Anthropogenic Global Warming theory debunked
The following is from http://www.greenwatchamerica.net/
“Thursday, December 31st, 2009
Two German scientists, in a paper re-edited and re-published earlier this year, have thoroughly debunked the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming. John O’Sullivan has more.
In a recently revised and re-published paper, Dr. Gerlich debunks AGW and shows that the IPCC ‘consensus’ atmospheric physics model tying CO2 to global warming is not only unverifiable, but actually violates basic laws of physics, i.e. the First and Second Law of Thermodynamics. The latest version of this momentous scientific paper appears in the March 2009 edition of the International Journal of Modern Physics.
The central claims of Dr. Gerlich and his colleague, Dr. Ralf Tscheuschner, include, but are not limited to:
1) The mechanism of warming in an actual greenhouse is different than the mechanism in the atmosphere, therefore it is not a ‘greenhouse’ effect and should be called something else.
2) The climate models that predict catastrophic global warming also result in a net heat flow from atmospheric greenhouse gasses to the warmer ground, which is in violation of the second law of thermodynamics.
Essentially, any machine which transfers heat from a lower temperature reservoir to a high temperature reservoir without external work applied cannot exist. If it did it would be a ‘perpetual motion machine’—the realm of pure sci-fi.
If you are interested, you can read the entire paper online at this link. We highly recommend that you do.
This paper is a perfect culmination to a year that saw the tide of public opinion turn against the Radical Green agenda. We predict that 2010 will see this trend continue, and we’ll look back at 2009 as the turning point in the Man-made global warming debate.
Most Egregious Claim of the Week
A brand new course of study has become wildly popular through colleges in America: ‘Green’ energy. USA Today fills us in:
Colleges are rapidly adding new majors and minors in green studies, and students are filling them fast.
Nationwide, more than 100 majors, minors and certificates were created this year in energy and sustainability-focused programs at colleges big and small, says the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education. That’s up from just three programs added in 2005.
Two factors are driving the surge: Students want the courses, and employers want the trained students, says Paul Rowland, the association’s executive director.
‘There’s a great perception that there’s a sweet spot with energy to do good and do well, and it appears to be the place of job growth,’ says Rob Melnick, executive dean of the Global Institute of Sustainability at Arizona State University.
But by offering these courses, these schools are capitalizing on a trend, and taking advantage of idealistic young college students without giving them a proper foundation for their futures. John Stossel has details:
Minnesota Public Radio reported this month that one stimulus-funded weatherization training program in Minneapolis graduated 130 students—but only 19 have found jobs.
Even if USA Today is right, and the green energy graduates will find work. It’s not necessarily a good thing, because the jobs will be mostly funded by the taxpayer (becoming more and more prevalent—my addition)—and won’t really contribute to society’s wealth. Creating ‘green jobs’ may be a mantra on the left. But when government creates the jobs, they’re little better than welfare. (Government trying to control and create supply and demand. In the long run, it NEVER works!—my addition)
College students have a right to study whatever interests them, and we’re hardly advocating taking that right away. However, colleges ostensibly are offering training for young men and women to become productive members of society. In this case, however, it seems to be making even those students able to secure employment dependent upon the hard work of others. (“Green” curriculum is the 2000’s version of the “women’s studies” curriculum of an earlier politically correct movement. The only thing “women studies” majors could do is teach “women’s studies” to others—most of whom were forced by the universities to take at less one course in the “subject” area—my addition.)
Patrick Gallagher, Editor”
This is what the Bible says about our climate: “Then Noah built an altar to the Lord and, taking some of all the clean animals and clean birds, he sacrificed burnt offerings on it. The Lord smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: ‘Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though every inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
As long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night will never cease.’” Genesis 8: 20-22 (NIV)
This is what the Bible says about GOD’S promises: “‘God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?’” Numbers 23: 19 (NIV)
Now, let me think. Should I believe “Al Gore and his cohorts’ prediction of “Global Warming” fifty years into the future or should I believe GOD’S sure PROMISE?
GOD’S PROMISE: “‘As long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night will never cease.’”
Al Gore’s fantasy prediction 50 years into the future: catastrophe of man’s own making
The winner is:
As I’ve said before, no human can accurately predict what the weather is going to be like 50 years from today. We have difficulty predicting with 100% accuracy what the weather is going to be like seven days from now. This I do know. If GOD wants global warming as predicted by the “Al Gore gang” to occur, there is NOTHING man can do to stop it. If GOD doesn’t want global warming to occur, it won’t, no matter what man does. Of course, GOD could always let man proceed as they choose without HIS hand in it either way. I don’t know what will occur 50 years from now and NEITHER DOES any other human on this planet!
This I also know. If I were living a life of SIN, I’d be more concerned about what GOD will do today and tomorrow or what will happen to me after my death (none of us has a guarantee that we will live another fifty years) than what is going to occur in another 50 years!!!
The following is from http://www.greenwatchamerica.net/
“Thursday, December 31st, 2009
Two German scientists, in a paper re-edited and re-published earlier this year, have thoroughly debunked the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming. John O’Sullivan has more.
In a recently revised and re-published paper, Dr. Gerlich debunks AGW and shows that the IPCC ‘consensus’ atmospheric physics model tying CO2 to global warming is not only unverifiable, but actually violates basic laws of physics, i.e. the First and Second Law of Thermodynamics. The latest version of this momentous scientific paper appears in the March 2009 edition of the International Journal of Modern Physics.
The central claims of Dr. Gerlich and his colleague, Dr. Ralf Tscheuschner, include, but are not limited to:
1) The mechanism of warming in an actual greenhouse is different than the mechanism in the atmosphere, therefore it is not a ‘greenhouse’ effect and should be called something else.
2) The climate models that predict catastrophic global warming also result in a net heat flow from atmospheric greenhouse gasses to the warmer ground, which is in violation of the second law of thermodynamics.
Essentially, any machine which transfers heat from a lower temperature reservoir to a high temperature reservoir without external work applied cannot exist. If it did it would be a ‘perpetual motion machine’—the realm of pure sci-fi.
If you are interested, you can read the entire paper online at this link. We highly recommend that you do.
This paper is a perfect culmination to a year that saw the tide of public opinion turn against the Radical Green agenda. We predict that 2010 will see this trend continue, and we’ll look back at 2009 as the turning point in the Man-made global warming debate.
Most Egregious Claim of the Week
A brand new course of study has become wildly popular through colleges in America: ‘Green’ energy. USA Today fills us in:
Colleges are rapidly adding new majors and minors in green studies, and students are filling them fast.
Nationwide, more than 100 majors, minors and certificates were created this year in energy and sustainability-focused programs at colleges big and small, says the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education. That’s up from just three programs added in 2005.
Two factors are driving the surge: Students want the courses, and employers want the trained students, says Paul Rowland, the association’s executive director.
‘There’s a great perception that there’s a sweet spot with energy to do good and do well, and it appears to be the place of job growth,’ says Rob Melnick, executive dean of the Global Institute of Sustainability at Arizona State University.
But by offering these courses, these schools are capitalizing on a trend, and taking advantage of idealistic young college students without giving them a proper foundation for their futures. John Stossel has details:
Minnesota Public Radio reported this month that one stimulus-funded weatherization training program in Minneapolis graduated 130 students—but only 19 have found jobs.
Even if USA Today is right, and the green energy graduates will find work. It’s not necessarily a good thing, because the jobs will be mostly funded by the taxpayer (becoming more and more prevalent—my addition)—and won’t really contribute to society’s wealth. Creating ‘green jobs’ may be a mantra on the left. But when government creates the jobs, they’re little better than welfare. (Government trying to control and create supply and demand. In the long run, it NEVER works!—my addition)
College students have a right to study whatever interests them, and we’re hardly advocating taking that right away. However, colleges ostensibly are offering training for young men and women to become productive members of society. In this case, however, it seems to be making even those students able to secure employment dependent upon the hard work of others. (“Green” curriculum is the 2000’s version of the “women’s studies” curriculum of an earlier politically correct movement. The only thing “women studies” majors could do is teach “women’s studies” to others—most of whom were forced by the universities to take at less one course in the “subject” area—my addition.)
Patrick Gallagher, Editor”
This is what the Bible says about our climate: “Then Noah built an altar to the Lord and, taking some of all the clean animals and clean birds, he sacrificed burnt offerings on it. The Lord smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: ‘Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though every inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
As long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night will never cease.’” Genesis 8: 20-22 (NIV)
This is what the Bible says about GOD’S promises: “‘God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?’” Numbers 23: 19 (NIV)
Now, let me think. Should I believe “Al Gore and his cohorts’ prediction of “Global Warming” fifty years into the future or should I believe GOD’S sure PROMISE?
GOD’S PROMISE: “‘As long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night will never cease.’”
Al Gore’s fantasy prediction 50 years into the future: catastrophe of man’s own making
The winner is:
As I’ve said before, no human can accurately predict what the weather is going to be like 50 years from today. We have difficulty predicting with 100% accuracy what the weather is going to be like seven days from now. This I do know. If GOD wants global warming as predicted by the “Al Gore gang” to occur, there is NOTHING man can do to stop it. If GOD doesn’t want global warming to occur, it won’t, no matter what man does. Of course, GOD could always let man proceed as they choose without HIS hand in it either way. I don’t know what will occur 50 years from now and NEITHER DOES any other human on this planet!
This I also know. If I were living a life of SIN, I’d be more concerned about what GOD will do today and tomorrow or what will happen to me after my death (none of us has a guarantee that we will live another fifty years) than what is going to occur in another 50 years!!!
posted by Christian Gunslinger at 4:37 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home