Monday, May 25, 2015

The Rape Exception to Abortions: Women Speak Out in Favor of ….

Pledge in Solidarity to Defend Marriage

Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” ~ Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God created human government. It is, therefore, inconceivable that God would create government and then tell His people to stay out of it.” ~ Pastor Adrian Rogers


Texas Senator Ted Cruz is the leader for the United States!


“We’ll Be Watching You” from Empower Texans

The lyrics thanks to Empower Texans

“Every hand you shake,
Every cent you take,
Every vow you break,
Every vote you make,
We’ll be watching you!

Every single day,
Every word you say,
Every game you play,
Every time you stray,
We’ll be watching you!

Oh, can’t you see,
You represent me?
How my wallet aches,
With every vote you make!

Every hand you shake,
Every cent you take,
Every vow you break,
Every vote you make,
We’ll be watching you!

I recall what you said during the race,
The policies you promised to embrace,
Now, it seems like you’re all over the place!
Did your values disappear without a trace?
We keep waiting, watching, hoping, please!”

Rejected for violation of our support and up for reelection in 2016

House of Representatives

Renee Ellmers: Incumbent Congressional District 2 North Carolina


Kelly Ayotte: Incumbent Senator New Hampshire

Ron Johnson: Incumbent Senator Wisconsin

Rob Portman: Incumbent Senator Ohio


“God created human government. It is, therefore, inconceivable that God would create government and then tell His people to stay out of it.” ~ Pastor Adrian Rogers


New app now available!

Juggle Bug ~ Mobile Phone Game ~ Its FREE! ~ TRY IT!


My blog site for the U.S. House of Representatives District 19 for Texas campaign is:


Christian bakers Aaron and Melissa Klein proprietors of Sweet Cakes by Melissa ordered to pay $135,000 for emotional suffering to a “homosexual pair”:

Readers can donate to the Klein family here.



“Is the life of a baby conceived in rape worth protecting?
Sarah Terzo
May 17, 2015

H.R. 36, a bill banning abortions after 20 weeks, except in cases of rape or incest, has passed the U.S. House, and many pro-lifers are applauding. However, there are two groups of pro-lifers who are definitely not applauding: those conceived in rape and those who gave birth to a child that was conceived in rape (Nor am I. I have always been a life without exceptions pro-lifer as is GOD! “Thou shalt not murderhas no exceptions! Therefore, as far as I am concerned, there are no exceptions. Not to mention the baby murderers use ANY exception as a grounds to push for even more exceptions until there are NO exceptions and abortion/MURDER is completely sanctioned!my addition).

Many men and women who were conceived in rape are suffering emotionally right now. Why? Because the message being given is that their lives should not be protected—that their lives are not valuable (Or, are not valuable enough to protect while others are!my addition). This bill is saying that it would be perfectly fine to abort them, and pro-lifers are lining up to support it (It is not the best way to go! There are, unfortunately, some Republicans WHO DO have exceptions! They are not pro-life without exception. I did an earlier post asking if they are really pro-life! I am not about to kneel before GOD and say that I said exceptions are alright. As I said, the Bible does not have any exceptions toThou shalt not murder!”my addition).

Rebecca Kiessling is just one pro-life activist who was conceived through rape. Her birth mother was unable to get an abortion because abortions were illegal at the time (Fortunately, for her!my addition). Kiessling has often said that she owes her life to laws banning abortion in all cases (Which must be the case! All abortions are MURDER and MURDERS should always be illegal!my addition). She now runs a ministry that helps rape victims and their children. Conceived today, there is a good chance her life would have been violently ended before birth (Because of federal government sanctioned MURDER through a Supreme Court edict!my addition).

Kiessling was allowed to have the normal life experiences that we all take for granted. She was allowed to laugh with other children, pet a dog, see a sunset, play outside, make friends, and do all the other things that children are able to do when they are not torn apart in the wombs of their mothers (She was given LIFE as intended!my addition). Under H.R. 36, it would be perfectly legal for Kiessling, as a pre-born baby, to have been brutally dismembered in the womb; her arms and legs torn from her body and her skull crushed (Not only are they murdered! They are murdered through torture!my addition). Is this acceptable (NO!my addition)? Is this moral (NO!my addition)? Is this pro-life (NO!my addition)? Kiessling would say no (She is correct!my addition). And quite frankly, I agree with her (So does GOD!my addition).

In a brief interview, she told me the following:

‘Children like me who were conceived in rape have become the whipping boy of the pro-life movement. If this were any other segment of the population who are only 1 percent, like Asians, Muslims, or those who are bi-racial, no one would ever support a bill with an discriminatory exception for them. This was a message bill, which has no chance of becoming law because the President will veto it. So what kind of message was just sent (That the MURDER of those conceived through rape through no fault of their own is acceptable and they are not worthy of protection!my addition)?

If it’s relevant that the unborn children feel pain, then why is it not relevant that children conceived in rape also feel pain (It is, of course!my addition)? Let me tell you that I am pain-capable and we took a beating yesterday. Now even legislators like Renee Ellmers are going to get scored with a 100 percent pro-life approval rating (She is not!my addition). So what good does it do when they continue to prop up unworthy legislators? It just perpetuates the discrimination (It does!my addition).’

And indeed it does.

Another group of people who are in mourning over the pro-life acceptance of H.R. 36 are women who gave birth to children who were conceived in rape. Many of them feel that their children have been devalued and their choice disparaged (They are correct!my addition).

Elizabeth Reed, who conceived through rape and gave her daughter up for adoption, says the following:

‘As a woman who conceived a child in rape, I feel utterly betrayed and heartbroken by ‘pro-life’ leaders and elected officials who knew there were exceptions in H.R. 36 and supported it anyway. My experience was not easy, by any means.

I was 15 years old, raped by a person I trusted, kicked out of my home by my mother, and homeless. And yet, I chose life and adoption for my daughter. It was a hard road. Whenever someone says they are pro-life ‘except in cases of rape’ I feel directly like they are saying to me that my experience was useless—that I should have aborted her and moved on—that her life doesn’t matter, and she’s not worthy of what I went through—that if maybe she were just a normal unplanned pregnancy, my story would carry more weight (They are the ones who are being discredited, not her! GOD knows she made the only acceptable decision!my addition).

When they say things like ‘no woman should be forced to carry a rapist’s child,’ I feel slapped in the face. My daughter wasn’t the rapist’s child—she is mine (Exactly! When did the sins of the father fall upon the child of the father?my addition), and she is her adoptive parent’s child. If the pro-choice argument is that the baby is part of a woman’s body to do with as she wishes (This is a LIE!my addition), how then does it make sense to say the exact opposite when the child is conceived in rape?

I know that rape is traumatic, first hand. I understand the plight of women who have been abused, but my daughter was a picture of hope to me. She was the only thing that redeemed my experience. She is Romans 8: 28 on legs—that in ALL things, God works for the good. Even tragedy.’

[Romans 8: 28 (NIV)

And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.”my addition]

I would like to remind all my readers exactly what this bill says is perfectly okay to do to rape-conceived children. Here is one description of a late-term dismemberment abortion by a former abortionist:

‘A second trimester D and E abortion is a blind procedure. The baby can be in any orientation or position inside the uterus. Picture yourself reaching in with the Sopher clamp and grasping anything you can.

At twenty weeks gestation, the uterus is thin and soft so be careful not to perforate or puncture the walls. Once you have grasped something inside, squeeze on the clamp to set the jaws and pull hardreally hard. You feel something let go and out pops a fully formed leg about 4 to 5 inches long. Reach in again and grasp whatever you can. Set the jaw and pull really hard once again and out pops an arm about the same length. Reach in again and again with that clamp and tear out the spine, intestines, heart and lungs (Torture ending in a MURDER!my addition).

The toughest part of a D and E abortion is extracting the baby’s head. The head of a baby that age is about the size of a plum and is now free floating inside the uterine cavity. You can be pretty sure you have hold of it if the Sopher clamp is spread about as far as your fingers will allow. You will know you have it right when you crush down on the clamp and see a pure white gelatinous material issue from the cervix. That was the baby’s brains. You can then extract the skull pieces. If you have a really bad day like I often did, a little face may come out and stare back at you (How can any doctor be a part of this kind of torture?my addition).’

This was an excerpt from Dr. Anthony Levantino’s description of an abortion at 20 weeks. Is it okay to do this to a child just because she was conceived in rape (NO!my addition)? Is it okay to dismember babies and crush their skulls if they were conceived in violence (NO!my addition)? Do two wrongs make a right (NO!my addition)?

Abortion, under any circumstances, is the violent killing of a baby (YES!my addition). It is bad for the baby (Always!my addition). It is bad for the mother, as well. In a study done by psychologist David Reardon and discussed in the book ‘Victims and Victors,’ interviews were gathered from 192 women who became pregnant as a result of rape or incest.

Of the women who filled out the questionnaire, only one woman said she did not feel at least some regret about her choice. Ninety-three percent said that their abortions had not been a good solution and that they would not recommend it to others in similar situation. Only 7 percent supported the view that abortion was ‘usually’ a good solution in cases of rape (They are wrong!my addition). Notably, not one woman who gave birth regretted their choice (Nor should they!my addition). These are stunning statistics, but they show that abortion is never in a woman’s best interest (Absolutely correct! Having an abortion makes the mother, by definition, a MURDERER unless forced against her will!my addition).

One woman in Reardon’s study said:

‘I was an innocent victim of a horrible crime. I was not to blame for what the rapist did to me (Of course not!my addition). But in choosing to abort, to kill the innocent child growing within me, I lowered myself to the level of the rapist (For that she is responsible!my addition)… It only compounded my pain; it didn’t solve anything.(1)’

Another said:

‘I soon discovered that the aftermath of my abortion continued a long time after the memory of my rape had faded. I felt empty and horrible. Nobody told me about the pain I would feel deep within causing nightmares and deep depressions (Of course not!my addition). They had all told me that after the abortion I could continue my life as if nothing had happened (They LIED as they do!my addition).(2)’

Can it really be true that over 90 percent of women who abort due to rape regret their choice? Interestingly enough, another study found similar results. Dr. Sandra Mahkorn’s 1979 study found that abortion did not help rape victims heal. The later Reardon study only confirmed her findings. According to Mahkorn, who was a licensed rape counselor:

‘The ‘abortion is the best solution’ approach can only serve to encourage the belief that sexual assault is something for which the victim must be ashameda sin to be carefully concealed … Too often the pregnancy receives the most attention and the anger, guilt, fear, and lower self-esteem related to the assault fail to be addressed.(3)’

In future articles, I will delve into this issue more deeply. I will highlight the testimonies of more women who conceived in rape, as well as those of children who were conceived in rape and incest.

Until then, please ask yourself: Is late term abortion any less violent when the victim has been conceived through rape (Of course not!my addition)? Are not all babies worth protecting (Always!my addition)?

David C Reardon, Julie Makimaa, and Amy Sobie Victims and Victors: Speaking out about Their Pregnancies, Abortions, and Children Resulting from Sexual Assault (Springfield, Illinois: Acorn Books, 2000) 38

David C Reardon Aborted Women: Silent No More (Chicago, Illinois: Loyola University Press, 1987) 206

Sandra Kathleen Mahkorn ‘Pregnancy and Sexual Assault’ The PsychologicalAspects of Abortion David Mall and Walter Watts (Washington DC: University publications of America, 1979) 65 – 69”

Every abortion is MURDER! Everyone! “Thou shalt not murderhas NO exceptions!

Sign petition to defund Planned MURDERHOOD on site:



Planned MURDERHOOD is the undisputed leader in MURDERING boys and girls in the United Statesthe American holocaust!

Every abortion is MURDER! Everyone!

The abortion/MURDER method used after 13 weeks to MURDER a baby in the womb:



Dilation and Extraction (D and E): Used after 13 weeks - The cervix is dialated and the unborn child is dismembered with plier-like forceps. Force is needed to pull the baby apart. The instrument is used to seize a leg or other part of the body and then, with a twisting motion, tear it from the babys body. The babys spine is snapped and the skull crushed. After the baby parts are removed, they are reassembled outside the womb to be sure all are removed. Frequently baby parts are left inside the mother’s womb. This can cause serious complications and sometimes death.”

After 13 weeks: The babys limbs are pulled from his/her body! His/her spine is snapped! His/her skull is crushed! And the Left complained about waterboarding prisoners of war? Are you serious!


Abortion is government sanctioned torture and MURDER!

Life begins at Conception!

Personhood begins with Life!

Having an abortion MURDERS a person!


Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)

Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. Whoever sows to please their flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; whoever sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.”

Victory through JESUS the Christ is complete! The question is how many will join the FAMILY of GOD and how many will be lost?

Lets make 2015 a benchmark year in protecting all human life from conception to natural death. It can be done. It will not be done if we do not try, pray, work, and put our faith and trust in GOD, JESUS, and the HOLY SPIRIT and THEIR power!

Planned MURDERHOOD is the most prolific MURDER organization in our nations history! Without question! And the federal government gives it money! And the federal government gives money to worldwide organizations that MURDER unborn babies! Why are we funding MURDER?

2 Corinthians 5: 10 (NIV)

For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad.”

Romans 8: 28 (NIV)

And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.”


Texas Senator Ted Cruz’s Liberty University announcement


SLED: Defend the Unborn with Scott Klusendorf


President Barack Hussein Obama: I can not bypass Congress and change the laws on my own!


Our values are Pro-Life, Pro-Family, Limited Government, Defenders of Religious Freedom. We only endorse candidates who clearly demonstrate their conservatism.” ~ The Madison Project

Federal law limits contributions to $5,400 per person ($2,700 primary election, $2,700 general election). Donations are not tax deductible.

Senate Conservatives Fund and Madison Project’s Senate Endorsements for 2016

01) Indiana Republican Senate candidate Marlin Stutzman


Marlin’s website:


02) Florida Republican Senate candidate Ron DeSantis:

Campaign website:


His donation site:

03) Utah Senator Mike Lee (Elected 2010)



Donate through Senate Conservatives Fund to all three or any of the three


House of Representative endorsements:

01) Rod Blum ~ U.S. Congress 1st Congressional District Iowa (Elected 2014)



02) Jim Bridenstine ~ U.S. Congress 1st Congressional District Oklahoma (Elected 2012)