“Morton Secular Progressive” and the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES
Tonight, my response to “Morton Secular Progressive” as a recent anonymous commentator identified himself or herself as he or she commented on my blog. The original comment as posted:
“Anonymous said …
I notice in your commentary that you while you rail against abortion, you don’t mention how many of the 3,287+ unwanted infants you are on the list to adopt. My guess is that the number is zero because they don’t fall into your ‘christian’ demographic. It’s not particularly Christian, nor particularly useful to offer half-baked religious based criticism without offering any real solutions. It’s crazy and quite frankly kind of creepy. I’m guessing you live at home with your mother and just create critical blogs all day.
Morton Secular Progressive
9:22 AM”
To begin with, he/she is not responding to a commentary I wrote on that particular day. But rather, to a segment I’ve been posting since I wrote a short series of comments on the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES including one posted January 22, 2008. I have written extensively on the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES since I began blogging in July of 2005. I try to do a short series in January of each year since the obscene Supreme Court decision was dictated in January of 1973. The segment states the following:
“Based upon past historical data: 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS have occurred in the last 24 hours in the United States. See my post “BABY HOLOCAUST” posted January 22, 2008.”
The complete January 22, 2008 post entitled “BABY HOLOCAUST” (You did ask for the entire post didn’t you?) states the following:
“It has been 35 years since insanity has hit an all time high. It has been 35 years since Satan tightened his grip upon the United States of America. It has been 35 years since the government sanctioned MURDER of UNBORN CHILDREN!!!
According to a recent news article by the Associated Press posted on the internet on January 17, 2008: ‘The number of abortions in the United States fell to 1.2 million in 2005, down 25 percent from the all-time high of 1.6 million in 1990 and dropping the abortion rate to its lowest level since 1974, according to [(a)—my addition] report issued Thursday.’ Are we suppose to applause a decrease in the murder of unborn babies to 1.2 million in one year? True, it is better than 1.6 million. However, 1.2 million is 1.2 million too many!!! We are MURDERING 1.2 million UNBORN BABIES in one year!!!
Let’s examine these MURDEROUS numbers using a very conservative approach and based upon the information given in the Associated Press story. I checked a previous post I wrote on abortion. From that post, I got the number of abortions for 1973 and 1974—the first two years after MURDER was legalized by an obscene Court decision. The rate of UNBORN BABY MURDERS in 1973 was 774,600. The rate of UNBORN BABY MURDERS in 1974 was 898,600. We know from the news story that the highest number of UNBORN BABY MURDERS was 1.6 million in 1990. Using the conservative number of 1.2 million for each of the additional thirty years up to the end of 2005—the last year of figures, we have an additional 36 million UNBORN BABY MURDERS. The total conservative number of UNBORN BABY MURDERS is 39,273,200 through 2005. Including 2006 and 2007 that figure must be over 40 million UNBORN BABY MURDERS. Is there any other way to describe this slaughter of UNBORN BABIES than as a BABY HOLOCAUST???
Described another way, every day in 2005 there were 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS. Every hour of every day in 2005 there were 136+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS. Every minute of every hour of every day in 2005 there were 2+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS.
IN 2005 by the recorded record:
365 days = 1,200,000 UNBORN BABY MURDERS
1 day = 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS
1 hour = 136+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS
1 minute = 2 + UNBORN BABY MURDERS
(These figures DO NOT include any MURDERS by “morning after” pills since there is no possible way for man to document these MURDERS. Of course, GOD knows every single additional MURDER that occurs because of the use of “morning after” pills.)
Slowly, those of moral conviction seem to have made some headway to change this perversity. Yet, much still must be accomplished. We still have every major candidate of one political party supporting the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES. WE still have too many who actually have the immoral audacity to demand to be allowed to MURDER our UNBORN TODDLERS.
Wars fought by the United States have killed thousands upon thousands of Americans. The War of 1812 had an estimated 22,500 dead. The Civil War had an estimated 620,000 causalities. World War I had an estimated 126,000 dead. World War II had an estimated 405,500 dead. The Korean Conflict had an estimated 53,000 dead. The Vietnam Conflict had 47,378 battle deaths and 10,799 other deaths.
Of course, the United States has fought in other wars and conflicts besides those listed. To account for those deaths, add an additional 200,000. (That number is probably inflated but I will use it for this illustration.) That is an estimated 1,485,177 men, women, and probably some children killed in wars fought by the U.S. in the approximate 230 year history of our country. That’s about 1.5 million people in 230 years. That’s a high price to pay for freedom. It’s a price that most of those killed were willing to pay.
January 22, 1973 is a ‘date that will live in infamy.’ On that day thirty five years ago, 9 unelected men declared that women could legally murder their unborn babies. Over those thirty five years at least 40 million UNBORN BABIES were destroyed before they were even delivered. None of those babies had a choice. The vulgar slaughter continues today.
It is overwhelmingly holocaustic. It is overwhelmingly tragic. On Sunday January 15, 2006, page A3 a large display ad was published in the Peoria Journal Star. At the top left of the ad was a picture of a small baby. To the right were these words, ‘Take my hand not my life…’ The ad was calling attention to Sanctity of Human Life Week which was January 16-22, 2006.
How ungodly, how unholy, how tragic! Human life in the United States is now so undervalued that it is necessary to advertise the importance of human life.
January 22, 1973 is a ‘date that will live in infamy.’ On that day thirty five years ago, 9 unelected men proclaimed that women could legally murder their unborn babies. Over those thirty five years at least 40 million UNBORN BABIES were destroyed before they were even delivered. None of those babies had a choice. The vulgar slaughter continues today.
The supporters of the murder of unborn babies are fearful. They have not yet repented. They have not yet learned to fear the CREATOR of the universe. But, they are fearful. They are afraid, that with the changes in the Supreme Court, the Court will recognize the obvious—that each baby is a human life and that no one has the right to murder that life. Illinois’ two Senators voted against Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito. They are fearful that Roe v. Wade will finally be overturned. They have already seen the Court ordered end to ‘partial birth’ MURDERS.
January 22, 1973 is a ‘date that will live in infamy.’ On that day thirty five years ago, 9 unelected men ruled that women could legally murder their unborn babies. Over those thirty five years at least 40 million UNBORN BABIES were destroyed before they were even delivered. None of those babies had a choice. The vulgar slaughter continues today.
The Peoria Journal Star published an article (1/21/06. page B5) entitled ‘Group wants state to protect abortion.’ ‘The Illinois chapter of the National Organization for Women is pressuring state legislators to do more to keep abortion legal in the state regardless of federal decisions…. The Freedom of Choice Act will not be drafted and introduced in the General Assembly until the 2007 spring session. Members of the group say they are trying to line up commitments from legislators. Essentially, the act would keep abortion in Illinois legal, even if the Supreme Court overturns the 1973 decision.’ Neither that act nor any other act to legalize abortion in the State passed the General Assembly in 2007.
January 22, 1973 is a ‘date that will live in infamy.’ On that day thirty five years ago, 9 unelected men asserted that women could legally murder their unborn babies. Over those thirty five years at least 40 million UNBORN BABIES were destroyed before they were even delivered. None of those babies had a choice. The vulgar slaughter continues today.
Those who support life over MURDER and DEATH are not finished. We can not relax. We can not stop fighting to save the lives of unborn babies. The supporters of the murder of the unborn have not repented. They have not relented. They will try to do state by state including Illinois what the unconstitutional edict of the Supreme Court did thirty five years before. This election at every level of government is important in preserving life over the ‘culture of death.’ Continue praying, continue doing the will of the LORD, continue supporting candidates who support life over death. Encourage others to do the same.
January 22, 1973 is a ‘date that will live in infamy.’ On that day thirty five years ago, 9 unelected men affirmed that women could legally murder their unborn babies. Over those thirty five years at least 40 million UNBORN BABIES were destroyed before they were even delivered. None of those babies had a choice. The vulgar slaughter continues today.
The BABY HOLOCAUST is real!!!
The BABY HOLOCAUST is here today!!!
The BABY HOLOCAUST MUST END!!!
‘Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.’ Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)
‘He (the LORD JESUS the CHRIST—my addition) went on ‘What comes out of a man is what makes him ‘unclean.’ For from within, out of men’s hearts come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, MURDER (My capitalization—my addition), adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from within and make a man ‘unclean.’’’ Mark 7: 20-23 (NIV)
‘Then he called the crowd to him along with his disciples and said: ‘If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it. What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul? If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father’s glory with the holy angels.’’ Mark 8: 34-38 (NIV)”
“Morton Secular Progressive” declares:
“It’s not particularly Christian, nor particularly useful to offer half-baked religious based criticism without offering any real solutions.”
Doesn’t it seem strange that someone who admits that he/she is not a Christian believes he/she knows what is “Christian” and what is not “Christian” and he/she, therefore, has the authority to tell someone who is a Christian and identifies himself as a Christian what he should believe and do? Regardless, I have, in fact, previously offered solutions based upon the WORD of GOD—the Bible. For example, on Wednesday, January 23, 2008; I posted the following comment entitled—“Sexual immorality in today’s world.”
“The Word of GOD—the Bible—is not a ‘you’re okay; I’m okay’ type of book. In contrast, it is a ‘You’re NOT okay; here is how to be saved spiritually through JESUS the CHRIST and only then are you okay’ type of book.
The world has been sold a lie by the Satanic concept of consenting adults being allowed to do as they wish. I know of no place in the Word of GOD where immoral sexual behavior has a dividing line between adults and children. Of course, sexual behavior between an adult and a child is immoral. However, contrary to the lies spewed forth by Satan and the world, the only Biblically acceptable sexual intercourse is between a man and a woman who are married to each other.
As a rule, the world is not going to speak out against its own immorality. Rather, those of the world attempt to justify such behavior even to the extent of trying to justify and legalize the MURDER of their own unborn children.
If Christians do not boldly speak out about immoral behavior, who will? This nation has a former President who has had a long history of being accused of sexual immorality and who had an admitted immoral relationship while President. Yet, he receives millions of dollars to speak to groups and is idolized by many. Further, his wife is now seeking the Presidency herself. Where is our moral outrage? Is being silent the same as condoning the immoral behavior?
If Christians do not boldly speak out about immoral behavior, who will? This nation has an actress who is living with and has a child by an actor although not married to each other. They are ‘partners’ in today’s vernacular. She is honored, praised, and admired throughout the world by many worldly people. She was even praised for declaring that she would not have intercourse with said actor until he was officially divorced from his previous wife although they were ‘involved’ with each other. Where is our moral outrage? Is being silent the same as condoning the immoral behavior?
If Christians do not boldly speak out about immoral behavior, who will? ‘Each of the children, who range in age from 2 to 16, has the same mother but a different father. The alleged abuser was the only father present Wednesday. The others have not responded to notices about the proceedings, Bauer said.’ (Peoria Journal Star, May 24, 2007, page B2.) Where is our moral outrage? Is being silent the same as condoning the immoral behavior?
Many of the MURDERS of UNBORN BABIES today are the result of sexual immorality outside of marriage. Sexual immorality and the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES have a positive correlation. Decrease sexual immorality and the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES will also decrease. Increase sexual immorality and the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES will increase.
‘Be imitators of God, therefore, as dearly loved children and live a life of love, just as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us as a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God.
But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God’s holy people. Nor should there be obscenity, foolish talk or coarse joking, which are out of place, but rather thanksgiving. For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure or greedy person—such a man is an idolater—has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of such things God’s wrath comes on those who are disobedient. Therefore do not be partners with them.
For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) and find out what pleases the Lord. Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.’ Ephesians 5: 1-11 (NIV)
We can either live a life for self or live a life for GOD. We can not do both! Sexual immorality is sexual immorality regardless of the age of the participants.”
To ensure that “Morton Secular Progressive” understands my first solution to the “problem” of MURDERING our own UNBORN CHILDREN, I will state it in the simplest of terms. DON’T have sexual INTERCOURSE with someone you are NOT married to! Secondly, if you are married and are fortunate enough to create a new LIFE, raise that new child with love as intended by GOD when he created man and woman and instituted the concept of family and marriage.
Unfortunately, we have been sold such lies about marriage and family that it is hard for many people to even grasp the concept of a GOD ordained marriage and a GOD ordained family and thus we try to “better” our lives based upon our own selfish desires and concepts. The Bible says:
“Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.
Husbands, love (The love here is NOT “eros” love; rather it is “agape” love, the highest form of love for it is GOD-based love—my addition) your wives, just as Christ loved (The love here is NOT “eros” love; rather it is “agape” love, the highest form of love since it is GOD-based love—my addition) the church and gave himself up for her to make her holy, cleaning her by the washing with water through the word, and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. In the same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves (The love here is NOT “eros” love; rather it is “agape” love, the highest form of love for it is GOD-based love—my addition) his wife loves (The love here is NOT “eros” love; rather it is “agape” love, the highest form of love for it is GOD-based love—my addition) himself. After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church—for we are members of his body. ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh (Quoted from the Old Testament. Jesus also quoted the same passage when saying that marriage is permanent—not something that is tossed away as happens so often today. The one exception is adultery—my addition.).’ This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church. However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.” Ephesians 5: 22-33 (NIV)
“Sons are a heritage from the Lord, CHILDREN a REWARD from HIM (My capitalizations—my addition).” Psalm 127: 3 (NIV)
“In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendent of Aaron. Both of them were upright in the sight of the God, observing all the Lord’s commandments and regulations blamelessly. But they had no children, because Elizabeth was barren; and they were both well along in years.” Luke 1: 5-7 (NIV)
“Then an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing at the right side of the altar of incense. When Zachariah saw him, he was startled and was gripped with fear. But the angel said to him: ‘Do not be afraid, Zachariah; your PRAYER HAS BEEN HEARD (Actually praying for a child! Who would do such a thing!—my capitalization, my addition). Your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you are to give him the name John.” Luke 1: 11-13 (NIV)
“When his time of service was completed, he returned home. After this his wife Elizabeth became pregnant and for five months remained in seclusion. ‘The Lord has done this for me,’ she said. ‘In these days he has shown his favor and taken away my disgrace among the people.’” Luke 1: 23-25 (NIV)
What! It was considered a DISGRACE not to have children! What was wrong with those people? NOTHING in this respect!
“Morton Secular Progressive” further says:
“ … you don’t mention how many of the 3,287+ unwanted infants you are on the list to adopt. My guess is that the number is zero because they don’t fall into your ‘christian’ demographic.”
Does this comment even make sense? What “list to adopt” if they are being MURDERED while in the womb? What is telling is that he/she uses the phrase “3,287+ unwanted infants” while I wrote “3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS.” “Morton Secular Progressive” DOES NOT deny that the babies are MURDERED but seems to want to justify those MURDERS by declaring the infants to be “unwanted” as if that rationalization is an excuse for MURDER. We are not talking about an “unwanted” piece of clothing. We are talking about a human being, a baby, a child, a toddler, an infant. It is a HOLOCAUST!
As normal, he/she thinks that he/she has the right to tell me what action I should take. If I don’t approve of MURDERING unborn children, then I must adopt all (or at least some) unborn children or my disapproval is not valid. That’s intellectual nonsense! As far as “fall into your ‘christian’ demographic” is concerned, I can’t begin to respond because I have no idea what he/she means by my “‘christian’ demographic” and, quite frankly, I doubt if he/she does. It’s just more nonsensical rhetoric that is uttered by people who can’t defend the MURDER of unborn babies.
Finally, although it’s none of his/her business, no I’m not on a list for adoption although I know Christians who are and Christians who have adopted. I believe that every child conceived by a man and a woman should have both parents raising the child. Since I am single, I should not be raising someone else’s child. And that’s another key. Whose responsibility is it to raise a child? Last time I knew, it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the PARENTS!!! Irresponsible actions do NOT erase a person’s RESPONSIBILITY for those actions.
Finally, “Morton Secular Progressive” concluded with this statement:
“I’m guessing you live at home with your mother and just create critical blogs all day.”
I’m not sure where I live or with whom I am living is relevant to my position on this issue. I can only conclude that this section of the comment is another attempt at a putdown which is also common for those who have no substantive arguments against a contrary position. However, I would like to have more time to create “critical blogs all day.” Unfortunately, I do not. I do have two websites—http://www.christiangunslinger.com/ and http://www.stopthemurder.com/—that I need to find time for. Perhaps, this criticism from “Morton Secular Progressive” will give me the motivation to get them up and running. It is well past the time to STOP THE MURDER OF UNBORN BABIES!!!
Tonight, my response to “Morton Secular Progressive” as a recent anonymous commentator identified himself or herself as he or she commented on my blog. The original comment as posted:
“Anonymous said …
I notice in your commentary that you while you rail against abortion, you don’t mention how many of the 3,287+ unwanted infants you are on the list to adopt. My guess is that the number is zero because they don’t fall into your ‘christian’ demographic. It’s not particularly Christian, nor particularly useful to offer half-baked religious based criticism without offering any real solutions. It’s crazy and quite frankly kind of creepy. I’m guessing you live at home with your mother and just create critical blogs all day.
Morton Secular Progressive
9:22 AM”
To begin with, he/she is not responding to a commentary I wrote on that particular day. But rather, to a segment I’ve been posting since I wrote a short series of comments on the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES including one posted January 22, 2008. I have written extensively on the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES since I began blogging in July of 2005. I try to do a short series in January of each year since the obscene Supreme Court decision was dictated in January of 1973. The segment states the following:
“Based upon past historical data: 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS have occurred in the last 24 hours in the United States. See my post “BABY HOLOCAUST” posted January 22, 2008.”
The complete January 22, 2008 post entitled “BABY HOLOCAUST” (You did ask for the entire post didn’t you?) states the following:
“It has been 35 years since insanity has hit an all time high. It has been 35 years since Satan tightened his grip upon the United States of America. It has been 35 years since the government sanctioned MURDER of UNBORN CHILDREN!!!
According to a recent news article by the Associated Press posted on the internet on January 17, 2008: ‘The number of abortions in the United States fell to 1.2 million in 2005, down 25 percent from the all-time high of 1.6 million in 1990 and dropping the abortion rate to its lowest level since 1974, according to [(a)—my addition] report issued Thursday.’ Are we suppose to applause a decrease in the murder of unborn babies to 1.2 million in one year? True, it is better than 1.6 million. However, 1.2 million is 1.2 million too many!!! We are MURDERING 1.2 million UNBORN BABIES in one year!!!
Let’s examine these MURDEROUS numbers using a very conservative approach and based upon the information given in the Associated Press story. I checked a previous post I wrote on abortion. From that post, I got the number of abortions for 1973 and 1974—the first two years after MURDER was legalized by an obscene Court decision. The rate of UNBORN BABY MURDERS in 1973 was 774,600. The rate of UNBORN BABY MURDERS in 1974 was 898,600. We know from the news story that the highest number of UNBORN BABY MURDERS was 1.6 million in 1990. Using the conservative number of 1.2 million for each of the additional thirty years up to the end of 2005—the last year of figures, we have an additional 36 million UNBORN BABY MURDERS. The total conservative number of UNBORN BABY MURDERS is 39,273,200 through 2005. Including 2006 and 2007 that figure must be over 40 million UNBORN BABY MURDERS. Is there any other way to describe this slaughter of UNBORN BABIES than as a BABY HOLOCAUST???
Described another way, every day in 2005 there were 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS. Every hour of every day in 2005 there were 136+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS. Every minute of every hour of every day in 2005 there were 2+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS.
IN 2005 by the recorded record:
365 days = 1,200,000 UNBORN BABY MURDERS
1 day = 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS
1 hour = 136+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS
1 minute = 2 + UNBORN BABY MURDERS
(These figures DO NOT include any MURDERS by “morning after” pills since there is no possible way for man to document these MURDERS. Of course, GOD knows every single additional MURDER that occurs because of the use of “morning after” pills.)
Slowly, those of moral conviction seem to have made some headway to change this perversity. Yet, much still must be accomplished. We still have every major candidate of one political party supporting the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES. WE still have too many who actually have the immoral audacity to demand to be allowed to MURDER our UNBORN TODDLERS.
Wars fought by the United States have killed thousands upon thousands of Americans. The War of 1812 had an estimated 22,500 dead. The Civil War had an estimated 620,000 causalities. World War I had an estimated 126,000 dead. World War II had an estimated 405,500 dead. The Korean Conflict had an estimated 53,000 dead. The Vietnam Conflict had 47,378 battle deaths and 10,799 other deaths.
Of course, the United States has fought in other wars and conflicts besides those listed. To account for those deaths, add an additional 200,000. (That number is probably inflated but I will use it for this illustration.) That is an estimated 1,485,177 men, women, and probably some children killed in wars fought by the U.S. in the approximate 230 year history of our country. That’s about 1.5 million people in 230 years. That’s a high price to pay for freedom. It’s a price that most of those killed were willing to pay.
January 22, 1973 is a ‘date that will live in infamy.’ On that day thirty five years ago, 9 unelected men declared that women could legally murder their unborn babies. Over those thirty five years at least 40 million UNBORN BABIES were destroyed before they were even delivered. None of those babies had a choice. The vulgar slaughter continues today.
It is overwhelmingly holocaustic. It is overwhelmingly tragic. On Sunday January 15, 2006, page A3 a large display ad was published in the Peoria Journal Star. At the top left of the ad was a picture of a small baby. To the right were these words, ‘Take my hand not my life…’ The ad was calling attention to Sanctity of Human Life Week which was January 16-22, 2006.
How ungodly, how unholy, how tragic! Human life in the United States is now so undervalued that it is necessary to advertise the importance of human life.
January 22, 1973 is a ‘date that will live in infamy.’ On that day thirty five years ago, 9 unelected men proclaimed that women could legally murder their unborn babies. Over those thirty five years at least 40 million UNBORN BABIES were destroyed before they were even delivered. None of those babies had a choice. The vulgar slaughter continues today.
The supporters of the murder of unborn babies are fearful. They have not yet repented. They have not yet learned to fear the CREATOR of the universe. But, they are fearful. They are afraid, that with the changes in the Supreme Court, the Court will recognize the obvious—that each baby is a human life and that no one has the right to murder that life. Illinois’ two Senators voted against Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito. They are fearful that Roe v. Wade will finally be overturned. They have already seen the Court ordered end to ‘partial birth’ MURDERS.
January 22, 1973 is a ‘date that will live in infamy.’ On that day thirty five years ago, 9 unelected men ruled that women could legally murder their unborn babies. Over those thirty five years at least 40 million UNBORN BABIES were destroyed before they were even delivered. None of those babies had a choice. The vulgar slaughter continues today.
The Peoria Journal Star published an article (1/21/06. page B5) entitled ‘Group wants state to protect abortion.’ ‘The Illinois chapter of the National Organization for Women is pressuring state legislators to do more to keep abortion legal in the state regardless of federal decisions…. The Freedom of Choice Act will not be drafted and introduced in the General Assembly until the 2007 spring session. Members of the group say they are trying to line up commitments from legislators. Essentially, the act would keep abortion in Illinois legal, even if the Supreme Court overturns the 1973 decision.’ Neither that act nor any other act to legalize abortion in the State passed the General Assembly in 2007.
January 22, 1973 is a ‘date that will live in infamy.’ On that day thirty five years ago, 9 unelected men asserted that women could legally murder their unborn babies. Over those thirty five years at least 40 million UNBORN BABIES were destroyed before they were even delivered. None of those babies had a choice. The vulgar slaughter continues today.
Those who support life over MURDER and DEATH are not finished. We can not relax. We can not stop fighting to save the lives of unborn babies. The supporters of the murder of the unborn have not repented. They have not relented. They will try to do state by state including Illinois what the unconstitutional edict of the Supreme Court did thirty five years before. This election at every level of government is important in preserving life over the ‘culture of death.’ Continue praying, continue doing the will of the LORD, continue supporting candidates who support life over death. Encourage others to do the same.
January 22, 1973 is a ‘date that will live in infamy.’ On that day thirty five years ago, 9 unelected men affirmed that women could legally murder their unborn babies. Over those thirty five years at least 40 million UNBORN BABIES were destroyed before they were even delivered. None of those babies had a choice. The vulgar slaughter continues today.
The BABY HOLOCAUST is real!!!
The BABY HOLOCAUST is here today!!!
The BABY HOLOCAUST MUST END!!!
‘Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.’ Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)
‘He (the LORD JESUS the CHRIST—my addition) went on ‘What comes out of a man is what makes him ‘unclean.’ For from within, out of men’s hearts come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, MURDER (My capitalization—my addition), adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from within and make a man ‘unclean.’’’ Mark 7: 20-23 (NIV)
‘Then he called the crowd to him along with his disciples and said: ‘If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it. What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul? If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father’s glory with the holy angels.’’ Mark 8: 34-38 (NIV)”
“Morton Secular Progressive” declares:
“It’s not particularly Christian, nor particularly useful to offer half-baked religious based criticism without offering any real solutions.”
Doesn’t it seem strange that someone who admits that he/she is not a Christian believes he/she knows what is “Christian” and what is not “Christian” and he/she, therefore, has the authority to tell someone who is a Christian and identifies himself as a Christian what he should believe and do? Regardless, I have, in fact, previously offered solutions based upon the WORD of GOD—the Bible. For example, on Wednesday, January 23, 2008; I posted the following comment entitled—“Sexual immorality in today’s world.”
“The Word of GOD—the Bible—is not a ‘you’re okay; I’m okay’ type of book. In contrast, it is a ‘You’re NOT okay; here is how to be saved spiritually through JESUS the CHRIST and only then are you okay’ type of book.
The world has been sold a lie by the Satanic concept of consenting adults being allowed to do as they wish. I know of no place in the Word of GOD where immoral sexual behavior has a dividing line between adults and children. Of course, sexual behavior between an adult and a child is immoral. However, contrary to the lies spewed forth by Satan and the world, the only Biblically acceptable sexual intercourse is between a man and a woman who are married to each other.
As a rule, the world is not going to speak out against its own immorality. Rather, those of the world attempt to justify such behavior even to the extent of trying to justify and legalize the MURDER of their own unborn children.
If Christians do not boldly speak out about immoral behavior, who will? This nation has a former President who has had a long history of being accused of sexual immorality and who had an admitted immoral relationship while President. Yet, he receives millions of dollars to speak to groups and is idolized by many. Further, his wife is now seeking the Presidency herself. Where is our moral outrage? Is being silent the same as condoning the immoral behavior?
If Christians do not boldly speak out about immoral behavior, who will? This nation has an actress who is living with and has a child by an actor although not married to each other. They are ‘partners’ in today’s vernacular. She is honored, praised, and admired throughout the world by many worldly people. She was even praised for declaring that she would not have intercourse with said actor until he was officially divorced from his previous wife although they were ‘involved’ with each other. Where is our moral outrage? Is being silent the same as condoning the immoral behavior?
If Christians do not boldly speak out about immoral behavior, who will? ‘Each of the children, who range in age from 2 to 16, has the same mother but a different father. The alleged abuser was the only father present Wednesday. The others have not responded to notices about the proceedings, Bauer said.’ (Peoria Journal Star, May 24, 2007, page B2.) Where is our moral outrage? Is being silent the same as condoning the immoral behavior?
Many of the MURDERS of UNBORN BABIES today are the result of sexual immorality outside of marriage. Sexual immorality and the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES have a positive correlation. Decrease sexual immorality and the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES will also decrease. Increase sexual immorality and the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES will increase.
‘Be imitators of God, therefore, as dearly loved children and live a life of love, just as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us as a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God.
But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God’s holy people. Nor should there be obscenity, foolish talk or coarse joking, which are out of place, but rather thanksgiving. For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure or greedy person—such a man is an idolater—has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of such things God’s wrath comes on those who are disobedient. Therefore do not be partners with them.
For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) and find out what pleases the Lord. Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.’ Ephesians 5: 1-11 (NIV)
We can either live a life for self or live a life for GOD. We can not do both! Sexual immorality is sexual immorality regardless of the age of the participants.”
To ensure that “Morton Secular Progressive” understands my first solution to the “problem” of MURDERING our own UNBORN CHILDREN, I will state it in the simplest of terms. DON’T have sexual INTERCOURSE with someone you are NOT married to! Secondly, if you are married and are fortunate enough to create a new LIFE, raise that new child with love as intended by GOD when he created man and woman and instituted the concept of family and marriage.
Unfortunately, we have been sold such lies about marriage and family that it is hard for many people to even grasp the concept of a GOD ordained marriage and a GOD ordained family and thus we try to “better” our lives based upon our own selfish desires and concepts. The Bible says:
“Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.
Husbands, love (The love here is NOT “eros” love; rather it is “agape” love, the highest form of love for it is GOD-based love—my addition) your wives, just as Christ loved (The love here is NOT “eros” love; rather it is “agape” love, the highest form of love since it is GOD-based love—my addition) the church and gave himself up for her to make her holy, cleaning her by the washing with water through the word, and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. In the same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves (The love here is NOT “eros” love; rather it is “agape” love, the highest form of love for it is GOD-based love—my addition) his wife loves (The love here is NOT “eros” love; rather it is “agape” love, the highest form of love for it is GOD-based love—my addition) himself. After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church—for we are members of his body. ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh (Quoted from the Old Testament. Jesus also quoted the same passage when saying that marriage is permanent—not something that is tossed away as happens so often today. The one exception is adultery—my addition.).’ This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church. However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.” Ephesians 5: 22-33 (NIV)
“Sons are a heritage from the Lord, CHILDREN a REWARD from HIM (My capitalizations—my addition).” Psalm 127: 3 (NIV)
“In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendent of Aaron. Both of them were upright in the sight of the God, observing all the Lord’s commandments and regulations blamelessly. But they had no children, because Elizabeth was barren; and they were both well along in years.” Luke 1: 5-7 (NIV)
“Then an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing at the right side of the altar of incense. When Zachariah saw him, he was startled and was gripped with fear. But the angel said to him: ‘Do not be afraid, Zachariah; your PRAYER HAS BEEN HEARD (Actually praying for a child! Who would do such a thing!—my capitalization, my addition). Your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you are to give him the name John.” Luke 1: 11-13 (NIV)
“When his time of service was completed, he returned home. After this his wife Elizabeth became pregnant and for five months remained in seclusion. ‘The Lord has done this for me,’ she said. ‘In these days he has shown his favor and taken away my disgrace among the people.’” Luke 1: 23-25 (NIV)
What! It was considered a DISGRACE not to have children! What was wrong with those people? NOTHING in this respect!
“Morton Secular Progressive” further says:
“ … you don’t mention how many of the 3,287+ unwanted infants you are on the list to adopt. My guess is that the number is zero because they don’t fall into your ‘christian’ demographic.”
Does this comment even make sense? What “list to adopt” if they are being MURDERED while in the womb? What is telling is that he/she uses the phrase “3,287+ unwanted infants” while I wrote “3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS.” “Morton Secular Progressive” DOES NOT deny that the babies are MURDERED but seems to want to justify those MURDERS by declaring the infants to be “unwanted” as if that rationalization is an excuse for MURDER. We are not talking about an “unwanted” piece of clothing. We are talking about a human being, a baby, a child, a toddler, an infant. It is a HOLOCAUST!
As normal, he/she thinks that he/she has the right to tell me what action I should take. If I don’t approve of MURDERING unborn children, then I must adopt all (or at least some) unborn children or my disapproval is not valid. That’s intellectual nonsense! As far as “fall into your ‘christian’ demographic” is concerned, I can’t begin to respond because I have no idea what he/she means by my “‘christian’ demographic” and, quite frankly, I doubt if he/she does. It’s just more nonsensical rhetoric that is uttered by people who can’t defend the MURDER of unborn babies.
Finally, although it’s none of his/her business, no I’m not on a list for adoption although I know Christians who are and Christians who have adopted. I believe that every child conceived by a man and a woman should have both parents raising the child. Since I am single, I should not be raising someone else’s child. And that’s another key. Whose responsibility is it to raise a child? Last time I knew, it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the PARENTS!!! Irresponsible actions do NOT erase a person’s RESPONSIBILITY for those actions.
Finally, “Morton Secular Progressive” concluded with this statement:
“I’m guessing you live at home with your mother and just create critical blogs all day.”
I’m not sure where I live or with whom I am living is relevant to my position on this issue. I can only conclude that this section of the comment is another attempt at a putdown which is also common for those who have no substantive arguments against a contrary position. However, I would like to have more time to create “critical blogs all day.” Unfortunately, I do not. I do have two websites—http://www.christiangunslinger.com/ and http://www.stopthemurder.com/—that I need to find time for. Perhaps, this criticism from “Morton Secular Progressive” will give me the motivation to get them up and running. It is well past the time to STOP THE MURDER OF UNBORN BABIES!!!
posted by Christian Gunslinger at 4:36 AM
5 Comments:
You divorced?
You divorced?
Hopefully never married and no offspring, I can only think of how screwed up any kids he might have would be. Though it would be very funny and ironic if he had kids and they turned out to be gay.
They would definately be gay. I don't see any other option.
Also, obviously not married. Whose wife would let them blog this often? Bitter.
Post a Comment
<< Home