Obamacare May Go Back to the Supreme Court Over the Unconstitutional Provision to Force People to Finance the Abortion (AKA MURDER) of Unborn Babies

Texas Senator Ted Cruz’s Father—“We Mutually Pledge to Each Other Our Lives, Our Fortunes and Our Sacred Honor”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGURa1DfWEo#at=420

—

Coming rally in Washington D.C.—July 15^th

From: NumbersUSA www.numbersusa.com

“July 15th in Washington, D.C.: Anti-Amnesty March and Rally

Although this is not a NumbersUSA event, we are forwarding information to members who may be interested in attending.

Dear activist,

The Black American Leadership Alliance (BALA) has organized an anti-amnesty march and rally—the DC March for Jobs—in Washington, D.C. on Monday, July 15th. The goal is to ‘demand that our leaders reject amnesty, enforce immigration laws as written, and support policies that put black U.S. citizens back to work.’

As their web site notes, if the Gang of Eight’s immigration bill is enacted, it ‘will be costly for all Americans, but will harm black American workers more than any other group. Mass immigration and amnesty puts those poorest Americans from all walks of life out of work and suppresses wages, causing them to compete with aliens willing to work in poorer working conditions for cheaper pay. When 22 million Americans are either out of work or unemployed, now is no time to further over-saturate the labor force with increased immigration levels and amnesty. If Congress doesn’t stop this irresponsible legislation, the United States will continue to see more and more Americans of all races out of jobs and on the streets.’

The list of speakers for the event includes:

(Added to the speaker list are Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Steve King—two of my favorite Congressmen!)

Senator Ted Cruz (R-Tex.)
Representative Steve King (R-Iowa)
Former Representative Alan West (Fla.);
Representative Mo Brooks (R-Ala.);
State Senate Elbert Guillory (R-La.);
Frank Morris, former Executive Director of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation;
Mike Cutler, former INS Agent; and
Dennis Michael Lynch, filmmaker .

What: DC March for Jobs
When: Monday, July 15, 2013—9:30 a.m.
Where: Starts at Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC

For more information, visit https://www.numbersusa.com/content/action/dc-march-jobs.html

Alternatively, you can call 202-349-0858 or send an email to info@blackallianceorg.org

Look for a list of State Organizers on the site. Your state may already have a delegation planning to attend.”

Aren’t you interested in seeing how the mainstream media covers this—if at all? A Black group directly challenging the Democrat Party, Barack Hussein Obama, and the Black Congressional Caucus! If only the Republican Party leadership has the good sense to invite these conservative Black leaders into the mainstream of the Republican Party—where they should be! If not, they should join the TEA Party because we are fighting for the same things! Join Lloyd Marcus and others! Become Tea Party active!

—

I have posted on http://christiangunslinger1.blogspot.com information on the recall of Senators McCain and Flake of Arizona. Get involved! Get them out of office and replaced by social and fiscal conservatives!”

—

Petition to stand for families: http://www.standforthefamily.org/sff/sign_petition.cfm

The ‘I Stand for the Family’ International Petition

“Whereas, the traditional family is increasingly under attack on a variety of fronts at the international, national, state, and local levels, and

Whereas, weakening the family will have serious negative repercussions on families, individuals and societies, and

Whereas, it will take the best efforts of all of us working together to stem the tide of family disintegration and to preserve the family,

Therefore, I pledge my support to preserve and protect the family in the arenas where I have influence. Specifically I support efforts to:

1) Strengthen the family as the fundamental unit of society

2) Preserve and protect marriage as only between a man and a woman

3) Protect life before as well as after birth

4) Preserve the rights of all citizens to practice their religion as they choose so long as that does not infringe on the rights of others

5) Preserve the rights of parents to direct the moral, spiritual and intellectual upbringing of their children.”

—

From: http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/court-bats-obamacare-back-to-supremes/

“Court bats Obamacare back to Supremes
Roberts and company get 2nd chance to slap down health care takeover
By Bob Unruh

Chief Justice John Roberts and his cohorts on the U.S. Supreme Court will get a second chance to slap down the health care takeover known as Obamacare (This can not happen until the next session of the Supreme Court. This session has ended!—my addition).

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today that the Constitution’s Commerce Clause is enough authority for Congress to demand employers purchase private health insurance for their employees or pay government fines (Which is absolute nonsense!—my addition).

The case was launched by Liberty University at the outset of the fight over Obamacare. The university confirmed today as soon as the appellate court decision was announced that it would petition the Supreme Court to hear its challenge to the entire employer mandate.

‘If we are successful in striking down the employer mandate, it will benefit both religious and nonreligious employers,’ the university said in an announcement. ‘The petition will also include the claim that the forced funding of abortion violates the free exercise of religion and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act with respect to individuals (Which it MOST CERTAINLY does! I will NOT be involved in funding the MURDER of an unborn child and no government on earth can force me to do so! NONE!—my addition).’

Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, which is representing Liberty University, said he’s glad the court ‘reached the merits on the employer mandate, even though the court got it wrong, because this clears the way for the case to now go to the Supreme Court (If the Court decides to hear the case!—my addition).’

‘The Supreme Court concluded that the individual mandate cannot be upheld under the Commerce Clause because Congress cannot force people to buy an unwanted product (No kidding! It also can not be a tax because it would be a tax for NOT buying a specific product. Nowhere in the Constitution does the Congress have that authority!—my addition),’ Staver said. ‘But this court of appeals has now decided that Congress can force employers to buy an unwanted product. As Congress cannot force individuals to buy an unwanted product, neither can it force employers to do so. I look forward to having this matter before the Supreme Court (Of course it can not! That would be having unconstitutional control of businesses which is EXACTLY what the Obama Administration wants!—my addition).’

The appeals court agreed with Liberty Counsel on the procedural issues raised, that the school and individual plaintiffs have legal standing to bring the case and that the Anti-Injunction Act does not interfere.

The 4th Circuit judges found a stunning reason for its decision to turn down Liberty’s appeal, however, stating, ‘Plaintiffs present no plausible claim that the act substantially burdens their free exercise of religion, by forcing them to facilitate or support abortion or otherwise (Seriously! The government can force an individual to violate his religious beliefs? NOT me!—my addition).’

There have been dozens of lawsuits against the government over that very requirement and multiple decisions by federal judges that the government cannot enforce those provisions until the full legal argument is played out.

Liberty Counsel explained: ‘Unlike the individual mandate, the employer mandate exceeds Congress’ enumerated powers because it would impose a heavy burden upon employers. The penalties, which can be up to $15,000 per day per employee, are so punitive that they will not be upheld under the Taxing and Spending Clause. This refusal will result in millions of dollars in fines annually. These excessive fines constitute an impermissible penalty (The power to tax is the power to destroy!—my addition).’

On the first trip to the Supreme Court, the justices determined Obamacare was a legitimate tax, including its abortion-funding mechanisms.

Added Staver: ‘Liberty University cannot, as a matter of religious conviction, provide any coverage, direct or indirect, for abortion-inducing drugs or IUDs. This refusal will result in millions of dollars in fines annually. The act coerces Liberty to violate its religious convictions under penalty of enormous fines.’

While the Supreme Court last year ruled on Obamacare, it left several of the questions about the program unanswered. Liberty University said it had a right to have those litigated, and the Supreme Court agreed, resulting in the pending case.

Liberty Counsel said this challenge to Obamacare is the most comprehensive case pending because it challenges the employer mandate that companies must provide abortifacients or pay a penalty, the abortion mandate for religious employers, the abortion mandate for individuals and the entire law because tax bills must originate in the House (Yes, they MUST according to the Constitution! Article I, Section 7, ¶ 1:

“Section. 7.
All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.”—my addition).

‘Obamacare represents a frontal attack to religious freedom. Obamacare is a train about to collide with the fundamental right to free exercise of religion,’ Staver said earlier in the battle. ‘Not only does Obamacare violate the rights of religious employers because of its abortion mandate, it violates the rights of individuals who oppose abortion and the rights of all employers, religious or not.’

Liberty Counsel told the court that because Obamacare was classified as a tax, it violates the Origination Clause of the Constitution, which requires all tax laws to originate in the House.

Obamacare originated as House Resolution 3590, the Service Members Home Ownership Act. But after passing the House, Senate President Harry Reid simply removed its contents and title, replacing it with a new title and more than 2,000 pages (The Illinois General Assembly does this all the time which also violates the Illinois Constitution!—my addition).

‘H.R. 3590 was not originally a bill for raising revenue,’ Staver said. ‘This is the first time that the gut-and-amend practice has been used by the Senate to impose new taxes. Our Founding Fathers wrote the Origination Clause because they wanted to keep the power to tax as close to the people as possible. Even after the 17th Amendment passed, allowing for the direct election of senators, the Origination Clause was preserved to keep the ‘power of the purse’ closer to the people, through their elected representatives.

‘Obamacare cannot originate in the Senate and is therefore invalid (True! However, will a majority of the Supreme Court? To many of them, the Constitution is only to be used when it suits their purposes.’—my addition) Staver earlier explained that the whole argument changed when the Supreme Court ordered the 4th Circuit to consider the case (We are relying too much on an unreliable court system which has no problem ignoring/violating the Constitution! And most of the people do not know it and/or do not care!—my addition).

Staver said the university will clearly state that all abortions—whether chemically induced by drugs shortly after conception or performed in an abortion clinic—are equally reprehensible to many people of faith (Should be ANY person of faith!—my addition).

‘God created human life. Its sanctity and dignity are protected by God,’ Staver said. ‘We have no right to take innocent human lives, and certainly we cannot be forced to fund the taking of innocent life—basically forced to fund murder. We can’t do that. That’s a line that we simply cannot cross (And I will not cross!—my addition).”