Healthcare Nationalized update part 4
From Cincinnati Enquirer
http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20100316/EDIT01/3160365/Arrogant+approach+to+health+care
“Arrogant Approach to Health Care
March 16, 2010
America’s robust discussion of health care reform during the past year has been beneficial in many ways, giving the public greater awareness and insight into this complex issue. Unfortunately, the debate has been held pretty much on one-party terms as Democrats, controlling both houses of Congress and the White House, crafted the only plan allowed on the table, and negotiated behind closed doors. Now, despite the deep reservations of a majority of Americans, congressional leaders plan to ram through their proposal this week—bypassing normal congressional procedures.
It is a distressing prospect. We hope that moderate House Democrats—among them Rep. Steve Driehaus of Cincinnati, who says he ‘will not bend on the principle of federal funding on abortion’ but will be stuck in the middle of an elaborate charade to include that funding anyway—will put a stop to this sham.
Real debate has been sidestepped, while Democrats played a childish game of Catch-22 with health care legislation: Congressional leaders wouldn’t allow Republican proposals to be formally considered, then turned around and accused them of not having alternatives. Among themselves, Democrats cut a series of backroom deals that in any other context would be considered criminal payoffs and bribery.
Here’s how blatant it’s become: Last week, President Obama nominated for a federal appeals court the brother of a wavering Democratic House member from Utah.
This disgusting process, which Democrats brazenly wish to bring to conclusion this week, is being done with little regard for the opinions of a clear majority of Americans who, while they may believe health care reform is necessary, think this particular approach will take our nation down the wrong economic path.
Obama, despite all his fine talk of bipartisanship, has proven he has little regard for the ideas—or the constituencies—of those who are not his political allies. The paltry few GOP proposals that he has indicated he is willing to consider—even here, there are no real commitments—are so token as to be laughable.
Meanwhile, an Associated Press poll last week showed that 68 percent of Americans don’t want health care reform passed without Republican support.
Supporters of the Democratic plan can spin it any way they wish, but polls have consistently shown that a majority of Americans oppose their heavy-handed approach to reform. Americans may favor general principles such as universal coverage, but they are distrustful of the way this bill has been crafted and how it will change their relationship with their health care providers.
According to the Quinnipiac Poll, Ohioans oppose the Democrats’ reform plan 56 percent to 33 percent, although they agree 53 percent to 44 percent that Congress should keep trying to reform health care.
The legislation has major problems that have not even begun to be discussed in a serious way, and if Democrats have their way will not be debated at all. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, for example, calls the Senate bill ‘racially discriminatory’ because of provisions that ‘in addition to being unconstitutional, will not improve health care outcomes for minority patients.’
And despite denials, the bill has worrisome implications for Medicare. According to an Associated Press news account, much of the reform bill is ‘financed with Medicare cuts the government’s own experts say could be unsustainable.’
Democrats are devising an elaborate set of sleight-of-hand tricks to get this bill on Obama’s desk this week, including Senate ‘reconciliation’ to avoid a GOP filibuster.
Yes, both parties have employed reconciliation in the past—it has been used by Republicans in 14 of 22 instances since being adopted in 1974—but its purpose is supposed to be resolving budget issues, not making far-reaching policy decisions that will alter one-sixth of the U.S. economy.
Its blatant abuse is yet further damning evidence of congressional leaders’ arrogant, condescending attitude toward the people they ostensibly were elected to serve.”
I write the following on my October 24, 2008 blog, “Rule Chicago, rule Illinois, rule the nation. Ruin Chicago, ruin Illinois, ruin the nation.” Barack Hussein Obama’s only experience in politics was as a Chicago politician. He is running the Presidency just as the Chicago Democratic machine runs Chicago. Is it any wonder why we are experiencing what we are experiencing. We are getting exactly what the majority of those who voted voted for.
By the way, do you realize that the federal government is the largest “insurer” in the United States? When the President is attacking the insurance industry he is attacking his own operation of Medicare and Medicaid.
I haven’t tried this number yet. It is my understanding that the following toll free number is to the Congressional switchboard: (877) 762-8762. (I’ve also seen (877) 763-8762. I don’t know if it is correct.) Give it a try. Keep the Congressional phone lines backlogged. I heard that the President has postponed his planned trip for three months. Keep it up!!!
As I’ve said before, The House does not yet have the votes to pass this monstrosity. If it did, the House would be voting right now. Keep the pressure on until the Easter break. When members come back to their district, increase the pressure. This obscene power grab can be stopped. Don’t give up! I heard that the President has postponed his planned trip for three months. Keep it up!!!
As I’ve said before, if the MURDER of preborn babies remains in the bill as it is in the Senate bill being considered by the House, I will stop paying my federal taxes and will say so on the tax form. The House is now considering to “deem” the Senate bill passed. It is certainly unconstitutional (Article 1, Section 7, Clause Two, Procedure for Passing Bills and Resolutions)—“But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively.”
It is now being argued that the Republicans have used this process before and so the Democrats can now use it. That’s a nonsensical argument. Because the Democrats did not challenge the procedure doesn’t now mean that it is okay to violate the Constitution. And this procedure is absolutely a violation of the Constitution.
As I’ve said before, if I am required to purchase health insurance against my will as presently required in the Senate bill being considered by the House, I will NOT purchase insurance and I will NOT pay any tax for not purchasing insurance. The House is now considering to “deem” the Senate bill passed. It is certainly unconstitutional (Article 1, Section 7, Clause Two, Procedure for Passing Bills and Resolutions)—“But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively.”
Can anyone say political suicide! Have Democrats lost all sense of reality? The American people do not want this bill to pass. You need to keep proving it until they get the message. Even if it is necessary to keep the pressure on through Election Day 2010 when we can speak with the ballot. KEEP THE PRESSURE UP!!!
From Cincinnati Enquirer
http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20100316/EDIT01/3160365/Arrogant+approach+to+health+care
“Arrogant Approach to Health Care
March 16, 2010
America’s robust discussion of health care reform during the past year has been beneficial in many ways, giving the public greater awareness and insight into this complex issue. Unfortunately, the debate has been held pretty much on one-party terms as Democrats, controlling both houses of Congress and the White House, crafted the only plan allowed on the table, and negotiated behind closed doors. Now, despite the deep reservations of a majority of Americans, congressional leaders plan to ram through their proposal this week—bypassing normal congressional procedures.
It is a distressing prospect. We hope that moderate House Democrats—among them Rep. Steve Driehaus of Cincinnati, who says he ‘will not bend on the principle of federal funding on abortion’ but will be stuck in the middle of an elaborate charade to include that funding anyway—will put a stop to this sham.
Real debate has been sidestepped, while Democrats played a childish game of Catch-22 with health care legislation: Congressional leaders wouldn’t allow Republican proposals to be formally considered, then turned around and accused them of not having alternatives. Among themselves, Democrats cut a series of backroom deals that in any other context would be considered criminal payoffs and bribery.
Here’s how blatant it’s become: Last week, President Obama nominated for a federal appeals court the brother of a wavering Democratic House member from Utah.
This disgusting process, which Democrats brazenly wish to bring to conclusion this week, is being done with little regard for the opinions of a clear majority of Americans who, while they may believe health care reform is necessary, think this particular approach will take our nation down the wrong economic path.
Obama, despite all his fine talk of bipartisanship, has proven he has little regard for the ideas—or the constituencies—of those who are not his political allies. The paltry few GOP proposals that he has indicated he is willing to consider—even here, there are no real commitments—are so token as to be laughable.
Meanwhile, an Associated Press poll last week showed that 68 percent of Americans don’t want health care reform passed without Republican support.
Supporters of the Democratic plan can spin it any way they wish, but polls have consistently shown that a majority of Americans oppose their heavy-handed approach to reform. Americans may favor general principles such as universal coverage, but they are distrustful of the way this bill has been crafted and how it will change their relationship with their health care providers.
According to the Quinnipiac Poll, Ohioans oppose the Democrats’ reform plan 56 percent to 33 percent, although they agree 53 percent to 44 percent that Congress should keep trying to reform health care.
The legislation has major problems that have not even begun to be discussed in a serious way, and if Democrats have their way will not be debated at all. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, for example, calls the Senate bill ‘racially discriminatory’ because of provisions that ‘in addition to being unconstitutional, will not improve health care outcomes for minority patients.’
And despite denials, the bill has worrisome implications for Medicare. According to an Associated Press news account, much of the reform bill is ‘financed with Medicare cuts the government’s own experts say could be unsustainable.’
Democrats are devising an elaborate set of sleight-of-hand tricks to get this bill on Obama’s desk this week, including Senate ‘reconciliation’ to avoid a GOP filibuster.
Yes, both parties have employed reconciliation in the past—it has been used by Republicans in 14 of 22 instances since being adopted in 1974—but its purpose is supposed to be resolving budget issues, not making far-reaching policy decisions that will alter one-sixth of the U.S. economy.
Its blatant abuse is yet further damning evidence of congressional leaders’ arrogant, condescending attitude toward the people they ostensibly were elected to serve.”
I write the following on my October 24, 2008 blog, “Rule Chicago, rule Illinois, rule the nation. Ruin Chicago, ruin Illinois, ruin the nation.” Barack Hussein Obama’s only experience in politics was as a Chicago politician. He is running the Presidency just as the Chicago Democratic machine runs Chicago. Is it any wonder why we are experiencing what we are experiencing. We are getting exactly what the majority of those who voted voted for.
By the way, do you realize that the federal government is the largest “insurer” in the United States? When the President is attacking the insurance industry he is attacking his own operation of Medicare and Medicaid.
I haven’t tried this number yet. It is my understanding that the following toll free number is to the Congressional switchboard: (877) 762-8762. (I’ve also seen (877) 763-8762. I don’t know if it is correct.) Give it a try. Keep the Congressional phone lines backlogged. I heard that the President has postponed his planned trip for three months. Keep it up!!!
As I’ve said before, The House does not yet have the votes to pass this monstrosity. If it did, the House would be voting right now. Keep the pressure on until the Easter break. When members come back to their district, increase the pressure. This obscene power grab can be stopped. Don’t give up! I heard that the President has postponed his planned trip for three months. Keep it up!!!
As I’ve said before, if the MURDER of preborn babies remains in the bill as it is in the Senate bill being considered by the House, I will stop paying my federal taxes and will say so on the tax form. The House is now considering to “deem” the Senate bill passed. It is certainly unconstitutional (Article 1, Section 7, Clause Two, Procedure for Passing Bills and Resolutions)—“But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively.”
It is now being argued that the Republicans have used this process before and so the Democrats can now use it. That’s a nonsensical argument. Because the Democrats did not challenge the procedure doesn’t now mean that it is okay to violate the Constitution. And this procedure is absolutely a violation of the Constitution.
As I’ve said before, if I am required to purchase health insurance against my will as presently required in the Senate bill being considered by the House, I will NOT purchase insurance and I will NOT pay any tax for not purchasing insurance. The House is now considering to “deem” the Senate bill passed. It is certainly unconstitutional (Article 1, Section 7, Clause Two, Procedure for Passing Bills and Resolutions)—“But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively.”
Can anyone say political suicide! Have Democrats lost all sense of reality? The American people do not want this bill to pass. You need to keep proving it until they get the message. Even if it is necessary to keep the pressure on through Election Day 2010 when we can speak with the ballot. KEEP THE PRESSURE UP!!!
posted by Christian Gunslinger at 3:44 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home