Thursday, December 05, 2013

Breast Cancer in Women: Is there a Significant Difference Link between Having an Abortion and Developing Breast Cancer? Scientific Studies Claim …….

Competition is good for the economy and competition is good for the Republican Party!!! Competition keeps Congressmen committed to we the people!!! Primary Republicans who do not support the Constitution as written.


“Stunningly huge cancer threat uncovered

Dozens of studies result in ‘a real game-changer’

A new meta-analysis of studies concludes that a single abortion raises the risk of breast cancer for a woman by an astonishing 44 percent. (My use of red. Not only does every abortion MURDER an innocent unborn baby but, according to numerous studies, every abortion significantly increases the risk of breast cancer! When is the federal government going to issue warnings about this? When is the MURDER industry going to acknowledge these risks? Who is involved in the real War on Women?” Who does not care about the health of women? LEFTIST DEMOCRATS!my addition).

Professor Joel Brind, a science adviser for the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer who reached a similar conclusion in 1996 (This has been know for at least 20 years and still no outrage! MURDER is more important than the health of women?my addition), called the finding a “real game-changer” in the controversy over the link between abortion and breast cancer.

The new study’s conclusion comes amid legal battles against Obamacare’s requirement that employers pay for abortifacients and steroid drugs, commonly known as birth control pills.

The analysis by Yubei Huang, published in the peer-reviewed journal Cancer Causes and Control, looked at all 36 studies that have been done in China regarding the risk of developing breast cancer for women who have had at least one induced abortion (Is there any nation that has more abortions per year than China?my addition).

The risk rocketed 44 percent, Huang found, after one abortion. After two, the risk rose to 76 percent. After three, it climbed to 89 percent.

Brind said his 1996 study was attacked by abortion advocates ‘entrenched in universities, medical societies, breast cancer charities, journals, and especially, government agencies like the National Cancer Institute,’ the NCI.

‘In reality, the NCI is just another corrupt federal agency like the IRS and the NSA (When it comes toprotectingtherightto MURDER the unborn, one must protectthegrowthindustry!my addition),’ he asserted.

Brind said that despite the evidence, abortion advocates ‘have viciously been attacking pro-life pregnancy resources centers (PRCs) for ‘lying’ to women by telling them about the ABC link as a reality (Of course! They are the LIARS! They are the MURDERERS!my addition).’

But now comes the confirming Chinese study.

‘Not only does it validate the earlier findings from 1996, but its findings are even stronger,’ he said.

First, it documents a 44 percent breast cancer risk increase with a single abortion.

It also confirms the ‘dose effect,’ that more abortions results in a higher risk (Makes sense!my addition), he said.

‘Risk factors that show such a dose effect have more credibility in terms of actually causing the disease,’ he noted.

Third, he pointed out the China study’s statement that the ‘lack of a social stigmas associated with induced abortion in China may limit the amount of underreporting.’

Other studies, she said, have been attacked based on the assumption that many women have abortions but won’t admit it, keeping their healthy results out of the study tabulations.

That ‘line of attack,’ he said, ‘has now been neutralized.’

And he noted studies from India and Bangladesh earlier this year ‘reported breast cancer risk increases of unprecedented magnitude: over 600 percent and over 2,000 percent, respectively, among women who had any induced abortions.’

Americans must pay attention, he said, because of the pending U.S. Supreme Court cases over Obamacare’s required coverage of abortion and contraceptives.

He noted the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer and the Breast Cancer Prevention Institute have filed briefs in the cases.

‘Women do want to know’

Dr. Jane Orient, a spokeswoman for the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, told WND it is outrageous that American health care providers are not more aggressive and deliberate in warning women of the risk of a fatal cancer if they choose to abort (Scared off by the MURDER industry! Who screams louder to protect their cash cow?my addition).

‘Women do want to know,’ she said. ‘The abortion interests do not want them to know this (Of course they do not! It will scare off customers! They are in this for the money NOT for womens health!my addition). The medical establishment has been behind the effort to conceal it [the link].’

Reggie Littlejohn, whose organization Womens Rights Without Frontiers focuses on China’s forced-abortion policy, said the warning to women around the world is clear.

‘Obviously this does not simply apply to Chinese women, but to all women. When we’re talking about informed consent in the U.S., women need to be informed of the very strong link between abortion and breast cancer (They will not be by the MURDER industry nor by the establishment media! Have you seen this on CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, CNN, or for that matter FOX? I dont watch any of them. But, I doubt if it is in the news! If it is, the starting statement will beA CONTROVERSIAL new ….” my addition).’ she said.

She said the documentation turns the Chinese policy of one-child limits and forced abortion into secondary women’s rights violations. The first violation is when hundreds of thousands of unborn girls are aborted each year in a society that stands on the primacy of males. The second is when an aborted baby girl’s mother faces the much higher risk of breast cancer (The Left does not care!my addition).

Her organization noted the Chinese work was done by a team of epidemiologists from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital.

The study found induced abortion significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer among Chinese females, and the risk of breast cancer increases as the number of IA increases (My use of redmy addition).’

Historically, China had had a low breast cancer rate compared to Western nations, but over the last two decades the rate has ‘increased at an alarming rate,’ the study said.

The increase was parallel to China’s one-child policy, which includes forced abortions, the report said.

‘This groundbreaking study reveals yet another human rights violation in connection with China’s one-child policy: Forcibly aborted women are also at significantly higher risk of breast cancer,’ Littlejohn said.

‘Not only do the women of China have to endure the tremendous trauma of late-term forced abortion, taking their babies from them; but also, years later, breast cancer, taking their health and even their lives from them,’ she said.

Littlejohn said the strong association of abortion and breast cancer established by the new study ‘brings the women’s rights violations under the one child policy to a new level: a woman pregnant in China without a birth permit is subjected to both government-imposed forced abortion, and also breast cancer as a result of it.’

‘Where abortion is forced, the subsequent development of breast cancer becomes a violation of women’s rights in itself,’ she said.

The study looked at 36 articles (two cohort studies and 34 case-control studies) covering 14 provinces in China.

Just months ago, the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association, JAMA, published a study showing the rate of metastatic breast cancer in women ages 25 to 39 nearly doubled between 1976 and 2009, from 1.53 to 2.9 per 100,000 (“legalizedMURDER by abortion began in 1973! Coincidence? I do not think so!my addition).

The American Council on Science and Health calls the increase ‘slight (Slight! It is almost a doubling! 1.53 X 2 = 3.06!my addition).’ But at the time, Orient pointed out there has been no corresponding increase in older women.

Karen Malec, president of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer, said it was ‘utterly stunning’ that lead author Rebecca Johnson’s team called the increased incidence in advanced cancers among young women ‘small.’

‘That’s a nearly doubled increase in the incidence of a disease with a mean five-year fatality rate of 69 percent,’ she said. ‘By contrast, the mean five-year fatality rate among women with breast cancers that have not spread to distant sites is 13.2 percent.’

And what distinguishes the younger women from the older? The sexual revolution, said Orient.

‘Young women in huge numbers have taken higher doses of hormones than their menopausal sistersin birth-control pills,’ she said.

It was in 2005 when the World Health Organization classified oral contraceptives as Class-1 carcinogens, one of only about 100 substances found to be ‘carcinogenic in humans.’

Orient said breast cancer is generally hormone sensitive and is often treated with anti-estrogens. Pregnancy is the most important cause of a high estrogen level (My use of redmy addition).

She noted estrogen increases by 2,000 percent by the end of the first trimester, increasing cancer vulnerability. However, by the end of pregnancy, 85 percent of breast-cancer tissue has become cancer-resistant because of hormones made by the fetal-placenta presence.

That means a completed pregnancy protects against breast cancer (My use of redmy addition). The protection is lost when a pregnancy is aborted, making a woman even more vulnerable to breast cancer (My use of redmy addition).

Buried by politics

Orient said there have been dozens of studies that have shown a significant increase in breast cancer in women who have had an abortion (My use of redmy addition).

In 2010, Bradley Mattes, executive director of the Life Issues Institute told WND that for years, major research institutes have denied any link between abortion and breast cancer because the issue has been politicized (My use of red. The REAL WAR on WOMEN!”my addition).’

‘It’s not politically correct to acknowledge that,’ said Mattes. ‘It took many years for the link between smoking and lung cancer to be acknowledged.’

‘They deny there’s a link between abortion and breast cancer,’ Mattes told WND at the time. ‘Even if the media came down and hit them in the head, I don’t believe that they’d change their mind because they believe abortion is a positive.’

WND reported in 2007 a study showed abortions could be classified as carcinogens, because the number of breast cancer cases could be predicted reasonably accurately based on the number of abortions in a given population.

The study, ‘The Breast Cancer Epidemic: Modeling and Forecasts Based on Abortion and Other Risk Factors,’ was done by Patrick S. Carroll of London-based research institute PAPRI. The results were published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

The study showed that among risk factors, abortion is the best predictor of breast cancer (My use of redmy addition).’

WND reported in 2005 that for the first time, an abortion clinic had accepted an order of judgment for performing the procedure without informing the patient of psychological risks and increased risk of breast cancer.

The lawsuit against the All Women’s Health Services clinic in Portland, Oregon, was the second of its kind in the U.S. to be successfully prosecuted but the first to obtain a judgment.

Jonathan Clark, attorney for the 19-year-old plaintiff, told WND he believed the judgment ‘makes a pretty powerful statement about the science,’ indicating the clinic was not willing to argue against the claim that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer (My use of redmy addition).

In 2010, WND columnist Jill Stanek, a pro-life activist, also reported on the link between birth control and breast cancer.

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer has posted online links to various studies on the subject, and Stanek wrote about a 2009 study in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention.

The 2009 study found a 40 percent increased risk of contracting breast cancer under the age of 40 if a woman has had an abortion (My use of redmy addition).”

Is it not the duty and responsibility of a just society to warn its citizens about the possible risks to the mother in MURDERING her own child! Has greed won out? Why is science discounted in relation to these studies? Science is based upon replicability. Are all or these studies fraudulent? Who really cares about the health of women? Abortion IS NOT healthcare! The REALWAR on WOMENis being waged by LEFTIST DEMOCRATS and their cohorts!


Medical Groups Recognizing Link

A list of medical organizations recognizing a link between abortion and breast cancer is provided below. Telling women their abortions are related to increased breast cancer risk is clearly not good for cancer fundraising businesses, the abortion industry and the pharmaceutical industry. Medical groups whose doctors do not perform abortions or refer women for abortions will be among the first to recognize that abortion raises a woman’s breast cancer risk.

National Physicians Center for Family Resources
P.O. Box 59692
Birmingham, AL 35259

The National Physicians Center for Family Resources offers a CD intended for parents and health educators which cites ‘increased breast cancer risk’ as a ‘long-term complication of abortion’ and offers a biological explanation for the abortion-breast cancer link. The CD is entitled, ‘Prescriptions for Parents: A Physicians’ Guide to Adolescence and Sex.’

Catholic Medical Association
2020 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, #864
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: 1-877-CATHDOC (877-228-4362)

‘Whereas epidemiological evidence of an association between abortion and breast cancer has existed for almost a half century,

‘Whereas 29 out of 38 worldwide epidemiological studies show an increased risk of breast cancer of approximately 30% among women who have had an abortion,

‘Whereas all women undergoing abortion are entitled to full informed consent as to all risks including long term risks,

‘Therefore be it resolved that the Catholic Medical Association endorses the passage of state legislation to require abortionists to inform all women of their future increased vulnerability to breast cancer.’

Resolution Approved 10/15/03

American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists
844 South Washington, Suite 1600
Holland, MI 49423

AAPLOG has posted a position statement about the ABC link on its website.

Breast Cancer Prevention Institute
9 Vassar St.
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601

The Polycarp Research Institute
2232 Second Avenue
Altoona, PA 16602

Ehtics and Medics
6399 Drexel Road
Philadelphia, PA 19151

MaterCare International
8 Riverview Avenue
St. John's, Newfoundland
Canada A1C 2S5
Phone: 709-579-6472
Fax: 709- 579-6501

Statement Concerning the Link between Induced Abortion and Breast Cancer, R. L. Walley. FRCSC., FRCOG., MPH Executive Director and Honourary Research Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

‘MaterCare International an international group of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists was presented with the evidence of the link between abortion and breast cancer at its international conference in Rome in October 2004 by Dr Joel Brind’s research group. The medical explanation and the epidemiological evidence convinced our group that there is a significant increase in breast cancer risk after induced abortion, especially before the first full term pregnancy. This evidence has been denied by the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) and other researchers. Recently ten studies have been published in an attempt to discredit Brind’s conclusion.’

‘In turn Brind has examined these ten studies and in a peer reviewed paper published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (Vol 10, No 4, Winter 2005, he has shown that they have serious methodological weaknesses and flaws and therefore do not invalidate the conclusion that there is a increased risk of breast cancer.’

‘Women have a basic right to know of this increased risk of breast cancer and it is unacceptable that the information should be denied to them by the medical and cancer research establishments. MaterCare International as an organisation of women’s health specialists recognies its responsibilities in this matter and will do all it can to publish this evidence.’

Breast Care Center-EAMC
G/F OPD Bldg East Avenue Medical Center, East Avenue,
Quezon City, Philippines
Phone: (632)-928-0611 loc 578

Medical Groups Supporting Disclosure of Research
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
1601 N. Tucson Blvd., Suite 9
Tucson, AZ 85716-3450

‘The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons believes that patients have the right to give or withhold fully informed consent before undergoing medical treatment. This includes notification of potential adverse effects. While there is a difference of medical opinion concerning the abortion breast cancer link, there is a considerable volume of evidence supporting this link, which is, moreover, highly plausible. We believe that a reasonable person would want to be informed of the existence of this evidence before making her decision.’

Jane Orient, MD
Executive Director
October 27, 2003

Read Mrs. Malec’s article, ‘The Abortion-Breast Cancer Link: How Politics Trumped Science and Informed Consent,’ in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons:

[The POLITICAL COWARDS! You witnessed how the MURDER industry and Leftist politicians attacked the Susan G. Komen organization when it tried to stop funding the abortion industry!—my addition]

Medical Groups in Need of Political Courage

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

American Medical Association

A spokesman for the AMA told World Net Daily that its group ‘doesn’t have a policy at all’ on whether its doctors should inform women about the abortion-breast cancer research. [John Dougherty, ‘Can doctors be sued over abortion? Those who don’t inform patients of breast cancer link could be targets,’

World Net Daily March 27, 2002.

Available at: Visited October 8, 2003.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

American Society of Breast Surgeons

Miami Breast Cancer Conference

All Cancer Groups

We all know that baby MURDERERS lie! They lied to the Supreme Court when they claimed that it was not known when life begins. They lie to protect their monied interests. They are MURDERERS who want to protect the continuation of those MURDERS! They do not care about women or their health! Baby MURDERERS do NOT care about the health of women! They do care about their profits!