Hate crime?
https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367
The above link is for a company—Vision Forum—that provides unique products for the family. I am an affiliate for the company and receive a small commission whenever someone uses this link and then makes an unreturned purchase while using the link. Check it out. I think you might like the products offered. I do. See my more complete explanation on my post of February 1, 2008 entitled “Affiliate program with Vision Forum.”
Webmasters Earn Money Here!
Based upon past historical data: 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS have occurred in the last 24 hours in the United States. See my post “BABY HOLOCAUST” posted January 22, 2008.
I will not be continuing my Creationism posts today. I do plan to return to them soon.
Then, I plan to answer the response about Iraq. I am sorry for the change in plans. Plans, in reality, often are altered for one reason or another. “The best laid plans … often go astray.” Thank you for your understanding and patience.
How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish, barbaric decisions of the United States Supreme Court?
Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers
“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)
http://www.familytaxpayers.net/
http://www.childpredators.com/
http://www.lifedynamics.com/
http://www.libertylegal.org/
http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/
http://www.searchtv.org/
The following article was in the Peoria Journal Star on February 8, 2008, page B2.
“19-year old pregnant woman attacked by 4 men
Peoria—A 19-year-old pregnant Peoria woman was attacked late Wednesday night by a group of four black males in the 2400 block of West Starr Street.
The victim said she was walking to her mother’s house when four men she described as black and between 17 and 19 years old pushed her to the ground and began punching and kicking her in the face, back and back of the neck. The group did not attempt to rob her but did yell ‘No Luv’ (That is the way it was spelled in the paper. I don’t know how the reporter knew it was spelled luv instead of love. Maybe the four attackers spelled it for the victim?—my addition) as they continued beating her.
The victim did not immediately seek medical attention but did so Thursday when she was complaining of abdominal pain. She was treated and released at OSF Saint Francis Medical Center in Peoria on Thursday”
What do you think? Was this one of those so called hate crimes? Was it a hate crime because there were four attackers? Was it a hate crime because the victim was a woman?
The article did not specify the race of the woman but did for the attackers. If the woman was Caucasian, was it a hate crime? If the victim was Black, was it a hate crime? Can a hate crime occur when both the victim and the attackers are of the same race? Was it a hate crime against the unborn baby?
No, that can’t be possible. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that unborn babies are not people—they are just a blob inside a woman and are the same as the woman. Consequently, we know, according to the United States Supreme Court, that a hate crime can not occur against an unborn baby. According to the Court, they have no rights except the right to be MURDERED by their loving mother.
Now, there is another question. If a hate crime is possible, is it possible to have a love crime? Since the attackers reportedly yelled “No Luv” maybe it was a love crime to convince the victim that she needs to develop were love skills. What do you think? Can legislators identify love crimes if legislators can identify hate crimes?
I’ve wondered. How is it possible for prosecutors, juries, and the court to get into the mind of the attacker(s) at the time of the attack to determine if the attack is a hate crime? Wait! I know the answer. They don’t have to achieve that impossible task. The legislators have done it for them. If certain identified crimes occur, according to the legislators they must automatically be hate crimes.
But this I don’t quite understand. Why is being attacked and severely beaten more of a crime if “hate” is involved, than just being beaten? Why would these four attackers be punished more severely if it was identified as a “hate” crime? Isn’t crime—crime. Will the beating be any less severe if it is not a hate crime? Will it be more painful if it is identified, after the fact, as a hate crime?
I’ve got an idea. Let’s try to stop crime instead of wasting time and effort trying to determine if it is a “hate” crime. Isn’t all crime a “hate” crime of one sort or another? This is the nonsense that has developed since humanists gained control of the country.
It is time to take back our nation from the libertines. That would be real change! Not only that, but that would be positive change! Change of and by itself is not necessarily good or bad. The change that occurs is what determines if it is good or bad. Change can be just as bad as it can be good.
Would electing a person who supports the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES be good? Ask GOD. I have no doubt what the answer is!!! Isn’t MURDER of an UNBORN BABY the ultimate hate crime?
“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)
https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367
https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367
The above link is for a company—Vision Forum—that provides unique products for the family. I am an affiliate for the company and receive a small commission whenever someone uses this link and then makes an unreturned purchase while using the link. Check it out. I think you might like the products offered. I do. See my more complete explanation on my post of February 1, 2008 entitled “Affiliate program with Vision Forum.”
Webmasters Earn Money Here!
Based upon past historical data: 3,287+ UNBORN BABY MURDERS have occurred in the last 24 hours in the United States. See my post “BABY HOLOCAUST” posted January 22, 2008.
I will not be continuing my Creationism posts today. I do plan to return to them soon.
Then, I plan to answer the response about Iraq. I am sorry for the change in plans. Plans, in reality, often are altered for one reason or another. “The best laid plans … often go astray.” Thank you for your understanding and patience.
How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish, barbaric decisions of the United States Supreme Court?
Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers
“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)
http://www.familytaxpayers.net/
http://www.childpredators.com/
http://www.lifedynamics.com/
http://www.libertylegal.org/
http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/
http://www.searchtv.org/
The following article was in the Peoria Journal Star on February 8, 2008, page B2.
“19-year old pregnant woman attacked by 4 men
Peoria—A 19-year-old pregnant Peoria woman was attacked late Wednesday night by a group of four black males in the 2400 block of West Starr Street.
The victim said she was walking to her mother’s house when four men she described as black and between 17 and 19 years old pushed her to the ground and began punching and kicking her in the face, back and back of the neck. The group did not attempt to rob her but did yell ‘No Luv’ (That is the way it was spelled in the paper. I don’t know how the reporter knew it was spelled luv instead of love. Maybe the four attackers spelled it for the victim?—my addition) as they continued beating her.
The victim did not immediately seek medical attention but did so Thursday when she was complaining of abdominal pain. She was treated and released at OSF Saint Francis Medical Center in Peoria on Thursday”
What do you think? Was this one of those so called hate crimes? Was it a hate crime because there were four attackers? Was it a hate crime because the victim was a woman?
The article did not specify the race of the woman but did for the attackers. If the woman was Caucasian, was it a hate crime? If the victim was Black, was it a hate crime? Can a hate crime occur when both the victim and the attackers are of the same race? Was it a hate crime against the unborn baby?
No, that can’t be possible. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that unborn babies are not people—they are just a blob inside a woman and are the same as the woman. Consequently, we know, according to the United States Supreme Court, that a hate crime can not occur against an unborn baby. According to the Court, they have no rights except the right to be MURDERED by their loving mother.
Now, there is another question. If a hate crime is possible, is it possible to have a love crime? Since the attackers reportedly yelled “No Luv” maybe it was a love crime to convince the victim that she needs to develop were love skills. What do you think? Can legislators identify love crimes if legislators can identify hate crimes?
I’ve wondered. How is it possible for prosecutors, juries, and the court to get into the mind of the attacker(s) at the time of the attack to determine if the attack is a hate crime? Wait! I know the answer. They don’t have to achieve that impossible task. The legislators have done it for them. If certain identified crimes occur, according to the legislators they must automatically be hate crimes.
But this I don’t quite understand. Why is being attacked and severely beaten more of a crime if “hate” is involved, than just being beaten? Why would these four attackers be punished more severely if it was identified as a “hate” crime? Isn’t crime—crime. Will the beating be any less severe if it is not a hate crime? Will it be more painful if it is identified, after the fact, as a hate crime?
I’ve got an idea. Let’s try to stop crime instead of wasting time and effort trying to determine if it is a “hate” crime. Isn’t all crime a “hate” crime of one sort or another? This is the nonsense that has developed since humanists gained control of the country.
It is time to take back our nation from the libertines. That would be real change! Not only that, but that would be positive change! Change of and by itself is not necessarily good or bad. The change that occurs is what determines if it is good or bad. Change can be just as bad as it can be good.
Would electing a person who supports the MURDER of UNBORN BABIES be good? Ask GOD. I have no doubt what the answer is!!! Isn’t MURDER of an UNBORN BABY the ultimate hate crime?
“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)
https://affiliates.visionforum.com/idevaffiliate.php?id=367
posted by Christian Gunslinger at 9:24 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home