of the United States nor anything in the history of the United States that gives FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANTS the right of the writ of habeas corpus to be administered by civilian courts. NOTHING! NOTHING!! NOTHING!!!

This ruling is simply an illegal edict by a Supreme Court that enjoys rewriting the Constitution of the United States. THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!! THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!! THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!!

Article I, Section 8 declares “The Congress shall have Power … To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water….” Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.” NOT ANY FEDERAL COURT; NOT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.” Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.” Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.”

Historically, when Congress has not made such rules during time of war, who do you think made such rules? The Supreme Court??? NO!!! NEVER!!! It has been the President under his power as commander in chief of the armed forces—Article II, Section 2. Does the Supreme Court have the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water?” NOT ACCORDING TO THE CONSTUTITION OF THE UNITED STATES!!! If that power is so listed, please tell me where it is because I have some knowledge of the Constitution and I have NEVER read it in the CONSTITUTION! NEVER!!! I haven’t read it because it is NOT in the CONSTITUTION!!!!!

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)