Sex Education, Planned Parenthood (AKA MURDERHOOD), Obamacare, and Sexually Transmitted Diseases

The library is closed Friday and Saturday. I plan to resume posting Monday.


—

I posted a questionnaire I sent to the two mayoral candidates for the Village of Morton and the answers given by one of the candidates—Stephen Newhouse. The questions and answers are posted at:

http://christiangunslinger7.blogspot.com.

If the other candidate responses I will also post his answers. At the present, he has not.

—

Watch this video of an 11-year-old discussing homosexual marriage and read youtube’s disparaging labeling of the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CRhGDmdG4dk

—

Petition to reaffirm support for marriage being between one man and one woman—traditional, GOD-given marriage

http://www.grassfire.com/979/petition.asp?Ref_ID=20051&CID=979&RID=38738633

—

WARNING: Graphic language!

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/03/27/obamacare-funnels-75-million-to-planned-parenthood-to-push-sex-on-kids/

“Obamacare Funnels $75 Million to Planned Parenthood to Push Sex on Kids

by Paul Rondeau
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
3/27/13

While the White House says sequestration has eliminated funds for children touring the White House, President Obama has no problem spending $350 million federal tax dollars for sexual indoctrination programs starting in kindergarten for those same children.

This is not your grandmother’s sex education about how things work and what can go ‘wrong.’

In fact, the exact opposite is the essence of the Personal Responsibility Education Program (What in the world does Planned MURDERHOOD know about responsibility? For that matter, what do Democrats know about responsibility? Ah ha! This program is a program under Obamacare! No wonder!—my addition) (PREP):

https://www.cfda.gov/?s=program&mode=form&tab=step1&id=e9085baafbd785d09c9e4e52f9ec4ac4

Obamacare funnels $75 million annually into PREP, which must be used exclusively for Planned Parenthood-style ‘comprehensive’ sex ed programs where no type of sex is wrong and the only sexual behavior PP considers ‘unsafe’ is becoming pregnant.

More than one-fourth of the funds—$20 million—has been awarded to a coalition of six Planned Parenthood affiliates, operating under the name Northwest Coalition for Adolescent Health, to implement HHS’s TOP

http://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/oah-initiatives/tpp/programs/teen_outreach_program.pdf

program across Montana, Oregon, Idaho, Washington, and Alaska at over 50 sites. In Oregon schools,

http://www.stopp.org/article.php?id=11107

(Read this article! Two short paragraphs from the article:

“The TOP program is one of many insidious programs being promoted across the nation via huge federal government grants that super-fund Planned Parenthood in its bid to stealthily override parents and gain access to children both on and off campus, as it adds things like after-school programs and grant money to schools in order to bolster its acceptance.

Disguised as teen pregnancy prevention initiatives, these programs spell disaster for our nation’s children. The huge government grants and the impact they are already beginning to have on communities are driving an impending moral crisis the likes of which our spiraling nation has yet to face.”)

Planned Parenthood is paying children cash incentives to participate.

PP is funded with our tax dollars to market sex to our children in our schools under the guise of sex education, anti-bullying, diversity, and tolerance. Once sexualized, those children then become PP sex customers for contraceptives, STD testing, and abortion.

‘A glance at the teacher outline for Lesson 1A, the introductory lesson (page 12 of the linked PowerPoint presentation), shows exactly how abstinence plays out in the sex-encouraging scheme at Planned Parenthood. ‘Abstinence,’ it says, ‘means choosing not to do any sexual activity that carries a risk for pregnancy or STD/HIV,’’ says Rita Diller, national director for STOPP.org. ‘In other words, abstinence has nothing do with abstaining from sex acts. So long as the student avoids STDs and pregnancy, and is comfortable with what he or she is doing, it’s an anything goes.’

Last year Diller’s parent organization, American Life League, released a video titled ‘Hooking Kids on Sex,’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7XR9yH2ETk

graphically detailing just what Planned Parenthood sex education is. It went viral and was viewed almost one-quarter million times in the first week before a PP activist got YouTube to suspend it. ALL came back with Hooking Kids on Sex (II). Even those who thought they knew Planned Parenthood were shocked.

The video’s moderator, Michael Hichborn, argues that PP follows the same business model as a drug dealer: Young children are encouraged to masturbate and explore their bodies with mirrors to introduce them to sexuality. Hichborn says of the graphic pictures used to ‘educate’ pre-pubescent children, ‘If a dirty old man showed these things to a ten year old in a park, he would be arrested. But when Planned Parenthood shows them to kids in a classroom, it gets government money (Of course! Any time Planned MURDERHOOD gets into a school it is time to remove your children out of that school!—my addition).’

Back in 2000 at Tufts University, a state-funded sex education workshop targeting 14-21 year olds caused a scandal dubbed Fistgate. A Massachusetts state official who spoke to teens at the conference said:

‘Fisting (forcing one’s entire hand into another person’s rectum or vagina) often gets a bad rap … [It’s] an experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate with … [and] to put you into an exploratory mode.’

This bizarre and dangerous sexual act was presented to children as young as 12-14 as run-of-the-mill normal sex. When PP participated the next year, in 2001, recording devices of any kind were banned and the media was not allowed in to any of the workshops (I wonder why?—my addition).

Kevin Jennings, cofounder and executive director of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a sponsor of the conference, wrote it off as a glitch but also criticized those who filmed the proceedings as proof. Jennings was later appointed by President Obama as America’s ‘safe’ schools czar (Showing the quality of Obama appointments!—my addition): assistant deputy secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools inside the Department of Education.

Jennings told attendees at a GLSEN conference over a decade ago that he looked forward to the day when promoting homosexuality in schools will be seen in a positive light (It is NOT!—my addition). GLSEN activist and kindergarten teacher Jaki Williams has said that during kindergarten children are ‘developing their superego,’ and ‘that’s when the saturation process needs to begin (Indoctrination process!—my addition).’

So if you ever wonder why more and more young people accept homosexual behavior and same-sex marriage as ho-hum, look no farther.

Thanks to Obamacare, both Jennings and Williams are getting their wish.

LifeNews Note: Paul Rondeau is the executive director of American Life League. This article originally appeared in Rondeau’s pro-family column Common Sense at the Washington Times and is reprinted with permission.”

—

From: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/cdc-110197000-venereal-infections-us-nation-creating-new-stis-faster-new-jobs-or

“CDC: 110,197,000 Venereal Infections in U.S.; Nation Creating New STIs Faster Than New Jobs or College Grads (CDC is Center for Disease Control—my addition)

March 27, 2013
By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) - According to new data

http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/STI-Estimates-Fact-Sheet-Feb-2013.pdf

released by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were 19.7 million new venereal infections in the United States in 2008, bringing the total number of existing sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the U.S. at that time to 110,197,000.

The 19.7 million new STIs in 2008 vastly outpaced the new jobs and college graduates created in the United States that year or any other year on record, according to government data. The competition was not close.

The STI study referenced by the CDC estimated that 50 percent of the new infections in 2008 occurred among people in the 15-to-24 age bracket. In fact, of the 19,738,800 total new STIs in the United States in 2008, 9,782,650 were among Americans in the 15-to-24 age bracket.

By contrast, there were 1,524,092 bachelor’s degrees awarded in the United States in the 2007-2008 school year, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. That means the total number of new STIs in 2008 outpaced the total number of new bachelor’s degrees by nearly 13 to 1, and the number of new STIs among Americans in the 15-to-24 age bracket outnumbered new bachelor’s degrees by more than 6 to 1.

While the CDC estimates that there were 19.7 million new STIs in the United States in 2008, data published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics indicated that the total number of people employed in the country actually declined by 2.9 million during that year.

The CDC said the new venereal infections contracted each year cost the nation about $16 billion.

‘CDC’s new estimates show that there are about 20 million new infections in the United States each year, costing the American healthcare system nearly $16 billion in direct medical costs alone,’ said a CDC fact sheet.

The CDC study—‘Sexually Transmitted Infections Among U.S. Women and Men: Prevalence and Incidence Estimates, 2008’—was published in the March edition of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the journal of the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association.

The study distinguishes between ‘incidences’ of a disease, which is the number of new infections in a year, and the ‘prevalence,’ which is the total number of new and existing infections.

‘In 2008, there were an estimated 110 million prevalent STIs among women and men in the United States,’ said the study. ‘Of these, more than 20% of infections (22.1 million) were among women and men aged 15 to 24 years. Approximately 19.7 million incident infections occurred in the United States in 2008; nearly 50% (9.8 million) were acquired by young women and men aged 15 to 24 years.’

The study focused on estimating the incidences of sexual transmission of particular diseases as opposed to other forms of transmission. For example, it did not include HIV infections that were not sexually transmitted. It also counted the number of infections rather than the number of people infected—recognizing that a single individual could have multiple infections.

‘When calculating the number of prevalent and incident infections, only those infections that were sexually transmitted were counted,’ said the CDC fact sheet. ‘In general, CDC estimated the total number of infections in the calendar year, rather than the number of individuals with infection, since one person can have more than one STI at a given time (e.g., HPV and chlamydia) or more than one episode of a single STI (e.g., repeat chlamydia infection).’

The most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States in 2008 was human papillomavirus (HPV), which caused 14,100,000 estimated infections that year.

After HPV, in order of magnitude, according to the study, new STIs in the U.S. in 2008 included 2,860,000 new Chlamydia infections; 1,090,000 new Trichomoniasis infections; 820,000 new Gonorrhea infections; 776,000 new Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 (HSV-2) infections; 55,400 new syphilis infections; 41,400 new HIV infections; and 19,000 new Hepatitis B infections.

The total of 110,197,000 existing STIs in the United States in 2008 included 79,100,000 HPV infections, 24,100,000 HSV-2 infections; 3,710,000 Trichomoniasis infections; 1,579,000 Chlamydia infections; 908,000 HIV infections; 422,000 Hepatitis B infections; 270,000 Gonorrhea infections; and 117,000 Syphilis infections.

As noted, the number of people working in the U.S. in 2008 declined by about 2.9 million (dropping from 146,273,000 in December 2007 to 143,369,000 in December 2008). The Bureau of Labor Statistics has published historical data on the number of people employed in the U.S. going back to 1948. In no year since then has the U.S. economy created anywhere near the 19.7 million new STIs estimated for 2008.

On average during that period, the U.S. has increased employment by 1.3 million per year.”

Since President Obama took office in January of 2009, do you think these instances of sexually transmitted diseases have gone down, remained the same, or increased?

Welcome to Obama’s America of change with NO hope! Hope returns when we as a nation return to GOD!

Does Viewing a Depiction of an Abortion (AKA MURDER) Change the Opinion of a Pro-Choice Person?

The library is closed Friday and Saturday. I plan to resume posting Monday.

—

I posted a questionnaire I sent to the two mayoral candidates for the Village of Morton and the answers given by one of the candidates—Stephen Newhouse. The questions and answers are posted at:

http://christiangunslinger7.blogspot.com.

If the other candidate responses I will also post his answers. At the present, he has not.

—

Watch this video of an 11-year-old discussing homosexual marriage and read youtube’s disparaging labeling of the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CRhGDmdG4dk

—

Petition to reaffirm support for marriage being between one man and one woman—traditional, GOD-given marriage

http://www.grassfire.com/979/petition.asp?Ref_ID=20051&CID=979&RID=38738633

—

Warning: There are graphic pictures of an abortion (AKA MURDER) of an unborn baby at 23 weeks depicted at the end of this post.

From: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/what-happened-when-my-pro-abortion-friend-saw-this-picture?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=ab3eaeaa3f-LifeSiteNews_com_US_Headlines_03_26_2013&utm_medium=email

“What happened when my pro-abortion friend saw THIS picture …

BY REBEKAH O'BRIEN
Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:04 EST

I had only been working for LifeSiteNews for a few weeks when a friend of mine came for a visit. She’s one of my best friends, and she’s an extraordinary person, full of love and compassion. She is also pro-abortion.

As the social media coordinator, I have the responsibility of finding stories on LifeSiteNews.com and posting them to Facebook and Twitter.

I spend a lot of time reading articles. While my friend was visiting, I was reading an article that contained the illustration displayed here, of a D&E abortion of a 23 week old baby.

My friend looked over my shoulder and gasped.

‘What are you LOOKING at?’ she asked, horrified.

‘That’s an abortion (That’s a MURDER—my addition),’ I answered plainly.

‘But, that’s a baby (Of course he/she is! Was a baby from the day of conception!—my addition)’ she exclaimed. ‘That doesn’t happen!’

‘That’s a 23 week abortion. That happens quite frequently, actually.’

I tried to remain calm.

She’s not stupid. Really, honestly, she isn’t. She’s actually incredibly intelligent, educated. She has a degree.

I truly believe that my friend has been deceived.

How else could an intelligent, loving individual be completely ‘pro-choice’ (Satan is the great deceiver! However, we allow it!—my addition)?

Deception.

People are told what they want to hear (Exactly! They LIE!—my addition), that it’s ‘just a blob of tissue,’ or they’re told, ‘abortion is OK in certain circumstances,’ and most importantly, they’re told ‘abortion is a woman’s right." But when they are presented with the reality that what they thought was a blob of tissue was actually a baby, a human being, a lot of them change their minds. Yes, a lot.

She just stared at the illustration with pain in her eyes.

‘I don’t know if I’m OK with that (Really!—my addition).’ She said with finality.

The reason I am telling you this story is not simply to share the pro-life message.

I am telling you this to explain to you the importance of supporting pro-life organizations and sharing the truth (That’s what I am doing!—my addition).

It’s one thing to read a story and have your pro-life beliefs affirmed, but it’s another thing entirely to take that information and spread it as far and wide as you possibly can.

And we have seen time and time again that the truth is what changes hearts and minds (The TRUTH [GOD’S TRUTH] will set you free!—my addition).

At LifeSiteNews, we make it our mission is to provide you with the investigative, in-depth truth reporting you need to effectively engage the secular culture.

But that means LifeSiteNews needs you. We need you to keep spreading the message—because hearts will change, and ultimately, lives will be saved.

Without people like you, what would be the purpose of the pro-life journalist?

At this very moment, though, we need your financial help. We are struggling to meet our absolutely minimum campaign goal of $125,000 and we need your help now. (Click here to find out more about how we use your donations.)

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/how-we-spend-your-donation

Please consider donating to LifeSiteNews. No amount is too small! And please keep us in your prayers, as we continue to fight in this battle for life.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/donate

God bless,

Rebekah O’Brien
Social Media Coordinator
LifeSiteNews.com”

North Dakota New Pro-Life Bills Become Law! Thank You North Dakota!

           


I posted a questionnaire I sent to the two mayoral candidates for the Village of Morton and the answers given by one of the candidates—Stephen Newhouse. The questions and answers are posted at:


http://christiangunslinger7.blogspot.com.

If the other candidate responses I will also post his answers. At the present, he has not.

—

Watch this video of an 11-year-old discussing homosexual marriage and read youtube’s disparaging labeling of the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CRhGDmdG4dk

—

Petition to reaffirm support for marriage being between one man and one woman—traditional, GOD-given marriage

http://www.grassfire.com/979/petition.asp?Ref_ID=20051&CID=979&RID=38738633

—

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/03/22/north-dakota-passes-personhood-amendment-abortion-ban/

“North Dakota Passes Personhood Amendment Abortion Ban

by Steven Ertelt
Bismarck, ND
LifeNews.com
3/22/13

The North Dakota legislature finalized passage of a personhood amendment that backers claim will lead to banning abortions in North Dakota. However, leading pro-life groups are concerned the measure would only entrench legalized abortion further.

The North Dakota House approved the bill 57-35 after the Senate already okayed it. Gov. Jack Dalrymple, a Republican, has not said if he will sign the bill into law.

The legislature approved SCR 4009,

http://legiscan.com/ND/bill/4009/2013

which states ‘the inalienable right to life of every human being at any stage of development must be recognized and protected.’ The chamber also approved SB 2303 which ‘ensures that the protection that our criminal laws afford to victims of crimes extends to all human beings born and unborn.’

‘We are intending that it be a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, since Scalia said that the Supreme Court is waiting for states to raise a case,’ state Senator Margaret Sitte (R), the sponsor of the personhood initiative, said after Senate passage.

Concerned Women for America President Penny Nance applauded the vote in comments to LifeNews.

‘We applaud North Dakota for defending life. The bills in North Dakota protect the lives of the most innocent Americans, those without a voice, in the womb. Hopefully, these bills will start a national discussion about what life is and our duty as a civil society to protect it. It starts in the states,’ she said.

The state has also approved other pro-life bills that are expected to do more to stop abortions in the state.

The North Dakota bills already passed include a ban on abortion based on gender and genetic abnormality (HB1305) and ban abortion after a heartbeat is detected (HB1456). The bills still under consideration seek to define a human being (SB 2303), demand that abortion doctors have admitting privileges to hospitals (SB 2305), ban abortions when babies can detect pain (SB 2368).

‘As people see the truth of abortion, the dirty money and messaging behind it, and the compassion and redemption the pro-life movement offers, I truly believe we will see waves of similar pro-life legislation in other states (I pray that is true!—my addition). According to the latest Gallup poll, Americans now tilt pro-life by nine percentage points. 2012 was a big year for the pro-life movement, and 2013 is shaping up to follow suit. In 2012, 42 pro-life measures were enacted in 25 states and an average of seven abortion clinics closed every month (STOP the MURDER of unborn babies!—my addition),’ Nance said.

Jennifer Mason, spokesperson for Personhood USA, says SCR 4009 is the first personhood amendment to ever pass the state legislature. The state House signed off on similar personhood amendments previously passed in 2009 and 2011 but faced hurdles later in the legislative process.

‘North Dakota is leading the way for equal rights and protections for all human beings,’ she said. ‘After the struggles to pass life-affirming amendments in the Senate in the past four years, we are very pleased that the North Dakota Senate has chosen to protect all living human beings. This is a historic day in North Dakota.

‘Abortion laws are archaic (ILLEGAL and IMMORAL!—my addition), based on 40-year-old science and technology,’ added Mason. ‘Our understanding of pregnancy and human development since Roe v Wade has changed dramatically. There is no question now that the unborn child is a human being and a person, who has a right to legal recognition and protection (There was not a question back then either! The Supreme Court just ignored it!—my addition).’

Mason said SCR 4009 and SB 2303 were both written as to ensure that mother and baby are both treated as medical patients, that medical care is not inhibited, and that fertility treatments are not banned.

The personhood amendment probably would not ban abortions (It should! However, at this time we will take every victory and this is a victory! We have our foot in the door and are pushing the door open once again just as the Left did before Roe!—my addition)

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/11/08/personhood-amendment-in-mississippi-likely-wont-ban-abortion/

and would perhaps give a pro-abortion dominated Supreme Court or lower courts a chance to reaffirm the Roe v. Wade decision that allowed virtually unlimited abortions in 1973.

Some pro-life groups oppose the amendment because they say it will head to the Supreme Court, which will strike it down (How do they know this unless it is tried by the Supreme Court! Pessimists who do not trust GOD?—my addition) and add to the pro-Roe v. Wade case law upholding unlimited abortions. Knowing that, they say a better strategy is supporting pro-life Senate candidates and replacing pro-abortion President Barack Obama—paving the way for new Supreme Court justices who could overturn Roe or uphold such an amendment (In the mean time do everything one can to end the MURDER State by State! A law is legal until ruled illegal!—my addition).”

Update: The governor signed the bills this morning. Naturally, the Pro-MURDER group has promised a legal battle. However, the State of North Dakota MUST demand that the Constitution of the United States be followed! That means ANY CHALLENGE to this new State law MUST begin in the United States Supreme Court as required by the U.S. Constitution!

Article III, §2, ¶2:

“In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.” (My use of red)

North Dakota Attorney General
Wayne Stenehjem

E-mail: ndag@nd.gov

Mail:

State Capitol
600 E. Boulevard Avenue
Dept. 125
Bismarck, North Dakota 58505

Obamacare Repeal, Obamacare Mandate—3 Senate Votes Including 3 Republican RINOS Who Side with the Democrats

The library is closed Friday and Saturday. I plan to resume posting Monday.


Since today’s is a long post, I’m posting without comment. I did use red for important sections. These are three votes either pro-life or pro-MURDER. All Republicans voted to repeal Obamacare. However, a couple of Republicans voted pro-MURDER on the other two questions. Now, they will say they voted against Obamacare and not mention to Republicans that they voted for MURDER in the other 2.

One of which is Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois. One would think his bout with death would give him a life prospective. It did NOT! Unless he repents, his MURDER votes are dooming him! He also supports the homosexual agenda! I didn’t vote for him in the primary or general election. I will not vote for him ever, unless he repents!

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/03/22/democrats-defeat-cruz-amendment-to-repeal-pro-abortion-obamacare/

“Democrats Defeat Cruz Amendment to Repeal Pro-Abortion Obamacare

by Steven Ertelt
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
3/22/13

On the third anniversary of the passage of President Obama’s controversial pro-abortion health care bill, Democrats defeated an amendment to repeal Obamacare.

Senator Ted Cruz, a pro-life Republican from Texas, filed an amendment to the budget bill to establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund to provide for the repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 and to encourage patient-centered reforms to improve health outcomes and reduce health care costs.

But Democrats balked and defeated the measure 54-45, with Republicans voting for the amendment and Democrats in opposition.

‘Tomorrow is the three-year anniversary of the passage of Obamacare,’ Cruz said on the floor before the vote. ‘Obamacare is hurting young people. It’s hurting seniors. It’s hurting Hispanics. It’s hurting African-Americans. It’s hurting single moms. It’s hurting the economy. It should be repealed.’

‘ObamaCare itself includes some 20 tax increases over $1 trillion,’ Cruz said. ‘Many of those tax increases fall of the middle class.’

Until Democrats no longer control the Senate and White House, repeal of Obamacare will remain limited to the House.

Unhappy that the Supreme Court didn’t overturn the Obamacare law that includes taxpayer funding of abortions and rationing concerns, leading pro-life groups have urged members of Congress to vote to repeal the law wholesale.

In a letter to members of Congress previously, the National Right to Life Committee said it is concerned about both abortion funding and health care rationing.

‘NRLC vigorously opposed enactment of the Obamacare law in 2009-2010, because of its multiple provisions authorizing federal subsidies for abortion insurance, multiple provisions allowing abortion-expansive federal mandates, and multiple provisions that will place unacceptable limits on the right of vulnerable Americans to use their own money, if they choose, to obtain both health care and health insurance less likely to deny needed health care,’ the pro-life group explained.

It continued: ‘Since its inception, the pro-life movement has been as concerned with protecting the lives of older people and people with disabilities from euthanasia, including the involuntary denial of treatment, food, and fluids necessary to prevent death, as it has been dedicated to protecting unborn children from abortion.’

Meanwhile, the Susan B. Anthony List has urged members to vote for repeal as well and focused on abortion funding.

‘Obamacare creates heavy federal subsidies—your tax dollars—to help pay for insurance plans that cover elective abortion,’ it said in an action alert to its membership. ‘Millions of Americans will be enrolled—many unknowingly—in health care plans that include elective abortion coverage.’

‘These plans will charge enrollees, regardless of age and gender, a minimum of $1 per month—an ‘abortion surcharge’ that will go into an abortion slush fund. Under a rule recently issued by Health and Human Services (HHS), the existence of the ‘abortion surcharge’ only needs to be disclosed once—in the fine print—during the enrollment process,’ SBA continued. ‘This surcharge is included without itemization in the monthly premium and is never disclosed again.’

The Supreme Court incorrectly ruled

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/06/28/supreme-court-upholds-pro-abortion-pro-rationing-obamacare/

that Obamacare is constitutional, pro-life groups said in response to the decision. They are pointing out that the need is greater now than ever to defeat pro-abortion President Barack Obama and elect a pro-life Senate that will join the House in repealing the legislation.

Under the enacted law, federal tax-based subsidies will begin in 2014 to subsidize millions of private insurance plans that will cover abortion-on-demand, including some plans (‘multi-state plans’) that will be administered by the federal government. Under another provision of the law, the federal government could even order many plans that do not receive federal subsidies to cover abortion as a ‘preventive’ service. The law also created an array of other mechanisms and funding pipelines by which access to and subsidies for abortion can be expanded if President Obama wins a second term (sic—my addition).

The Senate vote on the amendment follows:

Grouped By Vote Position

Yes—45

Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Enzi (R-WY)
Fischer (R-NE)
Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heller (R-NV)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (R-WI)
Kirk (R-IL)
Lee (R-UT)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
Portman (R-OH)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rubio (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Toomey (R-PA)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)

No—54

Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Not voting

Lautenberg (D-NJ)”

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/03/22/senate-votes-to-reaffirm-the-pro-abortion-obama-hhs-mandate/

“Senate Votes to Reaffirm the Pro-Abortion Obama HHS Mandate

by Steven Ertelt
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
3/22/13

Members of the Senate voted today on a mostly party-line vote to reaffirm the controversial HHS mandate, that compels religious groups to pay for birth control and abortion-causing drugs despite their religious or moral objections.

Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a pro-abortion Democrat from New Hampshire, filed an amendment to reaffirm the HHS mandate authorized under the Obamacare health care law. That amendment passed on a 56-43 vote (see below).

Democrats supported the HHS mandate along with pro-abortion Republican Senators Susan Collins (Maine), Mark Kirk (Illinois) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) while pro-life Sen. Joe Manchin (West Virginia) was the only Democrat to vote with Republicans.

Shaheen said that her amendment makes sure a woman’s family planning decisions ‘are not dictated by government or her employer.’

‘The United States has one of the highest rate of unintended pregnancies in the developed world,’ Shaheen said. ‘Preventing unintended pregnancies just makes sense.’

But pro-life Senator Mike Johanns, a Nebraska Republican, disagreed and said, ‘We must also protect the deeply religious beliefs in this country. This law tramples on the rights of individuals.’

Earlier this week, the nation’s Catholics bishops said the revised mandate is a horrible violation of religious freedom.

The general counsel of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops states that the current proposed revisions of the Obama Administration’s contraceptive mandate are ‘an unprecedented … violation of religious liberty by the federal government’ and must be changed.

The statement is in comments filed March 20 regarding the mandate, which requires most health plans in the United States to cover abortion-inducing drugs, contraceptives, sterilization procedures, and related education and counseling, which the USSCB strongly opposes.

The comments, made on the USCCB’s behalf by Anthony R. Picarello, USCCB associate general secretary and general counsel, and Michael F. Moses, associate general counsel, note a number of continuing problems with the regulations, which had been the subject of earlier rulemaking and comment by the USCCB.

Their comments follow:

‘First, like earlier iterations of the regulation, the latest proposal requires coverage of items and procedures that, unlike other mandated ‘preventive services,’ do not prevent disease. Instead, they are associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including conditions that other ‘preventive services’ are designed to prevent.

Second, no exemption or accommodation is available at all for the vast majority of individual or institutional stakeholders with religious or moral objections to contraceptive coverage. Virtually all Americans who enroll in a health plan will ultimately be required to have contraceptive coverage for themselves and their dependents, whether they want it or not.

Third, although the definition of an exempt ‘religious employer’ has been revised to eliminate some of the intrusive and constitutionally improper government inquiries into religious teaching and beliefs that were inherent in an earlier definition, the current proposal continues to define ‘religious employer’ in a way that, by the government’s own admission, excludes (and therefore subjects to the mandate) a wide array of employers that are undeniably religious. Generally the nonprofit religious organizations that fall on the ‘non-exempt’ side of this religious gerrymander include those organizations that contribute most visibly to the common good through the provision of health, educational, and social services.

Fourth, the Administration has offered what it calls an ‘accommodation’ for nonprofit religious organizations that fall outside its narrow definition of ‘religious employer.’ The ‘accommodation’ is based on a number of questionable factual assumptions. Even if all of those assumptions were sound, the ‘accommodation’ still requires the objecting religious organization to fund or otherwise facilitate the morally objectionable coverage.

Fifth, the mandate continues to represent an unprecedented (and now sustained) violation of religious liberty by the federal government. As applied to individuals and organizations with a religious objection to contraceptive coverage, the mandate violates the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.

The vote on today’s amendment follows:

Grouped By Vote Position

Yes—56

Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Collins (R-Maine)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Kirk (R-Illinois)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-Alaska)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

No—43

Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Enzi (R-WY)
Fischer (R-NE)
Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heller (R-NV)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (R-WI)
Lee (R-UT)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Paul (R-KY)
Portman (R-OH)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rubio (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Toomey (R-PA)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)

Not Voting – 1

Lautenberg (D-NJ)”

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/03/22/senate-democrats-vote-against-conscience-protections-from-hhs-mandate/

“Senate Democrats Vote Against Conscience Protections From HHS Mandate

by Steven Ertelt
Washington, DC
LifeNews.com
3/22/13

Senate Democrats voted on Friday against an amendment from pro-life Senator Deb Fischer of Nebraska to the budget that would offer Americans conscience protections from the controversial HHS mandate.

The amendment would establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect women’s access to health care, including primary and preventive care, but in a manner consistent with protecting rights of conscience.

Earlier in the day, Senate Democrats voted today on a mostly party-line vote to reaffirm the controversial HHS mandate, that compels religious groups to pay for birth control and abortion-causing drugs despite their religious or moral objections. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a pro-abortion Democrat from New Hampshire, filed an amendment to reaffirm the HHS mandate authorized under the Obamacare health care law. That amendment passed on a 56-43 vote.

Maureen Ferguson, Senior Policy Advisor with The Catholic Association, decried the vote in comments to LifeNews.

‘The Senate today voted against the 1st Amendment and religious freedom in a vote forcing Americans to pay for abortion products in their health care plans,’ she said. ‘People of faith should not be forced to buy health plans that include products that so flagrantly conflict with their religious faith. They should be allowed the choice to buy plans that do not offer products that conflict with their deeply held religious beliefs.”

She said Senate Democrats ‘ran roughshod over the 1st Amendment and a corner stone principle of American freedom—religious liberty. We applaud the efforts of Senator Deb Fischer to protect religious liberty.’

‘The Senate has shown it cares less about the conscience rights of small business owners and charity workers than the cash reserves of big corporations,’ added Ashley McGuire, Senior Fellow with The Catholic Association. ‘Shame on those senators who care more about protecting the financial interests of corporations than the constitutional rights of their citizens. This is pandering to rich people with one hand while crumpling the Constitution with the other.’

Polling routinely shows that more than 60 percent of Americans oppose the use of taxpayer dollars for abortion. Polling also shows that 77 percent of Americans believe it is important that health care professionals not be forced to participate in procedures or practices to which they have moral objections.

The vote appears below. A Yes vote is the pro-life vote.

Yes—44

Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Enzi (R-WY)
Fischer (R-NE)
Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heller (R-NV)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (R-WI)
Lee (R-UT)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Paul (R-KY)
Portman (R-OH)
Pryor (D-AR)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rubio (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Toomey (R-PA)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)

No—55

Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Collins (R-Maine)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Kirk (R-Illinois)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-Alaska)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Not voting

Lautenberg (D-NJ)”

Abortion Doctors: Abortion Terminates a Human Life!

I posted a questionnaire I sent to the two mayoral candidates for the Village of Morton and the answers given by one of the candidates—Stephen Newhouse. The questions and answers are posted at:


http://christiangunslinger7.blogspot.com.

If the other candidate responses I will also post his answers. At the present, he has not.

—

Watch this video of an 11-year-old discussing homosexual marriage and read youtube’s disparaging labeling of the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CRhGDmdG4dk

—

Petition to reaffirm support for marriage being between one man and one woman—traditional, GOD-given marriage

http://www.grassfire.com/979/petition.asp?Ref_ID=20051&CID=979&RID=38738633

—

From: http://liveactionnews.org/abortionists-agree-abortion-is-killing/

“Abortionists agree—abortion is killing
by Sarah Terzo
March 15, 2013

‘A fetus isn’t a baby.’ ‘A woman has a right to choose.’ These are often the most common statements a pro-lifer hears when discussing abortion with pro-choice people. ‘It isn’t a baby until it’s born.’ ‘Abortion isn’t killing.’ The rank-and-file of the pro-choice movement usually deny that an unborn baby is a human being with a right to life. Occasionally you will find someone who argues that the fetus is a baby, but the woman has a right to abort him or her anyway—but usually you’ll hear pro-choice people denying the humanity of the unborn. One word that’s always avoided is pro-choice publications is ‘baby.’ ‘Fetus’ or ‘product of conception” or “tissue” is how the aborted baby is described. It isn’t a life, they say (They LIE! Which, of course, they must do to cover-up the MURDER that occurs each time a baby is MURDERED!—my addition).

But the people who know the most about abortion are the clinic workers and doctors who perform them. And many of them have come out saying things that would make even the most hardcore pro-choicers cringe.

In one article in the American Medical News that was probably never meant for pro-life eyes, abortion providers from around the country discussed the emotional difficulties of performing abortions. One doctor said:

‘I have angry feelings at myself for feeling good about grasping the calvaria [head], for feeling good about doing a technically good procedure that destroys a fetus, kills a baby [My use of red—my addition].’ (1)

Baby? Perhaps this doctor didn’t get the memo. Pro-choice activists know never to refer to the ‘fetus’ as a baby. You won’t hear NARAL Pro-Choice America or the National Organization for Women using the term ‘baby’ to describe a child being aborted.

Another abortion doctor uses honest terms to describe his job:

‘A late termination is actually not very nice and there is no way of getting away from it, I don’t feel I am doing it for any other reason than for the best of both the mother and the baby (Right! MY use of red—my addition).’ (2)

Again the word ‘baby.’ Could it be that these abortionists are fully aware that the fetuses’ they are aborting are in fact living babies (They are if they took and passed a basic biology course in high school!—my addition)?

If there is any doubt that at least some abortion providers know that abortion is killing a baby, it is put to rest by British abortionist Judith Arcana:

‘It is morally and ethically wrong to do abortions (Period! Without exception!—my addition) without acknowledging what it means to do them. I performed abortions, I have had an abortion (MURDERED her own child! But, why not? If she would MURDER someone else’s child, why not her own?—my addition) and I am in favor of women having abortions when we choose to do so. But we should never disregard the fact that being pregnant means there is a baby growing inside of a woman, a baby whose life is ended. We ought not to pretend this is not happening (My use of red—my addition).’ (3)

This straightforward admission must have caused some consternation to pro-choice activists who read Arcana’s article. Few are willing to admit to the reality of abortion.

One unnamed abortionist said the following in a book that profiled doctors from different fields:

‘Nobody wants to perform abortions after ten weeks because by then you see the features of the baby, hands, feet. It’s really barbaric. Abortions are very draining, exhausting, and heartrending. There are a lot of tears. … I do them because I take the attitude that women are going to terminate babies and deserve the same kind of treatment as women who carry babies … I’ve done a couple thousand (A mass MURDERER confesses! Will he claim the same when he is before GOD?—my addition), and it turned into a significant financial boon, but I also feel I’ve provided an important service (Justification ethic! Was Hitler providing an important service?—my addition). The only way I can do an abortion is to consider only the woman as my patient and block out the baby (My use of red—my addition)[.]’ (4)

In this short paragraph, the doctor mentions the word ‘baby’ four times.

It is clear that many abortion providers know that they are ending life. They see the babies kicking and moving on the ultrasound screen and then see them later, in pieces, in the back room of the clinic.

Clinic counselor Tim Shuck, who worked at the Lovejoy abortion clinic until his death from AIDS, said the following to a writer who was chronicling the daily workings of the clinic:

‘I have never denied that human life begins at conception. If I have a complaint about our society, it’s that we don’t deal with death and dying. Do we believe human beings have a right to make decisions about death and dying? Yes we do (No, we don’t!—my addition, and those decisions are made every day in every hospital.’ (5)

The author who quoted Shuck never revealed whether or not Shuck told the women he counseled that life begins at conception.

Another clinic worker said the following:

‘I see more of murder the further along they get. Although inside me I know it’s murder from the beginning (My use of red—my addition) …” (6)

In an article in the Dallas Morning News, abortion clinic administrator Charlotte Taft made the following statement:

‘We were hiding … some pieces of the truth about abortion that were threatening. [Abortion] is a kind of killing, and most women seeking abortion know that (How can they not?—my addition).’ (7)

This was a little too much honesty for Planned Parenthood—after Taft came out with this statement, they stopped referring patients to her clinic. Eventually, she resigned.

Reporter Leonard Stern spoke to Joan Wright, the owner of a clinic in Ottawa. She explained how she and her fellow workers were fighting to force pro-lifers to take down a banner that announced, ‘Abortion Stops a Beating Heart’ and gave a phone number for women considering abortion to call for help. Stern confronted her with pro-lifers’ allegations that her clinic gave deceptive counseling to women. From the article:

She said. ‘Good grief! They accuse us of pretending we’re not doing what we’re doing? I’m in the business of death (My use of red—my addition)!’ (8)

This is probably the most honest and frank admission by an abortion provider that you are likely to hear.

In his essay ‘Why I Am an Abortion Provider,’ Dr. William F. Harrison says the following: ‘No one, neither the patient receiving the abortion, nor the person doing the abortion, is ever, at any time, unaware that they are ending a life.’

In reality, the fact that abortion ends a life is often hidden from women. The baby is described as ‘products of conception’ or ‘tissue.’ The abortion ‘empties out the uterus.’ The facts of fetal development are glossed over or outright distorted. The woman is facing a life-changing, irrevocable decision at a vulnerable time in her life, and she is susceptible to being deceived.

Look at the way one abortion clinic (Summit Medical Center) describes an abortion

http://www.summitcenters.com/abortion-services/surgical-abortion.html

on its website.

‘You will first lay [sic] on an exam table like you would’ve for regular gynecological exam. Most patients will then receive IV sedation/twilight anesthesia … Patients opting for twilight anesthesia are mildly awake, but should feel no more than slight (if any) discomfort, and usually have little or no memory of the procedure afterwards.… Just as with a Pap smear, the doctor will use a speculum to hold the vaginal walls open, and then begin the procedure of using a series of dilation instruments to open the cervix. The contents of the uterus are then removed with a gentle vacuum aspirator.’

Here are more examples of abortionists and clinic workers who acknowledge that abortion is killing:

The owner of one abortion clinic, identified only as  ‘Michelle’ in a book by James D. Slack, said the following:

‘I’ve thought through this issue, to do it as long as I have, and I have to sleep well at night … Is it life? Clearly it’s life. Does it deserve protection? My answer is ‘no [And who are you to decide that?—my addition].’ The bottom line, you have two competing interests: the mother and the baby (or the embryo or the fertilized egg). And sometime during that nine month gestation, a woman’s rights are going to digress. At that point, I guess, rights can be ascribed to the fetus. (9)

This clinic owner has no problem calling an embryo a baby. She merely considers the baby’s life unimportant. There is no doubt that she knows exactly what is happening at her clinic.

Abortionist Don Sloan, explaining the morality of abortion to his teenage niece in an essay that appeared in an anthology on abortion, said the following:

‘Is abortion murder (YES!—my addition)? All killing isn’t murder (True! However, abortion is!—my addition). A cop shoots a teenager who appeared to be going for a gun, and we call it justifiable homicide—a tragedy for all concerned, but not murder. And then there’s war …’ (10)

In this case, the abortionist (Sloan has been practicing for over thirty years and has done over 20,000 abortions) admits that abortion is killing but claims that it is not murder. He equates abortion with self-defense and war. But is the unborn baby sleeping in her mother’s womb really an aggressor? Except in very rare cases, a woman’s life is not endangered by a pregnancy. And unless the pregnancy is a result of rape (which is a factor in only 1% of all abortions) the woman’s own actions (along with those of the baby’s father) resulted in the baby developing where he or she is. The baby may be unwanted, but she is not truly an intruder if the woman’s own actions are responsible for her presence in the womb. An unborn baby is not a teenager with a gun or an enemy soldier on a battlefield; she is an innocent and helpless member of the human race.

Abortionist Dr. Neville Sender said the following in a newspaper article:

‘We know that it is killing (My use of red—my addition), but the states permit killing under certain circumstances (Does that make it moral and/or right?—my addition).’ (11)

The clinic where Sender worked later came under scrutiny for throwing the bodies of aborted babies in the trash.

Abortionist Dr. Curtis Boyd, who performs abortions up to 24 weeks: “Am I killing? Yes, I am (My use of red—my addition). I know that.’ You can see a video of him saying it here.

http://clinicquotes.com/dr-curtis-boyd-abortionist-admits-that-he-is-killing/

Another abortionist, who remained anonymous, said:

‘It [the fetus] is a form of life[.] … This has to be killing (My use of red—my addition)[.] … The question then becomes, ‘Is this kind of killing justifiable?’ In my own mind, it is justifiable, but only with the informed consent of the mother.’ (12)

Another abortionist admits that abortion is killing but also tries to justify it by saying the babies he kills would have difficult lives if they were allowed to be born (My use of red. And that justifies MURDER!—my addition):

‘I have the utmost respect for life (No you do NOT!—my addition); I appreciate that life starts early in the womb, but also believe that I’m ending it for good reasons.’

‘Often I’m saving the woman or I’m improving the lives of other children in the family. I also believe that women have a life they have to consider. If a woman is working full-time, has one child already and is barely getting by, having another child that would financially push her to go on public assistance yes is going to lessen the quality of her life. And it’s also an issue for the child, if it would not have had a good life. Life is hard enough when you’re wanted and everything’s prepared. So yes, I end life, but even when it’s hard, it’s for a good reason (Situation ethics!—my addition).’ (13)

Are these good reasons to kill a child?

Another abortionist puts it more plainly:

‘Abortion is killing the fetus. … Human life, in and of itself, is not sacred. Human life, per se, is not inviolate.’ (14)

This doctor has foregone excuses and accepted the belief that human life is not sacred or worthy of protection (If it was his life, I’m guessing he would believe differently!—my addition). He has no need for justifications. He knows he is killing—and he doesn’t care.

After talking extensively to one abortionist, author Nancy Dey writes:

‘Dr. Ed Jones (pseudonym) says it’s always in the back of his mind that he is terminating a life (My use of red—my addition).’ (15)

Another abortionist, Dr. Harrison, simply said, ‘I am destroying a life (My use of red—my addition)’ (16). This doctor has performed over 20,000 abortions.

Dr. William Rashbaum performed thousands of abortions before his death in 2005. He revealed to an interviewer that he was haunted by a recurring nightmare of an unborn baby hanging on to the uterine wall with its tiny fingernails, fighting to stay inside. When asked how he dealt with this dream, he said, ‘Learned to live with it. Like people in concentration camps.’

The interviewer then asked if he really meant that metaphor:

‘I think it’s apt—destruction of life (My use of red—my addition). Look! I’m a person, I’m entitled to my feelings. And my feelings are who gave me or anybody the right to terminate a pregnancy (My use of red—my addition)? I’m entitled to that feeling, but I also have no right communicating it to the patient who desperately wants that abortion. I don’t get paid for my feelings. I get paid for my skills … I’ll be frank. I began to do abortions in large numbers at the time of my divorce when I needed money. But I also believe in the woman’s right to control their biological destiny (Including MURDER! He can not be serious!—my addition). I spent a lot of years learning to deliver babies. Sure, it sometimes hurts to end life instead of bringing it into the world (Callous! Lost?—my addition).’ (17)

Rashbaum knew that abortion takes a life, but he never mentioned this to the women who were coming in for abortions. One can only wonder about the psychological strain of equating oneself with a Nazi, with knowing that you end babies’ lives for a living.

Pro-choice writer Miriam Claire interviewed several abortion providers for a book she wrote. One of them, Dr. Bertram Wainer, said the following:

‘My whole professional training was to prolong life, to nurture and protect it. Abortion is clearly at odds with that ethos … [yet] I have never refused to perform an abortion because of any personal conflict[.]’ (18)

There are other examples of abortionists and clinic workers who admitted that abortion ends lives. Magda Denes, a pro-choice author, interviewed a number of doctors and clinic workers in her book In Necessity and Sorrow: Life and Death Inside an Abortion Hospital. Every doctor she interviewed, and many of the clinic workers, admitted at some point during the interviews that they regarded abortion as murder (My use of red—my addition). One doctor said:

‘It [abortion] goes against all things which are natural. It’s a termination of a life (My use of red—my addition), however you look at it.’ (19)

There are similar quotes throughout the book.

There is no way to know for whether or not these doctors and clinic administrators are representative of all abortion providers. But it is clear that many, if not most, abortion providers know that they kill. It is also clear that the average pro-choice person, who argues in support of allowing these men and women to continue practicing, has no awareness of the truth (I think they do or at least should!—my addition) that so many abortion providers know—that abortion kills babies.

1. Diane M. Gianelli, ‘Abortion Providers Share Inner Conflicts,’ American Medical News, July 12, 1993

2. ABC.net: Religion and Ethics: 12-28-2005. Quoted by Life Dynamics

3. Judith Arcana ‘Feminist Politics and Abortion in the US’ Pro-Choice Forum (Psychology and Reproductive Choice) Sponsored by The Society for the Psychology of Women.

http://www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/psy_al8.php

4. John Pekkanen. M.D.: Doctors Talk About Themselves (Delcorte Press: New York, 1988) 90-91

5. Peter Korn. Lovejoy: A Year in the Life of an Abortion Clinic (The Atlantic Monthly Press: New York, 1996) p 94

6. James Tunstead Burtechaell, C.S.C. Rachel Weeping: the Case against Abortion (San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row Publishers, 1982) 135 – 136

7. ‘Abortion rights activist resigns as clinic director; Taft cites differences with Routh Street owner’ Dallas Morning News 2/2/1995

8. Leonard Stern ‘Abortion Wars’ The Ottawa Citizen Sun 28 May 2000

9. James D Slack Abortion, Execution, and the Consequences of Taking Life (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2009) 49

10. Tamara L. Roleff. Abortion: Opposing Viewpoints (Greenhaven Press: San Diego 1997) 25

11. John Powell, S.J. Abortion: The Silent Holocaust (Argus Communications: Allen, Tx) 1981, p 66

12. Democrat & Chronicle 7/5/92

13. Cheryl Alkon ‘Confessions of an Abortion Doctor’ Boston Magazine December 2004

14. Abortionist ‘Dr. Smith’ (Pseudonym). Leo Wang ‘The Abortionist’ Berkeley Medical Journal Spring 1995

15. Nancy Dey Abortion: Debating the Issue (Enslow Publishers: Springfield, IL 1995) 49

16. Nat Hentoff ‘An Abortionist’s World: How to Rationalize Inhumanity’ The Washington Times Febuary 6, 2006. Citing Stephanie Simon ‘Offering Abortion, Rebirth’ Los Angeles Times November 29, 2005

17. Norma Rosen ‘Between Guilt and Gratification: Abortion Doctors Reveal Their Feelings,’ New York Times Magazine April 17, 1977 p 73, 74, 78

18. Miriam Claire The Abortion Dilemma: Personal Views on a Public Issue. (Insight Books: New York) 1995, p 30

19. Magda Denes, PhD. In Necessity and Sorrow: Life and Death Inside an Abortion Hospital (Basic Books, Inc.: New York 1976)147

Planned Parenthood (AKA MURDERHOOD), College Students, High School Students, Home School Students, and Students for Life of America

I posted a questionnaire I sent to the two mayoral candidates for the Village of Morton and the answers given by one of the candidates—Stephen Newhouse. The questions and answers are posted at:


http://christiangunslinger7.blogspot.com.

If the other candidate responses I will also post his answers. At the present, he has not.

—

Watch this video of an 11-year-old discussing homosexual marriage and read youtube’s disparaging labeling of the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CRhGDmdG4dk

—

From: http://www.lifenews.com/2013/03/21/planned-parenthood-preys-on-college-students-with-abortions/


“Planned Parenthood Preys on College Students With Abortions

by Kristan Hawkins
Cincinnati, OH
LifeNews.com

This spring, Students for Life of America’s full-time team is criss-crossing the country starting new pro-life groups. But what some folks may not know is that we spend the a vast majority of our time helping the 705 already active Students for Life groups already in existence—training them to handle anything that is thrown their way on campus.

And boy do some crazy things happen in our nation’s high schools and college campuses! But recently, what happened at the University of Cincinnati ‘takes the cake.’

As you may already know, two weeks ago the University of Cincinnati Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer Alliance and UC Feminists groups put on an exploitive program entitled ‘Re-envisioning the Female Body.’”

“However, what many don’t know is that the Planned Parenthood panel, which was scheduled to be held on campus as the kickoff to the vulgar photo exhibit, was actually moved to the Planned Parenthood abortion facility down the street from the university at the last minute.

That’s right—an abortion facility, down the street from the college.

What better way for them to lure in young women and men and get them comfortable with going into an abortion facility?

College-aged women are unfortunately Planned Parenthood’s biggest abortion customers, representing 46% of all abortions, and their business model is slick. They specifically target college students by building abortion facilities close to campus.

http://studentsforlife.org/files/2012/07/Abortion-Facilities-Target-College-Students.pdf

Simply put, Planned Parenthood doesn’t exist to help women, it exists to profit off of them.

1st: They meet children in middle and high school, offering to teach sex education classes for teachers as a public service. During these classes, Planned Parenthood workers are careful not to bring up abortion, for they know the negative connotations that come with the word. However, they teach our young women and men that waiting until marriage is an impossible task and that when they are ready to become sexually active to go to them for their birth control and STD testing, not their parents.

2nd: When children come to them, they provide poor quality, faulty birth control that ensures their profits. Planned Parenthood’s condoms for example have the lowest possible ranking by Consumer Reports.

http://www.lifenews.com/2005/01/05/nat-1085/

Furthermore, statistics have proven that contraception does NOT lower abortion or STD rates. According to the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute, 54% of women who have abortions used contraception during the month they became pregnant. STD rates are also skyrocketing, with 1 in 4 college students carrying at least one STD, and 1 in 2 of sexually active people contracting an STD by age 25.

3rd: They distribute proven abortion-causing chemicals called ‘morning-after’ pills to people of all ages and genders (men can use them to secretly induce abortions) while falsely claiming they do not cause abortions.

4th: They mislead women through claims that abortion is a quick, easy solution to unexpected pregnancies by withholding pertinent information such as the mental and physical risks, including the scientifically proven abortion-breast cancer link.

http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/biology/index.htm

And despite all this, in 2012,

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/annual-report-4661.htm

Planned Parenthood received a record $542 million of YOUR tax dollars, performed a record-breaking 333,964 abortions, and had an annual budget of over $1.2 billion with $300 million in profit. That’s right—$300 million in profit! (And Planned MURDERHOOD is a NON-profit organization!—my addition)

While what happened at University of Cincinnati is outrageous and should be condemned by all of us, it’s just further proof of the need to keep up the pressure and educate Americans on what Planned Parenthood is really all about.

And that’s exactly what Students for Life of America is prepared to do.

In 2 weeks, we will be launching an historic initiative aimed at educating our young people about Planned Parenthood’s Plan for them, and I hope we will have your support.

Today, can you say a prayer for our upcoming campaign and forward this post on to your pro-life family and friends? I can’t wait to share all of the details with you soon!”

—

From: Students for Life www.studentsforlife.org

I have been receiving Students for Life of America e-mails for several years. It has been an organization that was located on college campuses. The organization is expanding and has just established a website for high school students who are pro-life! And they all should be!

http://highschool.studentsforlife.org/

Along with the main site redesign, we are so excited to be launching a one-of-a-kind program specifically with pro-life high school and homeschool students in mind at

http://highschool.studentsforlife.org/

The passion of high schoolers and homeschoolers across the nation has overwhelmed us and now we want to make sure you have all of the training, support, and resources you need to courageously abolish abortion in this lifetime!

Our new program includes trainings on topics such as: Abortion Apologetics, Leadership, Sidewalk Counseling, and Sexual Risk Avoidance. We’ve created step-by-step guides on how to start a pro-life group at high schools and in homeschool communities. Public or private, big or small, every high school and homeschool community can be reached with the pro-life message. And we at Students for Life want to make that possible!

Our new website includes resources and ideas with just a few clicks of the mouse! EVERYTHING you need to start a group is available in our new High School and Home School Guidebooks.

http://highschool.studentsforlife.org/welcome-to-high-school-students-for-life/

But we won’t just stop there! Stay tuned for our new programs, trainings, and events! We want to give high school and homeschool students all the tools you need to be effective in your community to see an end to abortion.

Are you already in a high school or homeschool pro-life group or want to start one? Contact National High School and Homeschool Coordinator Missy Martinez

http://highschool.studentsforlife.org/free-stuff/

to find out what free resources she can send you!

Visit the new site at HighSchool.StudentsForLife.org now!

http://highschool.studentsforlife.org/”

HPV Shot Is Costing the Federal Government Millions?

I posted a questionnaire I sent to the two mayoral candidates for the Village of Morton and the answers given by one of the candidates—Stephen Newhouse. The questions and answers are posted at:


http://christiangunslinger7.blogspot.com.

If the other candidate responses I will also post his answers. At the present, he has not.

—

Watch this video of an 11-year-old discussing homosexual marriage and read youtube’s disparaging labeling of the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CRhGDmdG4dk

—

From: http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/feds-pay-millions-due-to-deadly-hpv-shot/

“FEDS PAY MILLIONS DUE TO DEADLY HPV SHOT

Thousands of adverse reactions include seizures, paralysis, blindness, memory loss
By Garth Kant

After declaring a popular vaccine to prevent a sexually transmitted disease safe for girls and boys as young as 11 (Who declared it so? The Obama regime? The regime that promotes and supports the MURDER of unborn babies? Who would follow the advice of EVIL?—my addition) , the federal government has now paid almost $6 million to victims of the shot—including at least two who died after receiving it.

And the government hasn’t even settled half of the 200 claims against it.

The public interest law firm Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain documents with that information from the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS.

The documents show that HHS’s National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, or VICP, has awarded $5,877,710 to 49 victims in claims made against the HPV vaccines. That includes payments for two claims of death caused by the vaccine.

Judicial Watch found:

• Only 49 of the 200 claims filed have been compensated for injury or death caused from the HPV vaccine. Of the 49 compensated claims, 47 were for injury caused from HPV vaccine, the additional two claims were for death caused due to the vaccine.

• Ninety-two (nearly half) of the total 200 claims filed are still pending. Of those pending claims 87 of the claims against HPV vaccine were filed for injury, the remaining five claims were filed for death.

• Fifty-nine claims have been dismissed outright by VICP. The alleged victims were not compensated for their claims against the HPV vaccine. Of the claims dismissed, 57 were for injuries, two were for deaths allegedly caused by the HPV vaccine.

• The amount awarded to the 49 claims compensated totaled $5,877,710.87. This amounts to approximately $120,000 per claim.

VICP compensates those harmed by certain vaccines. The HHS website describes the program as a ‘no-fault alternative to the traditional tort system,’ covering 16 types of vaccines, including HPV.

As WND has reported, the federal government has recommended the HPV vaccination for girls and boys as young as 11. But it has caused thousands of adverse reactions, including seizures, paralysis, blindness, pancreatitis, speech problems, short-term memory loss, Guillain-Barré syndrome and even death.

‘At present there are no significant data showing that either Gardasil or Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline) can prevent any type of cervical cancer since the testing period employed was too short to evaluate long-term benefits of HPV vaccination (Then why is the federal government promoting being vaccinated?—my addition),’ according to the Annals of Medicine.

Referring to the information on the damage claims, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said, ‘This new information from the government shows that the serious safety concerns about the use of Gardasil have been well-founded.’

He added, ‘Public health officials should stop pushing Gardasil on children.’

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, said the HPV vaccine is used to protect against cancers caused by sexual contact.

It reports 53 percent of girls ages 13 to 17 received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine in 2011.

The CDC recommends girls ages 11 to 12 receive three doses of the vaccine. It also recommends the vaccine for females ages 13 to 26 who did not receive the vaccine when they were younger, and for males ages 11 to 21.

The recommendation by the American Academy of Pediatrics that boys 11 and 12 (I don’t trust anything coming from the American Academy of Pediatricts! It promotes and advocates giving birth control to 11-year-olds!—my addition) should be immunized routinely for HPV is a new development WND reported on Feb. 27.

A few years ago, children received just a handful for vaccinations for such diseases as polio, smallpox and tetanus.

Now, the average baby gets 24 shots in 24 months.

Those vaccinations are for diphtheria and tetanus, whooping cough and measles, chickenpox and bugs that cause meningitis, pneumonia and diarrhea, and some are given a number of times.

And now, a vaccine against anthrax may be added to the mix.

A presidential ethics panel recommends testing an anthrax vaccine on children as young as infants, WND reported yesterday. Critics say that would make children guinea pigs in a study that might not help them and could harm them.

The rapidly growing list of vaccinations and concerns about potential harm are an increasing worry for many parents.

Many parents are also worried about a possible link between vaccines and autism. And just today, as WND reported, the government released a survey that estimates one in 50 U.S. schoolchildren has autism (I don’t trust anything coming from this government either!—my addition).

A CDC study WND reported last year put the figure at one in 88. That study was considered more rigorous, but it still meant that the number of cases of autism had doubled in just five years. It also meant one million U.S. children and teens had some form of autism.

Persistent concerns about a possible link between childhood vaccines and autism often involve a preservative called Thimerosal, as WND has reported.

WND columnist Ellen Ratner wrote in December that autism has increased by 1,000 percent in 40 years.

She reports John Hopkins professor Leo Kanner found in 1935 that ‘the rate of autism in children was zero prior to 1930. Then in 1930, Thimerosal, a mercury containing preservative, was used in some vaccines.’

‘In July 1999, the Public Health Service agencies, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and vaccine manufacturers concurred Thimerosal should be eliminated, or at least reduced in vaccines,’ Ratner continued.

Another concern many parents have is that a vaccine might encourage risky behavior.

The HPV vaccine is meant to protect against cancers resulting from sexually transmitted diseases, and the CDC is recommending it for girls age 11.

Many parents have expressed concerns that the vaccine could create a false sense of safety and encourage promiscuity (Then don’t let your children be vaccinated!—my addition).

A study released in October and given much play in the establishment media concluded that an HPV vaccination does not make girls promiscuous (Make? Does that mean they aren’t more promiscuous or they are more promiscuous for other reasons?—my addition .

As CBS reported, the study acknowledges, ‘The researchers didn’t ask girls about having sex, but instead looked at ‘markers’ of sexual activity after vaccination against the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus, or HPV. Specifically, they examined up to three years of records on whether girls had sought birth control advice, tests for sexually transmitted diseases or pregnancy or had become pregnant (They had access to the private records of minors? In the State of New York, parents can not get their own children’s medical records!—my addition).”

The study examined activity indicating the sexual behavior of girls ages 11 and 12 until the time they became 14 and 15.

Whether vaccination has any influence on similar markers of sexual activity in older teens wasn’t examined in the study.”

Here is the simple and obvious solution. If children are not sexually active, they don’t need the vaccination and they won’t develop cancer caused by sexual activity! Duh! Sometimes the obvious and the simplest is the best answer!