Pro-Life: Is Rape/Incest an Acceptable Exception to Being Pro-Life

The Tea Party Leadership Fund Push to Primary John Boehner. Your signature is needed by January 31, 2014!

http://primaryboehner.com/

—

Draft Jim Bridenstine for U.S. Senate for Oklahoma led by the Senate Conservatives Fund. Normally, I do not do drafts. This is an exception.

http://www.draftjim.com/sign?c=61752d563d6c47ee079dd2a29a57a305

—

From: http://politicaloutcast.com/2014/01/way-cadre-rape-conceived-anti-abortion-champions-changing-conversation/

“The Way A Cadre Of Rape-Conceived Anti-Abortion Champions Are Changing The Conversation
by Mark Horne
January 24, 2014

I was pretty shocked to see this story at Business Insider: ‘Inside The World Of Anti-Abortion Activists Who Were Conceived In Rape And Incest.’

I knew there were people who were conceived by rape whose mothers refused to abort them. What I didn’t know was that they are having a real effect on changing minds and hearts (As well they should! Simple logic should tell anyone who thinks that the innocent unborn baby is never responsible for the sins of the father or mother! That it why it is ALWAYS murder! Always! The baby is always innocent!—my addition).

Libertarian blogger Andrew Klavan writes at the conservative site Truth Revolt on Thursday that the women in these photos helped change his mind about abortion. He now thinks the practice should be illegal under all circumstances.

Texas Governor Rick Perry had a similar change of heart after meeting with anti-abortion activist Rebecca Kiessling, who was conceived by rape. Before the 2012 election, she talked with Perry, explaining to LifeNews.com that the meeting went something like this:
I said to him, ‘When you make that rape exception, it’s like you’re saying to me that I deserved the death penalty for the crimes of my father. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, my father didn’t even deserve the death penalty (According to the same Supreme Court, every unborn baby does, if it is the will of the mother. Is that logical? Is that legal? Is that Constitutional? The answer is no to each of the questions!). The Supreme Court has said there is no death penalty for rapists. But you say that I, as the innocent child of rape, deserved the death penalty?’ And Perry said, ‘No, no, I don’t believe that.’ (But, he did! Which tells you something about his reasoning ability! And tells you even more about the reasoning ability of those on the Left and of those on the Supreme Court who made the decision to give the State’s sanction to MURDER!—my addition).’

Perry now insists that the life of the mother should be the only exception when it comes to abortion. (Rick Perry is as wrong about the life of the mother faux premise as he was wrong about the so-called rape/incest exception! There are NO exceptions for MURDER! I oppose MURDER except for … WHAT? When is MURDER acceptable? Did GOD say “Thou shalt not murder ……./ except?”—my addition)

What’s weird about the force of these people is that they don’t only make a case against the rape exception but they make the abortion issue itself much more personal for pro-abortionists. I think it must be because, while a pro-abortionist normally thinks the mother is the main decider (even though that is often a convenient myth) when it comes to rape, they are not really neutral: they assume abortion is the best option.

So when they are confronted with someone whose aborting they have been actively calling for, it gets a lot more awkward.

Logically, of course, to be pro-abortion means that all of us should have, in principle, been killed if our mothers had decided so. So, really, these people conceived by rape are simply pushing the point home about abortion in general.

Perhaps their message will make the pro-life movement more consistent and thus more effective in winning converts.”

We should be consistent! Abortion/MURDER is NEVER acceptable! NEVER! NO one has the “right” to MURDER another human being! No one!

We will have been MURDERING unborn babies for 41 years! A total abomination for any nation! A total atrocity for any nation! A total evil for any nation!

No one has the “right” to MURDER another person! NO ONE!

Christians were bold in the First Century church! Are Christians as bold today?

Christians were resolute in the First Century church! Are Christians as resolute today?

Christians stood for the truth in the First Century church! Are Christians standing for the truth today?

If not Christians, who? If not now, when?

—

This is my two part suggestion to Tea Party groups, social conservatives, Constitutionalists, and anyone else who wants to save our Republic from the approaching destruction.

1) Run as many conservative candidates in as many Republican primaries as possible.

2) Then, run as many independent and/or third party candidates as possible in as many races as possible where we did not win the primary.

That is why I am working to get the Constitution Party on the ballot in Texas. If we get on the ballot, we will have two Congressional House candidates running and two State candidates running. Getting on the ballot is the first step. Winning elections is the second. Winning elections will grow the Party. The Constitution Party is much more in line with the Tea Party movement than is the Republican Party. And I have been involved with all three!

—

The Constitution Party of Texas website: http://cptexas.us/home/                                                                

If elected to Congress, I will not, under any circumstances, vote for present Speaker of the House John Boehner to be Speaker of the House. I call on every Republican primary candidate running in Texas Congressional District 19 to publicly (in writing) make the same pledge. It would not be a bad idea for every Republican candidate running for the House of Representatives to give the same pledge. See my post at http://christiangunslinger3.blogspot.com on December 16, 2013 entitled “Speaker of the House John Boehner Attacks the Tea Party Again for Being Fiscally Responsible!”

—

If I am elected to the House, I will use the Constitution, as written, to do everything in my power to stop judicial tyranny! Will the other candidates pledge the same? I know our present Representative has NOT done everything possible to stop judicial tyranny! Why is that?

—

Competition is good for the economy and competition is good for the Republican Party!!! Competition keeps Congressmen committed to we the people!!! Primary Republicans who do not support the Constitution as written.

—

The Constitution Party of Texas website: http://cptexas.us/home/
                                                               

E 15 EPA nonsense

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceW9Nc1hVHU