The Declaration of Independence and an anonymous comment

I suggest you check out the following website if you are a policy holder of Farmers Insurance Group or thinking about having them insure you in any capacity: www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com




https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367


The above link is for a company—Vision Forum—that provides unique products for the family. I am an affiliate for the company and receive a small commission whenever someone uses this link and then makes an unreturned purchase while using the link. Check it out. I think you might like the products offered. I do. See my more complete explanation on my post of February 1, 2008 entitled “Affiliate program with Vision Forum.”

Based upon past historical data: 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS have occurred in the last 24 hours in the United States. See my post “BABY HOLOCAUST” posted January 22, 2008.

I’ve been involved in a problem one of my clients has with Farmers Insurance Group. My previous posts in relation to this problem were:

September 10, 2007 post: “Beware of Farmers Insurance Group”
September 11, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group’s response”
September 18, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company received the requested list”
September 19, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Company’s response to the list”
October 16, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and my request for information”
November 27, 2007 post: “Farmers Insurance Group does not respond to my request”
January 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group latest stall”
January 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group is sent a response”
January 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group pays some money”
January 19, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group continues to be obstinate”
January 26, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group receives another request”
February 11, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group shows how low they will go?”
February 12, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group: If I were going to respond to the final letter”
February 13, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and associated companies”
February 14, 2008 post: “Farmers Insurance Group and how others rate the company”

I will not be continuing my Creationism posts today. I do plan to return to them soon.

Then, I plan to answer the response about Iraq. I am sorry for the change in plans. Plans, in reality, often are altered for one reason or another. “The best laid plans … often go astray.” Thank you for your understanding and patience.

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish, barbaric decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

www.farmersinsurancegroupsucks.com

www.childpredators.com

www.lifedynamics.com

www.libertylegal.org

www.alliancedefensefund.org

www.searchtv.org

I have not been able to post for the last four nights because of server problems. I hope it is successful tonight. I’m trying again!

When I posted a letter to the editor (which as far as I know has not been published) on July 7th dealing with The Declaration of Independence I received a comment from an anonymous individual. Tonight, I’m again posting that original article (since it was short), the anonymous comment copied exactly as it was written in its entirety, and my comment on the anonymous comment.

I had planned on returning to my posts on the Supreme Court decision and FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANTS. However, that has changed. I wrote a letter to the editor today and, as is my practice, I am posting it so that all can see any changes made by the paper if it is selected to be published. I have written my next segment on the Supreme Court decision and FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANTS and plan to begin posting that continued series next. Until then, the letter to the editor:

Although I had reread The Declaration of Independence the day before, thank you for printing the full text of the document on July 4, 2008 on the editorial page. Isn’t it amazing though that people can read the same document and come away with totally different interpretations of the text.

I and many others read:

■ “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” (paragraph one) and conclude that the founding fathers realized that there are absolute truths established by GOD.

■ “that they are endowed by their Creator” (paragraph two) and conclude that the founding fathers believed in a CREATOR of the universe not in some evolutionary “slime to man” nonsense.

■ “appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world” (last paragraph) and conclude that the founding fathers recognized that GOD is the SUPREME JUDGE not any man created court by whatever name.

■ “with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence” (last paragraph) and conclude that the founding fathers understood that GOD is ultimately in control.

Meanwhile, others including some members of our Supreme Court want to remove all reference of GOD and to GOD from the public arena. Is The Declaration of Independence unconstitutional because of its unabashed references to GOD?

“Anonymous said

Last I checked the Declaration of the Independence has no direct relationship with the United States Legal System and had the founding fathers wanted the United States wanted the country they created to be governor by religious law or had the “law of God” been superior to the law of the United States then dont you think that they would have made mention to that in the Constitution, the founding document of the nation and it legal system, or at least made mention of God. God’s law might be the supreme law of the universe but as far as temporal law goes with in the border the United States there is no law above that made by the Constitution. I am a Christian and believe in God, but that does not mean that I think that his law should by the law of a temporal nation nor should it be force upon people that dont believe. People that wish to force on other do a great disservice to God and Christ by turning many many people away from him.

11:11 AM”

My Comment: I wish people would read what is actually written instead of what they seem to want to have been written. Last I checked, the post was not about our legal system or whether or not the country should be governed by religious law. I simply quoted four instances within The Declaration of Independence that made reference to GOD and gave a brief comment on what I thought might be the implications that could be drawn from each quote.

My final paragraph was the theme of the post. Our Supreme Court has been making unconstitutional decisions trying to remove all references about GOD from the public arena. References that were made by our Founding Fathers both before the Constitution was written (By the way, our present Constitution was our second Constitution as a nation. The first—The Articles of Confederation—was discarded in favor of a stronger national government.) and, although not mentioned because of requirements for the length of a letter to the editor, after the Constitution was adopted. The final question was a question based upon logic. If, for example, the Ten Commandments can not be displayed alone because of references to GOD which supposedly is an attempt to somehow establish an official religion, then shouldn’t The Declaration of Independence also be outlawed because of its four direct references to GOD. This, of course, would mean that the study of The Declaration of Independent should not be allowed in government schools since it would obviously be an attempt to establish an official religion based upon belief in GOD according to past Supreme Court decisions. The point, of course, is that the Supreme Court is being absurd and is ruling illegally in this area.

I didn’t think that would need to be explained. Perhaps, I put too much credence in the ability of people to read things as they are written?

Since the anonymous comment did not deal with what I had actually written, there isn’t any real need for me to comment further. However, I will since I believe the writer, who ever he or she may be, states some things that should be addressed.

Let’s start with the following statement, “but as far as temporal law goes with in the border the United States there is no law above that made by the Constitution.” My first question. Do you know what the Constitution actually says in this area? I know that is what is taught in schools including colleges but that is not the actual wording of the Constitution itself. Article VI, ¶ 2 (This is know as the Supremacy Clause.) declares the following: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance therefore; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary not withstanding.” Thus according to Article VI, ¶ 2, THREE areas of law are listed as the supreme law of the land: 1) the U.S. Constitution 2) laws passed by Congress pursuant to the Constitution and 3) Treaties entered into by the United States. Did you know this? Does the Supreme Court know this?

Speaking of the Supreme Court, let’s take another of the comments made by the anonymous writer. The comment was “then dont you think that they would have made mention to that in the Constitution.” Now here is my question: If the Supreme Court was intended to be the FINAL arbitrator for what is Constitutional and want is not Constitutional, then don’t you think that the writers of the Constitution would have put that very significant POWER INTO THE CONSTITUTION??? I do and they DID NOT!!!

I think that needs to be restated. The Founding Fathers were not dummies and the Constitution was written after much debate and disagreement. And yet, the Founding Fathers DID NOT give the Supreme Court the power to declare a law of Congress or anything else for that matter to be unconstitutional. That power simply is NOT present in the Constitution. In fact, the Supremacy Clause lists laws passed by Congress as the supreme law of the land along with the Constitution and U.S. treaties. It does NOT give the courts any power in that area what so ever and it certainly does NOT say that the Supreme Court is the supreme law of the land or the FINAL arbitrator. (See my yesterday post.)

The judicial branch led by the Supreme Court has become the most powerful branch of government because they have been allowed to have the FINAL authority in almost all facets of government from local school boards, to the States, and to the federal government contrary to the Constitution of the United States. Unfortunately, the people seem to have grown weary of the messiness of democracy and seem to prefer the totalitarian exactness of a dictatorial COURTOCRACY.

Or as the Bible so clearly states, we reap what we sow. We sow the seed of Supreme Court supremacy and infallibility, and we reap the corrupting power of MY WORD IS FINAL AND ABSOLUTE! Unfortunately for the Supreme Court and the nation, it is ONLY GOD’S WORD THAT IS FINAL and ABSOLUTE!!!

THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!! THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!! THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE CONSTITUTION!!!