Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Indiana, Planned MURDERHOOD, the Federal Courts, and the Constitution

On my June 3rd post I wrote that the State of Indiana was taken to federal court because of a newly passed law to restrict money to Planned MURDERHOOD. At that time, I pointed out the Constitutionally obvious truth that an inferior federal court has NO jurisdiction over the case. The inferior federal court has now issued its Unconstitutional ruling which places an injunction against the State in relation to a Constitutionally passed law of the State of Indiana.

From: http://enews.earthlink.net/article/us?guid=20110624/b43a2952-3d43-4d27-bbc3-b88e8bc91c50

“Judge stops Indiana cuts to Planned Parenthood funds
From Associated Press
June 25, 2011 3:03 AM EDT

INDIANAPOLIS (AP)—Planned Parenthood of Indiana expects to start offering services to Medicaid patients again Saturday after a federal judge ruled the state is not allowed to cut off the organization’s public funding for general health services solely because it also provides abortions.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt’s ruling Friday blocked parts of a tough new abortion law and granted Planned Parenthood of Indiana’s request for an injunction on the state’s move to defund the organization. The decision sides with federal officials who said states cannot restrict Medicaid recipients’ freedom to choose their health care provider or disqualify Medicaid providers merely because they also offer abortions.

Indiana attorney general’s office spokesman Bryan Corbin said the state likely will appeal.” (As well it should since the inferior federal court does NOT have the Constitutional authority to do anything when a State is a party to a federal law suit. This case, as I have repeatedly said, Constitutionally should start and end at the Supreme Court. Until then, the law is inherently Constitutional!!!—my addition)

“A recent federal Medicaid bulletin said states may not exclude qualified health care providers merely because they also provide abortions. Pratt noted in her ruling that the federal government had threatened to withhold some or all of Indiana’s Medicaid funds because of the new law, which could total more than $5 billion annually and affect nearly 1 million residents.

‘Thus, denying the injunction could pit the federal government against the State of Indiana in a high-stakes political impasse,’ the judge wrote in her ruling. ‘And if dogma trumps pragmatism and neither side budges, Indiana’s most vulnerable citizens could end up paying the price as the collateral damage of a partisan battle.’” (Exactly how does any of this make the law Unconstitutional! Give the provision of the U.S. Constitution that is being violated by the State of Indiana with the passage of this law. But wait!!! This inferior federal court has NO authority to do anything in this area. No inferior federal court has Constitutional authority over a State. NONE!!!—my addition)

“Daniels’ office said the governor did not have an immediate statement on ruling.

Marcus Barlow, a spokesman for the state’s Family and Social Services Administration, said that while the injunction is in effect, Planned Parenthood will be able to provide services and apply for Medicaid reimbursement as it did previously. He said the agency was unsure if it would push for an appeal of the decision or whether Planned Parenthood would continue to get funding during any appeal period.” (To provide funding to Planned MURDERHOOD is to violate a Constitutionally passed State law. An Unconstitutional decision by an inferior federal court is null and void by definition. The court has NO jurisdiction! The State has the right and duty to withhold funding!—my addition)

“Indiana Right to Life President Mike Fichter called the judge’s overall decision troubling.

‘We are deeply disappointed that today’s ruling brushes aside the will of the Indiana Legislature,’ he said. (Exactly correct! And Unconstitutionally did so!!!—my addition) ‘This ruling opens the pipeline for our tax dollars to flow back into the hands of Indiana’s largest abortion provider and denies women seeking abortions the right to know about an unborn child’s ability to feel pain.’”

For as I’ve said repeatedly, NO inferior federal court judge has jurisdiction over a State. NONE! The Constitution of the United States of America clearly states in Article III, Section 2, ¶ 2: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.” Who has jurisdiction when a State is a party to the case? The United States Supreme Court!!! And only the United States Supreme Court until and unless the Constitution is amended!!! An inferior federal court has no such jurisdiction! The inferior federal courts in the United States have NO jurisdiction over States! NONE!!!

Just as Christians restore the church by returning to the Bible and being obedient to the will of GOD as given in the Bible, so will we the people restore the nation by returning to the Constitution as written by the founding fathers and as Amended by we the people through our representatives. However, don’t be deceived. To save the moral decay of this nation both MUST occur.

It’s time, it is past time to TAKE BACK THE NATION!!!
It’s time, it is past time to TAKE BACK THE NATION!!!
It’s time, it is past time to TAKE BACK THE NATION!!!