Pro-Abortion University Professor Who Was Caught on Tape Attacking a Pro-Life 16 Year Old Is Charged, Has Legal Bills, Needs Assistance. The Girl’s Mother Is an Attorney!
Primary States for May 20, 2014
04) Arkansas Primary: May 20, 2014 ~ Run-Off: June 10, 2014
10) Georgia State Primary: May 20, 2014 ~ Primary Run-Off: July 22, 2014 ~ General Run-Off (if needed): December 10, 2014
12) Idaho Primary: May 20, 2014
17) Kentucky Primary: May 20, 2014
37) Oregon Primary: May 20, 2014
38) Pennsylvania Primary: May 20, 2014
NEWS FLASH:
www.amazon.com now has the exclusive right to sale my first e-book in its Kindle Store.
The title of the e-book is The Black Sword: The Secret U.S. Army in Vietnam
A paperback and hardcover version of the book was available since 2007. I believe it was since 2007. I do not know for sure. It was copyrighted in 2007. That edition had one comment and that comment was very negative receiving a one star rating.
The direct link to the e-book:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00KCWVHIK
Here is that comment in its entirety and without change from the site:
“A poorly self aggrandizing working of ficition. November 8, 2012
By Robert M. Stanford
Format: Hardcover
I should prefix this by saying that I know the author of this book. To start regardless of how this book this being marketed by the author, it is a piece of fiction, the author never served in the military in capacity. Where to start with this review, the book is very poorly written and the author clearly did not do much in the way of historical research on military tactics in general or the Vietnam war in particular. The book reads much like a bad war movie mixed with some kind of cheesy martial arts film, the battle scenes are ridiculously unrealistic. Including laughably bad claims like how the author was trained in hand to hand combat techniques where he would be able to kill some one with one punch in less than one second, he selected for the group because he was genius with Forest Gump like running ability, doing three hours of weight training for 6 straight days a week for months, claims of gun with finger printer readers that only let the owner fire them, ect. Save yourself some money and avoid this book”
Robert does indeed know me. However, it goes a little deeper. Robert is my nephew— the first born of my younger sister. She is four years younger than I am. I was working for a living teaching school when she graduated from Illinois State University. She didn’t meet her future husband until she was working as a teacher. Therefore, Robert wasn’t even born during the time period of most of the book. Robert also never served in the military. Neither did his father or mother.
I do state that I have a tested I.Q. of 130 or above. Both of my children have tested I.Q.s of 130 or above. Does that prove that I do? Of course not. Therefore, before I wrote the book, I went to the public school district that I attended from first grade through high school. I asked for and received a copy of my school records including the results of an I.Q. test. I have written proof that I have a tested I.Q. of 130 or above. If I didn’t, I would not have put it in the book. However, I never said, anywhere in the book, that I am a genius.
As far as his statement that “the book is very poorly written.” That is, at best, an opinion. Read again what he wrote. How well written are his comments? I was a high school American government/economics teacher for ten years. Having been a teacher, I am use to negative comments from students. Most of those comments were from people who did not do well in my class. I expected the students to earn their grade through work and meeting my standards. If they did not, they suffered the consequences. Most did not like the consequences.
If you read the dedication page, I paid an English teacher to edit the work. We did each of the six chapters the same way. At the time, I lived in Tucson and she lived in Arkansas where she taught high school English. I mailed a chapter to her, she ripped it to shreds. I corrected and rewrote the chapter based upon her suggestions and sent the rewritten chapter back to her. She found more items to criticize and gave more suggested corrections. I corrected a second time and sent them back once again. She approved the chapter and mailed it back. When Robert states that “the book is very poorly written,” he criticizes her. I do not believe those criticisms are justified.
Concerning the publication of the book itself, I did not want to go through a regular publishing house because I did not want the book to be edited by the publisher. Since I did not know how to publish a book, I hired a publishing company to do the actual printing of the book and the creation of the front and back book covers. When the company rejected my print copy because the margins were wrong several times including after I went to a Peoria printer to have the margins done correctly by a professional, I wrote the CEO of the company saying I was cancelling the contract because the company was not fulfilling its obligation to print the book. Without my knowledge, the book was printed and offered to the public including on Amazon in paperback and hardcover editions. My guess is that a company lawyer told the CEO that he had better fulfill the contract. I did not know the book was in distribution until I received a royalty check from the company. The copyright date on this published version of the book is 2007.
In the mean time, after borrowing money from my mother, I went to the Peoria printer and paid that company to print my book under my Arizona established publishing company. I had established the company in Arizona before moving back to Illinois in 2004. I never planned to live in Illinois—the land of Barack Hussein Obama—permanently. Until this book was published, I had not actually published anything through the company. My book through my publishing company was published in 2008.
Here is a strange occurrence. Robert’s mother—my younger sister—purchased four books in 2008. There are four people in her family—mother, father, brother, sister. I would have thought that Robert would have first read the book in 2008. He certainly did not have to purchase it from Amazon.
It was family squabble time. In 2004, I moved back to Illinois to care for my mother after my father had died. My two sisters and I had a verbal agreement that I would stay in Illinois until mom dies, caring for her in her home. She would not be put into a nursing home. After a series of minor strokes over a period of about a year, my sisters broke the agreement and put her in a home. Conflict resulted over my staying or leaving the house and the State. Discussion was done by e-mail. I stated in one e-mail that I was going to write more Black Sword books—five in total—and the next one would include the current dispute.
In early January of 2012, I received an eviction notice. The process continued through the year until a court date was set for November 30, 2012. (I believe that is the correct date. I did not bother to check to make sure.) On October 15, 2012, my oldest sister died after a brief illness. On November 8, 2012, Robert posted his criticism of the book. Coincidence? On November 30, 2012, I was court ordered to leave the house by midnight on December 31, 2012. On December 31, 2012, I moved out of the house.
If Robert meant to hurt sales of the book, I hope he did. I want the other company to stop selling my book. And the company did send me notice that I am being dropped. Good! I had told them not to publish.
If you read this blog regularly, you may know that I actually write five blogs, six days a week. Not on Sunday.
http://christiangunslinger.blogspot.com—pro-life
http://christiangunslinger1.blogspot.com—politically conservative
http://christiangunslinger3.blogspot.com—politically conservative
http://christiangunslinger5.blogspot.com—pro-traditional family
http://christiangunslinger7.blogspot.com—politically conservative concentrating on the primaries and the upcoming general election
By the very nature of my blogs, I expect the radical Left, pro-abortion/unborn baby MURDERERS, and pro-homosexual behavior advocates to attack my e-book as well as anything else I wrote and publish. Robert may be the first but I do not expect him to be the last.
The e-book costs only $3.00. The only cheaper price is $2.99 and I do not price my books that way. Everyone should know that $2.99 is actually $3.00. What a sad marketing ploy! Spend the $3.00 to determine whether or not Robert is correct. If a member of Amazon prime, the book is a free selection. You just might be pleasantly surprised. I have received very positive comments from readers including people who have actually been in the military unlike Robert and a student at the United States Naval Academy located in Annapolis, Maryland who is the grandson of a friend.
And finally, I would like nothing better than being reconciled with my sister and the rest of my earthly family. The theme of the second book is family. Planned publication date 2015. The theme of the third book is politics with the planned publication date being 2017. The fourth about education in 2019. And the last and final book in the series, on the church of JESUS, the CHRIST in 2021.
The direct link to my e-book:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00KCWVHIK
—
From: http://www.lifenews.com/2014/05/19/feminist-studies-professor-charged-with-assaulting-pro-lifers-faces-huge-legal-bill/
“Feminist Studies Professor Charged With Assaulting Pro-Lifers Faces Huge Legal Bill
by Carole Novielli | Santa Barbara, CA | LifeNews.com | 5/19/14
It looks like the pro-choice Feminist Studies professor who assaulted a pro-life teen on the campus of UC Santa Barbara is looking for financial assistance due to ‘growing legal fees (She should have growing legal fees! She acted illegally and arrogantly and it was all caught on tape! Pro-life people should tape everywhere they go and file a police report against those who violate the law!—my addition).’
In March, the Santa Barbara District Attorney filed charges of grand theft, battery, and vandalism against Professor Mireille Miller-Young for violence she committed against young pro-life activists who held a peaceful outreach on the UC Santa Barbara campus on March 4th.
Stephanie Gilmore, Ph.D. who describes herself as the editor for the Committee on LGBT History and a member of the editorial collective for the academic journal Feminist Studies has posted this plea for help on behalf of the pro-choice professor, ‘Dr. Mireille Miller-Young is facing increasingly high legal fees as a result of her activism (illegal actions—my addition) in response to anti-choice (pro-life—my addition) demonstrators. Of course, the legal system will determine the outcome of her case. But if you are inclined to help with the fees she will have to pay (Why? She’s a college professor! Let her be responsible for her own actions! Actions have consequences! —my addition)—to her attorney and possibly to restitution—please donate here. All money raised will go directly to Mireille.’
The notice has since been removed but not before the group on facebook Fire Mierille Miller Young saved a copy (Why was it removed?— my addition).
Gilmore penned her support for the violent actions of Miller-Young in a Feminist-Wire blog where she writes, ‘In the early 1990s, I volunteered as an escort at a women’s clinic that provided, among many other services, legal abortion … A court of law will determine the outcome of any legal actions that result from the situation. Legal agencies will also determine whether or not the actions of groups like LA Survivors are terrorist (Is she serious? How is what they are doing associated with terrorism? How in the world did these people earn PhDs? Makes one wonder about the system doesn’t it!— my addition). But I stand with Mireille Miller-Young because she stands with women—ALL women (LIAR! Does she stand with the women who are MURDERED in the womb? Or don’t they count!—my addition)—in the face of political intimidation and harassment (What political intimidation and harassment? She stole! She committed battery! She was caught on tape!—my addition). She is a warrior who deserves our support and praise (Criminals deserve support and praise? Is she demented?—my addition) … Mireille Miller-Young took a stand, rejected what she saw as a type of terrorism (Do they even know the definition of terrorism? If anyone was a terrorist, it was her! Attacking a 16 year old!—my addition), and defended her right to her bodily integrity [Her bodily integrity? What does that even mean?—my addition] (after all, she is a human being). In so doing, she defended all of us. I am in solidarity with Mireille Miller-Young (Look at the terms they use: bodily integrity, solidarity, terrorism! I’m waiting for comrade!—my addition).”
On March 4, 2014, the radical pro-abortion professor at the University of California at Santa Barbara made headlines when she went berserk on a group of pro-life advocates on campus earlier this month.
The professor claimed that she set a good example when she attempted to incite students to violence and initiated the theft of a pro-life activist’s sign (Sure she did! A good example for a good Leftist!—my addition). We hope that the only example set by her actions is that crime will not be tolerated by the DA (For sure! I’m sure she was surprised charges were even filed! However, she was caught on tape and the tape went public! What is a D.A. to do?—my addition), nor the University of California. The prosecution should reach a resolution that deters anyone from committing these crimes again (Should! Will it happen? Need to keep it public!—my addition).
Catherine Short is the mother of 21-year-old Joan Short and 16-year-old Trin Short, two of the young women assaulted by the professor. She is also an attorney and Life Legal Defense Foundation Legal Director (Ouch! You do not attack an attorney’s daughter! No wonder the D.A. filed charges!—my addition) and issued a full statement about the case HERE.
Thrin Short was also interviewed on the pro-life TV show—Life Talk which can be viewed here:
Mark Crutcher, president of Life Dynamics, Inc. and host of Life Talk was outraged.
Crutcher asked why parents would send their kids to a school with such poor judgment that they did not fire Miller-Young immediately, ‘What is wrong with the parents and the students who are going there … paying all this money to go to an institution that would have a woman like this on staff. Why wasn’t she fired? If I had a kid going there, first off I am going to call the school and say, you’re not getting another nickel from me as long as this woman’s on staff. Because, it indicates bad judgment on your part. You’re judgment is so poor that this woman can admit that she did this thing, and then come out and say, I had the right to do it? And you’re going to keep her on staff, and you’re going to let her try to mold young minds? Not with my money, you’re not. Why are students still going there and why are parents still paying for it? That’s the part I don’t understand,’ Crutcher stated.
Crutcher is publicly calling for the professor to be fired.
Short told Life Talk that the professor injured her scratching her arms.
I would ask UC Santa Barbara, Vice Chancellor Michael D. Young just who was the intolerant one here (That’s easily answered unless one is a Leftist protecting another Leftist!—my addition)?
LifeNews Note: Carole Novielli writes for Saynsumthn blog, where this originally appeared. Reprinted with permission.
The video of the original incident
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLemX9QtUa4
posted by Christian Gunslinger at 11:06 PM
<< Home