June 29, my physical birth day

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

http://www.kansasmeadowlark.com/2006/ShameOfKansas

www.childpredators.com

Reminder:

On my post entitled “Immigration reform, Oklahoma Style” I was asked the following: “What if someone is starving and destitute? As Christians, I thought we live by a higher law and that we see other people through the eyes of God, not through the eyes of any sort of nationalism. 10:47 AM” This is a good and a valid question. I knew I could not answer it in a few sentences. Originally, I thought I would answer it in one post. However, the more I thought about it, the more I realized this could be a book and still generate disagreement among Christians. Therefore, although I won’t write a book, I will probably deal with the question with several posts (How many I don’t yet know because I haven’t conceptually thought it out.) I have a few more posts in relation to immigration in general and then I hope to try to answer the question from my understanding of what the Bible says about this question. Since the 4th of July is approaching, I don’t know yet if it will be before or after that holiday. Stay tuned. I do plan on responding. Thanks for the penetrating question.

1) June 29 is my birth date. It is not my conception date when I first came into being as a human. I imagine most of us do not know our specific conception date although we obviously would normally know the approximate date. It is also not my spiritual birth date when I put on Christ in baptism. That happened twenty-five plus years later. But, it is my birth date. I was going to do a normal post for today but circumstances were such that I don’t have time. Consequently, this abbreviated version.

2) On a recent blog dealing with the attempt in Kansas to regulate the murder of unborn babies, a reader posted the following website: http://www.kansasmeadowlark.com/2006/ShameOfKansas

I checked it out very, very early yesterday morning. It has some interesting material you might want to check out too. Note part of the website address: Shame of Kansas! I may do a blog or two based upon the information given when I get back to my Planned Murderhood topic. I haven’t decided yet.

3) My book, The Black Sword: The Secret U.S. Army in Vietnam is coming closer to being published. All of the preliminary work before the printing process—the front and back cover design, editing, copyright page (I now have an ISBN number) and such—is finished. The estimate is that all will be complete in approximately a month. I will broadcast it when it is available. It has been a long process!

That’s it for this post. I hope to go back to the immigration topic for the next post and then answer the question asked above. If I don’t say it again, have a great 4th of July. Remember the sacrifices to establish and build this nation. Pray that we repent from our sinful path of disobedience to GOD!!! STOP our immoral plunge into the abyss of SIN!!!

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)

Immigrant and a citizenship Constitutional Amendment

On my post entitled “Immigration reform, Oklahoma Style” I was asked the following: “What if someone is starving and destitute? As Christians, I thought we live by a higher law and that we see other people through the eyes of God, not through the eyes of any sort of nationalism. 10:47 AM” This is a good and a valid question. I knew I could not answer it in a few sentences. Originally, I thought I would answer it in one post. However, the more I thought about it, the more I realized this could be a book and still generate disagreement among Christians. Therefore, although I won’t write a book, I will probably deal with the question with several posts (How many I don’t yet know because I haven’t conceptually thought it out.) I have a few more posts in relation to immigration in general and then I hope to try to answer the question from my understanding of what the Bible says about this question. Since the 4th of July is approaching, I don’t know yet if it will be before or after that holiday. Stay tuned. I do plan on responding. Thanks for the penetrating question. The following is the post for tonight.

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

One of the problems that has developed is that the children of non-United States citizens are citizens even though their parents are not. This is because of the Fourteenth Amendment which says in part “All persons born or naturalized in the United States…are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” This was a necessary addition to the Constitution to insure that the just freed slaves and their children be rightly recognized as United States citizens by the nation and by all the States. However, although it is no longer necessary in relation to slavery and its aftermath, it does cause some unintended consequences today.

When illegal immigrants enter the United States, any child born to those illegal immigrants is a United States citizen even though the parents of that child, if both illegal, are not. Consequently, a two year old is a citizen while the parents are not. This naturally causes problems in relation to deportment of illegal immigrants. Can we humanely deport the parents, although illegal, when the defenseless child is a citizen?

I lived in the Tucson area for a number of years. I have known several emergency room nurses who worked for a major hospital located in Tucson. It is common knowledge that Mexican citizens will drove to the United States to have their unborn child delivered on American soil. No hospital can legally turn away a patient. Therefore, that child born to Mexican citizens is also automatically an American citizen as provided by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Because of these unintended consequences, I propose the following Constitutional Amendment. Naturally, the lawyers will have to put it into Constitutional language but the intent is to prevent the children of illegal immigrants from automatically becoming American citizens and to stop Mexican citizens (for the most part but also other nationalities) from driving across the border (or entering the United States on vacation or otherwise) to insure American citizenship for their unborn child. The proposed amendment:

An individual who is born to a non-United States citizen within the boundaries of the U.S. or its territories is only a United States citizen if both parents are legally residing within the U.S. or its territories for 3, 7, 14 years, or some other number of years as determined by Congressional law before the birth of said individual.

If an individual becomes a naturalized citizen, the child (children) of that individual also is naturalized if the child (children) is under the age of 18 at the time of the naturalization. Congress by law may change the age restrict section of this Constitutional Amendment in relation to the child (children) becoming a United States citizen at the time of the naturalization of their parents.

Thus, the child of illegal immigrants born within the United States and its territories is NOT A UNITED STATES CITIZEN. If the parents are illegal, the child is illegal. Also, if an individual is born in the United States when their parents are not United States citizens that individual is NOT AUTOMATICALLY A UNITED STATES CITIZEN. The unintended consequences of the Fourteen Amendment should be ended with this amendment and problems that have developed because of those consequences should no longer be a problem for future births.

Immigration law of a foreign nation?

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

I received the following e-mail in late May from a reliable source (I have corrected some punctuation and changed the font.—my addition) When I asked him about it, he said he had received it second hand. No source was given for the information so I don’t know how reliable it is. My guess is, and it is only a guess, that it is factual, at least for the most part.

“READ THE WHOLE THING AND PASS IT ON TO EVERY AMERICAN YOU KNOW! HARSH YOU SAY??
1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools, no special ballots for elections, and all government business will be conducted in our language. 2. Foreigners will NOT have the right to vote, no matter how long they are here. 3. Foreigners will NEVER be able to hold political office. 4. Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, nor any other government assistance programs. 5. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage. 6. If foreigners do come and want to buy land that will be okay, BUT options will be restricted. They are not allowed to own waterfront property. That property is reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
7. Foreigners may not protest; no demonstrations, no waving a foreign flag, no political organizing, no "bad-mouthing" our president or his policies. If they do they will be sent home. 8. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be hunted down and sent straight to jail. (See my comments at the end of this material—my addition)
Harsh, you say? The above laws happen to be the IMMIGRATION LAWS of MEXICO!”

I have written about immigration before including last year when Congress was debating whether or not to grant citizenship to illegal immigrants. On my June 12, 2006 post entitled “Immigration again” I wrote: “This is the ranking of countries ‘… based on World Bank Gross Domestic Product figures from 2004.’” The country ranked 12th based upon gross domestic product figures from 2004 was Mexico! I also wrote during the same post that “Mexico (my underline) has the toughest penalties for immigration fraud. Prison sentences for violating that country’s immigration laws range from two years for first offenders to 10 years for repeat offenders.” (Peoria Journal Star, May 7, 2006, page A8)

As I said, my guess is that the above information is basically correct based upon my understanding of Mexico. Yet, the country complains about how we treat illegal immigrants that have come here from Mexico!!!

Immigration reform, Oklahoma Style

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

Because the U.S. Senate has once again decided to consider this year’s egregious immigration bill, I am going to switch from my Planned Murderhood series to immigration for the next couple of days. I received the following by e-mail yesterday. I can’t verify the accuracy of the information and no source was given for the information. However, the person who e-mailed it to me is reliable.

True or not, I think this is the direction States may have to take. As I’ve repeatedly said, I am opposed to giving citizenship to individuals who have violated our laws no matter if it is a free gift or if they have to purchase that citizenship. (When did we start selling citizenship as if it was any other commodity?) People who are here illegally should not be allowed to become citizens. They have chosen to violate our laws. They should not be reward for it!!! The information e-mailed to me:

“Oklahoma's Governor Brad Henry has signed a sweeping immigration reform bill, House Bill 1804, that its sponsor believes will go a long way in dealing with the illegal alien problem in the state.

House Bill 1804 was passed by overwhelming majorities in both the House and Senate of the Oklahoma Legislature. The measure's sponsor, State Representative Randy Terrill, says the bill has four main topical areas: it deals with identity theft; it terminates public assistance benefits to illegals; it empowers state and local police to enforce federal immigration laws; and it punishes employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens.

Oklahoma is no longer ‘O.K.’ for illegal aliens, Terrill observes. ‘When you put everything together in context,’ he contends, ‘the bottom line is illegal aliens will not come here if there are no jobs waiting for them, they will not stay here if there is no government subsidy, and they certainly won't stay here if they know that if they ever encounter our state and local law enforcement officers, they will be physically detained until they're deported. And that's exactly what House Bill 1804 does.’

The Oklahoma legislator is pleased the bill he sponsored into law was signed by Governor Henry and believes it will go a long way to curb the illegal immigration problem in the state. ‘I would remind people that states are separate sovereigns in our federal system,’ Terrill points out. ‘Anyone who doesn't understand that needs to go back and take an American federal government class in college,’ he says. As a result of that sovereignty, the Oklahoma lawmaker insists, ‘we have as much right—in fact, I would argue, a responsibility—to protect our taxpayers against that sort of egregious waste, fraud and abuse as the federal government should have a responsibility to protect that international border, but doesn't do that.’

Terrill says as long as the federal government refuses to do its job of protecting the international borders of the United States, states like Oklahoma must take action to deal with the problem that is costing taxpayers in the state $200 million a year in public benefits, law enforcement costs, and other resources.”

Planned Murderhood and a 2005 Kansas law

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

This is the third and final post on a short series dealing with two laws passed by the Kansas legislature in 2005. One of the laws was vetoed by the governor, this one was not. This article is from the Lawrence Journal—World and News (www.ljworld.com) and was originally published on August 9, 2005. It concerns a law passed and signed by the governor to require certain actions by murder clinics (Also known as abortion clinics.) in relation to pregnant girls under the age of 14. The article:

“Kansas and regional news
Underage sex law goes into effect
By Dave Ranney

August 9, 2005

To comply with a new state law, Kansas abortion providers now must send the Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI—my addition) identifying information and fetal tissue from all abortion patients younger than age 14. (This law should be for more girls than those under 14. Later in the news account an explanation is given as to the age provisions. Also, this may be a case of compromise in order to get some needed protection. That is a sad commentary on our society but some protection for underage girls is certainly better than none!—my addition)

“If you’re younger than 14 and you’re pregnant, there’s only one way you got there — and that’s statutory rape,” said Sen. Kay O’Connor, R-Olathe, sponsor of the law when it was before the Kansas Senate.

O’Connor said she and others hope the new law will help law enforcement agencies catch men who prey on young girls. (Note that the purpose of this law is to put child predators behind bars where they belong!!! Is it because murder clinics are not reporting the sexual activities of girls under 14, who by definition are being raped every time intercourse occurs, that this law needed to be passed? What do you think?—my addition)

But a counselor with Bert Nash Community Mental Health Center warned that tissue collecting and information sharing will likely cause some pregnant teens to delay talking to a counselor or seeking medical care.

‘This is not going to curb sexual activity,’ said Tami Radohl, a Bert Nash counselor at Southwest Junior High. ‘But it will, I’m afraid, discourage pregnant teens from turning to adults for help.’ (What absurd nonsense!!! This is a comment from a person counseling at a junior high school? That is obscene! What is she doing being a counselor in a public school? Why is she protecting rapists! These girls are under 14 and pregnant. They haven’t exactly turned to adults for help before becoming pregnant!!! Or, did each one of them become pregnant the first time they were raped? And that is exactly what it is. These girls under the age of 14 were raped! How does she know it won’t curb sexual activities? If one rapist is deterred because of this law, it is worth it! If one rapist is imprisoned because of this law, it is worth it. Why are baby murderers so bent on protecting rapists? There lack of support for this law is almost as obscene as their continued support for the obscene act of murdering unborn babies. What is wrong with these people? Why are they so lacking in morals?—my addition)

Age of consent

The new law, known as the Child Rape Protection Act, requires any doctor who performs an abortion in Kansas on girls younger than age 14 to collect fetal tissue and send it, along with identifying information, to the KBI.

It also requires that a copy of the identifying information be sent to the abortion provider’s local police or sheriff’s department. The information also is to include the girl’s parents’ or legal guardians’ names, addresses and telephone numbers.

Passed by the 2005 Legislature, the new law took effect July 11.

In Kansas, the age of consent is 16. (Too low although still the standard in some States. Some States have raised it to 18.—my addition) The Child Rape Protection Act only focuses on girls younger than 14 because of the state’s so-called Romeo and Juliet law, which exempts consensual sex when participants are between 14 and 19. (This too is not the best provision and this is probably why supporters of this law had to compromise and put the age provision at under 14. Of course, there are girls under the age of 16 [the age of consent in Kansas] who are being raped by adults older than 19 and therefore not protected by this “Romeo and Juliet” law. A girl of 15 who is being raped by a man of 40 also needs to be protected but compromises are sometimes necessary. Some protection is better than no protection. Prayerfully, the law will be both enforced [A key necessity.] and improved after it proves to be successful at restricting statutory rape.—my addition)

According to Kansas Department of Health and Environment statistics, 11,427 abortions were performed in the state last year. (11,427 murders of unborn babies in one year in one state!!!—my addition) Of these, 30 involved girls under 14. (At least 30 girls under the age of 14 were being raped!!! No doubt more were being raped than that but they did not become pregnant, they gave birth, and/or their abortion was not reported.—my addition)

Eleven of the 30 girls were from Kansas; 19 were from out of state. (This probably means that some girls from others States were brought to Kansas because the laws in Kansas at that time were not as strict and/or as enforced as the laws from the State they lived in or no murder clinic was available. It has to be remembered that these are all minor girls under the age of 14!!! Obscenity packed upon obscenity!!! What kind of society are we??? Why are murder clinics protecting these rapists!!! —my addition)

Compliance

“We are complying with the law,” said Peter Brownlie, CEO of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri. (How very nice! If they would have reported rape in the first place would this new law be necessary? Will they continue to comply? Is he telling the truth? Planned Murderhood and their supporters are baby murderers!!! Who can believe murderers!!!—my addition)

(I believe the following four items listed are previous news stories on this topic. I’m listing them here because they were included in the story and you might be interested in going to the website and checking these stories out.—my addition)

• Sebelius signs proposed ‘Child Rape Protection Act’ (04-16-05)
• Anti-abortion advocates unhappy with state board’s plan for clinic rules (03-29-05)
• Kline: Clinic probe about rape, illegality (03-04-05)
• Kline searching medical records on late-term abortions for evidence of crimes (02-24-05)

‘They’re very uncommon. In the first six months of this year, we had five,’ Brownlie said, referring to the abortions performed at the Planned Parenthood clinics in Kansas. (Do you believe this statement!!! 5 pregnancies of girls under the age of 14 at murder clinics in the first six months of the year is his definition of uncommon. THERE SHOULD BE NONE!!! GIRLS UNDER THE AGE OF 14 SHOULD NOT BE PREGNANT!!! IN EACH INSTANCE, HE IS TALKING ABOUT THE RAPE OF A GIRL UNDER THE AGE OF 14!!!—my addition)

Last month, Atty. Gen. Phill Kline’s office drafted four pages of rules and regulations that spelled a plan for enforcing the new law. The draft will be discussed during an Aug. 22-23 meeting of the Joint Committee on Rules and Regulations. A hearing for soliciting input form (I gather that this should be “from” not “form” but I copied it as written—my addition) the public is set for Oct. 5.

Brownlie said Planned Parenthood would not protest collecting tissue for and sharing information with the KBI.

‘Intimidation’

Radohl (This is the junior high school counselor—my addition) said she was aware there have been 19- and 20-year-old men in Lawrence who use alcohol and drugs to coax 13- and 14-year-old girls into having sex, but most young pregnancies involve sexual partners closer in age to one another. (This is suppose to make rape alright!!!—my addition)

‘What I see the most by far are teens having sex with other teens,’ Radohl said. (And that is alright even when the girls are under 14??? This woman SHOULD NOT BE A COUNSELOR. SHE SHOULD NOT BE AT ANY SCHOOL THAT WANTS TO PROTECT THEIR STUDENTS!!!—my addition)

Julie Burkhart, head of the Wichita-based ProKanDo abortion rights lobby, accused the new law’s supporters of governing by intimidation. (What nonsense!!! Who are they intimidating??? RAPISTS!!!—my addition)

‘This isn’t about protecting children,’ (Yes, it is. How does she know? Planned Murderhood is certainly not protecting children!!!—my addition) Burkhart said. ‘It’s about shaming patients at a time in their young lives when they need support. (THEY ARE BEING RAPED!!!—my addition) If it was about protecting children, then why does the law only apply to abortions? (Because PLANNED MURDERHOOD fought this law all the way and prevented a more comprehensive law from being passed. Clearly this is a law based on comprise to get something passed. Now these murderers are arguing that the partial protection is wrong because it is not full protection. They don’t want any protection for any girl of any age!!!—my addition) Why doesn’t it require hospitals to collect tissue for girls under 14 who give birth?’ (See response below by a supporter of the bill—my addition)

KDHE records show that in 2003 — the latest data available — 40 girls between ages 10 and 14 gave birth. Included in those 40 births were two in Douglas County, two in Johnson County, 10 in Sedgwick County, and 11 in Wyandotte County.

O’Connor (A legislator who supported the bill—my addition) said the bill did not include hospitals because there’s little evidence that hospitals have covered up underage pregnancies. (In other words, if Planned Murderhood would report rape cases of minor girls as required by law, this law would not be necessary. Planned Murderhood is now arguing they should not have to follow this new law because they did not follow old laws while hospitals did!!!—my addition)

The same, she said, cannot be said about the state’s abortion providers.

O’Connor cited tape-recorded telephone calls in which clinic workers are heard telling callers posing as abortion-seeking 13-year-old girls how to keep their 22-year-old boyfriends out of trouble. (This is the undercover work from Texas as previously covered in earlier posts.—my addition)

Burkhart and Brownlie have denied the tapes’ authenticity. (Denying it doesn’t mean it isn’t true. Would you believe organized murderers?—my addition)

O’Connor confirmed that the tapes were provided by Life Dynamics, an anti-abortion group based in Texas.

‘What we’re trying to do is stop these rapes,’ O’Connor said. (Good for them! Condemnation to Planned Murderhood for not following the laws if they did not!!! Why are they so bent upon not doing the things necessary to prevent rape!!! Why are they fighting a law design to protected girls under 14!!! Are they condemning themselves by their own actions!!!—my addition.)

Modifications sought

Spokesmen for associations representing the state’s doctors and hospitals said they did not plan to testify against the proposed rules and regulations.

‘We’re not going to get involved in that,’ said Jerry Slaughter, executive director of the Kansas Medical Society. ‘It’s our assumption that those who provide the service are prepared to do that.’ (The baby murderers will fight the law every step of the way!—my addition)

Brownlie said he would ask the committee to modify portions of the rules and regulations.

‘Some of what’s in there is unenforceable, like it says tissue samples have to be at least 5 square centimeters in size,’ he said. ‘Well, for medical abortions there may not be that much.’ (May not??? Any obstacle to protect rapists!!!—my addition)

Medical abortions are those induced by drugs rather than surgical procedures.”

Get involved!!! Demand action!!! Demand answers!!! Demand accountability!!! It is well past time to take back our nation from the immoral influences of darkness. To do so is to please GOD!!! Not to do anything is to aid and abet evil!!! STOP THE INSANITY!!! SAVE A NATION FROM MORAL DESTRUCTION!!!

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)

Planned Murderhood regulation vetoed

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

My last post discussed a news story about the State of Kansas attempting to regulation abortion clinics in 2005. I posted it and prayerfully will be posting two more (including this post) about actions of the Kansas legislature in 2005 as a brief case study of efforts to regulate and limit the murder of unborn babies in this country. Because of the lack of news coverage by the libertine mass media, it is difficult to know what is occurring in this area unless one is personally, actively involved in trying to reverse the obscene practice of murdering our unborn. Also, I would hope that knowing that others are working to end the murder of unborn babies will energize still more people to become involved in stopping these murders.

This second post involves two laws passed in 2005 by the Kansas legislature in relation to the murder of unborn babies. The one to regulate abortion clinics as discussed in the first post was vetoed by the governor. Another law dealing with child rape was approved by the governor. Earlier posts have contained information accusing Planned Murderhood of deliberately and knowingly protecting child rapists by their actions and/or inactions when dealing with young, minor girls who are sexually active and/or pregnant. This article is from The Christian Post (www.christianpost.com) and dated April 16, 2005. I got the article from the website. The article:

“Kansas Gov. Vetoes Abortion Regulation Bill, Approves Child Rape Protection Act

The governor vetoed tightened regulations for abortion clinics, but signed legislation that requires doctors to collect fetal tissue after abortions performed on minors, to be used in criminal investigations.
By
Susan Wang
susan@christianpost.com
Sat, Apr. 16 2005 11:38 AM ET

People on both sides of the abortion issue proclaimed victory and defeat in Kansas on Friday after its state governor vetoed tightened regulations for abortion clinics, while signing legislation that requires doctors to collect fetal tissue after abortions performed on minors, to be used in criminal investigations.

On Apr. 15, Governor Kathleen Sebelius approved the Child Rape Protection Act under which doctors must take fetal tissue samples for all abortions performed on girls under 14.

Opponents argue that the new law violates the privacy of patients. Tissue samples along with the patient’s information would be sent to the Kansas Bureau of Investigation. (Isn’t that an obscene argument? These are minor girls under the age of 14 who by definition have been raped and quite possibly have been repeatedly raped and these protectors of rapists argument “privacy of the patient”!!! What utter nonsense!!! What about protection of the patient!!! What immoral neglect of the well being of the children involved!!!—my addition)

Supporters, including pro-life groups, said the new law is necessary to help investigate child rape cases. (Isn’t it about time that immoral individuals who are raping young girls under the age of 14 be held accountable??? [Actually, under the age of consent!!!] The sad truth is that this law should not be necessary. If abortion clinics and their employees were actively involved in protecting these girls instead of hiding the rapes this law should not be necessary. Notice that the argument is NOT that the clinics are already doing all that can be done to protect these girls from these rapists!!! —my addition)

The legislation will become law on July 1.

On the same day, Sebelius rejected the Women’s Health Protection Act, which would have set minimum health and safety standards for abortion clinics and changed the regulating facility for abortion clinics from the Board of Healing Arts to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment.

Abortion rights groups praised Sebelius, saying that the bill targeted abortion clinics with the intention of closing down the facilities. Supporters of the bill argued that the tightened regulations were meant to protect women’s health. (Is it a bogus argument that the regulations for safety are designed to close down the facilities? Isn’t this really an argument that the clinics don’t want to spend the money to help insure the safety of their patients? Is it a case that in the first instance, they argued for patient privacy [Although it is more likely that they are more concerned about clinic privacy than patient privacy.] while here they are demonstrating a lack of concern for the patient? Do you really think that a state legislature would have the votes to place egregious requirements on these clinics?—my addition)

In her veto message, Sebelius criticized legislators, saying, ‘Once again in 2005, the Legislature has chosen pure politics over good policy, has rejected uniform standards for all procedures, and has instead chosen to regulate only one procedure—abortion.’ (I don’t know the politics of Kansas. However, I do understand the legislative process in general. There might be several reasons why only murder clinics were singled out. The most obvious being that that might have been the only way that the bill could be passed. Is the governor hiding behind this excuse to continue to protect the clinics? Is the profitability of the murder clinics more important than the health and safety of the patients who use them???—my addition)

Sebelius, who vetoed a similar bill in 2003, emphasized that she ‘will sign this law when it includes all surgical procedures and all surgical centers to ensure the safety of all Kansans.’ (Most changes in state policy are not all or nothing propositions. Compromises are often needed to pass legislation that calls for changes in established procedures. It is often the case that once a change has partially occurred and has been shown to be successful, that the change can be expanded to include all or most of the original changes desired. Doesn’t the governor know this??? Or, is she using the all or nothing approach as an excuse to veto the legislation and avoid the perceived need to regulate murder clinics??? I don’t know. What do you think???—my addition)

Supporters of the bill, however, have not yet lost hope. The bill passed in the House with 88 votes and in the Senate with 27 votes, enough to override Sebelius’ veto. An attempt to override the veto is likely when the legislature resumes on Apr. 27.” (I did only a cursory check to determine if the veto was overridden. However, I could not find that it was. I don’t know the answer but am guessing that it was not. Why, it wasn’t, if it wasn’t? I don’t know. It probably had to do with the politics involved in the legislature. Some legislators may have voted for it originally knowing that the governor would veto it. This is rather certain. These murderers and their supporters intend to fight every step of the way to protect their nauseating sin of murdering unborn babies.—my addition)

Get involved!!! Demand action!!! Demand answers!!! Demand accountability!!! It is well past time to take back our nation from the immoral influences of darkness. To do so is to please GOD!!! Not to do anything is to aid and abet evil!!! STOP THE INSANITY!!! SAVE A NATION FROM MORAL DESTRUCTION!!!

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)

Planned Murderhood attacked in Kansas?

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

The following news story was published in the Lawrence Journal—World and News (www.ljworld.com) on Monday, March 21, 2005. Note the date. This was over two years ago. I posted this article for several reasons which I’ll explain at the end of the article.

“Analysis: Recent events bolster abortion opponents
Bill to regulate clinics gains steam after incidents in Kansas, Texas

By John Hanna – Associated Press Writer

March 21, 2005

Topeka — Abortion opponents are pushing again for legislative approval of tougher regulation of the state's six abortion clinics, an effort that foundered two years ago when Gov. Kathleen Sebelius vetoed their bill.

This year's push might have lacked momentum—or failed to happen at all—without recent events.

First came the report of a death of a young Texas woman who'd received services in January at Dr. George Tiller's clinic in Wichita, long the site of protests because he performs late-term procedures.

Then came sanctions against a doctor over conditions at his Kansas City, Kan., clinic.

Finally, there's Atty. Gen. Phill Kline's ongoing pursuit of records from Tiller's clinic and one operated in Overland Park by Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri. While Kline and his allies have stressed his investigation into child rapes, he also wants to examine potentially illegal late-term abortions.

‘There are a number of things that have come together to force it this year,’ said Rep. Nancy Kirk, D-Topeka, an abortion rights supporter.
This year's bill is similar to the one vetoed in 2003 by Sebelius, an abortion rights supporter. It's also similar to one the House approved in 2004, only to see the measure languish in a Senate committee.

It would require the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE—my addition) to set minimum health and safety standards. Some minimum requirements on the training of clinic personnel or the availability of emergency equipment would be set by state law, however.

Anti-abortion legislators and activists said they hadn't planned to push this year for such legislation, knowing Sebelius’ position.

Abortion opponents learned of the Texas woman's death and the sanctions against the doctor and went public. And Kline's investigation became public after the clinics went to the Kansas Supreme Court to block two subpoenas issued by a judge at Kline’s behest.

‘I think the events gave us an injection, to get the energy flowing again,’ said Rep. Mary Pilcher Cook, R-Shawnee, a supporter of the bill.

Abortion rights supporters suspect that the real goal is to make clinic regulation so burdensome that at least a few will close, restricting the availability of abortion.

‘Those who are anti-choice have learned that they are not going to simply overturn Roe v. Wade, which is their goal,’ said Julie Burkhart, director of ProKanDo, an abortion rights political action committee, referring to the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion across the nation. ‘They’re trying to chip away.’

The Board of Healing Arts regulates doctors. KDHE regulates hospitals and outpatient surgery clinics, but not offices or clinics where minor surgeries are performed under local anesthesia.

So far, abortion clinics are grouped with the latter, though Planned Parenthood's facility in Overland Park is licensed as an outpatient surgery center.

Abortion rights activists repeatedly maintain that the procedures are safe medically and there's no reason for abortion clinics to be singled out in regulatory legislation any more than doctor’s offices or clinics performing minor surgeries.

But abortion opponents still hope for widespread public acceptance for the idea that abortions are risky, performed in often unsafe conditions in lightly regulated clinics.

That's why at news conferences they've shown blown up photographs taken inside Dr. Krishna Rajanna’s clinic in Kansas City, Kan., in 2003, reportedly by an informant.

In a consent order Rajanna signed, the Board of Healing Arts said his clinic was not clean enough, and it required him to, among other things, become certified to revive patients whose hearts stop. Rajanna accepted a $1,000 fine.

Anti-abortion advocates viewed punishment as far too mild. Indignant anti-abortion legislators wrote the board a letter, questioning its handling of the case.

In a memo to legislators last week, Larry Buening, the board's executive director, said Rajanna voluntarily ‘took numerous remedial steps.’

‘No one who reviewed the investigative file found that patients are at risk or that there is any imminent and certain harm to the public by the doctor's continued practice,’ Buening wrote. ‘During the investigation, no patient complaint was received and no evidence of patient harm was discovered.’

Nor has evidence come to light to fully explain what happened to the Texas woman who received services at Tiller’s clinic.

But abortion opponents see a lack of information as another reason for their bill. With stricter regulation, they argue, Kansans would know more about what goes on inside abortion clinics—and whether it meets people’s idea of adequate medical care.

‘Women's health needs to be protected, and no matter how long and how hard we have to work to get it accomplished, we can’t give up,’ Pilcher Cook said.

Abortion rights supporters are used to such determination from their antagonists. It may flag from time to time, but it doesn’t disappear, as this year’s clinic regulation bill shows.”

Why was this article posted? First, to show the difficulty of changing the obscene practice of murdering our unborn babies. Those who support the murder of the unborn have been fighting any attempt to place any restrictions upon the practice. Although they claim that one reason that the murder of the unborn should be allowed is to insure the health of the woman, they don’t want restrictions that are offered to help to insure the health of the mother. Women have died while an abortion is being performed or soon after; yet, they argue that regulations to provide a safer environment for the abortion are not needed. There first concern seems, in reality, to be to protect the practice of murdering unborn babies rather than providing a safer environment for the woman during that murder.

Sometimes, it may take years for even minor victories. We can not stop trying. The moral well-being of the nation is at stake. If we do not surrender, through GOD’S help we will be victorious in the end. GOD wants our involvement. It is our obedient duty to work to fulfill HIS WILL.

Second, the Attorney General of Kansas was working even in 2005 to discover and expose the tie between Planned Murderhood and protecting child predators as presented in previous posts. Note this quote from the news story. “Finally, there’s Atty. Gen. Phill Kline’s ongoing pursuit of records from Tiller’s clinic and one operated in Overland Park by Planned Parenthood…. While Kline and his allies have stressed his INVESTIGATION INTO CHILD RAPES (Capitalization of the words is my addition.), he also wants to examine potentially illegal late-term abortions.”

Finally, note how the author of this story always refers to those who are trying to save human life by using the negative. Not once does he refer to individuals as pro-life supporters or by some other similar positive description. The terms he uses are: “abortion OPPONENTS” (used at least 4 times—my addition); “ANTI-ABORTION legislators and activists”; “’ANTI-CHOICE’” (used in a quote—my addition); “ANTI-ABORTION advocates”; “indignant ANTI-ABORTION legislators”; and “ANTAGONISTS”. (Capitalization of the words is my addition.)

In contrast, he repeatedly refers to those who support the murder of unborn babies as “abortion rights supporter(s)”. The key word of course being “rights” as if a woman has a right to murder her unborn baby which she does not have and never will have. An obscene Supreme Court decision has allowed the murder of unborn babies. There has never been nor can there ever be a right to murder!!!

Get involved!!! Demand action!!! Demand answers!!! Demand accountability!!! It is well past time to take back our nation from the immoral influences of darkness. To do so is to please GOD!!! Not to do anything is to aid and abet evil!!! STOP THE INSANITY!!! SAVE A NATION FROM MORAL DESTRUCTION!!!

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)

Planned Murderhood barred from schools?

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

The following is an article that is in World magazine June 23, 2007, page 21. Isn’t it amazing that I am doing a series on Planned Murderhood and this article that fits in perfectly with the series is published this week? As normal, I have not seen or heard a similar news story from the libertine, mass media. Have you if you live outside of Missouri? And of course, I live right next door in Illinois. It must not be of interest to Illinois residents.

“Conflict of interest
Missouri bill takes those who earn money on abortion out of the sex-ed business by Lynn Vincent

The unusual pro-life bill that survived a Democratic filibuster attempt to reach the Missouri governor’s desk in late May was actually born outside an abortion clinic. In the summer of 2005, Mary Maschmeier, a longtime sidewalk counselor, was standing outside the Planned Parenthood clinic on Forest Park Avenue in St. Louis when she saw a yellow school bus drive up, filled with kids.

‘I stopped the driver and asked him why he was bringing children to the clinic,’ Maschmeier said. The driver said the kids were from the local Boys and Girls Club. He was driving them to Planned Parenthood for a sex-ed class, part of the club’s summer program, he said. (How wonderful and perfectly reasonable? The organization that is one of the largest baby murderers in the country is “teaching” our children about sex!!! Who said people aren’t logical???—my addition)

Maschmeier knew that Planned Parenthood also provided sex education classes in local public schools. That’s when it hit her: In allowing an organization that makes money terminating pregnancies to teach kids how not to get pregnant, the state of Missouri was allowing the fox to guard the henhouse. ‘That’s when I realized, hey, we need to work on this,’ she said. (Shouldn’t every state legislature and organization realize this???—my addition)

Missouri abortionists performed 8,350 terminations in the state in 2003, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Of those, girls ages 15 to 19 had 1,284 abortions; girls under age 15 had 52. (How many of those 52 abortions do you think were reported to the State of Missouri as an instance of statutory rape [See previous posts.]? By definition, unless the girls were married, weren’t they all instances of statutory rape?—my addition)

Nationally, girls in both age groups had 130,732 abortions in 2003 (Over one-tenth of a million—my addition). But that number does not account for abortions in five jurisdictions: California, New York, West Virginia, New Hampshire, and the District of Columbia. In 2000, those regions reported 416,040 abortions to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, Planned Parenthood’s research arm, but not to the CDC. (That is almost ½ million unborn babies murdered in just four states and the District of Columbia in one year!!! –my addition)

The Guttmacher report did not break down state reporting by age group, but a separate report noted that the average cost of an abortion in 2001 was $487. That means that aborting the children of girls from young teen through age 19 produces at least $63.7 million in annual revenue for abortionists nationwide—not including revenue from regions that account for nearly a third of all terminations performed in the United States, but where age-group breakdown remains unreported. (That is a lot of money from one “simple medical procedure” that just happens to murder an unborn baby!!!—my addition)

To have groups that perform abortions teaching kids sex education is ‘clearly a conflict of interest,’ (No kidding!!!!!!!—my addition) Maschmeier said. She contacted Sen. Chuck Gross, a St. Charles County Republican, who worked with other legislators to pass HB1055, a pro-life measure that in part prohibits any provider of abortion services from providing either direct instruction or curriculum for sex education in public schools. (It is about time!!!—my addition)

In Missouri, that means Planned Parenthood. Only three abortion clinics operate in the state, and all of them are affiliated with the national group. ‘This legislation will sever the relationship between Planned Parenthood and our public school,’ said Missouri Family Network president Kerry Messer.

HB1055 also formalizes and funds the ‘Missouri Alternatives to Abortion Public Awareness Program,’ enables schools to emphasize abstinence, and requires any clinic performing second-and third-trimester abortions to meet the standards of an ambulatory surgical center. An ‘alert’ on Planned Parenthood’s website warns that upgrade costs associated with the latter provision will ‘force the closure of abortion services in Kansas City and Columbia.’ (One would think that an organization that claims to be sooo concerned about the health of women would already provide such standards. Perhaps they are more concerned about profit than women’s health. Do you think??? Duh!!!—my addition)

The bill’s abstinence language, along with the ban on abortion-affiliated sex-ed instructors, ‘encountered huge, huge opposition during floor debate,’ said Rep. Therese Sanders (R), HB1055’s primary House sponsor. (Of course!!!—my addition) Opponents insisted that no one was going to receive information about contraceptives, she said: ‘’Ignorance is not a form of birth control!’ was one of their sound-bites.’ (Their real concern, of course, is to keep Planned Murderhood plugged into a major source of their supply of murder victims—teenage and younger girls. Why would any reasonable person allow the potential murderers to associate and “teach” the potential source of the victims of their obscene practice?—my addition)

Planned Parenthood’s alert claims the bill ‘will remove the requirement of comprehensive, medically accurate sex education from public schools.’ But the bill’s final language directs schools to present students with ‘the latest medically factual information regarding both the possible side effects and health benefits of all forms of contraception, including the success and failure rates’ for pregnancy and STDs.

Paula Gianino, CEO of Planned Parenthood’s St. Louis region, told WORLD her group is reviewing HB1055 and ‘will soon make a decision on whether to file suit against all or part of the law.’ (Of course, the out of control courts have been one of the biggest supporters of the murder of the unborn.—my addition) Republican Gov. Matt Blunt is expected to sign HB1055 in the coming weeks, making Missouri ‘the first state in the nation to put a wall of separation between public schools and abortion providers,’ said Messer. ‘We hope other states will do the same.’” (I should hope so!!! Why has it taken so long for the first State to do the obvious??? We need to help the other States to realize that you don’t allow the providers who murder our unborn to also “teach” our young!!! Do they define the murder of the unborn as an acceptable form of contraception???—my addition)

Planned Murderhood according to Encarta

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

In the process of writing my most recent blogs, I checked to see what Encarta had to say about Planned Murderhood (also known as Planned Parenthood). The following is the total information given in this one article. I have only a few comments to make about this at the end. Here, then, is Encarta’s article on Planned Murderhood.

“Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. (PPFA), a reproductive health care organization dedicated to the principle that every individual has a fundamental right to choose whether or not to have a child.

PPFA has more than 150 affiliates and operates nearly 1000 clinics throughout the United States. It has headquarters in New York City. The more than 20,000 volunteers and staff that work at the organization's centers provide medical and educational services to nearly 5 million people each year. These services include counseling on fertility and pregnancy; screening for cancer and sexually transmitted infections (STIs); treatment for STDs; testing and counseling on the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS); sexuality education; parent/child communication programs; and services related to contraception, prenatal care, abortion, and adoption.

PPFA's independent political arm, the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, engages in lobbying and electoral activity to help expand and preserve reproductive health and rights for all Americans. In the mid-1990's PPFA established a political action committee to make financial contributions to political campaigns.

PPFA also is involved in international family planning programs. The organization provides support for family planning projects in developing countries through Family Planning International Assistance, a program Planned Parenthood established in 1971. In 1994 PPFA established Global Vision, a program that disseminates information about global population issues. PPFA is a founding member of the International Planned Parenthood Federation. This organization, established in 1952, consists of family-planning associations from more than 140 countries.

During the 1990s PPFA has been troubled by internal disagreements over the organization's direction. After Pamela Maraldo became the PPFA president in 1993, she moved to change the emphasis of PPFA from reproductive care to general family medicine. Her efforts caused widespread concern among PPFA affiliates and the board of directors, and in 1995 Maraldo resigned. In 1996 Gloria A. Feldt, a longtime PPFA regional administrator, became president of PPFA. Feldt planned to refocus the PPFA on advocacy of a woman’s right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.

PPFA traces its origins to the efforts of Margaret Sanger, an American nurse who worked to give all women access to information on contraception and reproduction. In 1916 Sanger, along with two other women, opened the first birth control clinic in the nation in Brooklyn, New York. Sanger founded the American Birth Control League in 1921, an organization that worked to legalize birth control, and in 1923 she established the Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau to provide services related to contraception and to collect data to use in lobbying efforts. In 1939 these two organizations merged to become the Birth Control Federation of America, renamed the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942.

Reviewed by: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.” Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2007 [DVD]. Redmond, Wa: Microsoft, Corporation, 2006.

“These services include counseling on fertility and pregnancy; screening for cancer and sexually transmitted infections (STIs); treatment for STDs; testing and counseling on the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS); sexuality education; parent/child communication programs; and services related to contraception, prenatal care, abortion, and adoption.” In and of themselves, there is nothing wrong with any of the “services” offered by Planned Murderhood except, of course, for the murdering of unborn babies which is not a service at all—it is organized, “legalized” murder. Was Planned Murderhood one of the organizations that pushed for the obscene Supreme Court decision that asininely declared that it is a “legal right” to murder one’s own unborn baby? If so, do you think such a position would be relevant to an article about the organization?

How much adoption services do you think this organization provides? Wouldn’t a break down of the percentage of time, effort, and money devoted to each of these “services” be appropriate? Is there an emphasis on adoption or the murder of unborn babies? When the organization claims to do so much in so many related areas, aren’t the areas of concentration and emphasis important to knowing and understanding the organization?
What is meant by “services related to contraception”? Do they provide contraception to under aged children? Is that important in understanding the organization? What kind of “sexuality education” do they provide? Is that important in an organization that advocates the murder of unborn children and who have infiltrated our public schools? (See the next post—the LORD willing.)

“In 1996 Gloria A. Feldt, a longtime PPFA regional administrator, became president of PPFA. Feldt planned to refocus the PPFA on advocacy of a woman’s right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.” This is an extremely important comment!!! An attempt to redirect the efforts of the organization was defeated and the organization is focused on murdering unborn babies!!! What a damning pronouncement!!! The focus of the organization is to murder unborn babies!!!

“Reviewed by: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.” This statement at the conclusion of the article seems both extremely unusual and enlightening. Naturally, I have not read the vast majority of the articles in Encarta. However, I have read some of them. This is the ONLY article that I have read where it is declared that the organization discussed has reviewed the article before it was published. Why do you think that occurred? Is Planned Murderhood controlling what others write about them? Why was this organization given this privilege? How very strange? How very illuminating!!!

Planned Murderhood’s crimes against children, part 4?

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

The following material is from the web-site www.childpredators.com (This site has the tapes of the calls made from Texas to Planned Murderhood and to the National Abortion Federation asking about a possible abortion for a 13-year-old girl as presented in World magazine as quoted on my first post concerning this issue.) This material is a portion of a seventeen page special report entitled Child Predators: Exposing the Partnership between Planned Parenthood, The National Abortion Federation and Men Who Sexually Abuse Underage Girls by Mark Crutcher. I am not including the footnote numbers for the sections that I am quoting. Go to www.childpredators.com to read and/or get a copy of the complete report including footnotes. The report can be saved as a copy in PDF format. Because of the length of the report and the importance of the information provided, I am going to post the report in sections. (Please remember this: at this point, Planned Murderhood is only alleged to have violated the law. Even an organization that murders thousands of unborn babies yearly is innocent until proven guilty.) Tonight, section three of the report from www.childpredators.com as obtained from the site:

“Redress

As tragic as this situation is, the pro-life movement has an opportunity, and perhaps even a responsibility, to step in and do something about it. In the area of legislation, one possibility is that we may be able to stop these organizations from receiving state and federal funding. Recipients of these funds are required to see that the money is used in accordance with all state and federal laws. The fact that these family planning facilities are in clear violation of child abuse or statutory rape reporting requirements creates an environment for us to demand that their funding be immediately cut off.

Given their heavy reliance on state and federal tax dollars, losing that money would be nothing less than a financial catastrophe for these organizations.

Better yet, their failure to adhere to state and federal law means that funds allocated in past years were obtained fraudulently. Because of that, we may be able to force a return of those funds. Needless to say that could literally cripple the entire abortion industry.

As for litigation, the possibilities are nothing less than staggering. To capitalize on this, Life Dynamics is developing several exciting new litigation strategies and support services to be used by attorneys who represent the girls and parents victimized by these two organizations. Interestingly, a perfect model for one of our litigation strategies is being created at this very moment.

We are all aware of the firestorm currently swirling around the Catholic Church regarding the issue of pedophile priests. Already, dioceses have either settled or lost lawsuits totaling hundreds of millions of dollars, and some have been forced to close schools and sell property to pay off these awards. If you look at these suits, what you find is that these Catholic dioceses are not being sued because their priests molested children. They are being sued for negligence because they allegedly knew about the sexual abuse of children and failed to report it to the authorities. These suits contend that by protecting pedophile priests and concealing their behavior, these dioceses were in effect guaranteeing that there would be additional victims in the future.

Obviously, any organization or any individual that harbors pedophiles and conceals the sexual abuse of children deserves to be prosecuted. But right now what is happening. Instead, Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation are being given hundreds of millions in tax dollars while doing exactly the same things for which huge awards are being levied against Catholic dioceses.

For the pro-life movement, our duty is to go into the civil court system and see that the legal standard currently being rigorously and justifiably enforced against the Catholic Church is also enforced against Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation. If we are successful at that, there are several reasons why it could toss these organizations into a financial tailspin from which they would never recover.

First, the number of potential plaintiffs is immense. By their own admissions, Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation have had contact with millions of sexually active underage girls every year for almost three decades. That fact alone could easily spawn an unimaginable number of individual suits or one of the largest class-action suits in American history.

Additionally, every time another underage girl is given an abortion or birth control without a report being made to the state, both she and her parents become potential plaintiffs in a lawsuit. As we can prove, the abortion industry’s own data shows that this is happening several thousand times a day, and those figures are backed up by government documentation.

To fully understand the incredible potential represented by these numbers, consider the fact that the Catholic Church is currently being financially decimated by these kinds of suits and no one is claiming that they have created anywhere near as many victims.

Another consideration is that, so far, most of the allegations being brought against priests are for conduct that occurred many years ago. But the charges we are making against the abortion industry are for conduct that is still occurring thousands of times every day and in every state of the union. Also, while the vast majority of the complaints against priests have little or nothing in the way of evidence, the documented evidence we have against Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation is overwhelming, current, and fully verified.

On the civil litigation front, there is also another factor we should not overlook. To put it bluntly, these organizations have the kind of money, insurance, and assets that are certain to make them very attractive to America’s personal injury trial lawyers.

At Life Dynamics, we also think there are other ways American courtrooms can be brought into this battle. For example, we intend to alert attorneys general and district attorneys across the country about the criminal activity of Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation.

We will ask them to conduct their own investigations with an eye toward criminal prosecution, by pointing out that providing clandestine birth control may place someone in more legal jeopardy than providing clandestine abortions. Failing to report an abortion may suggest that they are only guilty of concealing a crime that has already been committed. But providing birth control to a child without reporting might be interpreted as participating in an ongoing or future crime.

If that is so, the issue is no longer simply a failure to report child sexual abuse or statutory rape, but actual complicity in child sexual abuse or statutory rape. That could be viewed as a felony rather than a misdemeanor.

From a public relations standpoint, this issue provides a platform for the pro-life movement to show the American people exactly what the abortion industry is really about.

To capitalize on that opportunity, Life Dynamics is launching a nationwide public education campaign. The public has a right to know exactly how vicious and how cynical Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation are when it comes to protecting their financial and political agendas. The fact is that the abortion industry sees the harboring of sexual predators and the destruction of their underage victims as nothing more than the cost of doing business, and we intend to bring that reality into the light of day.

A second goal of our public education campaign is to educate children and parents who may have been victimized by these organizations about their litigation opportunities. The www.childpredators.com web site was specifically designed with this purpose. This web site is also a venue for employees and former employees of family planning facilities to come forward. We think there is a strong possibility that many of these people have either participated in or witnessed these crimes—some without even realizing it at the time.

Another educational opportunity relates to the nations 16,000 school districts. It is well known that many of them allow Planned Parenthood and similar organizations to come on campus and teach sex education or provide counseling. In addition, many school districts refer their students to these types of family planning organizations.

We have already completed a nationwide direct mail campaign to inform every one of these school districts about the legal exposure they have created for themselves by associating with these organizations. They need to know that should the organization in question provide services to an underage student without reporting to the state, the school district could be brought into any subsequent litigation.

In the second phase of this campaign we sent a certified letter to every school district in America alerting them to the fact that they should examine their legal liability for failing to report abuse, as an entity which comes in contact with underage children. Hopefully, this will cause their attorneys to advise them to take a second look at their sex education, abortion referral, birth control and condom distribution policies.

In addition, we are setting up a nationwide program to make sure that grassroots activists in every school district are able to make sure that the actions of their local school district do not result in lawsuits being filed by the child victims of unreported abuse or their parents.

The Bottom Line

This document reveals only a fraction of the evidence we have uncovered so far and every day we are finding new data—including some which indicates that this problem is getting worse. In time we will release this information to the public along with additional data from our undercover investigation.

What is already clear is that this is a tragedy of enormous proportions. When young girls are sexually abused like this, they lose their innocence, their childhood, their dignity, and sometimes even their lives.

While it seems almost unthinkable that anything positive can come from this, we have an opportunity to see that it does. At the very moment Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation chose to participate in these crimes, they sowed the seeds of their own destruction. Today, the challenge facing the pro-life movement is to make certain that those seeds bear fruit. And you can be assured that Life Dynamics is committed to leading that charge.”

As I’ve said, any individual or organization is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Ask yourself, why hasn’t the national, libertine mass media picked up on this story? Have you read or heard about this in the national, libertine mass media? I haven’t. Have you read or heard about this in your local media? I haven’t except for a local Christian radio station that had a short news story in mid-May. Why is an accusation of aiding and abetting child predators not considered an important news story? Where is the libertine mass media?

Why aren’t more law enforcement organizations investigating these allegations of supporting abuse? Perhaps they are but we do not hear of them because of the silence of the libertine mass media or because they are currently investigating. According to Life Dynamics, two Attorney Generals are investigating. However, that is two out of fifty. Ask law enforcement agencies to do their own undercover investigations. If they investigate whether or not businesses sell cigarettes to minors (and they do and should), shouldn’t they also investigate to determine if these two national organizations deliberately aid and abet child predators with the intent to continue their obscene practices of murdering unborn babies and encouraging sexual promiscuity by minors?

Get involved!!! Demand action!!! Demand answers!!! Demand accountability!!! If it is occurring, demand that those who are aiding and abetting child predators be prosecuted to the full extent of the law!!! Immoral sexual activities has never been a case of “no harm; no foul”! It certainly is not in the case of minor girls who are being preyed upon by men who are being protected by organizations that receive millions of dollars of our money!!!

It is well past time to take back our nation from the immoral influences of darkness. To do so is to please GOD!!! Not to do anything is to aid and abet evil!!! STOP THE INSANITY!!! SAVE A NATION FROM MORAL DESTRUCTION!!!

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)

Planned Murderhood’s crimes against children, part 3?

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

The following material is from the web-site www.childpredators.com (This site has the tapes of the calls made from Texas to Planned Murderhood and to the National Abortion Federation asking about a possible abortion for a 13-year-old girl as presented in World magazine as quoted on my first post concerning this issue.) This material is a portion of a seventeen page special report entitled Child Predators: Exposing the Partnership between Planned Parenthood, The National Abortion Federation and Men Who Sexually Abuse Underage Girls by Mark Crutcher. I am not including the footnote numbers for the sections that I am quoting. Go to www.childpredators.com to read and/or get a copy of the complete report including footnotes. The report can be saved as a copy in PDF format. Because of the length of the report and the importance of the information provided, I am going to post the report in sections. (Please remember this: at this point, Planned Murderhood is only alleged to have violated the law. Even an organization that murders thousands of unborn babies yearly is innocent until proven guilty.) Tonight, section two of the report from www.childpredators.com as obtained from the site:

“The Proof

With the information we now have, it is simply undeniable that Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation have made a conscious decision to conceal the sexual exploitation of children and protect the men who commit these crimes.

We have uncovered an overwhelming body of statistical evidence showing that the rate at which these two organizations fail to comply with mandatory reporting laws is in excess of 90 percent. This data was obtained from government sources, medical journals, independent researchers and the abortion industry itself.

To test this conclusion we conducted a covert survey in which we called over 800 Planned Parenthood and National Abortion Federation facilities across the country. Our caller portrayed a 13-year-old girl who was pregnant by her 22-year-old boyfriend. Her story was that she wanted an abortion because she and her boyfriend did not want her parents to find out about the sexual relationship. In every call the ages of the girl and her boyfriend were made perfectly clear. It was also made clear that the motivation for the abortion was to conceal the illicit sexual activity from the girl’s parents and the authorities. Additionally, our caller never said a single thing that might suggest that her parents would become abusive if they discovered her sexual activity.

The results of this survey were appalling. Even though many of these clinic workers openly acknowledged to our caller that this situation was illegal and that they were required to report it to the state, the overwhelming majority readily agreed to conceal this illegal sexual activity.

Some employees of these organizations even coached our caller on how to avoid detection, how to circumvent parental involvement laws and what to say or not say when she came to the clinic. In a significant number of instances she was encouraged to lie about—or conceal—her age or her boyfriend’s age or to give false names.

One of the clinic representatives who acknowledged that she was required by state law to inform at least one of our caller’s parents in writing that their daughter was seeking an abortion, went on to advise our caller that the best way to hide this from her parents was to use a fictitious address when she checked-in for her abortion.

During these calls it was not uncommon for the Planned Parenthood or National Abortion Federation representative to warn our caller that if someone were to find out about this situation her boyfriend could go to jail. In those situations it was unmistakable that our caller was being instructed to be more careful about what information she gave out and to whom. It was also not uncommon for the employee to interrupt our caller when she started talking about her age or the age of her boyfriend. On those occasions the obvious indication was that the employee did not want to hear this information.

In other calls the facility employee advised our caller that she had already provided too much information for them to be able to help her. In those instances she would often be given the number of another family planning facility and encouraged to tell a different story when she called there. At times, this advice was quite specific with the employee telling her exactly what to say—or not say—to the people she talked to at the second facility.

In states requiring that parents be informed when their underage daughters seek abortions, the law allows those girls to have abortions without their parents being notified if they get permission from a state judge. This is called a judicial bypass. During our calls to states with parental involvement legislation in place our caller was often informed about this option while also being instructed not to voluntarily tell the judge about the age of her boyfriend. In some instances these employees even encouraged her to lie to the judge if specifically asked for that information. Other employees advised her that neighboring states have no parental involvement requirements and that if she went there and either concealed or lied about the age issue, she would have no problem getting a secret abortion. In other words, these people were suggesting to a minor girl that she travel outside the state in order to cover up a crime that was being committed against her.

In some calls she was given instructions on how to circumvent the parental involvement requirement altogether, even to the point of suggesting that she bring someone along to sign for her who looked old enough to impersonate one of her parents. In one particularly egregious case, the clinic worker lamented the fact that because our caller’s boyfriend was only 22 he wouldn’t look old enough to pass as her father. She went on to suggest that our caller look for an older person to help her out. When our caller said her boyfriend had a 50-year-old uncle who would do it, the employee said that would be okay as long as the uncle was instructed to not say anything while at the clinic to indicate he was not really her father. The employee stated that the uncle could even drop by, sign the papers, and leave before she actually came in for the abortion, and that the clinic’s notary public would notarize the uncle’s signature for the state’s required documentation—despite knowing that it was a fraudulent representation.

(While preparing this post, I remembered a situation that happened to me. I was in the process of gathering signatures to run for the State House of Representatives in Arizona. I normally gathered my own signatures without outside help because it gave me an opportunity to meet and talk to citizens who would then be voting in the election. After having my petition form signed by a woman, we began to talk about issues. She asked me for my position on abortion. I said I was opposed to it and wanted the Supreme Court to reverse the decision they had erroneously made. She asked to remove her name from my petition because SHE WORKED FOR AN ABORTION CLINIC AND IF ABORTIONS WERE ENDED SHE WOULD LOSE HER JOB AND HER LIVELIHOOD!!! Would such employees lie to protect their jobs?—my addition)

In a number of cases the employee would not react at all to the age issue, causing us to question whether it had registered with them or not. At that point our caller would simply ask outright if her age or her boyfriend’s age was a problem. Generally what she got was a very cavalier ‘wink and nod’ type of response.

Sometimes she would be told that, technically speaking, the clinic was required to report this activity to the state but that if the caller would either lie about her age or just keep her mouth shut when she came in for her abortion, no one would ask any questions. Several times she was told that the facility had no interest in the ages of the parties involved or that they do not verify ages or check IDs and would accept whatever she told them at face value. One employee went so far as to tell her that if she came in with the cash she could be any age she wanted to be.

Unfortunately, during these calls, responses like those described here were neither rare nor isolated. In the final analysis, virtually every Planned Parenthood and National Abortion Federation facility we contacted was willing to illegally conceal the sexual abuse of this 13-year-old girl.

In every case, the clinic representative had never met this child, knew virtually nothing about her, had only engaged in a very brief telephone conversation with her, and was told nothing to indicate that her parents would be abusive if they discovered the sexual relationship. Nevertheless, they were willing—and in many cases eager—to help this child hide from her parents and the authorities the fact that she was being sexually exploited. Toward that end they provided step-by-step instructions on how to circumvent state laws that were enacted specifically for the purpose of protecting children exactly like her in situations just like this.

Perhaps even more disturbing is that we identified a willingness by abortion industry employees to facilitate ongoing criminal behavior. At some point, our caller would raise the possibility that she might not be pregnant and asked whether the clinic would help her get birth control. Over 90 percent—a number identical to our statistical findings mentioned earlier—agreed to supply her with birth control and thereby help her conceal this illegal relationship. This offer was made even by people who had earlier in the call correctly identified this situation as sexual abuse or statutory rape.

In many of these instances, they told our caller that her adult boyfriend could come with her to pick up the birth control, and some even offered to let him pick it up without her.

In other words, even though they had evidence that a sexual crime was being committed against a 13-year-old child, they were not only willing to conspire with the perpetrator to cover it up but they offered to provide him the means by which he could continue the abuse.

When we had completed our phone survey, one of the most alarming observations we made was about the manner in which they handled these calls. From start to finish, the attitudes of the employees we talked to made it brutally obvious that this is an issue they deal with routinely. In fact, several of them even volunteered that they get calls like this all the time.

To fully appreciate the gravity of this, imagine that employees of a convenience store were caught giving minors advice on how to circumvent laws designed to keep them from buying alcohol or tobacco, or a gun dealer was found to be teaching minors how to purchase handguns. These are perfect analogies to how Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation are treating sexually exploited underage girls.

In addition to this phone survey and the statistical data mentioned earlier, we have gathered an incredibly large amount of material directly from the abortion industry confirming that they are fully aware of the laws which require them to report these instances to the state.

Furthermore, we have admissions by them—in their own materials—that they have rarely complied with these laws in the past and have no intention of complying with them in the future.

Beyond that, we have also obtained materials recommended by these organizations or furnished at their conferences that encourage clinic staff to either circumvent or ignore these state reporting requirements.

Additionally, some Planned Parenthood and National Abortion Federation facilities actually maintain web sites and produce advertising materials telling minor girls that their sexual activity can be covered up by patronizing one of their family planning clinics.

Earlier in this report we listed a few of the factors driving the epidemic of adult men sexually exploiting underage girls, but what our investigation has shown is that the single most important factor is the willingness of Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation to conceal these crimes.

Among law enforcement and others who are knowledgeable about this issue, it is well established that once someone starts preying on young girls for sexual purposes they almost never stop on their own.

In effect, what the abortion industry does is make certain that no one else stops them either. In practical terms, the American abortion industry has chosen to become paid accomplices of the pedophiles and sexual deviants who target underage girls.”

To be continued.

Planned Murderhood’s crimes against children, part 2?

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

The following material is from the web-site www.childpredators.com (This site has the tapes of the calls made from Texas to Planned Murderhood and to the National Abortion Federation asking about a possible abortion for a 13-year-old girl as presented in World magazine as quoted on my first post concerning this issue.) This material is a portion of a seventeen page special report entitled Child Predators: Exposing the Partnership between Planned Parenthood, The National Abortion Federation and Men Who Sexually Abuse Underage Girls by Mark Crutcher. I am not including the footnote numbers for the sections that I am quoting. Go to www.childpredators.com to read and/or get a copy of the complete report including footnotes. The report can be saved as a copy in PDF format. Because of the length of the report and the importance of the information provided, I am going to post the report in sections. Tonight, section one of the report from www.childpredators.com as obtained from the site:

“Introduction

For several months Life Dynamics has been conducting an investigation into the issue of teen pregnancy. What we found can only be described as sickening. Underage girls, some as young as 10 years old, are being sexually exploited by adult men in numbers that are unprecedented in American history.

According to the most reliable studies, among girls 15 and younger who become pregnant, between 60 and 80 percent of them are impregnated by adult men”

“By almost any standard, our country is experiencing an epidemic of child sexual abuse. In this report you will see that the driving force behind this tragedy is the fact that men who prey on underage girls have powerful national organizations that are willing to harbor them. Our investigation has uncovered irrefutable evidence that both Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation—often operating on taxpayer dollars—knowingly conceal these crimes while aiding and abetting the sexual predators who commit them.”

“There are many other factors that contribute to this epidemic, but the basic problem is that we live in a sex obsessed culture in which girls are more vulnerable to sexual predators than at any time in our nation’s history. Any parent who thinks their daughter is not a potential victim is fooling themselves. The data is absolutely clear that victims are black and white, rich and poor, urban, rural and suburban and that they come from every cultural and socio-economic background.”

The Crime

In all 50 states, sexual activity with underage children is illegal. Also, every state mandates that if a healthcare worker has reason to suspect that an underage girl is being sexually abused, they are required by law to report that information to a designated law enforcement or child protective services agency. That agency is then responsible to investigate the possibility that the child may be the victim of sexual abuse or statutory rape.

Because the pregnancy of an underage girl is evidence that she is a victim of sexual abuse, any healthcare worker who has contact with a pregnant underage girl has an obligation to initiate a report to the state.

The important point here is that the healthcare worker is required to report the incident, not investigate it. The responsibility of determining whether or not the circumstances that led to this girl’s pregnancy are criminal lies solely with the state agency to which the report is mandated.

Additionally, the fact that a minor girl may be lawfully allowed to have an abortion or secure birth control without her parents being informed is irrelevant. The law still mandates reporting of the sexual activity to the state.

To be continued.

Planned Murderhood’s crimes against children?

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

The following material is from the web-site www.childpredators.com (This site has the tapes of the calls made from Texas to Planned Murderhood and to the National Abortion Federation asking about a possible abortion for a 13-year-old girl as presented in World magazine as quoted on my first post concerning this issue.)

“KS Attorney General investigates! IN Attorney General investigates! - get updates here
NEW—Planned Parenthood sued, accused of ‘aiding and abetting’ child rape—NEW”

“Crimes Against Children

Who profits financially in cases of child sex abuse?

The dirty little secret is that Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation know they will sell more abortions, more birth control products and more treatments for sexually transmitted diseases when they turn a blind eye to child rape. Men involved with minors need to conceal these sexual relationships, so they take their underage victims to clinics that offer minors confidential abortion services and birth control. When Planned Parenthood and other family planning service providers ignore child abuse reporting laws, they help these men to continue their ongoing sexual abuse of children.

It's illegal for an adult man to seduce an underage girl into a sexual relationship. Every state has statutory rape laws that prohibit sex between adults and children. But Planned Parenthood, the National Abortion Federation, family planning service providers, and all other clinics that profit from selling products and services to sexually active underage girls, have a financial incentive to ignore the laws that were designed to protect children from sexual abuse. And now there’s proof that 91% of these businesses don’t comply with child abuse reporting laws. On the contrary, they actually help conceal child rape from law enforcement!

Who is using tax dollars to protect child abusers?

Men who prey on underage girls just have to put up the cash and Planned Parenthood clinics will quietly help these men cover up child rape. Despite receiving millions of tax dollars from various government entities, Planned Parenthood clinics consistently counsel underage girls to conceal ongoing child rape. Clinics do this because they profit every time they convince a minor child to utilize their services. Planned Parenthood's profits from selling pregnancy tests, abortions and other services to child rape victims would drop substantially if they actually obeyed the laws on reporting potential child sexual abuse.

All fifty states require healthcare workers and others to report suspected child abuse to Child Protective Services or some other law enforcement agency. But family planning services and abortion clinics operated by Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation continue to thumb their noses at child abuse reporting laws. The National Abortion Federation, Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics profit handsomely by ignoring child rape reporting laws and, if this issue comes up, they hide behind a lot of rhetoric about ‘privacy’ in order to avoid the real issue—their willful failure to comply with these child protection laws.

The tapes don't lie, but Planned Parenthood does!

Our undercover investigation obtained over 800 taped conversations with Planned Parenthood and National Abortion Federation (NAF—my addition) clinics all across America, which prove that Planned Parenthood and NAF fail to comply with the law. They ignore the law even in cases of child sex abuse where child rape is disclosed and acknowledged—not just suspected. These tapes have already been used in court by one state to defend their parental involvement law against a Planned Parenthood lawsuit. To learn more about this investigation and the evidence that proves that this failure to report is the policy and practice of these groups, Click here.” (LISTEN TO THE TAPES!—my addition)

As I’ve said before, any individual or organization is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Listen to the tapes. Ask yourself, if employees of these two organizations are protecting child predators, why hasn’t the national, libertine mass media picked up on this story? Have you read or heard about this in the national, libertine mass media? I haven’t. Have you read or heard about this in your local media? I haven’t except for a local Christian radio station that had a short news story in mid-May. Why is an accusation of aiding and abetting child predators not considered an important news story? Where is the libertine mass media?

Why aren’t more law enforcement organizations investigating these allegations of supporting abuse? Perhaps they are but we do not hear of them because of the silence of the libertine mass media or because they are currently investigating. According to the headlines above, two Attorney Generals are investigating. However, that is two out of fifty. Ask law enforcement agencies to do their own undercover investigations. If they investigate whether or not businesses sell cigarettes to minors (and they do and should), shouldn’t they also investigate to determine if these two national organizations deliberately aid and abet child predators with the intent to continue their obscene practices of murdering unborn babies and encouraging sexual promiscuity by minors?

Get involved!!! Demand action!!! Demand answers!!! Demand accountability!!! If it is occurring, demand that those who are aiding and abetting child predators be prosecuted to the full extent of the law!!! Immoral sexual activities has never been a case of “no harm; no foul”! It certainly is not in the case of minor girls who are being preyed upon by men who are being protected by organizations that receive millions of dollars of our money!!!
It is well past time to take back our nation from the immoral influences of darkness. To do so is to please GOD!!! Not to do anything is to aid and abet evil!!! STOP THE INSANITY!!! SAVE A NATION FROM MORAL DESTRUCTION!!!

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” Galatians 6: 7-8 (NIV)

Planned Murderhood threatens law suit

How many unborn toddlers were murdered today because of the humanistic, paganish decisions of the United States Supreme Court?

Stop the
Murder of
Unborn
Toddlers

“Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” James 4: 17 (NIV)

The following is a news article from Cybercast News Service taken off of the organization’s web-site. The web-site’s address is http://www.cnsnews.com/ (Check it out.).
The original publish date was May 15, 2007. This article was referenced in the World magazine article posted three posts ago. I have not seen or heard any reference to this material in the libertine mass media. Why do you think they are remaining silent about such a large and powerful organization that murders unborn babies?

“Planned Parenthood Threatens to Sue Undercover ActivistBy Nathan BurchfielCNSNews.com Staff WriterMay 15, 2007

(CNSNews.com) - Planned Parenthood of Los Angeles is threatening to sue a student pro-life activist who recorded an abortion clinic employee encouraging her to lie about her age to avoid being reported as a victim of statutory rape.

Lila Rose, an 18-year-old sophomore at the University of California Los Angeles, is the founder of a pro-life magazine on campus. (More people should be actively involved in stopping the atrocity of murdering our unborn babies. Good for her for her active involvement at such a young age. I hope this experience strengthens her efforts rather than causing discouragement.—my addition) In March, she entered a Planned Parenthood of Los Angeles (PPLA) clinic, posing as a pregnant 15-year-old and said her boyfriend was 23 years old. A girl in that position would be considered a victim of statutory rape because she was under 16, and California law requires clinics such as Planned Parenthood to report cases of statutory rape. (Notice again that Planned Murderhood is REQUIRED to report such cases.—my addition) In hidden camera video of the encounter, a PPLA employee tells Rose that she could ‘figure out a birth date that works’ to avoid having PPLA notify police. (According to the hidden video, the employee deliberately encouraged lying to avoid obeying the law and yet she has personal knowledge that the underage person claimed a statutory rape occurred.—my addition)

As Cybercast News Service previously reported, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California President Kathy Kneer criticized the undercover investigation as ‘manipulative,’ but admitted that the PPLA employee had violated the organization's policy to follow all applicable laws. (She admitted that the employee violated the law. Since it was on tape, it would be hard not to admit the violation of the law. Are the appropriate State agencies investigating Planned Murderhood to determine if this is a recurring violation of State law?—my addition)

Following news of the undercover operation, Kneer said the organization had reminded all of its employees of the law and its own policies. (How very concerned, she seems. Should more occur than a simple reminder?—my addition)

On Monday, PPLA sent a cease-and-desist letter to Rose, warning her that "surreptitious" recordings of PPLA employees without consent violates California privacy laws.California law prohibits recording ‘intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication.’ Violating the prohibition could mean a $2,500 fine, plus civil penalties of $5,000 or more.In the letter, obtained by Cybercast News Service, PPLA president Mary Jane Wagle demands that Rose stop the undercover investigations, remove existing clips from online video sharing site YouTube, and turn the original tapes and all copies over to Planned Parenthood. (Is she more concerned about the illegal action of her employee or the fact that that information is available on a popular web-site for the entire world to see?—my addition)

‘If you do not agree to take these three steps, PPLA will seek all appropriate legal remedies,’ Wagle wrote. (I’m not sure that is the case since doing so is to admit that one of their employees violated the law. However, it is probably a major concern for an 18-year-old college student who also violated the law—my addition)Cybercast News Service obtained a copy of the video and audio before the cease-and-desist letter went into effect and has preserved it for our readers' benefit. (Click here for the full video—a large file that may take time to load. As produced by Rose, the video features clips of a song by rapper Ludacris and singer Mary J. Blige called "Runaway.") [I don’t think you can get to the video clip from “Click here” but you can by going to http://www.cnsnews.com/ (Watch it and see what Planned Murderhood is trying to cover-up).—my addition]

David French, an attorney with the Christian legal group Alliance Defense Fund, accused Planned Parenthood of ‘engaging in a campaign...to bully an 18-year-old to distract attention from the fact that their employees were engaging in unlawful behavior.’ (Isn’t this exactly what Planned Murderhood is doing?—my addition)

French, who is serving as Rose's legal adviser, said, ‘Nothing changes the truth of what's contained in those videotapes. Planned Parenthood was advocating that a patient lie, advocating a way around mandatory reporting requirements for statutory rape, and nothing that Planned Parenthood does as far as trying to bully her regarding the tapes themselves can change those facts.’ (In fact, they were violating California law according to the tape.—my addition)

Regardless of Planned Parenthood's activity in the clinic, French said his client hopes to avoid the court. ‘She's going to comply with the bulk of their demands on it regarding the videotapes themselves, so I would hope that Planned Parenthood would not pursue any further action against her,’ he said.Kneer told Cybercast News Service Monday that the cease-and-desist letter was meant ‘to protect the privacy of our patients and our employees and maintaining and complying with California laws, all of the laws, is important to us, and we think Lila needs to be more respectful of California laws.’ (Doesn’t Plan Murderhood also have to be more respectful of California laws. Is this a case of the “kettle calling the pot black”?—my addition)

She reiterated that Planned Parenthood has reminded its employees of California law regarding mandatory reporting of statutory rape and said that Lila's case is rare. (Lila’s case is rare? It seems that Ms. Kneer would have us believe that of all the employees that work for Planned Murderhood, this 18-year-old college student just happened to stumble onto the one rogue employee of Planned Murderhood who just happened to violate California law in that one instance. Does anyone want to buy a bridge I happen to own that’s located in the desert of Arizona?—my addition)

‘We essentially believe that in 99.9 percent of the time, our employees do follow the laws,’ Kneer said, (She “essentially” believes that does she? What nonsense!—my addition) adding that ‘attacks’ from ‘anti-choice extremists’ have led to national audits of abortion providers.

‘A thorough audit was done across the country and essentially came to the conclusion that providers are complying with state laws and there are no violations,’ Kneer said. (Who did the audit. Explain how thorough it actually was. Would she perhaps lie about this too? Was it a cover-up audit or a truly impartial audit done by a reliable source such as a law enforcement agency? There is that word again. What does she mean by “essentially”? Does she mean that there were some violations but not enough to really be important? Who determined what was important or what was not important. Notice this. She is not saying that the laws of the States were never violated. So who determined the degree of compliance as being “essentially” obeyed? Is that “good enough” when dealing with statutory rape?—my addition)

She said she couldn't comment on what happened to the employee in Rose's tape, but she did say that a clinician who breaks the law is ‘subject to losing their license. That's a personal issue for each employee, and as the employer, we want to make sure our clinicians know how to comply with the law and at the same time, make sure that patients can trust us.’ (What does that mean? That Planned Murderhood will not actual report cases of statutory rape? Think about it. Do you believe a 15-year-old girl would actually ask Planned Murderhood to murder her unborn baby if she also knew that her boyfriend could also be tried and convicted for statutory rape if she went to Planned Murderhood? Does it not seem logical that Plan Murderhood would not want her to know that the organization is required by law to report such intercourse as an instance of statutory rape and will actually report it? Do you really believe that an organization designed to murder unborn babies is going to willing and completely comply with such a law?—my addition)

‘Nothing we can say will most likely change Lila's views,’ Kneer said, ‘but I can tell you every day the American public trusts Planned Parenthood and that's because one in four individuals has been to a Planned Parenthood in their lifetime and they know the quality of healthcare we provide to our patients.’ (If the American public trusts Planned Murderhood, it is a misplaced and unfounded trust. They are baby murderers and they are one of the organizations that pushed for the murder of unborn babies!!! Murdering babies is not health care!!! It is murder!!! This also has nothing to do with whether or not Planned Murderhood reports as required by law. In fact, it might be construed as an admission that they do not report statutory rapes as required.—my addition)

'Hundreds' caught on tape

In 2002, an activist group called Life Dynamics ran a campaign in which a woman posing as a 13-year old impregnated by a 22-year-old and called clinics operated by Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation. The group has compiled tapes of workers encouraging girls to lie about their age to avoid being reported as a victim. (The tapes can be heard by going to the site from http://www.cnsnews.com/ or by going directly to the web-site which is http://www.childpredators.com/ [Listen to the tapes!].—my addition)

The group claims to have collected ‘over 800 tape recordings that show how Planned Parenthood and NAF workers secure business from victims of statutory rape by undermining parental authority, encouraging children to lie and promising minors that their employees will ignore mandatory reporting laws.’ (Reread that sentence. If this is true, why aren’t States enforcing their laws? Why are we not hearing about it and reading about it in the libertine mass media?—my addition)

‘[T]ell them your boyfriend is 16 or something because he could get in a lot of trouble,’ one employee in Alaska told the caller. A worker in North Carolina told the caller, ‘I wouldn't advise you to say anything about your boyfriend being 22, because that's statutory rape.’ (“I wouldn’t advise you to say anything about your boyfriend being 22, because that’s statutory rape.” Is this an instance of “essentially” complying with the law?—my addition)

Life Dynamics founder Mark Crutcher told Cybercast News Service Monday that telling girls to lie about their age is standard practice for abortion clinics because ‘there's lots of money in this.’ (There is indeed a lot of money in murdering unborn babies. How utterly obscene!!!—my addition)

He said the fact that Planned Parenthood threatened to sue Rose is a sign that the organization is interested in continuing the practice rather than reforming. ‘If they were interested in using this as the opportunity to educate their people then that would be their thrust and how the girl got the tapes would be somewhat irrelevant,’ he said. (Do you agree with this statement? Is Planned Murderhood more concerned about stifling the truth about their actual practices than obeying the law? Think about it.—my addition)

Crutcher said his organization has never heard a response from Planned Parenthood or the National Abortion Federation. It has never faced legal challenges, he said, because the calls were placed from Texas, which requires only that one participant in the conversation consent to having it taped.” (Where are the efforts of law enforcement agencies to look into this? They do sting operations to stop the selling of tobacco to underage children. Shouldn’t they do the same here to insure that organizations like Planned Murderhood are actually following the law? Where is the exposure from the libertine mass media? Why does Planned Murderhood seem to be above the law and the scrutiny of the libertine mass media?—my addition)