Supreme Court usurps its authority again, part 5
I suggest you check out the following website if you are a policy holder of Farmers Insurance Group or thinking about having them insure you in any capacity: http://www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com/
https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367
The above link is for a company—Vision Forum—that provides unique products for the family. I am an affiliate for the company and receive a small commission whenever someone uses this link and then makes an unreturned purchase while using the link. Check it out. I think you might like the products offered. I do. See my more complete explanation on my post of February 1, 2008 entitled “Affiliate program with Vision Forum.”
Based upon past historical data: 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS have occurred in the last 24 hours in the United States. See my post “BABY HOLOCAUST” posted January 22, 2008.
I’ve been involved in a problem one of my clients has with Farmers Insurance Group. My previous posts in relation to this problem were:
September 10, 2007 post: “Beware of Farmers Insurance Group”
September 11, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group’s response”
September 18, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company received the requested list”
September 19, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company’s response to the list”
October 16, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and my request for information”
November 27, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group does not respond to my request”
January 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group latest stall”
January 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group is sent a response”
January 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group pays some money”
January 19, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group continues to be obstinate”
January 26, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group receives another request”
February 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group shows how low they will go?”
February 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group: If I were going to respond to the final letter”
February 13, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and associated companies”
February 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and how others rate the company”
I will not be continuing my Creationism posts today. I do plan to return to them soon.
Then, I plan to answer the response about Iraq. I am sorry for the change in plans. Plans, in reality, often are altered for one reason or another. “The best laid plans … often go astray.” Thank you for your understanding and patience.
How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish, barbaric decisions of the United States Supreme Court?
Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers
“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)
http://www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com/
http://www.childpredators.com/
http://www.lifedynamics.com/
http://www.libertylegal.org/
http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/
http://www.searchtv.org/
I had planned on only one post in relation to the Supreme Court decision and FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANTS. However, that has changed. In the Peoria Journal Star’s typical practice of providing balanced journalism, the paper printed four articles in relation to the decision. Three of the articles—an editorial by a national journalist, a political “cartoon” editorial, and an editorial by the on staff editorial writers—supported the Supreme Court decision. One editorial was opposed to the decision. (I have commented on three of the four in previous posts. I have not yet commented on the staff editorial writers’ opinion.) However, it doesn’t matter. The paper could publish 100 editorials in favor of the decision and every one of them would be—wrong, wrong, wrong!!!
In the mean time, the Peoria Journal Star published three more articles on the Supreme Court decision dealing with FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANTS on June 22, 2008, page A5 for a total of seven specific editorials on this one subject. As with their balanced reporting practices, two of the articles were in support of the Supreme Court’s obscene ruling and one was opposed to the decision. Thus, a total of five editorials supported the decision and two were in opposition. However, it doesn’t matter. The paper could publish 100 editorials in favor of the decision and every one of them would be—wrong, wrong, wrong!!!
Tonight’s post is a political “cartoon” editorial published on June 22nd that supported the Supreme Court decision. The “cartoon” seems to be a take-off on the old “Chicken Little” story. I would identify the cartoonist but I have a difficult time reading his signature. It looks like “Oliphant” but I can’t guarantee that is correct. (My spell check did not identify it as a misspelled word so maybe that is correct.) A description of the “cartoon” is as follows:
Four men in black robes are running from the right to the left. The four men are labeled with the names of the four Supreme Justices who DID NOT support the majority opinion allowing FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANTS to appeal to civilian courts.
The first Justice is labeled SCALIA and is saying “The sky is falling” while pointing skyward with his right hand and holding a paper that is labeled “Guantanamo Decision 5-4” in his left hand. A second Justice is labeled ROBERTS and is saying “Run for your lives” while pointing skyward with his right hand. The third Justice is labeled ALITO and is saying “Habeas Corpus is at large in the land” while covering his head with his hands. The fourth and final Justice is labeled THOMAS and is not saying anything (Is it racist not to give Justice Thomas a speaking role?—my addition.) while pointing with his right hand to the sky. Oh yes, the four are running toward a much smaller caricature of President Bush who is depicted as saying “Goodness—what’s happening?” as if he hasn’t a clue as to what is occurring.
The “cartoon” is not cute nor clever NOR CORRECT. A more accurate replication of the situation would be to have the people who are running to be members of the general public declaring “The Supreme Court has usurped its power again!”, “The Supreme Court is out of control!”, “Impeach the five Justices who are giving aid and comfort to the enemy!”, “Treason is always an impeachable offense!”
This ruling is simply an illegal edict by a Supreme Court that enjoys rewriting the Constitution of the United States. THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!! THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!! THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!!
Article I, Section 8 declares “The Congress shall have Power … To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water….” Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.” NOT ANY FEDERAL COURT; NOT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.” Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.” Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.”
Historically, when Congress has not made such rules during time of war, who do you think made such rules? The Supreme Court??? NO!!! NEVER!!! It has been the President under his power as commander in chief of the armed forces—Article II, Section 2. Does the Supreme Court have the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water?” NOT ACCORDING TO THE CONSTUTITION OF THE UNITED STATES!!! If that power is so listed, please tell me where it is because I have some knowledge of the Constitution and I have NEVER read it in the CONSTITUTION! NEVER!!! I haven’t read it because it is NOT in the CONSTITUTION!!!!!
“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)
I suggest you check out the following website if you are a policy holder of Farmers Insurance Group or thinking about having them insure you in any capacity: http://www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com/
https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367
The above link is for a company—Vision Forum—that provides unique products for the family. I am an affiliate for the company and receive a small commission whenever someone uses this link and then makes an unreturned purchase while using the link. Check it out. I think you might like the products offered. I do. See my more complete explanation on my post of February 1, 2008 entitled “Affiliate program with Vision Forum.”
Based upon past historical data: 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS have occurred in the last 24 hours in the United States. See my post “BABY HOLOCAUST” posted January 22, 2008.
I’ve been involved in a problem one of my clients has with Farmers Insurance Group. My previous posts in relation to this problem were:
September 10, 2007 post: “Beware of Farmers Insurance Group”
September 11, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group’s response”
September 18, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company received the requested list”
September 19, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company’s response to the list”
October 16, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and my request for information”
November 27, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group does not respond to my request”
January 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group latest stall”
January 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group is sent a response”
January 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group pays some money”
January 19, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group continues to be obstinate”
January 26, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group receives another request”
February 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group shows how low they will go?”
February 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group: If I were going to respond to the final letter”
February 13, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and associated companies”
February 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and how others rate the company”
I will not be continuing my Creationism posts today. I do plan to return to them soon.
Then, I plan to answer the response about Iraq. I am sorry for the change in plans. Plans, in reality, often are altered for one reason or another. “The best laid plans … often go astray.” Thank you for your understanding and patience.
How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish, barbaric decisions of the United States Supreme Court?
Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers
“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)
http://www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com/
http://www.childpredators.com/
http://www.lifedynamics.com/
http://www.libertylegal.org/
http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/
http://www.searchtv.org/
I had planned on only one post in relation to the Supreme Court decision and FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANTS. However, that has changed. In the Peoria Journal Star’s typical practice of providing balanced journalism, the paper printed four articles in relation to the decision. Three of the articles—an editorial by a national journalist, a political “cartoon” editorial, and an editorial by the on staff editorial writers—supported the Supreme Court decision. One editorial was opposed to the decision. (I have commented on three of the four in previous posts. I have not yet commented on the staff editorial writers’ opinion.) However, it doesn’t matter. The paper could publish 100 editorials in favor of the decision and every one of them would be—wrong, wrong, wrong!!!
In the mean time, the Peoria Journal Star published three more articles on the Supreme Court decision dealing with FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANTS on June 22, 2008, page A5 for a total of seven specific editorials on this one subject. As with their balanced reporting practices, two of the articles were in support of the Supreme Court’s obscene ruling and one was opposed to the decision. Thus, a total of five editorials supported the decision and two were in opposition. However, it doesn’t matter. The paper could publish 100 editorials in favor of the decision and every one of them would be—wrong, wrong, wrong!!!
Tonight’s post is a political “cartoon” editorial published on June 22nd that supported the Supreme Court decision. The “cartoon” seems to be a take-off on the old “Chicken Little” story. I would identify the cartoonist but I have a difficult time reading his signature. It looks like “Oliphant” but I can’t guarantee that is correct. (My spell check did not identify it as a misspelled word so maybe that is correct.) A description of the “cartoon” is as follows:
Four men in black robes are running from the right to the left. The four men are labeled with the names of the four Supreme Justices who DID NOT support the majority opinion allowing FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANTS to appeal to civilian courts.
The first Justice is labeled SCALIA and is saying “The sky is falling” while pointing skyward with his right hand and holding a paper that is labeled “Guantanamo Decision 5-4” in his left hand. A second Justice is labeled ROBERTS and is saying “Run for your lives” while pointing skyward with his right hand. The third Justice is labeled ALITO and is saying “Habeas Corpus is at large in the land” while covering his head with his hands. The fourth and final Justice is labeled THOMAS and is not saying anything (Is it racist not to give Justice Thomas a speaking role?—my addition.) while pointing with his right hand to the sky. Oh yes, the four are running toward a much smaller caricature of President Bush who is depicted as saying “Goodness—what’s happening?” as if he hasn’t a clue as to what is occurring.
The “cartoon” is not cute nor clever NOR CORRECT. A more accurate replication of the situation would be to have the people who are running to be members of the general public declaring “The Supreme Court has usurped its power again!”, “The Supreme Court is out of control!”, “Impeach the five Justices who are giving aid and comfort to the enemy!”, “Treason is always an impeachable offense!”
This ruling is simply an illegal edict by a Supreme Court that enjoys rewriting the Constitution of the United States. THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!! THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!! THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!!
Article I, Section 8 declares “The Congress shall have Power … To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water….” Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.” NOT ANY FEDERAL COURT; NOT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.” Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.” Congress has the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.”
Historically, when Congress has not made such rules during time of war, who do you think made such rules? The Supreme Court??? NO!!! NEVER!!! It has been the President under his power as commander in chief of the armed forces—Article II, Section 2. Does the Supreme Court have the power to “make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water?” NOT ACCORDING TO THE CONSTUTITION OF THE UNITED STATES!!! If that power is so listed, please tell me where it is because I have some knowledge of the Constitution and I have NEVER read it in the CONSTITUTION! NEVER!!! I haven’t read it because it is NOT in the CONSTITUTION!!!!!
“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)
posted by Christian Gunslinger at 5:01 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home